World War 3
- December 10, 2022
- The Farm 51
- 7h median play time
Get on Steam"World War 3" is a multiplayer tactical first-person shooter set in a modern global conflict. Engage in thrilling skirmishes across real-world locations, utilizing a wide range of weapons, vehicles, drones, and tactical strikes. Fight through stunningly detailed maps, with every shot and decision potentially crucial to your team's victory. Customize your loadout and collaborate with your team to outgun and outflank your enemies.
PC
Windows
Cloud
Reviews
- gameplay1,806 mentions
- 43 % positive mentions
- 53 % neutral mentions
- 5 % negative mentions
The gameplay of World War 3 has received mixed reviews, with many players praising its mechanics, customization options, and overall fun factor, often comparing it favorably to titles like Battlefield and Call of Duty. However, issues such as server stability, lag, and bugs have marred the experience for some, leading to frustration during matches. While the core gameplay is seen as solid and engaging, particularly with its tactical elements and realistic damage mechanics, players express a desire for further optimization and content updates to enhance the overall experience.
“Played this when it first came out and had a blast; the gameplay and mechanics were great and it was doing something a little different from other shooters at the time.”
“I´m loving the game; it has the mechanics other AAA titles should have, in terms of mobility. Having lean, prone roll, hip fire stance, and free look are not things to overlook.”
“The gameplay is refreshing, and the core gameplay is there and it still delivers despite some disappointment in the community concerning the above.”
“I had fun for about 2 hours in this and couldn't handle the janky gameplay much more after that; I've tried off and on to get back into it, and I just cannot.”
“The gameplay is a deformed baby of battlefield and a generic tactical shooter, which ends up being not fun at all.”
“The gameplay itself can be quite boring.”
- optimization1,018 mentions
- 15 % positive mentions
- 56 % neutral mentions
- 29 % negative mentions
The optimization of the game has been a significant point of contention among players, with many reporting severe performance issues, including stuttering, low frame rates, and long loading times, even on high-end systems. While some users have noted improvements over time, the consensus is that the game remains poorly optimized, requiring further updates and fixes to enhance stability and performance. Overall, players express frustration over the game's current state, often comparing it unfavorably to other titles in the genre.
“Optimization has improved and new content is nice and clearly thought out.”
“The performance is great and optimization.”
“After few months I tried this game again and now it's much better, the game got better optimization and works more smooth, gameplay is fast and dynamic so you will not get bored on the battlefield, I would call this project one of the most ambitious FPS games for this year.”
“The game is poorly optimized, filled with people who are willing to defend it no matter what, and who will call any review stating otherwise to their point of view wrong.”
“Optimization is a big problem.”
“The performance is rather poor and there are a load of issues.”
- graphics819 mentions
- 46 % positive mentions
- 47 % neutral mentions
- 8 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with many players praising their impressive quality, detailed environments, and smooth performance on high-end systems. However, several users have reported optimization issues, leading to frame rate drops and visual inconsistencies, particularly on lower-end hardware. Overall, while the graphics are generally considered good for an indie title, there are calls for further improvements and optimizations to enhance the gaming experience.
“The graphics are outstanding and the game ran as smooth as expected on my Strix 4090.”
“Graphically, the game is very good looking, with solid lighting, textures, and atmosphere.”
“The graphics are really impressive, but unfortunately, there are issues with cheaters and unlocking content.”
“The graphics are poor and date back to 2015; the gunplay is a mishmash of Tarkov meets Rainbow Six Siege, shoddy with janky animations.”
“The game supposedly boasts improved lighting and graphical fidelity, but it somehow looks worse, feels worse, and is a chore to play.”
“The graphics are really disappointing; despite my high-end setup, I struggle to get a stable frame rate, and the textures look like a blurry mess.”
- stability405 mentions
- 4 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 96 % negative mentions
The game's stability has been a significant concern among players, with many reporting persistent bugs, server issues, and crashes that hinder gameplay. While some users note improvements over time, the overall experience remains marred by glitches, lag, and connectivity problems, leading to frustration and disappointment. Despite these challenges, a few players still find enjoyment in the core mechanics, suggesting potential for future enhancements as the developers continue to address these issues.
“Not buggy or slow, does not need the most expensive equipment to run smoothly, always lots of servers and clean, non-glitchy players on every server.”
“Now that they've re-re-released after going dark for a while, I can say they've put a huge amount of work into the stability of the game; it runs great.”
“The game runs great and looks good for an early access game.”
