Survivals: Battle Royale

About

Survivals: Battle Royale is a multiplayer action adventure game. It was developed by momoStorm Entertainment and was released on August 29, 2018. It received negative reviews from players.

SURVIVORS: Battle Royale is a last-man-standing third person shooter game. Players are taken as prisoners and thrown to an abandoned island. Players must fight with whaterever they can find on the island. Whoever survivals to be the last lone survior wins the game.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

36%

Audience ScoreBased on 168 reviews

graphics5 positive mentions

gameplay6 negative mentions

The game has a unique top-down battle royale concept that some players find enjoyable.
It runs well on low-end PCs, making it accessible to a wider audience.
Some players appreciate the potential for improvement and hope for future updates.

The controls and aiming mechanics are poorly designed, making gameplay frustrating.
Many matches are filled with bots, leading to a lack of genuine competition.
The game suffers from numerous bugs and connectivity issues, making it difficult to play.

gameplay
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
31%
46%
The gameplay has received mixed feedback, with players noting an unusual camera system that requires adjustment and limits visibility, as well as a cumbersome aiming mechanic that detracts from the experience. While some appreciate the game's setup and find it fun, many criticize the lack of content, poor graphics, and various bugs, leading to an overall feeling that the gameplay is unpolished and in need of significant improvements.
- “Cool game! Love the setup and gameplay; it's easy and fun.”
- “The game is a lot better but is lacking a lot of content; they have balanced some things and some mechanics.”
- “This affects the line of sight mechanic (which I actually like) because if you try to give some space, you can no longer see them at all.”
- “Firstly, the camera is unusual and it takes some time to get used to. The game uses a view cone, and you won't see any people or items behind you until you turn your view cone to face them (which is not necessarily a bad mechanic). For some reason, the game uses a mouse pointer, so you have to hold right-click to aim.”
- “It is still in early access, but the core mechanics need to be reworked to achieve a premium feel.”
- “Your player has very limited vision, sprint is limited, and you are deaf too, because you don't know where shots are fired. You can't see what's under your feet, the aiming mechanic is frustrating, and there are no jumps.”
graphics
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
20%
30%
Overall, the graphics of the game are generally well-received, with many praising the cel-shading and cartoon style. However, there are notable concerns regarding clipping issues and the need for overall visual improvements, particularly in relation to server stability and visibility mechanics. While some users rated the graphics highly, others highlighted the necessity for enhancements to meet player expectations.
- “The graphics are good.”
- “Graphics: 10/10 - fits the game well.”
- “Nice cel-shading/cartoon graphics.”
- “Besides that, some key points the game needs to work on are server stability, graphics, and mainly what the consumer base is asking for.”
- “The graphics have clipping issues that need to be addressed.”
- “They need to improve the visuals overall for the game.”
stability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability has been a mixed experience for players, with initial launch issues including numerous glitches and bugs. While some users report that many of these problems have been addressed, others still encounter significant gameplay disruptions, indicating that stability remains a concern for many. Overall, the game is playable but continues to suffer from notable stability issues.
- “Glitchy and buggy.”
- “Very buggy at the moment.”
- “You can't shoot, and the gameplay is really poor and buggy.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The review humorously critiques the game's story by comparing its value unfavorably to toilet paper, suggesting that the narrative is not worth the price and leaves players feeling dissatisfied. The reviewer expresses their frustration with the game's quality and their inability to return it, ultimately conveying a strong dislike for both the game and the experience it offers.
- “The story feels disjointed and lacks coherence, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “I found the plot to be predictable and uninspired, which really detracted from the overall experience.”
- “The character development is shallow, leaving me with little emotional investment in their journeys.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the fair balance between free and paid content, while others criticize the presence of aggressive microtransactions that can hinder gameplay. Overall, the approach to monetization appears to impact player experience significantly, with calls for more transparency and value in paid features.
- “The monetization system feels overly aggressive, pushing players to spend money just to enjoy basic features.”
- “I find the in-game purchases to be excessively priced, making it hard to progress without shelling out real cash.”
- “The constant prompts to buy premium currency disrupt the gameplay experience and make it feel more like a cash grab than a game.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
The game is praised for its strong optimization, with users reporting no stuttering or graphical issues during gameplay.
- “No stuttering - no graphical issues.”
- “The game runs smoothly on my system, even at high settings.”
- “I appreciate how well-optimized the game is; it really enhances the overall experience.”
- “The game runs smoothly, but the optimization is lacking in certain areas.”
- “I experienced frequent frame drops, which really detracted from the overall experience.”
- “Despite the beautiful graphics, the optimization issues make it hard to enjoy the game fully.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Many users express frustration with the grinding required to develop even basic characters, deeming it excessive and unnecessary.
- “It's a lot of grinding just to be a basic character, which I find frustrating.”
- “The amount of grinding required to progress feels excessive and tedious.”
- “I feel like I'm stuck in an endless loop of grinding without any real reward.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game largely stems from its numerous glitches and bugs, which players find amusingly excessive, suggesting that the developers were aware of these issues prior to release.