Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade

Multiplayer combat but possibly more of a battle against the game.

Starting at $6.99Buy now

Based on the extensive universe of Warhammer 40,000, Eternal Crusade will take gamers into a vicious battle between four factions of the 41st millennium in order to control a persistent world at war. Whether it is PvP (Player versus Player) or PvE (Player versus Environment) squads will have to work together and engage in massive battles and exterminate the other factions! To do so; fans can choos…

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Reviews

50%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,479 reviews

gameplay103 positive mentions

optimization86 negative mentions

The game captures the Warhammer 40k atmosphere well, with great voice acting and detailed models.
Gameplay is fun and engaging, especially in team-based matches with friends.
The game has improved over time with updates and patches, showing potential for future growth.

The game suffers from severe balance issues, with certain factions being overpowered compared to others.
Matchmaking can be frustrating due to long wait times and unbalanced teams, often favoring experienced players.
The game is plagued by technical issues, including lag, crashes, and poor optimization, making it difficult to enjoy.

gameplay
448 mentions
23 % positive mentions
64 % neutral mentions
13 % negative mentions
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating its engaging melee and ranged combat mechanics reminiscent of titles like Gears of War and Call of Duty. However, criticisms highlight issues such as clunky controls, unbalanced classes, and repetitive gameplay, which can detract from the overall experience. While some players find enjoyment in the tactical elements and community aspects, others express frustration over technical problems and a lack of polish, suggesting that the game still requires significant improvements to reach its full potential.
- “Engaging melee and ranged gameplay.”
- “The gameplay is a lot of fun.”
- “Gameplay is great, fluent change of ranged into melee combat and the weapons are marvelous.”
- “The gameplay is not consistent enough for a full launch; sometimes you may have a fun firefight, or a decent melee duel; however, the game mechanics can make for more frequent frustrating experiences than fun ones.”
- “The gameplay itself is utterly broken; ranged weapons feel incredibly weak, and melee weapons are near instant kills. Races are largely unbalanced, in particular, Eldar possess a major advantage, online play feels like a chore and is painfully unfair to players who don't have the money to spend on a handful of high-powered weapons.”
- “The performance is extremely poor, the mechanics and interface are very clunky and unintuitive, and the gameplay is both superficial and uninspired.”
optimization
263 mentions
8 % positive mentions
60 % neutral mentions
33 % negative mentions
The game's optimization has been widely criticized, with many players reporting severe performance issues, including low frame rates and lag, even on high-end systems. While some users note that optimization has improved over time, the consensus remains that the game is still poorly optimized, requiring significant adjustments to settings for playable performance. Overall, the game's current state is deemed unacceptable for many players, leading to frustration and disappointment.
- “Optimization has come a long way as well!”
- “The performance for me so far is great as the developers keep fixing performance issues and optimization with every patch, I can max out the settings at 1080p with 40fps+ truly amazing to see a space marine in action with this!!”
- “While it is still unoptimized, lighting passes on maps still need work, etc., the core of the gameplay here is rock solid and well worth picking up.”
- “I bought in early and was extremely disappointed by the graphics and lack of optimization. At the time, the best I could say is that it was playable, even if it looked like a PS1 game.”
- “The performance is middling; it's a bit heavy for how it looks.”
- “The game is poorly optimized, set to the highest graphics setting and resolution, and plays at a crawl with a terrible frame rate.”
graphics
221 mentions
22 % positive mentions
64 % neutral mentions
14 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with many players noting that they appear dated and poorly optimized, often resembling visuals from previous console generations. While some appreciate the aesthetic and detail in certain elements, others criticize the overall performance, experiencing significant lag and low frame rates even on high-end systems. Overall, the consensus suggests that while the graphics have potential, they currently fall short of modern standards and require substantial improvement.
- “The graphics are stunning and the playstyle is good.”
- “The attention to detail in effects, graphics, and dialogue is superb.”
- “The graphics are very slick and the art style is coherent.”
- “I bought in early and was extremely disappointed by the graphics and lack of optimization. At the time, the best I could say is that it was playable, even if it looked like a PS1 game.”
- “The graphics are very slick, but the art style is coherent. However, the game runs poorly and is graphically underwhelming all around.”
- “The graphics are outdated at best, and the game has seen improvement but it still looks graphically substandard and mechanically feels clunky.”
stability
140 mentions
4 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
96 % negative mentions
The game's stability is widely criticized, with players reporting numerous bugs, glitches, and performance issues that significantly hinder gameplay. Many reviews highlight the unbalanced factions and matchmaking problems, exacerbated by a dwindling player base, leading to long queue times and frustrating experiences. While some players find enjoyment despite these issues, the consensus is that the game remains a buggy and unfinished product, lacking the promised content and polish.
