Operation: Harsh Doorstop

About

Operation: Harsh Doorstop is a single player and multiplayer tactical shooter game with a warfare theme. It was developed by Drakeling Labs and was released on February 15, 2023. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Operation: Harsh Doorstop is a free, community developed, tactical shooter. Developed by the studio Drakeling Labs in partnership with MicroProse Software, Inc. Built using the OHDCore framework for Unreal Engine 4.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

71%

Audience ScoreBased on 10,413 reviews

gameplay181 positive mentions

optimization110 negative mentions

The game features impressive and immersive graphics, especially for a free title, with clean models and well-crafted environments.
The core gameplay mechanics are solid and show potential for tactical gameplay, particularly with community-driven features and modding support.
The humor and lighthearted interactions within the community add an entertaining layer to the gameplay experience, making it enjoyable despite its flaws.

The graphics are criticized for being bland and poorly optimized, leading to performance issues and a lack of detail on lower settings.
Gameplay suffers from sluggish movement, clunky controls, and a lack of depth, resulting in a repetitive experience that feels unfinished.
The game is plagued by significant bugs, glitches, and performance issues, contributing to a frustrating gameplay experience and a lack of engaging narrative.

gameplay
687 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
26%
60%
14%
The gameplay of "Operation: Harsh Doorstop" has received mixed reviews, with many players noting its solid core mechanics and potential for tactical gameplay, particularly in a community-driven context. However, criticisms highlight sluggish movement, clunky controls, and a lack of depth in gameplay features, leading to a repetitive experience. While the game shows promise, especially with modding support, it currently feels unfinished and in need of significant polish and additional content to enhance player engagement.
- “Harsh Doorstop has a lot going for it—it's a promising tactical shooter with a strong community-driven spirit and a solid gameplay core.”
- “It's rough around the edges, but the core gameplay is solid and fun, and the constant updates from the developers are encouraging.”
- “The game encourages players to dive into its mechanics and create custom content, allowing for endless replayability and variety.”
- “The gameplay lacks depth, polish, and the quality expected from a title that was hyped as a revolutionary alternative.”
- “The gameplay feels clunky and frustrating, the AI is poorly implemented, and while the graphics might look decent at first glance, it quickly becomes clear that visuals alone can't save a bad experience.”
- “The gameplay is mediocre and everything just feels janky, which just makes it frustrating to play and ends up pissing you off.”
graphics
503 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
46%
11%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the visuals as impressive and immersive, especially for a free title, while others criticize them as bland, dated, or poorly optimized. Many users note that the graphics can vary significantly depending on settings, with lower settings leading to a lack of detail and visibility issues. Overall, while there are commendable aspects to the graphics, such as clean models and decent effects, there is a consensus that improvements are needed in optimization and texture quality.
- “The graphics are stunning, and the gameplay is incredibly immersive.”
- “The visuals are clean and well-crafted, offering stunning environments that add to the immersion without sacrificing performance.”
- “Great game with amazing graphics and first-person perspective.”
- “The graphics look flat and boring.”
- “The graphics are very poor by today's standards.”
- “The graphics are so comical that I stood still and watched enemies that I knew were enemies pass me and I could not visually discern if they were enemy combatants or not.”
optimization
328 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
50%
34%
The game's optimization has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many players reporting significant performance issues, including low frame rates and stuttering, even on high-end hardware. Numerous reviews highlight the presence of bugs and unresponsive AI, contributing to a frustrating gameplay experience. While some users note that the game shows potential and runs adequately on lower-end systems, the consensus is that it requires substantial optimization improvements to be considered playable.
- “The visuals are clean and well-crafted, offering stunning environments that add to the immersion without sacrificing performance.”
- “Great potential but needs to be optimized.”
- “At its current state, it's very optimized, the gameplay is solid and the game provides a lot of fun moments.”
- “The performance is meh, the game doesn't fully utilize my hardware, even with DX12.”
- “Controls are clunky, optimization is non-existent, and the AI is laughable.”
- “The game is poorly optimized; I have a RTX 2070 Super and a Ryzen 7 3800X, and it still only reaches about 70 FPS, which really frustrates me because I'm used to 144 FPS or higher.”
stability
172 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
94%
The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous users reporting significant bugs, glitches, and performance issues that detract from the overall experience. Many players describe the controls as unresponsive and the AI as poorly implemented, leading to frustrating gameplay. While some acknowledge the game's potential and fun aspects, the consensus is that it remains a buggy and unfinished product, particularly for an early access title.
- “There is little to no UI, and it runs great both on my Steam Deck (with a community layout, of course) and my PC.”
- “This game looks great and runs great; I love it.”
- “In my 7 hours of gameplay, I have had fun; it's not that buggy and it reminds me a lot of Battlefield in the fact it has multiple different types of teams depending on the rules and maps.”
