Battalion Legacy

60%
Game Brain Score Based on 8,986 reviews
  • gameplay
  • graphics
  • optimization
Battalion Legacy Game Cover
Starting at $6.50Buy now
Get on Steam

"Battalion Legacy is a Warfare Shooter game that offers both single-player and multiplayer modes, with a focus on 5v5 infantry combat for a competitive experience. The game boasts good mechanics, pretty visuals, and integration with FACEIT for skill-based competitive matchmaking, tournaments, and rankings. However, it is also known for being very grinding, having some bugs, and offering 1v1 Showdown mode."

  • PC
  • Play​station 4
  • Windows
  • Xbox One
  • Cloud
  • NVIDIA GeForce NOW
  • Play​Station
  • Xbox
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

60%
Audience ScoreBased on 8,986 reviews
gameplay378 positive mentions
optimization54 negative mentions
  • gameplay1,040 mentions

    The gameplay of Battalion 1944 has received mixed reviews, with many players praising its fast-paced, skill-based mechanics reminiscent of classic Call of Duty titles like COD2 and COD4. While the core mechanics and gunplay are often described as satisfying and enjoyable, issues such as unbalanced gameplay, server problems, and frustrating mechanics like jump shooting and prone camping have led to significant criticism. Overall, the game shows potential for competitive play but requires further refinement and a more stable player base to fully realize its promise.

    • “The gameplay is fast-paced and intense, with a perfect balance of strategy and skill required to excel.”
    • “The gameplay in Battalion 1944 is smooth and satisfying, with a focus on skill-based gunplay and close-quarters combat.”
    • “The gameplay feels great, and I expect the stability of the game to continue to improve.”
    • “But after 30 hours of gameplay, the reality set in - this game is a mess.”
    • “The gameplay is alright, but bad spawns and quick deaths can be frustrating.”
    • “The mechanics in this game are absolutely atrocious and tedious, bringing down the fun element by a lot.”
  • graphics332 mentions

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the decent visuals and smooth performance, while others criticize them as outdated or poorly optimized. Many users note that the graphics evoke a nostalgic feel reminiscent of older WWII shooters, but they also highlight issues such as graphical bugs, low texture quality, and inconsistent performance across different hardware setups. Overall, while some find the graphics satisfactory for gameplay, others feel they fall short of modern standards, impacting the overall experience.

    • “The graphics are stunning, although my rule of life when it comes to competitive games is, 'competitive games do not need to look good.'”
    • “This game delivers an aesthetic of a classic shooter whilst still bringing in that modern polished feel.”
    • “The graphics are very good, and each gun feels like it should.”
    • “Graphical issues are noticeable and break immersion.”
    • “The graphics look like they belong to a game from 2012, and not 2018.”
    • “Horrible graphics, wonky servers, and average gameplay.”
  • optimization206 mentions

    The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting significant performance issues such as stuttering, high CPU usage, and unplayable frame rates, even on decent hardware. While some users have noted improvements and smooth performance on higher-end systems, the overall consensus indicates that the game still requires substantial optimization to be accessible and enjoyable for a wider range of PCs. Many players express frustration over the game's inconsistent performance and the lack of effective fixes despite ongoing updates.

    • “The gameplay is decently fun, performance is pretty much flawless and the community so far seems wonderfully non-toxic.”
    • “It's extremely well optimized, very consistent, and doesn't have loads of RNG issues.”
    • “The new movement, visuals, optimization, and economy are great and improve the game greatly.”
    • “All the players are gone; the game randomly became unoptimized, pushing an RTX 2060 to 100% usage.”
    • “Performance is extremely bad even on the lowest settings and resolution; it is absolutely unplayable from a competitive standpoint. Not even 120Hz will be achievable realistically unless you run a $3000 rig, which this game with its poor graphics does not warrant but necessitates through its horrible optimization.”
    • “The game is for an early access title very polished, if we think about the PUBG disaster which still has a lot of bugs and performance problems in its release version.”
  • stability161 mentions

    The game's stability is a significant concern among users, with many reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and crashes that hinder gameplay. Issues such as poor hit detection, server instability, and unresponsive menus are prevalent, leading to a frustrating experience for players. While some acknowledge that the developers are actively working on patches, the overall consensus is that the game feels unfinished and requires substantial improvements to reach a stable state.

    • “It's very well optimized and runs great!”
    • “Well for starters, the game runs great, plays great, feels great, looks great and I really enjoy it.”
    • “Thanks to the mu2 update, the game runs great on my i5 2500k and 970 GTX, getting well over 144 fps.”
    • “The maps are poorly designed, the hit detection is wonky, and the game is riddled with bugs and glitches.”
    • “You can still rank up playing online matches against bots, but it's so buggy I have lost rank points or the weapon skins I unlocked were locked when I logged back in.”
    • “It's a buggy mess.”
  • monetization79 mentions

    The monetization aspect of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many users labeling it a "cash grab" due to the presence of microtransactions and in-game purchases that feel exploitative. While some players find microtransactions acceptable if they fund ongoing updates and content, the overall sentiment leans towards disappointment, as many believe the game should be free-to-play given its current state and issues. Additionally, concerns about the developers prioritizing monetization over game quality and stability have further fueled negative perceptions.