“Imagine buying the game back in the day and couldn't even play, because it had server issues for a good couple of months. After that, the game was not playable: crashes, black screens, stutters, FPS drops, and freezes.”
“It's a buggy mess lately that either won't let me in at all or the servers crash an hour or so after I start playing.”
“The game is still buggy but it's still in early access, so I can't say anything but I'd like to point out that there are still major glitches and lack of optimization, like: stutter both graphical and network types, crashes, long time of game and match loading, high CPU/GPU load even while being idle in the menu, low FPS on powerful rigs, etc.”
- monetization161 mentions
- 2 % positive mentions
- 40 % neutral mentions
- 58 % negative mentions
The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized as a cash grab, particularly after its transition to a free-to-play model, which many players feel has led to an influx of microtransactions and pay-to-win elements. While some appreciate the initial lack of microtransactions, concerns persist about future monetization practices, including the potential for weapon sales and excessive cosmetic purchases. Overall, players express disappointment over the game's direction, feeling that it prioritizes profit over quality and player experience.
“The in-game purchases are very fair; 4 dollars for a skin, wow.”
“Matches are quick and fast-paced, and you can unlock more weapons and attachments by playing the game (as of now, no other microtransactions to pay to unlock more guns, etc.).”
“No microtransactions so far; you earn everything, which is really nice and decently balanced.”
“It has already been abandoned by the devs. At this point, it's simply a cash grab they left up to pull in $$$ for their next title which is already in the works.”
“The game went free-to-play, which is nice but also bad because of course more monetization in-game like battle passes, skins, and more.”
“The grind to get guns that aren't painfully slow to aim down sights or damage will demotivate fresh newbies fast.”
- grinding96 mentions
- 3 % positive mentions
- 11 % neutral mentions
- 85 % negative mentions
The reviews overwhelmingly criticize the game's grinding mechanics, describing them as tedious, uninspired, and excessively time-consuming. Many players express frustration over the need to repeatedly farm for weapons and attachments, often feeling that the grind detracts from overall enjoyment and progression. While some players find the grind addictive and rewarding, the consensus leans towards it being a significant drawback that hampers the gaming experience.
“It's better XP now, so it's not that grindy. The only gripe I may have is the sound (will be better, I've read) and maybe some more destruction, but everything else I do love!”
“No grinding, just load up and fight.”
“A bit grindy sometimes.”
“Sick of insanely grindy battle passes.”
“The grinding is still ridiculous, and the matchmaking has gotten worse.”
“One of my biggest complaints is the never-ending grinding that must occur to level up not only your character, but your weapons as well.”
- story74 mentions
- 4 % positive mentions
- 81 % neutral mentions
- 15 % negative mentions
The reviews indicate that the game lacks a substantial story, with many users expressing disappointment over the absence of a narrative or campaign mode. While some players desire a more engaging storyline or AI-driven content, the consensus is that the game primarily focuses on multiplayer gameplay without a meaningful plot.
“Instead of leaving an actual review, allow me to tell you a story.”
“I'd like to know the backstory and the development of the war that the West will most likely become the victor of.”
“The future is looking bright; it even looks as though they may be doing a campaign-style multiplayer mission, like the ones you see in Rising Storm Vietnam.”
“The game currently has no story to speak of.”
“Add a story mode or something so people that bought your game can play it.”
“I wish for a story mode.”
- humor61 mentions
- 97 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 3 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is a standout feature, with players frequently noting the comedic elements in voice lines, ragdoll physics, and absurd gameplay moments that lead to laughter during sessions. While some aspects, like bugs and unbalanced mechanics, are frustrating, they often contribute to the overall hilarity, making the experience enjoyable despite its flaws. Overall, the game is described as a fun, lighthearted alternative to more serious shooters, perfect for those looking to share a laugh with friends.
“But hey, if you're a fan of weird and funny free-to-play games that require your soul and undivided attention where 'supposed' grizzled soldiers fighting in World War 3 can control recoil like a baby one-handing a double barrel, then this game is for you.”
“The state of the game is hilarious.”
“Ww3 in its current state is nothing more than a fun AF FPS with some annoying, albeit hilarious, bugs and is quite unbalanced at the moment too.”
“Maps for that other mode are too big, and vehicles feel like an unfunny joke.”
“The graphical models are very outdated, and the humor in the game is completely lacking.”
