Skip to main content

About

Warmode is a free-to-play, multiplayer shooter that pits two opposing factions against each other in fast-paced, action-packed battles. Choose your side between government military housings and armed hirelings, and engage in virtual combat with intense dynamics reminiscent of classic shooters. Experience off-scale battles and hurricane gameplay for an unforgettable shooter experience.

WARMODE screenshot
WARMODE screenshot
WARMODE screenshot
WARMODE screenshot
WARMODE screenshot
WARMODE screenshot
WARMODE screenshot

58%
Audience ScoreBased on 13,138 reviews
gameplay260 positive mentions
graphics242 negative mentions

  • Warmode offers fast-paced action and intuitive controls, making it accessible for players of varying skill levels.
  • The game features a strong community-driven gameplay experience and allows for significant character customization.
  • Many players find the humor in the game's glitches and shortcomings entertaining, leading to a 'so bad it's good' experience.
  • The game suffers from poor optimization, numerous bugs, and a lack of engaging content, leading to a repetitive experience.
  • Graphics are widely criticized as outdated and lacking detail, detracting from the overall experience.
  • The game's stability is a significant issue, with frequent glitches and server problems reported by many players.
  • graphics
    910 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game have received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users citing them as a significant deficiency. Common complaints include outdated visuals reminiscent of games from the early 2000s, poor animations, and a lack of detail, which detracts from the overall experience. While some players find the graphics tolerable for a free-to-play title, the consensus is that substantial improvements are needed to meet modern standards.

    • “The graphics are dope, making you feel like you're in the midst of a virtual warzone.”
    • “Good game, great graphics.”
    • “The graphics are amazing and the sounds; I recommend this game.”
    • “It is disappointingly bad for those who expect advanced graphics.”
    • “The graphics are terrible, the gameplay easily becomes repetitive after just 15 minutes and the game itself feels unbalanced.”
    • “The game's graphics is incredibly bad for a 2015 free-to-play game.”
  • gameplay
    764 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of Warmode is characterized by fast-paced action and a blend of mechanics reminiscent of both Call of Duty and Counter-Strike, making it accessible for players of varying skill levels. However, many users criticize the game for its repetitive nature, poor optimization, and numerous bugs, which detract from the overall experience. While some find enjoyment in its straightforward mechanics and community-driven gameplay, others highlight significant issues with hit detection, balance, and the prevalence of hackers, leading to a mixed reception.

    • “Warmode is an absolute gem in the world of online shooters, offering an exhilarating and addictive gameplay experience that keeps players coming back for more.”
    • “The intuitive controls and straightforward mechanics make it easy to jump right into the action, while the depth of strategy and skill ceiling ensures that there's always room for improvement and mastery.”
    • “With its fast-paced action, diverse gameplay modes, and active community, it offers hours of entertainment and excitement.”
    • “The gameplay is nothing special; it's a budget version of CS:GO, to be honest.”
    • “The graphics are terrible, the gameplay easily becomes repetitive after just 15 minutes, and the game itself feels unbalanced.”
    • “This game is horrible; if you like the shittiest spawns, physics, sounds, and gameplay, go ahead.”
  • stability
    216 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous players reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and server issues that significantly detract from the overall experience. Many users experienced game freezes, unresponsive menus, and game-breaking glitches, leading to frustration and, in some cases, uninstallation. While some find the glitches amusing and the game enjoyable despite its flaws, the consensus is that it requires substantial improvements to reach its potential.

    • “Great game for low-end PCs/laptops; it runs great.”
    • “The game is very fun and runs great!”
    • “The game is very fun and runs great!”
    • “I found this game to be pretty buggy, and overall a bad experience; I ended up removing it from my Steam account.”
    • “This game is super buggy and there are too many hackers.”
    • “This game is a buggy mess and the only thing that works is the uninstall button, which does so flawlessly.”
  • humor
    152 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in this game is widely appreciated, with many players finding it hilariously bad and entertaining due to its glitches, janky mechanics, and absurd gameplay. Users report having a great time laughing at the game's shortcomings, often comparing it to a "so bad it's good" experience, especially when playing with friends. Overall, while the game may not be technically sound, its comedic value and the fun derived from its flaws make it a memorable experience for many players.

    • “Funny story; I missed my SAT to determine which college I go to because I was playing this game XD.”
    • “Fun and glitchy as all hell, but the glitches make the game absolutely hilarious.”
    • “Horrible game, but hilarious and 'so bad it's good'.”
    • “Hackers are everywhere; it's not funny.”
  • optimization
    110 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its smooth performance and low system requirements, while others criticize it for significant framerate issues, input lag, and poor hit detection. Many users note that the game is playable on various hardware, but it still requires substantial improvements to fully optimize the experience, especially for low-end PCs. Overall, while some find it well-optimized, a considerable number of players express frustration over its optimization shortcomings.

    • “It runs absolutely fine on anything; it's well optimized.”
    • “This game is incredibly easy for anyone who has any skill at an FPS; however, even so, the game handles like a dream, and it's incredibly well optimized.”
    • “This game is very fun to play overall, and extremely optimized.”
    • “Terrible optimization, have to spend money, hackers.”
    • “Badly optimized, completely unplayable, no players and low framerate even on 1280x720.”
    • “Horrible optimization.”
  • monetization
    90 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's monetization model primarily consists of cosmetic microtransactions, which are generally viewed as non-intrusive and not pay-to-win. However, some players express frustration with the abundance of in-game purchases and perceive the monetization strategy as a cash grab, detracting from the overall experience. While many appreciate that the microtransactions do not affect gameplay, the implementation and balance of the game itself have drawn mixed reviews.

