Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown

I enjoyed playing this game, especially since I didn't have much prior experience with the series. The multiple choices and actions made it feel like my decisions were truly my own, without the pressure to play exactly as the captain would.

78%Game Brain Score

story, gameplay

optimization, grinding

79% User Score Based on 2,919 reviews

Critic Score 75%Based on 5 reviews

Platforms

Buy Nowfrom $34.99

Buy NowGet on Steam $34.99 Buy NowGet on Xbox Games Store

About

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown is a single player survival management game with drama and science fiction themes. It was developed by Gamexcite and was released on February 18, 2026. It received mostly positive reviews from both critics and players.

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown is a story-driven survival strategy game in which the fate of the iconic starship is in your hands. Take the helm, manage the ship and resources, and make difficult decisions. Will you be able to bring home the ship and its crew? “What if?” Scenarios Did you ever wonder what would have happened had Captain Janeway decided differently? If an important crew m…

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown screenshot

Skip User Reviews

79%Audience ScoreBased on 2,919 reviews

story272 positive mentions

optimization12 negative mentions

Strongly appeals to Star Trek Voyager fans, providing an immersive nostalgia trip and authentic series vibes.
Engaging mix of resource management, ship building, exploration, away missions, and story choices with multiple branching paths.
Meaningful decision making with permanent consequences adds challenge and replayability; manual save system added to help mitigate RNG frustration.

High reliance on RNG leads to frustrating and punishing failures even with high success chances, causing frequent save scumming.
Combat is basic and repetitive with limited player control and minimal voice acting overall.
Day one DLC considered exploitative, missing content like the Delta Flyer and Year of Hell arc, plus some bugs and UI clunkiness diminish the experience.

