Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown

I enjoyed playing this game, especially since I didn't have much prior experience with the series. The multiple choices and actions made it feel like my decisions were truly my own, without the pressure to play exactly as the captain would.

78%Game Brain Score

story, gameplay

grinding, optimization

79% User Score Based on 2,625 reviews

Critic Score 75%Based on 5 reviews

Platforms

Buy Nowfrom $23.99

Buy NowGet on Steam €27.99

About

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown is a single player survival management game with drama and science fiction themes. It was developed by Gamexcite and was released on February 18, 2026. It received mostly positive reviews from both critics and players.

ABOUT THE DEMO The demo of the game is English only. The full version will feature localization into additional languages, partial voice over as well as updated music and sound effects. Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown is a story-driven survival strategy game in which the fate of the iconic starship is in your hands. Take the helm, manage the ship and resources, and make difficult decision…

Skip User Reviews

79%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,625 reviews

story240 positive mentions

grinding50 negative mentions

Strong nostalgia and faithful adaptation of Voyager series, appealing especially to fans with many what-if scenarios.
Engaging gameplay loop with base building, resource management, and strategic decision making.
Developers are passionate, responsive, and have improved the game post-launch, adding manual saving and balancing.
Great replay value due to branching choices affecting story and crew.
Immersive atmosphere capturing spirit of survival in the Delta Quadrant with authentic ship model and UI design.

Heavy RNG can be frustrating and lead to frequent save scumming or full restarts, sometimes feeling unfairly punishing.
Lack of extensive voice acting and audio makes the game less immersive and largely text-heavy.
Space combat is simplistic, repetitive, and lacking player agency or excitement.
Resource management can feel tedious and unbalanced, especially early game with strict morale/time pressures forcing sector progression.
Day 1 DLC containing key story missions and heroes is criticized as a cash grab and should have been included in the base game.
Several UI/UX issues including limited save slots, cumbersome tech tree navigation, and forced scanning of all points of interest.
Some bugs and crashes reported, with occasional storyline inconsistencies or character replacements that reduce immersion.

