Days of War
- February 3, 2020
- Driven Arts
- 3h median play time
Get on Steam"Days of War is a fast-paced, competitive first-person shooter set in World War 2 with non-stop combat in 32-player multiplayer matches or offline against bots. Experience intense battles across 12 maps, including European, African, and Eastern front theaters. Customize your gameplay with the map editor and Steam Workshop support for creating and sharing custom maps."
PC
Playstation 4
Windows
Xbox One
PlayStation
Xbox
Reviews
- The game has a nostalgic feel reminiscent of classic WWII shooters like Day of Defeat.
- Good graphics and solid performance on higher-end systems.
- The developers are actively updating the game and listening to community feedback.
- The game suffers from a low player base, making it difficult to find matches.
- There are significant bugs and optimization issues that affect gameplay.
- The sound design and weapon mechanics need improvement, with many players feeling the weapons lack impact.
- gameplay122 mentions
- 25 % positive mentions
- 66 % neutral mentions
- 9 % negative mentions
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players enjoying the nostalgic feel reminiscent of classic FPS titles like Day of Defeat, while others criticize its clunky mechanics, lack of fluidity, and poor optimization. Many users appreciate the fun of multiplayer with bots and the potential for engaging gameplay, but express concerns about balance, map design, and the overall smoothness of the experience. Overall, while there are enjoyable elements, significant improvements are needed in mechanics and performance to enhance the gameplay experience.
“Balanced gameplay classes.”
“The gameplay is very much a nostalgia trip to the original Day of Defeat; I was happy to find that jumping in and using the same tactics I used 15 years ago were still relevant.”
“Great game with amazing core mechanics; can't wait for all the content that is planned to be released.”
“Not to mention the jerky, weightlessness and wonky gun mechanics that make this just one of the most unenjoyable experiences I've had since lockdown, stubbing my toe at 2:00 AM, and playing this.”
“The gameplay is god awful, the gun mechanics are very bland and don't require any skill at all... it uses the old Day of Defeat cone spread mechanic which I'm personally not a fan of, and there's a reason no other game uses that for iron sights.”
“Gameplay is still the same clunky Day of Defeat clone with poor gunplay, poor map design, poor movement, poor performance, and no replayability.”
- graphics117 mentions
- 37 % positive mentions
- 50 % neutral mentions
- 13 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many praising the visuals as "very good" and "beautiful," particularly in terms of map design and atmospheric detail. However, some players criticize the graphics as underwhelming or not meeting expectations, especially when compared to promotional materials, and note performance issues on lower-end systems. Overall, while there are commendable aspects, the graphics seem to vary significantly in quality and optimization across different setups.
“The graphics and map beauty is what drew me to it.”
“The graphics are very good, the gameplay is very good and gives server owners the ability to add bots if desired.”
“With UE4 horsepower behind it, the graphics in the game are phenomenally detailed.”
“The graphics are nothing special.”
“The trailers may look good, but the actual in-game graphics are pretty bad, even on 'epic' settings.”
“The graphics are borderline bait and switch--the EA version looks considerably worse than the trailers and screenshots.”
- optimization53 mentions
- 23 % positive mentions
- 62 % neutral mentions
- 15 % negative mentions
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its performance and smooth framerates, especially for an early access title, while others report significant issues such as stuttering, low FPS, and clunky animations. Many users express hope that ongoing updates will improve optimization further, as current performance varies widely depending on hardware and settings. Overall, while there are positive notes about optimization, a substantial number of players highlight it as a major area needing improvement.
“Graphics are nice, the game is very optimized and runs fast.”
“I definitely see an improvement with optimization, which improves overall gameplay.”
“The performance is fairly impressive for a game that is this early in early access.”
“Dow has a ton of performance issues for a game that doesn't have amazing graphics.”
“Cons - bad optimization (barely reaching and falling under 50 fps with 16GB RAM, GTX 770 on everything low) this makes the game unplayable in some cases.”
“Horribly optimized, unbalanced campfest.”
- monetization42 mentions
- 2 % positive mentions
- 2 % neutral mentions
- 95 % negative mentions
The monetization aspect of the game has been widely criticized, with many users labeling it a "cash grab" due to the removal of key features like aim down sights (ADS) and a perceived lack of development. Players express frustration over the game's decline in player base and gameplay quality, attributing these issues to the developers' focus on monetization rather than improving the game. Overall, the sentiment suggests that the game's monetization strategy has alienated its core audience and diminished its potential for success.