- “Get in, and the game runs great.”
- “The PvE mode is finally fixed and apparently bug-free from my current experiences.”
- “Currently, the game looks great and it runs great.”
- “The game is dead; when it first released, I was so excited and hopeful, but as time went by, the game never really improved and slowly died as the player base decreased. It's a shame since the game had a lot of potential, but with factions being unbalanced population-wise, the wars became really one-sided. The game is buggy and needs a lot of work, more content, and overall, it feels abandoned by the developers.”
- “It's awful in every way possible: horrifically buggy, laggy, broken, and with a general lack of care from the developers. It feels like a quick cash grab, and I wish I could get a full refund.”
- “The game is buggy, poorly optimized, and missing content that has been planned for the future. It's a blatant lie of a game, and I wouldn't recommend spending your money on it.”
monetization
74 mentions
4 % positive mentions
55 % neutral mentions
41 % negative mentions
The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized, with many players labeling it a "cash grab" due to the presence of expensive microtransactions for cosmetic items and gameplay advantages, despite the initial high price of the game. Players express frustration over broken promises regarding game features and the transition to a free-to-play model, which still includes costly in-game purchases. Overall, the monetization approach has significantly damaged the developers' credibility and the game's reputation among its community.
- “Since the game is free-to-play, there are microtransactions, but they're only cosmetic. Weapons come in the form of master-crafted items, which have slightly less recoil or a slight increase in durability. Master-crafted weapons are easily unlocked by playing the game, so it's more pay-to-skip than anything.”
- “I would also like to point out that the microtransactions in this game are purely cosmetic, unlike another title from this universe that has $20+ DLC for unit packs.”
- “The microtransactions are rife and cost a fortune. If you want to customize your marine to represent the vast factions and styles in 40k, prepare to spend a small fortune.”
- “It lasted too long to be called a cash grab, but it was certainly closer to a cash grab than a genuine attempt to follow through on the vision that was promised to fans.”
- “Game isn't terrible, but the controversy at launch regarding broken promises to backers and really scummy in-game purchases completely tanked the dev's credibility.”
- “The worst thing is that the original goals stated for the game were completely changed and we now have a full retail price game with microtransactions.”
story
45 mentions
9 % positive mentions
78 % neutral mentions
13 % negative mentions
The game's story aspect is widely criticized for its lack of depth and narrative, with many reviewers noting that it offers no meaningful backstory or campaign mode, reducing the experience to a series of multiplayer battles and basic PvE missions. Players express disappointment over the absence of a cohesive storyline, which they feel is a missed opportunity for a franchise rich in lore. Overall, the consensus is that the game feels incomplete and lacks the immersive storytelling that fans of the Warhammer 40,000 universe expect.
- “Now it's an entirely different story, and if you're a fan of the Warhammer 40,000 universe, it's an experience like no other.”
- “I hope the developers are still working on improving and expanding the game for a while as a whole, adding new stuff and vehicles and also better new player missions or something to teach newbies.”
- “Unlike most other 40k titles, this one doesn't have some edgy grimdark backstory to set the scene as to why all of these factions are fighting each other on this one particular planet.”
- “In fact, it has absolutely no story at all.”
- “Absolutely zero story and a terrible trailer that was basically slapped together the night before they announced the game's release.”
humor
34 mentions
94 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
6 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is a standout feature, with players enjoying both intentional comedic elements and the unintentional hilarity stemming from glitches and gameplay mechanics. Many reviews highlight the amusing interactions within the community, particularly among ork players who often role-play, adding to the game's charm. Despite its flaws and the developers' shortcomings, the humor keeps players engaged and entertained, making the experience enjoyable even amidst criticism.
- “Hilarious to see this as free to play now.”
- “The devs overpromised and underperformed on a regular basis, while making excuses and 'funny' jokes about how stupid and crazy they themselves are on the news page.”
- “Orkz are probably one of the best communities since they are usually in character and it's hilarious; they are by far the least upset about things.”
- “This 'game' (I use that term in the loosest sense possible) needs so much development it's really not funny; in fact, it's quite sad.”
- “I would wait for the game to be out; it is so unbalanced it's not funny.”
grinding
24 mentions
0 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
100 % negative mentions
Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and frustrating, particularly at higher levels where progression can feel unbalanced and unrewarding. While some enjoy the cooperative elements and the sense of achievement that comes from grinding, many express dissatisfaction with the excessive time required to unlock weapons, abilities, and gear, often leading to a sense of monotony. Overall, the grinding is seen as a significant drawback, detracting from the overall enjoyment of the game.