story
1,738 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
84%
2%
The story closely follows the main plot points of Star Trek: Voyager, offering fans a nostalgic and faithful retelling with opportunities to make alternate decisions that can affect crew outcomes and certain missions. While it provides meaningful branching choices and variations, the narrative is somewhat linear and limited in scope, with some missions locked behind RNG and DLC paywalls, and lacking extensive voice acting or in-depth new content. Despite occasional bugs and a punishing resource and morale management system that pressures progression, the story-driven gameplay and away missions deliver an engaging experience for fans who enjoy a strategic survival and management blend with story elements.
- “The biggest appeal is the possibility to change the canon story from different outcomes, depending on decisions you do or omit.”
- “The story is immersive and enjoyable.”
- “It's a solid survival-strategy game that does a great job of making you feel like you're part of voyager's story while giving you some creative freedom to change that story.”
- “The story missions themselves have been very underwhelming railroads; choices that should take us off the original storyline just go nowhere and circle back to doing what's 'supposed' to happen.”
- “The game punishes you with massive morale penalties if you linger in a sector to collect resources for your survival, which is basically your whole mission in Voyager.”
- “Dice rolls determine story progression and can cause you to miss entire storylines or missions, sometimes immediately disappearing missions after an unsuccessful roll, locking you out of critical content.”
gameplay
521 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
26%
65%
9%
The gameplay offers a compelling resource management and ship-building loop combined with decision-driven narrative elements and roguelike variability, appealing especially to Star Trek Voyager fans. However, it suffers from heavy reliance on RNG mechanics that can feel punishing and luck-based, leading to frustration and occasional tedium. While combat and exploration mechanics are somewhat basic and occasionally clunky, the overall experience is engaging and challenging, with room for improvement in polish, pacing, and save system features.
- “The game play loop in my opinion is solid with a good deal of relatively complex mechanics at play for the type of game it is.”
- “It has done a good job of combining the addictive gameplay of RTS resource management and strategic planning; base building and efficiency goals similar to Fallout Shelter and Oxygen Not Included; space sim styled combat mechanics; choice and consequence systems like Fallout New Vegas or Baldur's Gate 3; and rogue-like elements of multiple varied choice and chance based outcomes.”
- “Even so, the four core mechanics work together to create a satisfying gameplay loop, and while the game clearly comes from a small development team, its authenticity and reverence for the source material make it a delight to play and an easy recommendation for Voyager fans who enjoy story-driven strategy experiences.”
- “The resource management gameplay loop is way too unforgiving.”
- “Graphic go from meh to bad, the gameplay is a slot machine that punishes you even when you make good decisions and the battles with the voyager are awful.”
- “By excessively crippling Voyager at the outset and stripping away player input, the game currently prioritizes mechanical frustration over the strategic command experience fans expect.”
graphics
225 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
28%
60%
12%
The game's graphics are generally described as serviceable but outdated, with a mix of praise for atmospheric space visuals and criticism for low-quality character models, stiff animations, and occasional graphical glitches. While the art style captures the nostalgic aesthetic of the Star Trek Voyager era, many note a lack of polish, minimal animation, and a "mobile game" or early-2000s vibe rather than modern AAA quality. Overall, graphics support the game's storytelling and mood but fall short of high-end expectations.
- “The graphics are great, and the real character voices between sectors added an immersive element to it.”
- “The graphics look good for the most part, especially in the systems interface, with gorgeous shaders for the planet and a very high quality Voyager model.”
- “The pros are all over the place graphics pretty good wish for a few like nebula back drops (have not seen any yet if their are).”
- “The graphics are genuinely hard to look past: stiff visuals, weak effects, and a general “cheap mobile game” vibe that doesn’t sell the Voyager fantasy at all.”
- “Character graphics are the worst kind of uncanny valley, beer-bottle-with-plastic-arms, 3D-graphics-from-a-school-'puter-educational-game-from-2001 type cringe latex-dummy-looking models.”
- “The graphics are terrible, like the CGI in the 1995 TV show literally looks better than this 2026 game.”
music
137 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
76%
11%
The music in the game receives mixed feedback: while the licensed Voyager theme and cast voiceovers at key points are praised for enhancing immersion, the in-game soundtrack is often described as minimal, repetitive, and lacking dynamic variation, especially during combat. Many users desire more extensive and authentic Star Trek music and improved sound effects to better capture the show's atmosphere, though some acknowledge budget constraints for a small indie team. Overall, the music provides a nostalgic touch but falls short of creating a fully engaging auditory experience.
- “Voice acting and music - having 2 original cast introduce each sector is a nice way to set the stage for what's coming in the chapter and having the original intro at the menu is a nice touch.”
- “Thank you, developers for including the music from the show to help keep me focused and calm!”
- “When I got to the main menu, and the theme song played, my heart was filled with joy.”
- “With 7 years of music (the Voyager TV show soundtrack) available, why am I spending 90% of my time hearing nothing at all except the beep, boop, blip of the interface and the hum of background noise?”
- “The weakest element for me is the audio, even though the game seems to have the rights to the Voyager music, you barely hear it, and the game is often just ambient space sound.”
- “The music is genuinely awful. I recently listened to the Voyager OST, and this game's soundtrack is bland, generic, and completely misses the Voyager tone. It doesn’t even sound like Star Trek music at all.”
replayability
123 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
28%
65%
7%