story
1,954 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
83%
3%
Star Trek: Voyager – Across the Unknown faithfully retells the Voyager TV series' major story arcs with many missions and side quests drawn directly from episodes, offering fans a nostalgic and engaging narrative experience. While the story allows for some meaningful choices and alternate outcomes that impact crew and events, it remains largely linear and constrained by the original plot, with limited narrative freedom and few truly novel storylines. The storytelling is text-heavy with minimal voice acting and occasional bugs, and is best appreciated by players familiar with the show, as newcomers might find some context lacking and the pacing somewhat rushed.
- “So it's not possible to get immersed into the story when you are forced to read it, instead of being narrated.”
- “It follows closely the voyager TV series story beats, with side quests referencing specific episodes, allowing room for variation and different choices compared to the show's canon.”
- “The game puts you in command of the USS Voyager, where your decisions influence the story's progression, leading to multiple alternate outcomes and branching storylines that feel faithful yet fresh.”
- “The story missions themselves so far have been very underwhelming railroads; there's an illusion of choice presented in the dialogue options, but all of the ones I've tried that would/should take us off the original storyline just went nowhere and circled back to the same 'decision' with no option but to do what's 'supposed' to happen.”
- “The game punishes you with massive morale penalties if you linger in a sector to collect resources for your survival, which as Voyager is basically your whole mission. RNG failures that cut off entire branches of the story, character unlocks, etc. are the most frustrating. Any chance of meaningful decisions that impact the story is negated by the fact that consequences usually boil down to losing or gaining a character 'hero', and the more ethical choices are usually decided by a need to get resources.”
- “Dice rolls determine resource gathering, story progression, and sometimes even whether the player can access side story missions that randomly appear in different sectors. After an unsuccessful roll, these missions can immediately disappear without giving the player a chance to experience them — even though they may contain equipment or technologies that are critically important for the later stages of the game. I understand the focus on replayability, but completing side missions should not depend purely on whether you roll well or not.”
gameplay
583 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
26%
66%
8%
The gameplay is a mix of resource management, ship building, and choice-driven away missions, blending elements from games like FTL, Frostpunk, and Fallout Shelter. While many praise its immersive and thematic design with a compelling core loop, common criticisms center on heavy reliance on RNG mechanics, repetitive resource gathering, and clunky combat, which can lead to frustration and diminish strategic agency. Overall, it offers an engaging experience for fans of the genre and series but may feel shallow or tedious to those seeking deeper or more skill-based gameplay.
- “As a fan of both, I was shocked to play a Star Trek game that was good, combining 4X mechanics with semi-active space combat and a fun hero system for away missions.”
- “It has done a good job of combining the addictive gameplay of RTS resource management and strategic planning; Fallout Shelter's or Oxygen Not Included's base building and efficiency goals; space sim styled combat mechanics; FNV or BG3 choice and consequence systems; and the roguelike elements of being able to play through multiple varied choice and chance-based outcomes.”
- “Even so, the four core mechanics work together to create a satisfying gameplay loop, and while the game clearly comes from a small development team, its authenticity and reverence for the source material make it a delight to play and an easy recommendation for Voyager fans who enjoy story-driven strategy experiences.”
- “The resource management gameplay loop is way too unforgiving.”
- “Gameplay is repetitive and rather than 'making your own story' you just go big episode to big episode and are presented with a or b choices most of which boil down to 'should we feed the refugees?'”
- “The core gameplay loop for getting resources is flawed because it's just a random roll that can ruin you utterly if you're desperate for a particular resource.”
graphics
262 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
28%
59%
13%
The graphics of the game are generally serviceable but outdated, often compared to early 2000s or mobile game quality rather than modern AAA standards. While space and environment visuals, such as planets and the Voyager model, receive praise for detail and atmosphere, character models and animations are commonly criticized as low-quality or uncanny. Performance and optimization issues are noted, with limited graphical settings and occasional glitches, though the art style and aesthetic effectively capture the nostalgic Voyager atmosphere despite technical shortcomings.
- “The graphics and sound are very harmonious: the game creates a exciting atmosphere and the Voyager's journey is very immersive.”
- “The graphics look good for the most part, especially in the systems interface, with gorgeous shaders for the planet and a very high quality Voyager model.”
- “The pros are all over the place: graphics pretty good, wish for a few like nebula backdrops (have not seen any yet if there are).”
- “The bad: terrible optimization - this game has early PS3/2006-era graphics and it brings my GeForce 4070 to its knees.”
- “The graphics are genuinely hard to look past: stiff visuals, weak effects, and a general 'cheap mobile game' vibe that doesn’t sell the Voyager fantasy at all.”
- “Character graphics are the worst kind of uncanny valley, beer-bottle-with-plastic-arms, 3D-graphics-from-a-school-'puter-educational-game-from-2001 type cringe latex-dummy-looking models.”
replayability
143 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
66%
7%
Replayability in the game is generally considered strong due to meaningful choices, multiple endings, varied difficulty settings, and roguelike elements that encourage different playthroughs. However, some players find replay value limited by the linear story tied closely to the show, repetitive mission structure, and save system constraints, which can make subsequent runs feel less fresh. Overall, replayability is praised but may vary depending on player preference for narrative depth versus procedural variety.
- “There are many different choices to make in the game too and ways to play, including substantially different difficulty options; so definitely replayable.”
- “The game has a lot of replayability if you want to uncover all the different endings and see what your choices do, some even can affect things much further down the line.”
- “Everything you wanted FTL to be, wrapped up in an awesome Star Trek universe with plenty of familiar faces and chances to change the outcomes from the direction the show went, along with the multiple layers of resource collection and management, morale balancing vs gain and the brief but fun ship combat make this a very replayable, engaging game that I just can't put down.”
- “There is virtually no replayability, beyond reloading your single save game (yes, only one manual game save) or even more boringly, "restarting the chapter" and trying different options a few times.”
- “Given the game's story is the same from sector to sector, there is no real replayability value to this game, making "game over" screens a real slog; you can restart a sector, or load the last autosave or manual save, but then it just feels like you're finding the "right" path that the game wants you to take; the illusion of making decisions with consequence having been killed by the RNG gods.”
- “The hype about any procedural change seems to be just literally the resources and your choice chosen for the same missions - so replayability of this is really poor at this time.”
music
142 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
15%
74%
11%
The game's music is praised for featuring the iconic Voyager theme and some original cast voiceovers, which effectively evoke nostalgia and set the atmosphere. However, many reviewers find the in-game soundtrack sparse, repetitive, and lacking dynamic variety, with minimal ambient and combat music, leading to a subdued or hollow audio experience. While the licensed music is appreciated, there is a strong desire for more extensive, varied, and immersive music and sound effects to better capture the Star Trek Voyager ambiance.
- “The graphics, music, and sound are true to the game, but pretty functional, definitely far from flashy.”
- “Excellent game, the attention to detail is outstanding and the fact that you can actually look inside the ship is great, the gameplay is flawless and easy to learn leaving more time to enjoy the game rather than spending endless time on how the controls work, the graphics and sound are perfect and the soundtrack is outstanding!!!”
- “Very much an indie game, but I'm glad to find they licensed the theme music and managed to get two of the cast to voice logs in between sectors.”
- “The weakest element for me is the audio; even though the game seems to have the rights to the Voyager music, you barely hear it, and the game is often just ambient space sound.”
- “Very lackluster music, and often the combat levels just reuse ambient sector music, creating an incredibly non-immersive and shallow experience.”
- “I recently listened to the Voyager OST, and this game's soundtrack is bland, generic, and completely misses the Voyager tone.”
optimization
59 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
63%
20%
