War Trigger 3

About

"War Trigger 3" is a multiplayer military shooter game featuring modern weapons and vehicles. Players can compete in various game modes, including Search and Destroy, Territories, Conquer, Survivor, Team Deathmatch: Resources, and Team Deathmatch: Armored. Matches support up to 24 players in arenas designed for infantry, vehicle, and air combat. Character Count: 200

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

57%

Audience ScoreBased on 3,873 reviews

gameplay93 positive mentions

graphics172 negative mentions

graphics
505 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
47%
34%
The graphics of the game have received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users describing them as outdated, poor, and reminiscent of early 2000s titles. While some players acknowledge that the gameplay can be enjoyable despite the graphics, the consensus is that significant improvements are needed to meet modern standards. Overall, the visuals are often seen as a major drawback, detracting from the overall experience of the game.
- “Wt3 has extremely precise gunplay and real graphics, making it feel like I myself am in a war in real life.”
- “This game is a blast to play, and has a lot of content in the game, while the graphics and textures aren't the best, for a free-to-play title, and for what you get when you play the game, it is kind of worth it in my opinion.”
- “The graphics maxed out on 4k resolution is amazing.”
- “As the updates came into being, the graphics tanked, aiming became buggy, and the frame rate was given a horrible blow.”
- “Now there are rampant hacking problems, and the game looks graphically terrible in comparison to even AAA titles from 10 years ago.”
- “The graphics look like cardboard cutouts moving side to side, almost no animation value, absolutely no immersion.”
gameplay
285 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
48%
19%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing disappointment over its mechanics, which are often described as clunky, unintuitive, and reminiscent of older titles. While some players appreciate the nostalgic elements and find enjoyment in the vehicular combat and overall fun factor, others criticize the pay-to-win model, poor graphics, and lack of balance, leading to an overall perception of the gameplay as a downgrade from previous iterations. Despite these criticisms, a segment of players still finds the gameplay engaging and enjoyable, particularly after investing time to adapt to its mechanics.
- “The biggest nostalgia and the best gameplay, I highly recommend.”
- “Greatly enjoy playing, not as many people on as there used to be, but would rank the game five stars for gameplay; once you get the hang of it, it is amazing.”
- “This game has decent graphics and gameplay is a bit fun.”
- “It also seems to be abandoned, and with the updates that the devs made only seemed to downgrade the gameplay.”
- “The gameplay is horrible.”
- “The gameplay is slow and sluggish.”
stability
70 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
96%
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with numerous users reporting persistent bugs, glitches, and crashes that significantly detract from the overall experience. Many players express frustration over performance issues, including low frame rates and server problems, while some note that the game feels unpolished and riddled with hackers. Despite a few positive remarks about the humor in glitches, the consensus is that the game requires substantial improvements to its stability and performance.
- “Best game ever! Very fun, never boring, and about 85% bug-free.”
- “Free to play and no glitches!”
- “Ok, so I have a junky PC and it runs great on small maps. If you're like me, I would recommend this.”
- “Well, apart from it being mostly a buggy pay-to-win mess, I also can't even launch the game without it crashing anymore. Don't bother trying to play this game if you wish to keep your sanity.”
- “This game is not recommendable in its current condition; it is buggy, has barely any essential settings for an FPS game, looks terrible, and is overall barely playable.”
- “This game is buggy as hell and broken to bits.”
optimization
51 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
53%
39%
The game's optimization has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many players reporting severe performance issues, including crashes, lag, and stuttering, even on high-end systems. While some users note that it runs well on low-performance PCs, the general consensus is that the game has been poorly optimized, leading to a frustrating experience for many. Calls for improved optimization are frequent, indicating that this aspect significantly detracts from the overall enjoyment of the game.
- “Good game for low performance PCs.”
- “I like how it's a shooter game, a massive multiplayer game and how it runs smoothly.”
- “Decently optimized.”
- “The game is so poorly optimized that even though high graphics looks like absolute crap, it still lags a lot.”
- “This game has to be the worst optimized game I have ever played.”
- “The game suffers from graphic optimization; even with a GTX 970, the game freezes, and with a 100 mb optic fiber connection, we experience rubber banding and awful mouse smoothing.”
humor
37 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is largely derived from its glitches, poor graphics, and absurd gameplay mechanics, which many players find entertaining. Users appreciate the lighthearted fun of trolling opponents and the comedic value of the game's flaws, such as bad voice acting and ridiculous ragdoll physics. Overall, while the game may be technically lacking, its humor provides a source of enjoyment, especially when played with friends.
- “This game is amazing and funny... I keep laughing when playing this game... for example, I throw a grenade at the door and later I go out and die as the enemy comes in and the explosive bomb sends the enemy flying toward my screen... that made me laugh so hard.”
- “It's a really funny game... it's like BF3 and BO2, so it's super fun!”
- “The voice acting is downright horrible... but hilarious.”
monetization
36 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
58%
33%
