Wizard's Wheel 2

About

Wizard's Wheel 2 is a single player casual role playing game. It was developed by Winding Clock Games and was released on December 23, 2022. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

An idle and incremental rpg, inspired by retro, turned based role playing games, Wizard's Wheel 2 comes packed with heroes to collect, loot to acquire, equipment to upgrade, and a ton of ways to progress. Recruit, equip, upgrade, and spin the Wizard's Wheel in this deep, retro idle RPG.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

67%

Audience ScoreBased on 141 reviews

gameplay8 positive mentions

grinding13 negative mentions

The game offers a fun and addictive gameplay loop with a variety of characters and items to collect.
It's free to play and doesn't aggressively push microtransactions, allowing players to enjoy the game without spending money.
The retro graphics and RPG elements provide a nostalgic experience for fans of classic games.

The game is heavily reliant on a grindy progression system, making it feel tedious and slow at times.
Many players report a lack of clarity in mechanics and UI, leading to confusion about gameplay and character stats.
There are significant issues with bugs and crashes, which can disrupt the gaming experience and lead to lost progress.

gameplay
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
54%
13%
The gameplay is characterized by a solid core loop that can be addictive, offering depth and incremental growth, but it suffers from repetitiveness and a lack of clear explanations for mechanics. Players have noted the presence of microtransactions and a "pay to win" model, which detracts from the experience. While some mechanics, like the rebirth and timeline features, add interesting challenges, the overall execution is marred by bugs and a reliance on grinding, making it a mixed experience for players.
- “The core gameplay loop is fairly solid.”
- “Starting slow, but then a lot of depth and a fun gameplay loop to keep you busy for hundreds of hours (if the game is your thing).”
- “Really fun little addictive gameplay loop with shots of dopamine every so often to keep you coming back.”
- “This is a shallow incrementer (not so different from Idle Champions of the Forgotten Realms) only with a worse premise and worse gameplay.”
- “What I don't like is being immediately and openly confronted with game design that seems to relay a developer's opinion that I should start giving them money, now, within a quarter of a day, not even on cosmetics or quality of life features, but on core gameplay components.”
- “Gameplay is very repetitive and boring; also, there are some microtransaction and pay-to-win elements in it.”
grinding
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The grinding aspect of the game is a mixed bag, with some players appreciating the synergy and equipment sets for farming, while others find the grind excessively tedious and time-consuming, particularly in the transition between levels. Many agree that the game offers a lot of content but suffers from a steep difficulty curve and slow progression, making it feel overly grindy. Overall, it is seen as a time-consuming experience that may appeal to fans of the genre but could deter those seeking a more balanced gameplay experience.
- “There are really grindy games, and then there's this monstrosity.”
- “It would take a full week of grinding to improve just one piece of gear.”
- “If they turned down the grind tenfold it would still be too grindy, but it would be a huge improvement.”
graphics
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
24%
38%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some praising the cute art style and vibrant visuals, while others criticize them as shallow and poorly executed, particularly in high resolutions. The interface struggles with clarity, especially on 4K displays, detracting from the overall experience. Overall, while the aesthetic appeals to some, it lacks depth and excitement for others.
- “Very cute art style but very slow progressing.”
- “Cute graphics, but not very exciting music.”
- “Love the graphics and gameplay.”
- “The game visuals and the game itself are incredibly shallow... think of them as the too-bright, colorful, thin plastic cabinet dress theme on a poker machine at the casino.”
- “To confusing, bad graphics.”
- “Interface is terrible on 4k resolution, especially for pixel art style.”
music
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
60%
The music in the game is described as decent and enjoyable, with a retro vibe that complements the gameplay, though it can be repetitive. However, some players find the sound effects and music to be excessively loud, and the lack of volume sliders is a notable drawback. Overall, while the music is serviceable, it may not be particularly exciting for all players.
- “Excellent, exactly as advertised. The decent retro music is very enjoyable and soothing, and while it can be repetitive, it's not bothersome at all.”
- “For an idler game, the music is decent and serviceable, adding to the overall experience.”
- “The music complements the gameplay well, enhancing the nostalgic feel of the game.”
- “In general, the sound effects and music are way too loud in this game; unfortunately, there are no volume sliders.”
- “Cute graphics, but the music is not very exciting.”
- “For an idler game, the music is decent but ultimately serviceable.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
The story is criticized for being sparse and slow to develop, with players struggling to engage due to a lack of context and investment in the characters. While the narrative is minimal, some users appreciate the interesting gameplay mechanics that allow for customization and control. Overall, the storytelling aspect seems to be a weak point in the game.
- “The story starts off really slowly, and it feels like there is no real narrative to engage with.”
- “There is no story to speak of, which is disappointing given the interesting mechanics.”
- “The game lacks a coherent narrative, making it hard to stay invested in the experience.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
100%
The monetization model is generally seen as free-to-play friendly, with minimal in-app purchases and no ads, making it rewarding for long-term players. However, some users find the prices for in-game purchases to be excessively high. Overall, the game offers good value for those who engage with it over time.
- “Only a couple of in-app purchases, worth the $20 if you play for more than a month.”
- “Free-to-play friendly, free game, no ads, and upgrading is rewarding.”
- “The in-app purchases feel overpriced and give an unfair advantage to those who spend money.”
- “It's frustrating to see so many features locked behind a paywall, making it hard to enjoy the game fully without spending.”
- “The monetization strategy is aggressive, constantly pushing players to buy more to progress.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is inconsistent; while some players find it amusing, others are frustrated by frequent bugs that detract from the experience. Overall, the comedic elements may appeal to some, but technical issues can overshadow the fun.
- “Funny game”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
Players note that the game includes a performance notification feature that activates when storage exceeds 1000 items, indicating a focus on optimization to manage gameplay efficiency.
- “The game provides helpful notifications about performance when you have over 1000 items in your storage, ensuring you can manage your resources effectively.”
- “I appreciate how the game optimizes performance by alerting me when my storage is nearing its limit, allowing for better inventory management.”
- “The optimization features are great; I love receiving notifications that help me keep track of my storage and maintain smooth gameplay.”
- “The game notifies you about performance issues when you have over 1000 items in your storage, which feels like a poor design choice.”
- “Having to deal with performance notifications due to storage limits is frustrating and disrupts the gameplay experience.”
- “The optimization is lacking, as the game struggles to handle large inventories, leading to unnecessary interruptions.”