Skip to main content

Acceptable Losses

Acceptable Losses Game Cover
78%Game Brain Score
Most mentioned positive aspects:gameplay, atmosphere
Most mentioned negative aspects:story, replayability
78% User Score Based on 126 reviews

Platforms

PCMac OSWindows
Buy Nowfrom $7.99
Buy NowGet on Steam $7.99
Acceptable Losses Game Cover

About Acceptable Losses

Acceptable Losses is a single player tactical management game with a historical theme. It was developed by Zann Archive and was released on September 8, 2026. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

You are not the hero. You are in charge. In Acceptable Losses, you are the officer behind the line. You make the calls. You assign the missions. You sign the forms while your men bleed for inches of mud. Each day brings new orders. Send squads on patrols, trench repairs, wiring parties, or assaults. At night, face the paperwork. Read incident reports. Review medical updates. Scan in…

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Acceptable Losses screenshot
Acceptable Losses screenshot
Acceptable Losses screenshot
Acceptable Losses screenshot
Skip Games Like Acceptable Losses

Games Like Acceptable Losses

Looking for games like Acceptable Losses? Here are top tactical management recommendations with a historical focus, selected from player-similarity data — start with All Quiet in the Trenches, A Legionary's Life or Tharsis.

All Quiet in the Trenches Image
92%843reviews

All Quiet in the Trenches

2024Survival Role Playing
LinuxPCWindows
Games like All Quiet in the Trenches
A Legionary's Life Image
86%2.2kreviews

A Legionary's Life

2019Tactical Role Playing
PCWindows
Games like A Legionary's Life
Tharsis Image
70%2kreviews

Tharsis

2016Survival Role Playing
Nintendo SwitchPCWii U+9
Games like Tharsis
Burden of Command Image
84%522reviews

Burden of Command

2025Role Playing
PCWindows
Games like Burden of Command
War Hospital Image
63%650reviews

War Hospital

2021Role Playing
Xbox Series X|SPCEpic Games+7
Games like War Hospital
Classified: France '44 Image
77%629reviews

Classified: France '44

2024Role Playing
Xbox Series X|SPCPlaystation 5+3
Games like Classified: France '44
The Great War: Western Front Image
71%3.1kreviews

The Great War: Western Front

2023Tactical Turn-based Strategy
PCWindows
Games like The Great War: Western Front
Ultimate General: Gettysburg Image
80%2.1kreviews

Ultimate General: Gettysburg

2014Tactical Real-time Strategy
Nintendo SwitchPlaystation 5Playstation 4+12
Games like Ultimate General: Gettysburg
Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown Image
78%3.3kreviews

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown

2026Survival Management
Nintendo SwitchXbox Series X|SPC+3
Games like Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown
Last Train Home Image
86%3.2kreviews

Last Train Home

2023Survival Management
PCWindows
Games like Last Train Home
More games like Acceptable Losses
Skip User Reviews

Reviews

78%Audience ScoreBased on 126 reviews
gameplay9 positive mentions
story4 negative mentions
  • Authentic WWI atmosphere with effective immersion through sound, visuals, and writing.
  • Engaging and meaningful squad and resource management with permanent casualties and morale impact.
  • Good replayability due to varied mission outcomes, random events, and tactical decision-making despite the short length.
  • Excessive and sometimes unfair RNG severely impacts player agency and can lead to frustrating snowball failures.
  • Limited content and short campaign length leave players wanting more depth, variety, and longer playtime.
  • Lack of player control features such as detailed personnel management, resting troops, visible success chances, and mission selection mechanics.

  • story

    61 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    5% positive mentions, 88% neutral mentions, 7% negative mentions

    The story is praised for its unique WWI command experience and impactful decisions affecting squad survival, but heavily criticized for excessive randomness that undermines player agency and can abruptly end runs. Players desire more transparency in mission outcomes, better control over squad assignments, and less punishing RNG to reduce frustration. Despite repetitive mission types, the game’s evolving events and high-stakes management create dramatic tension and replay value.

    • “Decisions you make can mean not only mission success or failure, but the life or death of the men under your command.”
    • “The game contains dozens of missions with multiple possible outcomes, alongside a large collection of events that can alter circumstances after an operation begins.”
    • “Its combination of squad management, permanent casualties, unpredictable missions, headquarters pressure, administrative duties, and campaign progression creates a surprisingly thoughtful strategy experience from relatively simple ingredients.”
    • “Proper delegation doesn't matter, just pray the game doesn't decide to screw you by withholding missions needed to resolve issues or randomly killing off your entire squads, which it frequently does.”
    • “Often it's pure RNG, as has been said (and therefore your choices matter very little and can end in disaster regardless), and even then there are only a few types of missions.”
    • “You can do everything you can to lower the difficulty of a 3 or 4 star mission to a one star (difficulty is scaled from 1-4) and you can still get shafted because RNG decided you had a catastrophic failure on a whim resulting in you having 2 or 3 soldiers KIA and more wounded, which 9 times out of 10 ends up killing the run.”