    • “The game's monetization model includes microtransactions for cosmetic items and character customization.”
    • “Microtransactions were done perfectly as well; it's only cosmetics.”
    • “This game is better than some other free-to-play shooters because you don't have many microtransactions; the only microtransactions that you have are purely cosmetic and cost roughly $0.99, which in my opinion is great.”
    • “This also comes with in-game purchases and a whole lot of them... see this as a positive or a negative yourself but personally, I am never a fan of these cosmetic purchases.”
    • “There are microtransactions, which is a very poor attempt at nabbing money.”
    • “If the game was like the video I would like it. It pains me to write these reviews when I can see potential; why can't we have the video's game rather than this cash grab attempt of CS:GO?”
  • story
    58 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's storytelling is largely criticized for being minimal or non-existent, with many players noting a lack of engaging narratives and plot twists. While some reviews highlight a unique aspect of the game, such as its visuals, they still emphasize that the story does not significantly enhance the overall experience. Overall, the consensus suggests that the game prioritizes gameplay over storytelling, leaving many players wanting more depth in its narrative.

    • “The shadows are the most unique thing I've ever seen while the story is crisp and incredible and extremely sad at the end; I won't spoil it.”
    • “The character models shine almost as much as the great gameplay, and the story complements the beautiful gameplay.”
    • “Dialogue and story-heavy games from 'back in the day' like Planescape: Torment can get away with being mechanically outdated because that's not why you pick them up.”
    • “The game's storytelling and modes are not interesting and diverse.”
    • “There is no story in this game.”
    • “Single-player's a bit meh – needs more plot twists, fewer bots.”
  • music
    38 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the ambient tracks and menu music, while others criticize the lack of a diverse soundtrack and repetitive tunes. Many users express frustration over the absence of options to adjust or mute the music, leading to a perception of it being either annoying or insufficient. Overall, while some find the music enjoyable and fitting, others feel it detracts from the gaming experience due to its limitations.

    • “Cool sound tracks.”
    • “The music you hear when you start up the game is nice.”
    • “The frustration of losing levels is filled with relaxation and calmness because of the ambient music.”
    • “First off, there seems to be no soundtrack to the game, with menus being devoid of any sound and even voice lines being completely absent.”
    • “The menu music keeps repeating over, over, and over again.”
    • “The game was lacking music though which made it too silent.”
  • grinding
    20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviews indicate that the grinding aspect of the game can be quite tedious and repetitive, often described as a long grind that may require significant time investment for rewards. While some players find satisfaction in the process of earning better weapons, others criticize the lack of variation and progression, making the experience feel monotonous. Overall, the grind is seen as a mixed bag, with some enjoyment derived from the gameplay despite its repetitive nature.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “There is no grinding to unlock guns - each round you start with a pistol and have to earn money to buy better guns, all of them available from the start.”
    • “One long, tedious grind.”
    • “I haven't really counted, but there's not too much variation and it's getting repetitive and quite tedious after a 30m-1h session.”
    • “Man, grinding for a good gun is so slow.”
  • emotional
    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players report a strong emotional connection to the game, experiencing a wide range of feelings from laughter to tears. The gameplay evokes nostalgia and empowerment, with moments that resonate deeply, such as the impactful famas reload. Overall, the game fosters a sense of catharsis and personal achievement, even in the face of competitive challenges.

    • “I cried.”
    • “I laughed, I cried.”
    • “This game made me feel like a killer again.”
  • replayability
    10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's replayability is widely criticized, with many reviewers citing it as a significant issue due to its lack of engaging content and variety. While some players find it fun and worth downloading, the overall consensus is that it suffers from minimal replay value and could benefit from additional game modes.

    • “Nothing to complain about, worth the download, fun, free, replayable, could use some more game modes.”
    • “Replayability is the game's biggest problem.”
    • “Well, if you've played a shooter with minimal replayability, you've played this one.”
    • “It has many shortcomings such as storytelling, graphics quality, sound, multiplayer experience, replayability, price and content balance, technical issues, and the need for improvement.”
  • atmosphere
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviewers consistently highlight the game's atmosphere as a standout feature, noting that maps like Pityat contribute to a varied and immersive experience. The combination of diverse levels and ample map space enhances the overall ambiance, making it a key aspect of the gameplay.

    • “The map varies in levels and has a good atmosphere, along with decent map space.”
    • “Great atmosphere.”
  • character development
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players appreciate the character development aspect for its emphasis on customization, allowing them to design their own soldiers with various clothing, masks, and accessories, as well as modify weapons with optics and variants. This level of personalization enhances player engagement and investment in their characters.

Buy WARMODE

6h Median play time
114h Average play time
4-10h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 32 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Games Like WARMODE

Black Squad Image
War Trigger 3 Image
Line of Sight Image
S.K.I.L.L.: Special Force 2 Image
Hired Ops Image
Last Man Standing Image
Blockpost Image
Infestation: The New Z Image
Ironsight Image
BlackShot Image