The game offers strong replayability through its multiple story branches, meaningful choices, diverse crew and tech options, and roguelike elements that encourage varied playthroughs. While some find repetition in certain missions and dice mechanics a drawback, the overall consensus highlights the enjoyment of exploring alternate endings, decision impacts, and achievement hunting. Replay value is especially appreciated by fans of the series and those who enjoy narrative-driven, choice-based gameplay.
- “The game has a lot of replayability if you want to uncover all the different endings and see what your choices do, some even can affect things much further down the line.”
- “Played and beat through the story doing the 'canon Starfleet way' in 60 hours over several days but good replayability with wanting to go back to rebuild the ship differently using different tech or making different decisions during the storylines.”
- “Everything you wanted FTL to be, wrapped up in an awesome Star Trek universe with plenty of familiar faces and chances to change the outcomes from the direction the show went, along with the multiple layers of resource collection and management, morale balancing vs gain and the brief but fun ship combat make this a very replayable, engaging game that I just can't put down.”
- “Given the game's story is the same from sector to sector, there is no real replayability value to this game, making 'game over' screens a real slog; you can restart a sector, or load the last autosave or manual save, but then it just feels like you're finding the 'right' path that the game wants you to take; the illusion of making decisions with consequence having been killed by the RNG gods.”
- “Unfortunately, I don't think that the game has much replay value.”
- “The hype about any procedural change seems to be just literally the resources and your choice chosen for the same missions - so replayability of this is really poor at this time.”
grinding
52 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
96%
Grinding in the game is frequently described as tedious and slow, with resource management, repetitive planet scanning, and slow progression contributing to a tiresome experience. While some find early gameplay engaging, many note that the grind becomes frustrating, exacerbated by limited resources, unclear objectives, and obligatory tutorial repeats affecting replayability. Overall, the grind detracts from enjoyment for players who prefer less repetitive mechanics, though a few appreciate the survival challenge and ship customization despite the slow pacing.
- “Sure, I'll just go fail at options I already got correct the first run after 3 hours of researching, collecting, and grinding... I would love to go do that all over again.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “I have several friends with this wishlisted, so I'm posting this as a warning: I think this game is a boring, grindy, badly written piece of tedious fan fiction.”
- “Progression is slow, the tech tree is grindy, and the away mission system isn’t clearly explained — it often feels like you’re just clicking and hoping.”
- “As many others have pointed out, the constant quest for resources just to do the basics is tedious, and the morale issues are problematic even on the lowest difficulty setting.”
optimization
52 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
15%
68%
17%
The game's optimization is mixed, running smoothly on high-end desktops with minimal issues but showing performance drops in specific scenarios like the ship menu or sector views. While some players experience stuttering and poor performance on devices like the Steam Deck, recent updates have improved stability and optimization. Overall, it generally performs well but could benefit from further refinement, especially for lower-end hardware and touch-based interfaces.
- “Runs max setting easily with no upscaler on my desktop and can even run on medium to high settings on my Steam Deck with acceptable performance for the type of game it is.”
- “Feels very well optimized and the upscaler feels like a performance tool rather than a crutch for bad optimization.”
- “As of April 3rd, 2026, 2 months in: they fixed the lack of manual saving for those of us who don't play ironman mode by default, they optimized the game for better performance, and now they allow for custom difficulty that negates some of what mods had stepped in to fill such as base storage modifiers, morale control (stay too long, per sector, and so on), and have made the game far more in line with what was expected.”
- “As long as you can put up with the game's poor performance optimization, shallow combat, and frustrating RNG, then there's some fun whimsy here to play through; temper your expectations, and I'm sure you'll get some fun out of it!”
- “There are a few cons: a lack of optimization in the ship menu, which runs at around 20 to 30 FPS even though I'm above system requirements, lack of sensitivity settings for zooming and panning, and some nitpicks about the combat.”
- “Performance could be better; it really bogs down after playing for a while, like it isn't clearing anything out between solar systems or regions.”
stability
39 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
92%
The game suffers from numerous bugs and glitches, including graphical issues, buggy UI, combat problems, and a problematic save system, leading to crashes and lost progress. While it runs relatively well on some platforms and offers enjoyable core gameplay, its stability is hindered by frequent technical issues that the developers are actively working to fix. Overall, the game's launch state is notably unstable and may frustrate casual players despite its potential.
- “Runs great, fun story, fun base building, overall good game.”
- “Runs great on the Steam Deck, no problems whatsoever.”
- “The biggest and most glaring issue is that not one playtester finished the game enough times to find all the glitches and bugs.”
- “I really like it, but it's buggy as hell and crashes a lot; it even takes out the Steam client with it.”
- “No manual save; RNG is too punishing, for example having multiple 90% success chances but failing every single one. Also had several progression glitches with an unnamed saboteur continuously destroying my ship, affecting half the rooms all at once.”
atmosphere
37 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
54%
8%
The game captures the Star Trek: Voyager atmosphere authentically and nostalgically, with immersive visuals, music, and thematic tone that resonate well with fans. While praised for its genuine "voyager vibe" and thoughtful narrative choices, some users feel the atmosphere could be enhanced by more dynamic sound design, voice acting, and deeper dramatic impact to fully realize the intended existential tension and survival elements. Overall, it provides a compelling, if imperfect, atmospheric experience rooted in passion for the source material.
- “The atmosphere, the tone, the general “voyager vibe” — it’s all there.”
