Skip to main content

War Trigger 3

57%Game Brain Score
gameplay, humor
graphics, stability
57% User Score Based on 7,746 reviews

Platforms

PCPCiPhoneiPhoneWindowsWindowsMac OSMac OSMobile PlatformMobile PlatformiPadiPadPhonePhone

About

"War Trigger 3" is a multiplayer military shooter game featuring modern weapons and vehicles. Players can compete in various game modes, including Search and Destroy, Territories, Conquer, Survivor, Team Deathmatch: Resources, and Team Deathmatch: Armored. Matches support up to 24 players in arenas designed for infantry, vehicle, and air combat. Character Count: 200

57%
Audience ScoreBased on 7,746 reviews
gameplay186 positive mentions
graphics344 negative mentions

  • The game offers a nostalgic experience for players who enjoyed Red Crucible 2, with familiar gameplay mechanics and maps.
  • It's a free-to-play game that can run on low-end PCs, making it accessible to a wider audience.
  • The variety of vehicles and weapons adds an enjoyable layer of gameplay, allowing for different playstyles.
  • The game is heavily criticized for being pay-to-win, with many players feeling that purchasing weapons and upgrades is necessary to compete effectively.
  • There are numerous bugs and glitches that affect gameplay, including issues with hit detection and vehicle physics.
  • The player base has significantly dwindled, leading to long wait times for matches and a lack of community engagement.
  • graphics
    1,010 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game have received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users describing them as outdated, poor, and reminiscent of early 2000s titles. While some players acknowledge that the gameplay can be enjoyable despite the graphics, the overall consensus is that significant improvements are needed to meet modern standards. Many reviews suggest that the graphics detract from the overall experience, making it difficult for players to fully engage with the game.

    • “Wt3 has extremely precise gunplay and real graphics, making it feel like I myself am in a war in real life.”
    • “Even though this game went p2w, it's still fun and has good graphics when they're maxed out.”
    • “This is an amazing game with great graphics and runs really well on both my PC and laptop.”
    • “As the updates came into being, the graphics tanked, aiming became buggy, and the frame rate was given a horrible blow.”
    • “The graphics are horrible, there are only a few games going on at each time.”
    • “This game is budget Russian battlefield with graphics from the PlayStation 1.”
  • gameplay
    570 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing disappointment over its perceived decline compared to earlier versions. Critics highlight issues such as clunky mechanics, a pay-to-win model, and unbalanced gameplay, while some players still find enjoyment in its nostalgic elements and vehicle mechanics. Overall, the gameplay is described as inconsistent, with some praising its fun aspects while others criticize it for being slow, unintuitive, and reminiscent of outdated titles.

    • “The biggest nostalgia and the best gameplay, I highly recommend.”
    • “Greatly enjoy playing, not as many people on as there used to be, but would rank the game five stars for gameplay; once you get the hang of it, it is amazing.”
    • “Gameplay exceeded my expectations.”
    • “It also seems to be abandoned, and with the updates that the devs made only seemed to downgrade the gameplay.”
    • “Gun mechanics are completely lacking, have to pay or grind to even get a chance to use vehicles or new guns, maps are just awful (I can make exceptions but not for the overall product), plenty of hackers and not so many players, and lastly it's just a plain old 'oh this looks cool *5 mins later* why did I play this?' type of experience.”
    • “The gameplay is horrible, it's like 2 out of 10 and it's far far far away from COD or BF.”
  • stability
    140 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is heavily criticized, with numerous reports of bugs, glitches, and crashes that significantly detract from the overall experience. Many players express frustration over persistent performance issues, including low frame rates and server problems, while some find the glitches amusing or nostalgic. Overall, the consensus is that the game is currently unpolished and requires substantial improvements to enhance stability and gameplay.

    • “Best game ever, very fun, never boring, and about 85% bug-free.”
    • “Free to play and no glitches!”
    • “I have a low-end PC, and it runs great on small maps. If you're like me, I would recommend this.”
    • “Well, apart from it being mostly a buggy pay-to-win mess, I also can't even launch the game without it crashing anymore. Don't bother trying to play this game if you wish to keep your sanity.”
    • “This game, at the condition that it is in while making this review, is not recommendable. It is buggy, has barely any settings that are essential to an FPS game, looks terrible, and is overall barely playable.”
    • “This game is buggy as hell and broken to bits.”
  • optimization
    102 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many players reporting severe performance issues, including crashes, input lag, and unstable frame rates, even on high-end systems. While some users note that it runs well on low-performance PCs, the overall consensus is that the game is poorly optimized, leading to a frustrating experience exacerbated by microtransactions and a lack of focus on improving performance. Many players express a desire for the developers to prioritize optimization in future updates.

    • “I like how it's a shooter game, a massive multiplayer game and how it runs smoothly.”
    • “This is a very good game, but it needs more updates or rather optimization.”
    • “I have read through discussions on the store page, and it seems that some people are having optimization issues, but I have a fairly decent laptop and can run it on high textures, with anti-aliasing.”
    • “The game is so poorly optimized that even though high graphics looks like absolute crap, it still lags a lot.”
    • “This game has to be the worst optimized game I have ever played.”
    • “The game suffers from graphic optimization; even with a GTX 970, the game freezes, and with a 100 mb optic fiber connection, we experience rubber banding, and the mouse smoothing is awful.”
  • humor
    74 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is largely derived from its poor graphics, glitchy mechanics, and absurd voice acting, which many players find entertaining. Users report laughing at the game's various bugs and the ridiculous situations that arise during gameplay, such as comical vehicle interactions and exaggerated character actions. Overall, while the game is criticized for its quality, it is praised for providing light-hearted fun and laughter, especially when played with friends.

