Skip to main content
Survarium Game Cover

About

Survarium is a multiplayer open world role playing shooter game with a science fiction theme. It was developed by Vostok Games and was released on April 2, 2015. It received neutral reviews from players.

"Survarium is a free-to-play, massively multiplayer, Science Fiction Open World game that offers various game modes including co-op and PvP. Players can survive in anomalies to find valuable artifacts with unique properties, and new DLCs are regularly available for purchase featuring exclusive weapons. The game encourages fighting in a squad or solo, with higher risks leading to higher rewards."

Skip User Reviews

53%
Audience ScoreBased on 7,427 reviews
gameplay281 positive mentions
optimization89 negative mentions

  • The game has a unique atmosphere reminiscent of the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. series, with beautiful graphics and engaging gunplay.
  • Weapon customization is deep, allowing for various playstyles and strategies, making the gameplay enjoyable.
  • Despite being free-to-play, the game offers a fair amount of content and progression without feeling overly pay-to-win.
  • The game suffers from a small player base, leading to long matchmaking times and unbalanced matches where new players face veterans with superior gear.
  • There are numerous reports of hackers and cheaters, which detracts from the overall experience and fairness of the game.
  • The game has been in early access for several years with many promised features, such as an open-world mode, still not implemented.
  • gameplay
    793 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of Survarium has received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating its tactical and immersive elements, as well as its solid gun mechanics and unique features like anomalies. However, criticisms often focus on the game's pay-to-win mechanics, unbalanced matchmaking, and technical issues, which detract from the overall experience. While some players find the gameplay enjoyable and reminiscent of classic FPS titles, others feel it suffers from repetitiveness and a lack of depth, particularly in its current state as a free-to-play title.

    • “Amazing game, really nice gameplay.”
    • “The gameplay is very fast and smooth.”
    • “Great gameplay, not many pay-to-win elements.”
    • “Despite its intriguing premise, the game suffers from technical issues, lackluster graphics, and unpolished gameplay.”
    • “The survival mechanics feel shallow and repetitive, failing to capture the intensity and depth found in similar titles.”
    • “The gameplay is slow and boring, movement is sluggish as hell, and the game has horrible performance for as average as it looks.”
  • graphics
    762 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising the atmospheric and detailed environments that evoke a post-apocalyptic aesthetic reminiscent of the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. series. However, numerous complaints about poor optimization and technical issues hinder the overall experience, leading to inconsistent performance and visual quality across different systems. While some players find the graphics impressive for a free-to-play title, others criticize them as outdated or lacking polish, suggesting that improvements are needed to fully realize the game's potential.

    • “The game nailed the eerie, abandoned world aesthetic—overgrown cities, decayed structures, and deadly anomalies lurking around every corner.”
    • “The graphics are absolutely stunning and the maps are beautiful.”
    • “The graphics are amazing, they help with immersion and are quite impressive for a free-to-play game.”
    • “The graphics are hot garbage; the guns look like they're made out of play-doh, and even the good gun sound is kind of scuffed.”
    • “The graphics are terrible; it's as if you're playing Call of Duty 4 graphics, and no, I'm not talking about the remastered version.”
    • “The graphics are underwhelming; the Stalker graphics just don't work in this day and age.”
  • story
    240 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its lack of depth and content, with many players expressing disappointment over the absence of a substantial narrative or single-player mode. While there is a single, short PvE mission and some atmospheric elements, the overall experience feels repetitive and grind-heavy, with players longing for more engaging storylines and missions. Despite the potential for a rich narrative, the game currently focuses heavily on PvP and lacks the promised story-driven content, leaving many players unsatisfied.

    • “The hope in me never died that they'd publish more story missions.”
    • “I really hope that the developers can continue to support and run this game because the concept and setting are so incredible and deep; they could really tell a hearty story if they really wanted to.”
    • “I liked the setting and story; the introduction/tutorial was fun.”
    • “The game promised a Stalker-esque open world back in 2015-2016 but has gotten only one semi-linear PvE mission since then.”
    • “No storyline at all; you can have fun for a bit then instantly get bored.”
    • “The developers promised some 'not quite Stalker-like' story-based free play experience and delivered a mediocre arena PvP shooter with loads of grind instead.”
  • optimization
    226 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting significant performance issues, including frame rate drops and lag, even on high-end systems. While some users noted improvements over time, others described it as poorly optimized, with graphics that do not run smoothly and require lowering settings for acceptable performance. Overall, the consensus indicates that while there are moments of good optimization, the game still needs substantial work to enhance its performance and stability.