“No ads while jumping.”
“Unfinished, under-promised, under-developed cash grab.”
“This was just another cash grab for the developers.”
“Overall, I consider this game a cash grab on dod:s fans and thus I refunded.”
- stability22 mentions
- 9 % positive mentions
- 9 % neutral mentions
- 82 % negative mentions
The game's stability has been widely criticized, with many players reporting significant bugs, glitches, and performance issues, including freezing and server problems. While some users acknowledge that the game runs smoothly on certain systems and express hope for future improvements, the overall consensus is that it feels unfinished and unpolished, making it difficult to justify its price at this stage.
“Runs great.”
“People are saying it isn't stable, but I have an i5 with a GTX 960 and it runs great at 70-100 fps.”
“This game is very buggy, do not buy it.”
“This game is not worth the money, the game freezes a long time already and they haven't fixed it.”
“Keep in mind, this game is still buggy, unfinished and unpolished.”
- story7 mentions
- 29 % positive mentions
- 29 % neutral mentions
- 43 % negative mentions
The game's story is criticized for lacking a coherent narrative, with some users comparing it to the disappointing launch of "No Man's Sky." While the dynamic multiplayer missions are praised for their fun factor, the overall execution of the story and game development has left players feeling disheartened.
“Alright, so this is pretty much a sad story... the devs just handled the whole thing very poorly, releasing the game in alpha for way too long with only a couple of maps.”
“I look forward to tons more dynamic missions in the near future.”
“Alright so this is pretty much a sad story... the devs just handled the whole thing very poorly, releasing the game in alpha for way too long with only a couple of maps.”
“No story line - yeah!”
“Sort of like No Man's Sky redemption story.”
- atmosphere5 mentions
- 60 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 40 % negative mentions
The game's atmosphere receives mixed reviews; while some players appreciate the excellent graphics and immersive environment, others criticize the sound design and lack of in-game music, which detracts from the overall experience. Many feel that improvements in audio could significantly enhance the atmosphere, which currently feels dark and lacking in depth.
“The graphics in terms of the maps are excellent; I love the atmosphere this game has.”
“I'd like to see in-game music to make it more atmospheric.”
“The sound design is a horrible mess; locating enemies is weird, weapons sound the same indoors and outdoors, and in tight hallways or open fields, it totally kills the atmosphere for me.”
“There's a lack of atmosphere. I know this can be fixed; just add some music here and there. After all, it's EA... yeah...”
- replayability4 mentions
- 50 % positive mentions
- -25 % neutral mentions
- 75 % negative mentions
The reviews indicate a stark divide in replayability for the game; while some find it refreshingly immersive despite its age, others criticize its clunky mechanics and poor design, deeming it lacking in replay value and recommending alternatives in the genre.
“These elements make the gameplay refreshing and immersive, enhancing its replayability.”
“I would recommend seeking out other games if you're looking for immediate fulfillment in this genre; there are a few that are in a more playable state!”
“Gameplay is still the same clunky dod clone with poor gunplay, poor map design, poor movement, poor performance, and no replayability.”
“I would say seek out other games if you want immediate fulfillment in this genre; there are a few to choose from that are in a more playable state!”
“Dod:s, an unloved game released 12 years ago, is still more playable.”
- music2 mentions
- 50 % positive mentions
- -50 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Users feel that the game's music is lacking and contributes to a deficiency in atmosphere, suggesting that adding more in-game music could enhance the overall experience.
“I know this can be fixed; just add some music here and there to enhance the atmosphere.”
“I'd like to see in-game music to make it more atmospheric.”
“- Lack of atmosphere - alright, I know this can be fixed, just add some music here and there, after all it's EA... yeah...”
- grinding1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Players express frustration with the grinding required to unlock weapons, noting that significant rank gaps hinder access to most guns, leading to a tedious experience.
“Most guns are locked behind a huge rank gap, requiring a lot of grinding to unlock. I'm currently rank 10 and only have 1 gun unlocked.”
“The grinding feels endless, and it often takes away from the enjoyment of the game.”
“I find the grinding to be tedious and repetitive, making it hard to stay engaged with the game.”
- humor1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The game is noted for its humor, with players highlighting its comedic elements and potential to deliver laughs.
“The game is really funny and has great potential.”
“The humor in this game is top-notch and keeps me laughing throughout.”
“I love how the game cleverly incorporates humor into its storyline.”