    • “This game is amazing and funny... I keep laughing when playing this game... for example, I throw a grenade at the door and later I go out and die when the enemy comes in and the explosive bomb sends the enemy flying toward my screen... that made me laugh so hard.”
    • “This game is a hilarious potato game. If you have a really bad PC but want to play shooting games, this is one to try. The graphics suck, the game is hilarious, the sounds are awful, but hey, it's something. I spent quite a few hours on it; it makes me laugh a lot. Just fly onto a roof, sit there RPG blowing people up... it's so funny. 90% of the players here are really noobs at the game, so it's mostly just light-hearted fun trolling people.”
    • “If you don't spend a single penny on this game and just mess around and enjoy how bad it is, it's actually kind of funny.”
  • monetization
    72 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players criticizing the prevalence of microtransactions and labeling it as a "pay-to-win" experience. While some users appreciate that the game is free and can be played without spending money, they express frustration over the imbalance created by in-game purchases that can significantly enhance gameplay. Overall, the sentiment leans towards dissatisfaction, with calls for a one-time purchase model instead of the current microtransaction system.

    • “Completely free games, no microtransactions, no DLC, no purchases of any sort!”
    • “Economy: you get microtransactions a bit, you can get by without them, and sometimes the devs will do a weekend where you get a pretty good gun absolutely free and permanent.”
    • “Sure you move slow, but the rest of the game is finely tuned, I like it, not to mention that it is free with little microtransactions.”
    • “Scam company and the biggest cash grab pay-to-win ever.”
    • “This game was decent to begin with, but so many weapons and in-game purchases were added to the point where this is a pay-to-play game pretty much.”
    • “You need to pay for literally everything through microtransactions.”
  • story
    68 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's storyline has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many players describing it as poorly executed and unengaging, often rating it as low as 1/10. While side missions are praised for their addictive nature and ability to enhance gameplay, they overshadow the main story, which is criticized for being lackluster and frustratingly tied to a pay-to-win model. Overall, players express a desire for a more coherent and rewarding narrative experience.

    • “These mini-epics are engaging, adding a dash of flavor to the main storyline, making it a full-course meal of gaming delight.”
    • “I love the idea of having to go up levels and complete online missions in-game to get honor (experience) and credits to buy new vehicles, guns, and appearance items.”
    • “It's like the game devs took all the fun parts, said 'screw it' and made a side quest buffet!”
    • “Story: 1/10 made me projectile vomit, it was that bad.”
    • “Story: plastic soldier/10”
  • grinding
    44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The grinding aspect of the game is heavily criticized, with players noting that it requires an excessive amount of time to earn in-game currency, often leading to a pay-to-win environment. Many feel that the grind is not worth the rewards, as superior weapons and items can take hundreds of hours to unlock without spending money. Overall, the consensus is that the game demands significant grinding, making it frustrating for those who prefer a more balanced experience.

    • “Don't waste your time grinding in this game since it'll take a lifetime before you get anywhere.”
    • “Everything they show you in the screenshots costs money, or hundreds of hours of grinding.”
    • “If I wanted to get a gun without hours of grinding, I would have to pay.”
  • music
    16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some users praising it as "badass," while others criticize it for being repetitive and lacking variety, particularly during gameplay. Overall, the soundtrack seems to be a point of contention, with ratings as low as 2/10 for its limited appeal.

    • “Make no mistake that it is still the same damn game, with some music and a graphical upgrade.”
    • “Music: 2/10 there was like one okayish menu song.”
    • “- repetitive music”
    • “Noo music when in game”
  • replayability
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game offers some replayability through various playable vehicles and character customization options, which can enhance the experience for some players. However, many users feel that overall replay value is lacking, leading to mixed opinions on this aspect.

    • “Yes, there are playable vehicles and also character customization.”
    • “To make it more playable and interesting.”
    • “The variety of options keeps me coming back for more.”
    • “- the replayability is just terrible.”
    • “- the replayability is just terrible.”
  • atmosphere
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere in the game is highly praised for its intensity and realism, particularly during multiplayer matches, which are enhanced by next-gen graphics and authentic sound design. Many players draw comparisons to the Battlefield series, noting that the game's atmosphere significantly contributes to the overall experience. Overall, the atmosphere is described as immersive and engaging, elevating the gameplay.

    • “Where Red Crucible really steps up is through its intense multiplayer matches, which, coupled with next-gen graphics and realistic weapon/vehicle sounds, creates a fantastic combat atmosphere.”
    • “The reason that I think it feels like Battlefield is because of the atmosphere it creates.”
    • “Nice game, good gameplay, and atmosphere.”
    • “The reason I think it feels like Battlefield is because of the atmosphere it creates.”
  • emotional
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional responses to the game are mixed, with some players expressing frustration and disappointment over gameplay mechanics, leading to feelings of annoyance and sickness. In contrast, others highlight poignant moments that evoke deep emotional reactions, such as tears and realizations about personal stakes, indicating that the game can elicit strong feelings despite its flaws.

    • “Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”
    • “I was about ten years old when my mother told him, "If you ever want to see your grandchildren grow up, you have to stop immediately." Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”

Buy War Trigger 3

18h Median play time
423h Average play time
6-100h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 44 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Games Like War Trigger 3

WARMODE Image
Black Squad Image
Hired Ops Image
Warface: Clutch Image
Survarium Image
This game contains adult content