War Trigger 3

About

War Trigger 3 is a single player and multiplayer open world shooter game with warfare and historical themes. It was developed by Rocketeer Games Studio, LLC and was released on December 22, 2015. It received neutral reviews from players.

Compete with friends or players from around the globe using some of the world's deadliest modern weapons and vehicles. Play with up to 24 players in 6 unique arenas designed for infantry, vehicle, and air combat.

Skip User Reviews

57%

Audience ScoreBased on 3,836 reviews

gameplay92 positive mentions

graphics153 negative mentions

Free-to-play shooter with a Battlefield-like experience suitable for low-end PCs
Vehicles including tanks and helicopters add fun and variety
Game has a large variety of weapons, customization options, and several maps
Gameplay is enjoyable once you understand core mechanics
Frequent updates and active community engagement by developers

Game suffers from pay-to-win mechanics making fair competition difficult
Graphics and sound are outdated and of poor quality
Controls are clunky; issues with aiming, weapon handling, and movement
Game is plagued by hackers, spawn camping, and poor moderation
Servers have low population, high ping issues, and matchmaking problems
Game has numerous bugs, glitches, and crashes frequently

graphics
490 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
50%
31%
The game's graphics are widely criticized as outdated, low-quality, and poorly optimized, resembling visuals from early 2000s or even earlier, with some users comparing them unfavorably to classic console titles. However, several players appreciate that the simple graphics allow smooth gameplay on low-end PCs and do not detract significantly from the overall fun, especially considering the game is free-to-play. While improvements and updates are frequently requested, many reviewers emphasize that gameplay outweighs graphical shortcomings for enjoyment.
- “A thrilling sequel, War Trigger 3 outshines its predecessors with improved graphics and engaging gameplay.”
- “Stunning graphics, incredible realism, both in terms of the animations and mechanics.”
- “Fantastic game, I highly recommend it, fun gameplay, great weapons, great graphics, a game that is incredibly satisfying!”
- “As the updates came into being, the graphics tanked, aiming became buggy, and the frame rate was given a horrible blow.”
- “Now there are rampant hacking problems, and the game looks graphically terrible in comparison to even AAA titles from 10 years ago.”
- “The graphics look like 2005 and are generally terrible.”
gameplay
278 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
50%
17%
Gameplay in War Trigger 3 and related titles receives mixed feedback: some praise its engaging mechanics, vehicle combat, and nostalgic, accessible style reminiscent of Battlefield and Counter-Strike, while others criticize it for clunky controls, sluggish movement, unbalanced pay-to-win elements, and outdated or repetitive design. Many users find it fun once familiar, but issues like poor hit detection, slow reloading, and pervasive grind-driven progression detract from the experience. Overall, the gameplay is generally considered enjoyable but marred by technical flaws, lack of polish, and monetization impacts.
- “A thrilling sequel, War Trigger 3 outshines its predecessors with improved graphics and engaging gameplay.”
- “Greatly enjoy playing, not as many people on as there used to be, but would rank the game five stars for gameplay; once you get the hang of it, it is amazing.”
- “The gameplay is insanely fun, if you spend the right cash on it.”
- “It also seems to be abandoned, and with the updates that the devs made only seemed to downgrade the gameplay.”
- “Aside from that, the vehicular combat has lost so much of its charm; the pseudo-realistic flight mechanics of the helicopter does not allow vertical attacks, which in RC2/WT1, though cannot do total vertical attacks, compensates it with cross-hair guided rockets.”
- “It is practically unplayable because of its running mechanics which make me want to quit the game instantly.”
stability
66 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
5%
95%
The game is widely criticized for being highly buggy and glitch-ridden, with frequent crashes, performance issues, and exploitable glitches that disrupt gameplay. While some bugs add a humorous or nostalgic element, many players find the instability frustrating, compounded by poor developer support and prevalent cheating. Overall, stability is a major concern, significantly impacting the user experience.
- “Best game ever, very fun, never boring, and about 85% bug free.”
- “Free to play and no glitches!”
- “Ok, so I have a low-end PC and it runs great on small maps. If you're like me, I would recommend this.”
- “Well, apart from it being mostly a buggy pay-to-win mess, I also can't even launch the game without it crashing anymore. Don't bother trying to play this game if you wish to keep your sanity.”
- “Most of the time you'll end up having someone cheating on your server, flying around, exploiting glitches (that have been reported many times and haven't been fixed for years by devs), ruining your gaming experience.”
- “The game suffers from graphic optimization; even with a GTX970 the game freezes, and even with a 100 Mbps optic fiber connection, we have rubber banding. The mouse smoothing is awful.”
optimization
51 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
53%
39%