    • “Microtransactions are okay in my opinion.”
    • “As long as the devs put the money into updates, maintenance, and new, free content, microtransactions are an acceptable way of funding a game in the long run (Rainbow Six: Siege is a good example for that in my humble opinion).”
    • “The microtransactions are really fair (only for loot boxes that you can also unlock fairly rapidly by playing the game, you can sell/buy skins on the Steam market, and most of the nicer skins you can unlock by leveling up).”
    • “Steam lets developers make money off these alpha games with pay-to-play scams, and sooner or later the developer seems to vanish, along with the paid customers, because it's all a cash grab.”
    • “This game plays like it should be free to play with microtransactions in the form of skins or emotes.”
    • “Within the span of a few updates, new in-game economy systems were added, scrapped, and reworked; microtransactions were prioritized; critical, game-breaking bugs remained unpatched.”
  • story26 mentions

    The reviews reflect a mixed reception regarding the game's story aspect. While some players appreciate the nostalgic feel of an old-school WWII narrative and find the gameplay engaging, others criticize the lack of a single-player story mode and describe the experience as linear and lacking depth. Overall, the game seems to prioritize competitive multiplayer elements over a traditional narrative.

    • “Nothing like getting immersed into a good WWII story.”
    • “Great story mode as well.”
    • “Bulkhead set out with one mission, to produce an 'old school' WWII FPS, and this is exactly what they achieved.”
    • “And so ends this sad story.”
    • “There is no single player story thingy, just set your graphics to performance and be ready for old school FPS.”
    • “Imagine playing a rip-off, worse quality Call of Duty 3 without the nostalgia effect or any storyline, just linear run and gun gameplay... yeah, no good and that's on max settings.”
  • humor21 mentions

    The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with many players finding it genuinely funny due to its quirky mechanics and community interactions, while others criticize it for being unintentionally amusing due to bugs and poor design choices. Some reviews highlight the game's potential for hilarious moments in multiplayer matches, though frustrations with gameplay issues often overshadow the humor. Overall, the game's comedic elements seem to resonate well with some players, making it enjoyable for casual play, despite its flaws.

    • “This game is effing hilarious.”
    • “Great community and hilarious chat rooms, games great for streaming and has a good balance for both sides as far as guns, maps are great and for some reason it just does not get boring.”
    • “The rifle is an insta-kill, I found it hilarious to run around, I died like 20 times until I got my first kill.”
  • music21 mentions

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising the soundtrack as wonderful and well-integrated into the gameplay, while others criticize the menu music for being too loud and causing crashes when attempting to adjust settings. Despite some technical issues, many players find the in-game music enjoyable, contributing positively to their overall experience. However, the inconsistency in sound quality and the inability to modify audio settings detracts from the enjoyment for some users.

    • “The game has a wonderful soundtrack, great graphics, and a lot of fun.”
    • “What a nice day to hear some epic menu music :)”
    • “Great lobby music 10/10”
    • “Don't be scared off by the terrible music in the trailers, or the behind-the-scenes of indie studios' cringefests.”
    • “None of the settings were able to be adjusted or changed, so I have the main menu music destroying my eardrums, giving me tinnitus (no way I'm taking the headphones off).”
    • “Game takes 5 to 10 minutes to start after I click on 'play', and when it opens, the screen is black and nothing happens, only hear the music. I restarted my PC, the game, even Steam, but the same thing happens. For now, I don't recommend it; I can't even play. If this keeps happening, I will ask for a refund.”
  • grinding14 mentions

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and frustrating, often exacerbated by poor mechanics, unbalanced gameplay, and the prevalence of bots and cheaters. Many feel that significant time investment is required to achieve meaningful progress, leading to a sense of monotony and dissatisfaction. Overall, the grind is seen as a barrier to enjoyment, with some players suggesting that it detracts from the overall fun of the game.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “The mechanics in this game are absolutely atrocious and tedious, bringing down the fun element by a lot.”
    • “You've gotta abandon the server, which is basically what happens when two high-rank competitive players are farming everyone else.”
    • “Unless you're Shroud, grinding is the only option to get good.”
  • replayability9 mentions

    Overall, players find Battalion 1944 to have significant replayability, thanks to its diverse and enjoyable maps, along with a solid selection of game modes and dedicated servers. While some users express concerns about server issues and player count affecting the experience, many still rate its replay value highly, suggesting that improvements could enhance it further.

    • “The maps are fun and versatile and have enough replayability for my taste.”
    • “A good selection of maps to boot, decent game modes and dedicated servers offers good replay value.”
    • “Game has massive replay value.”
    • “Fix servers, card system, and reduce damage dealt from snipers mid-torso down by 33%, then the game will be more playable and more reminiscent of COD4.”
    • “Battalion 1944, in my opinion, is an amazing game, but its replayability suffers due to the lack of content and variety.”
  • emotional5 mentions

    Reviews on the emotional aspect of the game are mixed, with some players appreciating the developers' engagement and the wholesome map design, while others feel misled by promotional content and lack a compelling emotional connection to the gameplay. Overall, the emotional impact seems insufficient to motivate continued play for many users.

    • “Even the reviews are mixed at the moment, seeing the developers' responses made me feel great and promising.”
    • “The map design is simple, yet wholesome.”
  • atmosphere4 mentions

    The atmosphere of the game is reminiscent of World War II, creating a beginner-friendly environment supported by a welcoming community. However, some players feel that the current atmosphere lacks the intensity of war, and there are concerns about server lag and bugs typical of early access titles.

    • “There's a beginner-friendly atmosphere, along with a welcoming and helpful community if you ask the right people.”
    • “Great game! It brings back the atmosphere of COD2 in the new COD: WWII.”
    • “The atmosphere feels very World War II.”
    • “Even if there is no war atmosphere, come on guys, don't release another game. Please shut down your company.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Battalion Legacy

Play time

6hMedian play time
109hAverage play time
3-35hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 55 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games

Game News