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players criticizing the prevalence of microtransactions and labeling it as a "pay-to-win" experience. While some appreciate that the game is free and can be played without spending money, others feel that the in-game purchases are excessive and detrimental to gameplay balance. Overall, the sentiment leans towards disappointment, with calls for a one-time purchase model instead of the current microtransaction system.
- “Completely free games, no microtransactions, no DLC, no purchases of any sort!”
- “Sure you move slow, but the rest of the game is finely tuned, I like it, not to mention that it is free with little microtransactions.”
- “Cons include you have limited resources (grenades, smokes, airstrikes, etc.) there are in-game purchases, but you can still easily grind for money and experience and get these items. In my opinion, it's not exactly a pay-to-play game; it is balanced and the payments are not necessary to be able to beat people.”
- “Scam company and the biggest cash grab pay-to-win ever.”
- “There is a chest system, but don't let it fool you; the odds of getting the weapon the chest is advertising is around or less than 1%.”
- “This game was decent to begin with, but so many weapons and in-game purchases were added to the point where this is a pay-to-play game pretty much.”
story
34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
79%
9%
The story in "War Trigger 3" is widely criticized, with many players finding it lacking and unengaging, often describing it as a disjointed experience that detracts from the overall gameplay. While side missions are praised for their addictive nature and ability to enhance the gaming experience, the main storyline is deemed poorly executed, leading to a significant disconnect between the narrative and the gameplay. Overall, players express frustration with the story's quality, often rating it very low.
- “These mini-epics are engaging, adding a dash of flavor to the main storyline, making it a full-course meal of gaming delight.”
- “I love the idea of having to go up levels and complete online missions in-game to get honor (experience) and credits to buy new vehicles, guns, and appearance items.”
- “The game has evolved a lot in a year; there have been weapons, maps, and vehicle releases, and we are now implementing achievements and missions into the game, where you can earn up to 5,000 honor points and 50 coins from doing them.”
- “It's like the game devs took all the fun parts, said 'screw it' and made a side quest buffet!”
- “Story: 1/10 made me projectile vomit, it was that bad.”
- “Story: plastic soldier/10”
grinding
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The grinding aspect of the game is heavily criticized, with players noting that it requires an excessive amount of time to earn in-game currency, often leading to a pay-to-win environment. Many feel that the grind is not worth the rewards, as it can take hundreds of hours to unlock desirable items, while those who spend money gain significant advantages. Overall, the consensus is that the game demands far too much grinding, making it frustrating for players who prefer a more balanced experience.
- “Don't waste your time grinding in this game since it'll take a lifetime before you get anywhere.”
- “Everything they show you in the screenshots costs money, or hundreds of hours of grinding.”
- “If I wanted to get a gun without hours of grinding, I would have to pay.”
music
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
38%
50%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some users finding it either lackluster and repetitive or praising it as "badass." However, many agree that the overall experience is hindered by a clunky user interface and poor graphics, overshadowing the musical elements.
- “Make no mistake that it is still the same damn game, with some music and a graphical upgrade.”
- “Music: 2/10, there was like one okayish menu song.”
- “- repetitive music”
- “No music when in game”
replayability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The game's replayability is mixed; while some players appreciate the variety of playable vehicles and character customization options that enhance replay value, others find it lacking and describe it as "terrible."
- “Yes, there are playable vehicles and character customization, which adds to the replay value.”
- “The variety of vehicles and character customization options make the game more engaging and replayable.”
- “The game offers multiple ways to play, enhancing its replayability and keeping it interesting.”
- “- The replayability is just terrible.”
- “Replay value?”
- “Yes, there are playable vehicles and also character customization.”
atmosphere
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
25%
The atmosphere of the game is highly praised for its intensity and realism, particularly in multiplayer matches, where next-gen graphics and authentic sound design enhance the combat experience. Many users note that it evokes a similar feeling to the Battlefield series, contributing to an engaging and immersive environment. Overall, the atmosphere is considered a significant strength of the game.
- “Where Red Crucible really steps up is through its intense multiplayer matches, which, coupled with next-gen graphics and realistic weapon/vehicle sounds, creates a fantastic combat atmosphere.”
- “The reason that I think it feels like Battlefield is because of the atmosphere it creates.”
- “Nice game, good gameplay and atmosphere.”
- “The reason I think it feels like Battlefield is because of the atmosphere it creates.”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game is polarizing; while some players express frustration and disappointment with gameplay mechanics, leading to a negative experience, others recount deeply moving moments that evoke strong feelings, such as tears and personal reflections on significant life choices. This contrast highlights the game's potential to elicit both strong negative and poignant emotional responses.
- “Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”
- “I was about ten years old when my mother told him, 'If you ever want to see your grandchildren grow up, you have to stop immediately.' Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”