- “This game is an absolute steaming hot pile of dog shit, don't even waste 30 seconds of your time on this mistake of a buggy pile of shit some people call a game.”
- “The game is a buggy mess.”
- “This game is just bad and buggy all around.”
story
119 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
70%
22%
The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its lack of depth and engaging narrative, with many players expressing disappointment over the absence of a coherent single-player storyline or mission variety. While some reviews highlight the potential for future content and improvements, the current state is described as bare-bones, leaving players wanting more in terms of immersive storytelling and mission design. Overall, the consensus is that the game needs significant enhancements to its narrative elements to fully realize its potential.
- “A refreshing tactical shooter, excelling in mechanics and story, outshining its genre counterparts.”
- “The plot is intricately woven, following a team of elite operatives on a high-stakes mission filled with danger and suspense.”
- “The characters are well-developed, each with their own distinct personalities and backstories, adding depth to the overall storyline.”
- “This game couldn't find its plot with a GPS.”
- “There's no content for story as of right now, so don't plan on sinking hours into a storyline just yet.”
- “I don't recommend playing this game at all right now; it's extremely bare bones, single player has no story (literally).”
monetization
119 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
5%
35%
60%
The monetization model of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating its completely free access and absence of microtransactions, which contrasts sharply with the prevalent practices in the AAA gaming industry. However, some users express frustration over hidden costs associated with DLCs and the developer's website being laden with ads, leading to accusations of it being a cash grab. Overall, while the game is praised for its no-strings-attached approach, concerns about potential future monetization changes and the current state of the game persist.
- “I give massive props for the free model with supporter packs that expand on the game with new eras and bonus content. It's refreshing when so many games instead go the route of massive amounts of microtransactions, even in full-price games.”
- “✔ 100% free—no ads, no battle passes, just war.”
- “The fact that there are no microtransactions also makes the game better as they aren't messing with your head every time you get on.”
- “Advertising a game as completely free while hiding content behind paywalls is insulting to players' intelligence.”
- “Absolutely horrendous cash grab by bluefake42, I remember being constantly shadowbanned and insulted in his YouTube comments for stating the obvious: this game is nothing more than a scheme to get patrons, nothing less, nothing more.”
- “I know this game is in 'early access', but you know when the gaming industry is going downhill when things like 'it's free' and 'no microtransactions/no predatory monetization' are marketing tactics and reasons to play the game.”
humor
50 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is frequently highlighted as a standout feature, with players enjoying the absurdity of glitches, friendly fire incidents, and the antics of both AI and other players. Many reviews mention the game's goofy moments and the lighthearted interactions within the community, making it a source of laughter despite its flaws. Overall, the humor adds a fun and entertaining layer to the gameplay experience, even amidst criticisms of technical issues.
- “This game isn't that bad as people sometimes say. I do enjoy committing war crimes at poor soldiers the whole time, which for me is fun, and the bugs are funny.”
- “It is a lot of damn fun, chilled laid-back fighting, and it's considerably goofy at times, which makes for some hilarious moments. The people in-game talking are always chill.”
- “The best part of the game, apart from it being and having mods you can download and play, is the fact that friendly fire incidents are funny. You can just continuously shoot your own teammates and cause a friendly fire incident; it's even funnier if more people join.”
grinding
30 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
10%
67%
23%
Reviews indicate that grinding in the game is a significant time commitment, often described as tedious and requiring excessive effort, with many players feeling it detracts from the overall experience. While some enjoy the grind against bots, the gameplay is criticized for being slow and frustrating, compounded by technical issues and a lack of polish. Overall, the grinding aspect is seen as a major hurdle that may deter players from fully engaging with the game.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “Game play is slow and tedious.”
- “Update: the game is garbage and not worth the tedious effort to play with jank all over the place. I am tired of the excuses that it's a free game; hit registration is terrible, and not to mention hacking hasn't been thwarted even though the player base complained for months about it.”
- “Honestly, had high hopes for this. Even in its current early build, it's pretty awful. The ballistics are terrible; you can land shots and they will not register, have your bullets stopped by a literal leaf, etc. Past that, there is no focus key for shooting, so you have to manage every shot, and it gets tedious with the insane recoil on every gun.”
replayability
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
61%
22%
The game's replayability is a mixed bag; while some players find it highly replayable due to extensive modding support and community features, others criticize it for lacking depth and variety in gameplay modes. Suggestions for improvement include adding diverse game modes and addressing historical inaccuracies, as many feel the current experience becomes repetitive and boring quickly. Overall, the reliance on mods for replayability indicates a need for more inherent content to sustain player interest.
- “O:hd provides a large-scale tactical shooter experience that offers features that the games industry has been neglecting, such as community servers and modding support. This allows you to modify many aspects of the game, play offline with AI bots, and enjoy a truly replayable experience.”