- “Choices have real weight, and the game does a strong job of translating the tone and atmosphere of what Voyager should have been (a constant fight for survival, alone, in hostile territory) into gameplay.”
- “Despite this clearly not being a AAA game, for such a relatively small game, it has a very nice and genuine Star Trek atmosphere to it.”
- “Thing is, the drama, character development and atmosphere is not really there.”
- “So yeah no atmosphere here either.”
- “But the area that should be its biggest asset - the atmosphere - is probably its biggest letdown, just because it has to play in an IP that is probably incredibly expensive to license and get assets for.”
monetization
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
8%
79%
The monetization of the game is divisive, with many criticizing the day-one DLC as a blatant cash grab that should have been integrated into the base price, while others appreciate the absence of predatory microtransactions common in mobile-style games. Fans generally recognize it as a passion project rather than a pay-to-win scheme, though the DLC and pricing strategy have alienated some players expecting more substantial procedural content. Overall, the monetization feels greedy to some, yet comparatively fair and non-exploitative to others within the franchise context.
- “Quick and simple gameplay that can be played in short bursts, with no predatory monetization (aside from day-1 DLC).”
- “This game plays and feels like a mixture of FTL and Fallout Shelter (without all the microtransactions).”
- “It’s really nice to play a modern Star Trek game that isn't built for mobile or filled with $50 microtransactions for a new ship; it feels like a real game and you can tell the developers put their heart into it.”
- “Let's be honest, it's too expensive for what it is and the DLC is a blatant cash grab for core content.”
- “Day 1 DLC package was a bit of a slap in the face as it feels like a shameless cash grab; they could have included it and just raised the price a bit more—I certainly would have still paid a higher price for this.”
- “The fact that it would have been even shorter if I hadn't shelled out the 5 or 8 bucks or whatever I paid for it is a ridiculous cash grab that I do not appreciate.”
emotional
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game evokes strong emotions primarily for fans with existing attachments to Voyager and its crew, delivering nostalgic and heartfelt moments, especially through voice acting and character-driven scenarios. However, its emotional impact can feel uneven, with pacing issues and a heavy reliance on text limiting resonance for newcomers, and some narrative elements coming off as artificial. Despite imperfections, the survival-focused storytelling and meaningful stakes provide a rewarding emotional experience for dedicated fans.
- “It could have been better, sure, but it was genuinely fun — and at this stage of my life, it made me feel like a kid again, glued to the TV, completely immersed in a nostalgic late-1990s mental, visual, and auditory atmosphere.”
- “I think I have such an emotional attachment to Voyager and her crew (it was the Star Trek airing when I was a kid) that anytime something happened where I lost one of the canon crew I was immediately save-scumming to change the outcome.”
- “As a huge Voyager stan, I lost Tuvok to a bad away mission and I'm still recovering :( heartbreaking, but that's the point—real stakes! 9/10 right now (bumping to 10/10 soon with patches?).”
humor
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is a mix of intentional and unintentional moments, often stemming from its brutal difficulty and quirky outcomes when making wrong decisions. Players find amusement in the unexpected catastrophic failures and the ability to rewrite Voyager history with hilarious results, making even disliked parts of the original series entertaining. Overall, the writing is endearing and the humor adds a lighthearted charm to the challenging gameplay.
- “It's like playing D&D with the most humorless, hard-nosed dungeon master you've ever met.”
- “It's certainly an imperfect game but I will say it is pretty funny to play a captain that consistently makes the wrong decision just to see what happens.”
- “You can rewrite Voyager history by going against what characters did in the show to hilarious results.”
character development
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
Character development in the game is generally well fleshed out and tied to story progression, with meaningful dialogue and leveling systems. However, some users feel the drama and emotional depth in character development are lacking, making it less impactful. Overall, it supports gameplay and narrative but could benefit from stronger atmospheric elements.
- “Other than that, combat feels good (enough), the story is top notch, character development/leveling is well fleshed out, and the graphics/performance leaves nothing to be desired.”
- “It has base building, it has character development, it has missions, combat, and above all, it is difficult.”
- “Thing is, the drama, character development and atmosphere is not really there.”
- “No power management, there's a bit of manual targeting one can do in the middle of battles but the unique aspects of the ships and combat tend to melt into cutscene dialogue selections based upon hero character development and ship rooms.”
- “Let's say character development.”

Skip Critic Reviews

75%Critics’ scoreBased on 5 critic reviews

Skip Game Offers

Buy Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown

19h Median play time

20h Average play time

7-33h Spent by most gamers

*Based on 24 analyzed playthroughs

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown

85%2.6kreviews

The Pale Beyond

2023

Survival Role Playing

77%2.1kreviews

Between the Stars

2024

Open World Role Playing

60%1.8kreviews

Shortest Trip to Earth

2019

Survival Role Playing

88%5.6kreviews

The Alters

2025

Survival Simulation

77%1.2kreviews

Halcyon 6 Starbase Commander

2016

Tactical Role Playing

More games like Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown is a survival management game with drama and science fiction themes.

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown is available on Nintendo Switch, PC, Windows and Nintendo Switch 2.

On average players spend around 20 hours playing Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown.

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown was released on February 18, 2026.

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown was developed by Gamexcite.

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown for its story but disliked it for its grinding.

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown is a single player game.

Similar games include The Pale Beyond, Between the Stars, Shortest Trip to Earth, The Alters, Halcyon 6 Starbase Commander and others.

Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown

Platforms