    • “The game has been optimized fairly well, much better than in the earlier days, the game runs really smooth now, and the graphics actually don't look half bad.”
    • “The graphics are really good and for an alpha/beta, it is surprisingly well optimized with my rig at max settings at 45-60fps.”
    • “Well-optimized & intuitively comprehensive engine, coolest maps ever, the level of realism is just on point - more physical than CS:GO, less overwhelming than Insurgency: Sandstorm.”
    • “The game is very poorly optimized with freezes, bugs, and framerate drops all the time.”
    • “This game is a pile of unoptimized crap.”
    • “Poorly optimized is a big understatement; I don't even know the gameplay seeing how I can't play at all.”
  • atmosphere
    166 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere of the game is widely praised for its immersive and captivating qualities, often drawing comparisons to the iconic "S.T.A.L.K.E.R." series. Players appreciate the detailed environments, sound design, and the unique post-apocalyptic setting that enhances the overall experience, despite some criticisms regarding gameplay balance and content. Overall, the game's atmospheric elements are considered its strongest feature, creating a rich and engaging world that resonates with fans of the genre.

    • “The atmosphere of this game was unparalleled.”
    • “The game’s unique setting, where nature itself is a threat, gives it a distinct atmosphere compared to other shooters.”
    • “The atmosphere is just so epic, sitting with a rifle in a bush, listening to grasshoppers and waiting for a vladimir to get in my sight - boooooooommm *echoing*.”
    • “Its obviously a very dead game, a poor man's Tarkov that lacks the tense, frantic atmosphere that Tarkov gives you.”
    • “The only thing good about this game is the menu which is low key similar to PUBG and the atmosphere of the maps is ehhh okay.”
    • “The atmosphere is currently 'daytime, clear skies,' which is a little disappointing.”
  • grinding
    133 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The grinding aspect of the game is widely criticized, with many players noting it as excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring significant investment to unlock weapons and gear. While some find the grind rewarding, especially when achieving new ranks or upgrades, others feel it detracts from the overall enjoyment, particularly when compared to the advantages offered by in-game purchases. Overall, the consensus is that while grinding is a core part of the experience, it can become frustrating and may lead to a pay-to-win dynamic.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “A bit grindy... sometimes.”
    • “One long, tedious grind.”
    • “Incredibly pay to win and overly grindy.”
    • “The game consists of hardcore grinding and nothing else; there is nothing to do but grind for items or pay real money for them.”
    • “This game is just grinding and nonstop mind-numbing actions in maps that are not good at all; it seems cheap from the start.”
  • stability
    132 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is a significant concern among players, with many reporting persistent bugs, glitches, and matchmaking issues that detract from the overall experience. While some users acknowledge that the game is still in early access and express hope for future improvements, the overwhelming sentiment is that the current state is frustratingly unstable, with frequent crashes and unresponsive features. Despite its potential and enjoyable gameplay, the numerous technical problems make it difficult for many to recommend the game at this time.

    • “Amazing game for a free-to-play title, looks and runs great.”
    • “My experience on this game so far is amazing, no bugs, no glitches, just pure fun.”
    • “Note: the gameplay itself seems to be bug-free for the most part, and the netcode is pretty solid as well.”
    • “I've played for a few years now, always buggy and filled with cheaters.”
    • “Game in general is pay to win, if you want good armor with decent weapons and attachments you will have to pay, game is suffering from lack of players as well as the game is quite buggy and unbalanced, but the gameplay at times can be fun, but it ends up being ruined by the horrid hitboxes (hitting invisible walls etc.).”
    • “Add that to the fact that the game is still riddled with bugs and glitches after 5 years in development (yeah I know it's still in early access) and also that there's not nearly enough players for you to find a match in a reasonable amount of time and you got a recipe for a hell of a bad game.”
  • monetization
    88 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization system in this game has drawn significant criticism, with many players labeling it as a "cash grab" due to its aggressive microtransaction model and pay-to-win elements. While some users appreciate that it is not overly intrusive compared to other free-to-play titles, the presence of expensive premium items and the grind required to progress without spending money have left many feeling frustrated and disillusioned. Overall, the monetization approach is seen as detrimental to the game's potential, overshadowing its gameplay and community engagement.

    • “One of the few free-to-play games that doesn't shove microtransactions down your throat.”
    • “There are microtransactions, but as far as I can tell, they really only get you guns that are skinned to look different; there really is no edge given if you buy them.”
    • “Remember it's free-to-play, so there have to be microtransactions, but they're not that intrusive and you can play the game without spending any cash.”
    • “This is one of those early access games that delivered beautiful visuals and gameplay, but also included pay-to-win microtransactions.”
    • “Okay, perhaps it is a small team and things take time, I get that, but it sure doesn't stop them from having ridiculously expensive monetization schemes in place with €30 weapons and premium accounts to moderately lower the endless grind.”
    • “Cash grab, once it used to have a lot of potential, now it's just a blatant run for your money without substance.”
  • humor
    48 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is often described as unintentional, stemming from its numerous bugs, absurd gameplay mechanics, and the prevalence of cheating, which leads to hilariously frustrating experiences. Players find amusement in the game's campy nature and the ridiculous situations that arise, especially when playing with friends. Despite its flaws, many reviewers appreciate the comedic value of the game, even if they acknowledge its shortcomings and the overall negative experience.