- “The ease of access to modding the game gives it a lot of replayability.”
- “Definitively an early access game, but it bridges the gap and is a better version of Squad with more replayability due to multiple conflict periods.”
- “Buggy game with zero depth or replayability.”
- “It's just run-shoot-die, then run-shoot-die, etc. This game has no replayability; it's not fun, it's a waste of time, a waste of gigabytes.”
- “Finally, the game doesn't have much replay value and becomes boring after a short amount of time.”
music
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
62%
19%
The music in the game is limited, primarily featuring tracks only in the main menu and at the end of matches, leading many players to feel that it lacks sufficient in-game ambiance and soundtrack. While some enjoy the existing music, they express a desire for more dynamic and engaging audio during gameplay, as well as options to manage loud or disruptive sounds from other players. Overall, the consensus is that the game would benefit from a more robust musical experience to enhance immersion.
- “I relaxed for 5 minutes listening to this music, long enough to realize that I would be okay.”
- “A soundtrack to liven the gameplay.”
- “I would also want some cool music when battling or something.”
- “The only time there will be any kind of music is either the main menu before joining a game or at the freeze screen at the end of a game where it displays the winning team.”
- “Music is too loud when you start it.”
- “Add music, or at least ambiance.”
atmosphere
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
13%
20%
The atmosphere of the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising its detailed maps, sound design, and overall ambiance, while others criticize it for being too bright, lacking immersive background noise, and feeling soulless. Many users suggest that improvements in sound effects and environmental details could enhance the chaotic and immersive experience expected from a war game. Overall, while there is potential for a captivating atmosphere, it currently falls short for some players.
- “Pretty fun, can be very janky but it gets the atmosphere perfect.”
- “The general ambiance and atmosphere of the game is really on point with the sounds and visuals!”
- “Game: releases for free, has detailed maps, realistic gun models, an incredible atmosphere and possibly the most potential out of any free game to ever release with the ability for workshop mods to change the game to its core.”
- “It's soulless and has no atmosphere.”
- “The game is very good, especially for a free-to-play game, but one problem I'm having is the atmosphere. I wish it had a more chaotic feeling instead of feeling like you're getting shot by peanuts. That's kind of the only thing killing it for me at the moment. For a war game, it's too quiet and peaceful. I think all it needs is redesigned sounds to make it more hellish and chaotic, and I bet people will like this game more.”
- “Animations, map design, sound atmosphere, vehicles, etc., but everything takes time.”
emotional
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a deep emotional connection to the game, highlighting its well-developed characters and compelling protagonist, which evoke feelings of nostalgia and investment in their journeys. The game's mechanics and community dynamics elicit a mix of heartwarming and heartbreaking experiences, with some players desiring even more intense emotional impacts, such as the portrayal of loss and moral dilemmas. Overall, the emotional resonance of the game is a significant aspect, leaving players feeling both uplifted and reflective.
- “The characters are well-developed and relatable, making it easy to become emotionally invested in their journey.”
- “The protagonist's journey is particularly compelling, showcasing not just physical prowess but also emotional depth and moral dilemmas.”
- “It is free and I still want to cry and complain that this game doesn't hug and kiss me at night.”
character development
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
Character development in the game is well-paced, effectively balancing tension with moments that allow for growth and strategic planning. While the overall character design is praised, some players feel that improvements in animation and viewmodel could enhance the experience further.
- “Additionally, the pacing is spot-on, balancing moments of tension with brief respites that allow for character development and strategic planning.”
- “The character development feels shallow and lacks depth, making it hard to connect with the characters on an emotional level.”
- “There are moments where character arcs seem rushed, leaving little room for meaningful growth or transformation.”
- “The dialogue often feels forced and doesn't contribute to character development, making interactions feel flat and unengaging.”

Skip Game Offers

Buy Operation: Harsh Doorstop

Operation: Harsh Doorstop
See offer on Steam

7h Median play time

21719h Average play time

3-12h Spent by most gamers

*Based on 21 analyzed playthroughs

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Operation: Harsh Doorstop

75%16.7kreviews

POLYGON

2020

Open World Shooter

45%1.9kreviews

CROWZ

2022

Open World Shooter

74%21.7kreviews

Bodycam

2024

Strategy

80%31.5kreviews

Zero Hour

2024

Tactical Shooter

60%29kreviews

World War 3

2022

Shooter

More games like Operation: Harsh Doorstop

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Operation: Harsh Doorstop is a tactical shooter game with warfare theme.

Operation: Harsh Doorstop is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 21719 hours playing Operation: Harsh Doorstop.

Operation: Harsh Doorstop was released on February 15, 2023.

Operation: Harsh Doorstop was developed by Drakeling Labs.

Operation: Harsh Doorstop has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its optimization.

Operation: Harsh Doorstop is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include POLYGON, CROWZ, Bodycam, Zero Hour, World War 3 and others.

Operation: Harsh Doorstop

Platforms

About

Buy Operation: Harsh Doorstop