Optimization reviews for the game are mixed, with some users praising smooth performance and efficient scaling on medium settings or less powerful devices, while others report poor optimization causing excessive GPU usage, frame rate drops, and stuttering even on high-end hardware. Performance issues often arise during ship building or in certain game scenes, with suggestions that recent patches have improved stability and customizability. Overall, while the game can run well on many systems, optimization remains inconsistent and could benefit from further refinement.
- “Runs max setting easily with no upscaler on my desktop and can even run on medium to high settings on my Steam Deck with acceptable performance for the type of game it is.”
- “Feels very well optimized and the upscaler feels like a performance tool rather than a crutch for bad optimization.”
- “As of April 3rd, 2026, 2 months in: they fixed the lack of manual saving for those of us who don't play Ironman mode by default, they optimized the game for better performance, and now they allow for custom difficulty that negates some of what mods had stepped in to fill such as base storage modifiers, morale control (stay too long, per sector, and so on), and have made the game far more in line with what was expected.”
- “Terrible optimization - this game has early PS3/2006-era graphics and it brings my GeForce 4070 to its knees.”
- “There are a few cons: a lack of optimization in the ship menu, which runs at around 20/30 fps even though I'm above system requirements, lack of sensitivity settings for zooming and panning, and some nitpicks about the combat.”
- “Performance could be better; it really bogs down after playing for a while, like it isn't clearing anything out between solar systems / regions.”
grinding
56 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
1%
95%
Grinding in the game is frequently described as slow, repetitive, and tedious, especially due to lengthy research times, resource scarcity, and mandatory tutorial repetition on each playthrough. While some find the resource management and ship upgrading engaging, many players feel the gameplay often turns into a monotonous grind with unclear objectives and RNG frustrations, diminishing overall enjoyment and replayability.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “Sure, I'll just go fail at options I already got correct the first run after 3 hours of researching, collecting, and grinding... I would love to go do that all over again.”
- “Progression is slow, the tech tree is grindy, and the away mission system isn’t clearly explained — it often feels like you’re just clicking and hoping.”
- “What I expected was a 'choose your own adventure' with exploration and ship building elements, but it ends up feeling like a mobile game from a decade ago where you are just farming resources and waiting for research to complete endlessly.”
- “Solar systems and sectors, absolutely, but this just makes the grind for your very limited resources just tedious and annoying when you travel 3 days in system, just to get 3 days of deuterium and have to travel back.”
stability
43 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
7%
93%
The game suffers from numerous bugs and glitches affecting combat, dialogue, UI, graphics, and save/load systems, leading to occasional freezes, crashes, and progression issues. While some find it playable and fun despite these problems, many consider the stability lacking and frustrating, especially for casual players. Developers are actively addressing these issues post-launch, but the current buggy state detracts significantly from the overall experience.
- “Runs great, fun story, fun base building, overall good game.”
- “Runs great on the Steam Deck, no problems whatsoever.”
- “I really like it, but it's buggy as hell and crashes a lot, it even takes out the Steam client with it.”
- “So many characters die randomly, random glitches destroy trade and entire story lines, some game mechanics do not work at all, needed information is not displayed.”
- “The biggest and most glaring issue..... not one playtested this game or finished it enough times to find all the glitches and bugs.”
atmosphere
39 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
54%
8%
The game successfully captures an authentic Star Trek: Voyager atmosphere through harmonious graphics, sound design, and thematic tone, evoking strong nostalgia and a genuine "Voyager vibe." While praised for its immersive existentialism and faithful portrayal of the Delta Quadrant tension, some critiques highlight missed opportunities such as limited character animation, lack of voice acting, and underdeveloped story drama that could have deepened the "alone against the odds" feeling. Overall, the atmosphere stands out as a genuine passion project element that resonates well with fans, despite certain limitations in execution.
- “Authentic Star Trek atmosphere thanks to the graphics and sound design.”
- “The atmosphere, the tone, and the narrative clearly come from people who understand Voyager and that era of Trek.”
- “Choices have real weight, and the game does a strong job of translating the tone and atmosphere of what Voyager should have been (a constant fight for survival, alone, in hostile territory) into gameplay.”
- “Thing is, the drama, character development and atmosphere is not really there.”
- “So yeah no atmosphere here either.”
- “But the area that should be its biggest asset - the atmosphere - is probably its biggest letdown, just because it has to play in an IP that is probably incredibly expensive to license and get assets for.”
monetization
25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
8%
80%
The game's monetization received mixed reactions, with some appreciating the lack of aggressive microtransactions typical in mobile games, but many criticizing the day-1 DLC as a blatant, greedy cash grab that fragments core content. While some players value the developers' evident passion and a more traditional pricing approach, others feel the pricing and DLC strategy disappoints fans and undermines the game's overall appeal.
- “Quick and simple gameplay that can be played in short bursts, with no predatory monetization (aside from day-1 DLC).”
- “This game plays and feels like a mixture of FTL and Fallout Shelter (without all the microtransactions).”
- “It’s really nice to play a modern Star Trek game that isn't built for mobile or filled with $50 microtransactions for a new ship; it feels like a real game and you can tell the developers tried to put their heart in it.”
- “Let's be honest, it's too expensive for what it is and the DLC is a blatant cash grab for core content.”
- “Day 1 DLC package was a bit of a slap in the face as it feels like a shameless cash grab; they could have included it and just raised the price a bit more—I certainly would have still paid a higher price for this.”
- “The fact that it would have been even shorter if I hadn't shelled out the 5 or 8 bucks or whatever I paid for it is a ridiculous cash grab that I do not appreciate.”
emotional
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game evokes strong nostalgia and heartfelt emotions for longtime fans of Voyager, especially through voice acting, music, and faithful character portrayals, making players feel deeply connected and invested in the crew’s fate. However, its emotional impact relies heavily on prior attachment to the series, with some finding the narrative and pacing rushed or lacking depth, and the reliance on AI-generated narration diminishing immersion for others. Overall, it offers a bittersweet, poignant experience that resonates most with dedicated fans despite certain emotional and structural shortcomings.
- “I can honestly say it has made me feel like I did when I first saw the Intrepid class ship on my TV screen, and fell in love with the theme, the ship, and the crew.”
- “I felt so awash in nostalgia playing this, hearing Voyager's main theme, listening to Robert Duncan McNeil and Tim Russ reprising their roles as Tom Paris and Tuvok, seeing everyone's character portraits... it really brings something heartfelt to this game.”
- “As a huge Voyager stan, I lost Tuvok to a bad away mission and I'm still recovering :( heartbreaking, but that's the point—real stakes! 9/10 right now (bumping to 10/10 soon with patches?).”
humor
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is often unintentional and arises from its brutal difficulty, unexpected outcomes, and quirky in-game scenarios, making for amusing and endearing moments despite the serious tone. Players find it funny to see their captain consistently make wrong decisions and enjoy the contrast with the original series. Overall, the humor adds a lighthearted layer to the challenging gameplay experience.
- “It's like playing D&D with the most humorless, hard-nosed dungeon master you've ever met.”
- “It's certainly an imperfect game, but I will say it is pretty funny to play a captain that consistently makes the wrong decision just to see what happens.”
- “You can rewrite Voyager history by going against what characters did in the show to hilarious results.”
character development
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Character development in the game is well fleshed out and integral to the story and decision-making, enhancing the overall narrative experience. However, some users feel the drama and atmosphere tied to character growth are lacking, with development mainly unfolding through dialogue choices and character interactions rather than immersive gameplay elements.
- “If you love Star Trek for plot & story, character development, mission planning and decision making, weighing pros and cons and the ethics of a situation then this may be the best Star Trek game ever made.”
- “Other than that, combat feels good (enough), the story is top notch, character development/leveling is well fleshed out, and the graphics/performance leaves nothing to be desired.”
- “It has base building, it has character development, it has missions, combat, and above all, it is difficult.”
- “Thing is, the drama, character development and atmosphere is not really there.”
- “No power management, there's a bit of manual targeting one can do in the middle of battles but the unique aspects of the ships and combat tend to melt into cutscene dialogue selections based upon hero character development and ship rooms.”
- “Let's say character development.”