    • “The trap system is hilarious.”
    • “The bots themselves can be quite ridiculous and funny at times, especially in the killcam.”
    • “I have to say the game was fun... that is if you want to laugh at all the hilarious things you can do.”
    • “The humor in the game falls flat; it tries too hard to be funny but ends up being cringeworthy instead.”
    • “I expected some lighthearted moments, but the jokes are stale and often miss the mark.”
    • “The attempts at humor feel forced and often detract from the overall experience rather than enhance it.”
  • music
    34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is generally praised for its immersive and atmospheric qualities, effectively complementing the post-apocalyptic setting with dark and dreary tones. While many players appreciate the soundtrack and sound design, some express a desire for more control over music choices and note that in high-stakes gameplay, music can sometimes detract from focus. Overall, the audio experience is considered a strong point, enhancing the game's ambiance and engagement.

    • “The soundtrack is pretty solid for the loading screens as you wait for a game.”
    • “The music is what you'd expect from a post-apocalyptic game: dark, dreary, and depressing.”
    • “The gunplay is slower and thus feels slightly more realistic than the average shooter, whilst the gorgeous maps of reasonable size make for engaging battles, during which the authentic firearm sounds go splendidly well with the immersive ambient soundtrack.”
    • “The music is what you'd expect from a post-apocalyptic game: dark, dreary and depressing.”
    • “There is no music really to be heard; then again, I feel that in this type of gameplay where a fraction of a second counts, music would take away from that factor.”
    • “All I get is music and a black screen.”
  • emotional
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional responses to the game are mixed, with some players expressing deep disappointment and frustration over gameplay issues, while others find moments of genuine connection and enjoyment. A few users report feeling moved to tears by the stakes presented in the game, indicating that it can evoke strong feelings despite its flaws. Overall, the emotional impact varies significantly among players, with some finding it touching and others feeling let down.

    • “I cried.”
    • “Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”
    • “Go in with an open mind and get a few hours of wholesome fun in!”
  • replayability
    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, the game's replayability is a mixed bag; while some players find it lacking and unengaging, others appreciate recent improvements and patches that enhance the experience. The community's feedback has led to significant updates, making the game more enjoyable for returning players. However, until more issues are addressed, many still feel that replay value is limited.

    • “Came back to this game after a year and it's been a good break. The devs have listened to some of the community and really improved the game; definitely more playable.”
    • “There are a lot of patches coming in every day or every two days, and to be honest, the patches make the game more playable and fun every time.”
    • “Replayability: yes, definitely.”
    • “It sucks and has little to no replay value.”
    • “Until the developers can get off their butts and fix what needs to be fixed, there's no replayability, no fun (for the most part), or anything like that to get out of this game.”
    • “Replayability: see previous points.”
  • character development
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Character development in the game is noted for its strong design and features, particularly the skills and weapon systems, which enhance player engagement. However, there are contrasting opinions, with some criticizing the overall character design and animations, suggesting a lack of cohesion in the game's aesthetic.

    • “The character development features and dashmap feature are the best of all.”
    • “Interesting character development, including skills, weapons, and leveling.”
    • “Really good character design, especially the item design.”
    • “The character development feels shallow and uninspired, making it hard to connect with any of the protagonists.”
    • “I was really disappointed with how the characters evolved; their arcs were predictable and lacked depth.”
    • “The lack of meaningful choices in character development left me feeling detached from the story and its characters.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Survarium

15h Median play time
45h Average play time
5-28h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 45 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Survarium

Games Like Survarium

Warface: Clutch Image
Heroes & Generals Image
Line of Sight Image
Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex - First Assault Online ImageGhost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex - First Assault Online ImageGhost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex - First Assault Online Image
Ring of Elysium Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Survarium is a open world role playing shooter game with science fiction theme.

Survarium is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 45 hours playing Survarium.

Survarium was released on April 2, 2015.

Survarium was developed by Vostok Games.

Survarium has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its optimization.

Survarium is a multiplayer game with local co-op support.

Similar games include Warface: Clutch, Heroes & Generals, Line of Sight, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex - First Assault Online, Ring of Elysium and others.