- atmosphere43 mentions
- 49 % positive mentions
- 42 % neutral mentions
- 9 % negative mentions
The game's atmosphere is generally praised for its realistic graphics, immersive battlefield experience, and compelling map design, creating a gritty and believable environment. However, many players feel that sound design needs significant improvement, as it detracts from the overall immersion, with suggestions for more ambient sounds and dynamic elements to enhance the atmosphere further. Overall, while the atmosphere is a strong point, it requires additional development to reach its full potential.
“Graphically, the game is very good looking, with solid lighting, textures, and atmosphere.”
“The atmosphere is great, and the gunplay is phenomenal.”
“Great atmosphere, graphics, effects, gunplay, and game modes.”
“While gameplay and atmosphere wise this game is good, the terrible sound design is what is keeping this game back.”
“Boring, lack of players, no atmosphere.”
“There is no atmosphere here, it takes you bare minimum 5 minutes to find an enemy and when you kill them, there's no gratification.”
- music38 mentions
- 24 % positive mentions
- 63 % neutral mentions
- 13 % negative mentions
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising the soundtrack for its intensity and ability to enhance immersion during gameplay, while others criticize it for being overshadowed by in-game sounds like gunfire and explosions. Many users express frustration with the inconsistent audio levels and the lack of music during loading screens and menus, which detracts from the overall experience. Overall, while some find the music enjoyable, it often fails to contribute positively to the gameplay due to its placement and volume issues.
“Bf3's soundtrack still gives me exciting goosebumps.”
“The soundtrack is great, having a well-balanced mix of intensity and low-toned backing that really gives that edge to gunfights and rounding corners.”
“The music is excellent and does not hinder the user from gameplay.”
“The biggest downside for me is the soundtrack.”
“The menus don't have music so you're just sitting there at nothing not knowing whether the game crashed or it's just slow.”
“Sound levels are rather inconsistent and 3D audio positioning is hard even with my 7.1 surround sound headset in FPS mode. Random sounds will be super quiet while others are loud, yet the overall sound level is very loud. Also, the battle music is rather annoying when trying to hear what's going on around you.”
- emotional22 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The emotional responses to the game are mixed, with many players expressing disappointment and frustration due to technical issues and gameplay mechanics that detract from their experience. While some find moments of satisfaction and connection in the gameplay, particularly in team dynamics and customization, the overwhelming sentiment is one of heartbreak and disillusionment, leading many to vow not to return until significant improvements are made. Overall, the emotional impact ranges from feelings of anger and regret to fleeting moments of enjoyment, highlighting a deep yearning for a better gaming experience.
“It is heartbreaking that the company is doing nothing about this.”
“This is the most heartfelt thumbs down by a person that so very much wanted this to work!”
“I play games like Battlefield to feel good, to relieve stress; all this 'game' has done is made me feel terrible about myself for things out of my control that were not thought of when putting this game out into early access.”
- replayability19 mentions
- 32 % positive mentions
- 53 % neutral mentions
- 16 % negative mentions
The game's replayability is a mixed bag among users; while some praise its incredible replay value and enjoyable mechanics, others feel it lacks sufficient replayability. Many acknowledge improvements in playability and progression, but concerns about player retention and server stability persist, impacting the overall experience. Overall, the game shows potential for replayability, especially with ongoing updates and optimizations.
“The graphics are stunning, the sound is great, and the gameplay has all of the ingredients to be a replayable masterpiece.”
“The customization is amazing, guns feel great, pace is balanced, and the replay value is outstanding-- it's honestly such a wonderful comeback to the BF3 formula that I missed so much.”
“Also, the replayability isn't there for me at least.”
“While this game is certainly in a much more playable state than at release, and I feel like a multitude of optimization, patching, and balancing has been implemented, a multiplayer driven game cannot survive without a steady stream of players, and this game continually struggles to rise to a 100 player average.”
“The replayability of this game is incredible.”
- character development1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -500 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Players appreciate the character development in the game, noting that the progression system makes leveling up feel rewarding and enhances the overall experience.
“I really appreciate the character development they implemented; grinding levels feels rewarding now.”
“The depth of character development in this game is impressive, making each character feel unique and relatable.”
“I love how the character development evolves throughout the game, allowing for meaningful choices that impact the story.”
“The character development feels shallow and lacks depth, making it hard to connect with the characters.”
“I was disappointed with the character arcs; they felt rushed and unconvincing throughout the game.”
“The choices you make don't seem to impact character development in any meaningful way, leaving it feeling flat.”