Skip Critic Reviews

75%Critics’ scoreBased on 5 critic reviews

Skip Game Offers

Buy Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown

19h Median play time

20h Average play time

7-32h Spent by most gamers

*Based on 25 analyzed playthroughs

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown

85%2.6kreviews

The Pale Beyond

2023

Survival Role Playing

77%2.1kreviews

Between the Stars

2024

Open World Role Playing

60%1.8kreviews

Shortest Trip to Earth

2019

Survival Role Playing

88%6.5kreviews

The Alters

2025

Survival Management

75%13.2kreviews

IXION

2022

Survival City Builder

77%1.2kreviews

Halcyon 6 Starbase Commander

2016

Tactical Role Playing

79%2.3kreviews

Expeditions: Viking

2017

Open World Role Playing

75%3.7kreviews

Encased

2021

Open World Role Playing

70%2.9kreviews

Dead State: Reanimated

2014

Role Playing

45%1.2kreviews

Cosmonautica

2015

Open World Management

More games like Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown is a survival management game with drama and science fiction themes.

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown is available on Nintendo Switch, Xbox Series X|S, PC, Windows and others.

On average players spend around 20 hours playing Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown.

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown was released on February 18, 2026.

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown was developed by Gamexcite.

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown for its story but disliked it for its optimization.

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown is a single player game.

Similar games include The Pale Beyond, Between the Stars, Shortest Trip to Earth, The Alters, IXION and others.

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown

Platforms

story

gameplay

graphics

replayability

music

optimization

grinding

stability

atmosphere

monetization

emotional

humor

character development