- “Don't forget that the in-game economy has gradually crumbled into a freemium system with dual currencies, loot crates, and soul-withering amounts of grinding required to rank up past level 3.”
- “A lot of the game is grinding to unlock better mods, abilities, and items, but beyond that, nothing really worthwhile.”
- “After you reach the maximum level cap (level 6 or tier 6), there isn't much you can do afterwards than grinding and getting loot crates for the equipment to just have everything.”
atmosphere
18 mentions
33 % positive mentions
50 % neutral mentions
17 % negative mentions
The atmosphere of the game is a significant highlight, with many players praising its strong representation of the Warhammer 40,000 universe, capturing its grim and violent essence effectively. While some critiques mention a lack of immersion in certain environments, the overall presentation, including unique race dynamics and tactical elements, contributes to a compelling and original atmosphere that resonates well with fans of the franchise. Visuals and player interactions further enhance the immersive experience, making it a standout feature of the game.
- “The game captures the 40k atmosphere very well.”
- “This game's atmosphere is amazing.”
- “I love this game's atmosphere and presentation.”
- “This game lacks atmosphere and immersion; it lacks the feel of it being 40k. For example, the environment should feature shiny cathedrals with golden skulls, and the absence of actual imperial-looking urban areas on an imperial world doesn't help.”
- “I love Warhammer, I love the general atmosphere, and I love the bizarre mix of melee and ranged combat that comes with the subject matter dealing with science fantasy knights... a subject I desperately wish had wider appeal, so I wouldn't have to keep coming back to this pile of garbage time and time again, like a battered spouse.”
- “Only with WH40K atmosphere.”
replayability
9 mentions
33 % positive mentions
33 % neutral mentions
33 % negative mentions
Overall, the game's replayability is mixed; while some players appreciate the variety of classes and potential for future expansions to enhance replay value, others criticize the current lack of content and performance issues that diminish long-term engagement. Many feel that once everything is unlocked, there is little incentive to continue playing, especially in its early access state.
- “A lot of replayability, many classes, weapons, etc.”
- “Sure it's not exactly the original concept, but they plan to work on that down the line while using the game in its finished state as a stepping stone to launch into their expansions that will only further the replayability and entertainment one can get from this game.”
- “Space marines, chaos space marines, eldar, and orks are playable races, each with 5 classes.”
- “Terrible performance across computers of all types, little to no replayability after unlocking everything unless you're part of a guild, and the developers have all but given up but refuse to show it.”
- “The original Doom had more replay value.”
- “It's pretty much exactly the same as the Star Wars Battlefront that just came out, in that it has zero replay value after you quit for the first time.”
music
4 mentions
75 % positive mentions
-25 % neutral mentions
50 % negative mentions
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising the quality of the voice acting and music as decent, while others found it to be mediocre and unremarkable. Overall, the music contributes positively to the atmosphere but does not stand out significantly in the overall experience.
- “The music and voiceover are quite good.”
- “Voice acting, music, graphics, map design, and environment are decent, to be honest.”
- “The game has some good aspects: at times, it offers a visually surprising description of the WH40K world, along with decent music.”
- “Everything about this is horrible: gameplay, music, sounds, menus, and the arena gameplay.”
- “The game got some things good too: at times, visually surprisingly good description of the WH40K world, even if in small patches, decent music and mediocre fun for a complete beginner with no clue of anything.”
character development
4 mentions
75 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
25 % negative mentions
Character development in the game is noted for its high-quality voice acting, animation, and design, appealing particularly to fans of the 40k universe. However, players feel the game falls short of expectations, as it is more akin to a team-based arena shooter with limited character progression, primarily revolving around skills that enhance equipment management rather than deep character growth.
- “The game idea and overall map and character design is great for people who are into the 40k universe.”
- “The voice acting, animation work, and character design are top-tier gold!”
- “Some character development includes skills that reduce the cost of equipment, allowing you to equip or make room for other items, trinkets, and so on.”
- “So at present, the game isn't what everyone had hoped or expected, as I believe it was originally marketed as an MMO, whereas it's presently more comparable to a drop-in team-based arena shooter (like Team Fortress 2) with progression; some character development (such as skills which reduce the cost of equipment allowing you to equip/make room for other items, trinkets, and so on).”
emotional
3 mentions
100 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
Users express a deep emotional connection to the game, highlighting the heartfelt communication from developers and their own disappointment over unmet expectations. The longing for a quality Warhammer game adds to the sense of heartbreak felt by fans.
- “I also saw the heartfelt announcements and apologies, and statements of determination that the devs gave us.”
- “As a fan, it's heartbreaking to think how good this game could be, that it should be after all this time in development.”
- “Which is heartbreaking because I am dying for a good Warhammer game!”