  • gameplay

    29 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    31% positive mentions, 59% neutral mentions, 10% negative mentions

    The gameplay is praised for its unique, atmospheric, and rewarding mechanics that effectively convey the game's themes, though some players find the RNG elements and incident mechanics frustrating due to their impact on player agency. It offers a short, engaging experience with a simple yet addictive soldier management system, but critics note a lack of depth, content, and long-term modes, which limits replayability and complexity. Continuous updates and developer support suggest potential for future improvements in gameplay depth and features.

    • “The gameplay is really unique and well-executed for what it is.”
    • “Acceptable Losses succeeds because its mechanics support its central idea: command means accepting responsibility for outcomes that cannot always be controlled.”
    • “An engaging and slightly addictive gameplay loop with a really good atmospheric experience designed to help you engage with the game as intended.”
    • “The incident mechanic is mostly annoying, as it provides no real interactions like the reports mechanic. It often just randomly kills or wounds your characters, leading to poor gameplay since there isn't much game about things you can't affect.”
    • “While I commend the concept of the game, building the mechanics around obscure score management without giving any reliable way to handle such scores is shabby at best.”
    • “I do admit the RNG can be a bit harsh sometimes, and its strong presence can reduce the impact you have. While it makes for good atmosphere and vibes, it can make your gameplay decisions feel meaningless.”

  • atmosphere

    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    63% positive mentions, 37% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions

    The game excels in creating a compelling and immersive World War I atmosphere, effectively conveying the tension and dread of war. While some randomness can lessen the impact of player decisions, it also enhances the authentic mood. Overall, the atmospheric experience is praised for deeply engaging players and complementing the gameplay.

    • “They really did nail the WW1 atmosphere!”
    • “The feeling of dread from having your soldiers wounded or dead from the different factors of war really adds to the atmosphere.”
    • “Fantastic game, unbelievable atmosphere and deeply rewarding gameplay loop.”

  • replayability

    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    38% positive mentions, 24% neutral mentions, 38% negative mentions

    The game offers a moderate to high level of replayability, driven by varied mission outcomes, random events, and different character combinations, ensuring no two playthroughs feel identical. However, some users feel replay value could be improved with additional content, customization options, longer campaigns, or features like an infinite mode. Overall, it is engaging and fun but leaves room for enhanced replay features.

    • “It's engaging, replayable, and no two playthroughs are the exact same.”
    • “Replay value comes from the large number of possible mission results, random events, modifiers, personnel combinations, and changing battlefield circumstances.”
    • “It's cheap and fun with a surprising amount of replayability.”
    • “Could use some more replayability though.”
    • “Fun little game, replay value is there somewhat but it would be nice if there was a 'next tour' button or something at the end of a successful campaign.”
    • “Currently, the game really lacks content or customization settings which makes its replayability value low.”

  • optimization

    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    33% positive mentions, 17% neutral mentions, 50% negative mentions

    The game emphasizes strategic decision-making over perfect optimization, with success influenced by both player effectiveness and some RNG elements. It runs well on a wide range of hardware, though the Steam Deck experience may require custom controls and isn't officially optimized. Overall, performance is solid, but flawless optimization isn’t the primary focus.

    • “The game encourages calculated compromise rather than flawless optimization.”
    • “As for performance basically you can run it on anything.”
    • “It feels like my review depends less on my performance as a commander and more on rngesus.”
    • “Your effectiveness is evaluated, and successful performance can generate influence that helps improve future circumstances.”
    • “Eventually, successful performance can lead toward a major over the top assault.”

  • emotional

    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions

    The game effectively conveys the emotional challenges of leading a platoon in wartime, providing a satisfying and impactful experience despite some room for improvement in visuals and emotional immersion.

    • “It simulates the difficult and emotionally taxing job of a platoon leader leading a section in the trenches of the Great War.”
    • “There is room to improve on the visuals and the emotional immersion, but overall I left feeling really satisfied after a playthrough or two.”

  • graphics

    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
    100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions

    The graphics are generally well-received, praised for their quality and contribution to overall satisfaction, though there is some room for improvement in visual detail and emotional immersion.

    • “Sound design and visuals are great.”
    • “There is room to improve on the visuals and the emotional immersion, but overall I left feeling really satisfied after a playthrough or two.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Acceptable Losses

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Acceptable Losses is a tactical management game with historical theme. Common tags for Acceptable Losses include turn-based, indie, world war i, 2d, choices matter and others.

Acceptable Losses is available on PC, Mac OS and Windows.

Acceptable Losses was released on September 8, 2026.

Acceptable Losses was developed by Zann Archive.

Acceptable Losses has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked Acceptable Losses for its gameplay but disliked it for its story.

Acceptable Losses is a single player game.

Similar games include All Quiet in the Trenches, A Legionary's Life, Tharsis, Burden of Command, War Hospital and others.