The game suffers from generally poor optimization, leading to frequent performance issues such as lag, stuttering, and crashes even on mid to high-end PCs, while low-end systems struggle significantly. Many users report degraded performance with updates and criticize the developers for focusing more on monetization than optimization improvements. Although a few note the game runs smoothly or is decently optimized on some setups, the consensus highlights a need for substantial optimization work to improve stability and gameplay experience.
- “Good game for low performance PCs.”
- “I like how it's a shooter game, a massive multiplayer game and how it runs smoothly.”
- “I have read through discussions on the store page, and it seems that some people are having optimization issues, but I have a fairly decent laptop and can run it on high textures, with anti-aliasing.”
- “And since you keep releasing the same thing over and over with somehow worse optimization, I am starting to believe this may be an asset flip scheme.”
- “The game is so poorly optimized that even though high graphics look like absolute crap, it still lags a lot.”
- “This game has to be the worst optimized game I have ever played.”
humor
37 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is mainly derived from its amusing glitches, poor graphics, funny voice acting, and overall “so-bad-it’s-funny” charm, providing players with lighthearted, often unintended comedic moments. Many players find the game's flaws and quirks entertaining, making it enjoyable especially in a casual or trolling context despite its technical shortcomings.
- “This game is amazing and funny... I keep laughing when playing this game. For example, I throw a grenade at the door, then later I go out and die as the enemy comes in and the explosive bombs the enemy towards my screen... that made me laugh so hard.”
- “This game is a hilarious potato game. If you have a really bad PC but want to play shooty games, this is one to try. The graphics suck, the game is hilarious, the sounds are awful but hey... it's something. I spent quite a few hours on it. It makes me laugh a lot. Just fly onto the roof, sit there RPG blowing people up... it's so funny. 90% of the players here are like really noob at the game so it's mostly just light-hearted fun trolling people.”
- “The only redeeming factor is the announcers' hilariously bad Russian accent.”
monetization
35 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
62%
29%
The game's monetization is widely criticized for heavy reliance on microtransactions, often seen as pay-to-win with overpriced weapons and items. Despite some claims that purchases aren't mandatory, many players feel the game pushes in-app buys excessively, detracting from balance and gameplay enjoyment. A few note it is free with minimal ads, but overall, the monetization is viewed as intrusive and detrimental.
- “Completely free game, no microtransactions, no DLC, no purchases of any sort!”
- “The microtransactions are at the least out of your way.”
- “You can still easily grind for money and experience to get items; in my opinion, it's not exactly a pay-to-play game. It is balanced, and payments are not necessary to be able to beat people.”
- “Scam company and the biggest cash grab pay-to-win ever.”
- “You need to pay for literally everything through microtransactions.”
- “This game was decent to begin with, but so many weapons and in-game purchases were added to the point where this is a pay-to-play game pretty much.”
story
31 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
74%
13%
The game's story is generally criticized as weak or nearly non-existent, with some users describing it as boring or outright bad. However, side missions are seen as engaging and add enjoyable content, though main missions can feel repetitive and grind-heavy. Overall, the narrative is minimal, serving mainly as a backdrop for mission and achievement progression rather than a compelling storyline.
- “War Trigger 3, where side missions are as addictive as a bag of chips.”
- “These mini-epics are engaging, adding a dash of flavor to the main storyline, making it a full-course meal of gaming delight.”
- “The game has evolved a lot in a year, with weapons, maps, and vehicle releases. We are now implementing achievements and missions, where you can earn up to 5k honor points and 50 coins from doing them, though it takes a significant time investment.”
- “It's like the game devs took all the fun parts, said 'screw it' and made a side quest buffet!”
- “Story: 1/10 made me projectile vomit, it was that bad.”
- “* missions are not fluid and are only there to gain more xp”
- “you have to disconnect from a server in order to change missions”
grinding
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players consistently criticize the game for its excessive grinding, with progression and unlocking powerful weapons requiring countless hours or significant monetary investment. While some content can be earned through grinding, the process is often described as tedious and frustrating, especially when competing against pay-to-win players. Overall, grinding is seen as a major barrier that diminishes enjoyment and fairness.
- “Very pay to win first-person shooter with insanely grindy currency to earn.”
- “Everything they show you in the screenshots costs money, or hundreds of hours of grinding.”
- “It is not impossible to get the superior weapons and armor but it will take a lot of luck and some serious grinding, and you will become a punching bag for those who spent the cash to have the advantage.”
music
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
28%
43%
The music received mixed feedback, with some users finding the menu song mediocre and noting a lack of in-game music, while others praised the soundtrack as "badass." Overall, the music quality was considered underwhelming and inconsistent.
- “♬ Music ♬”
- “[b] Music [/b]”
- “Music: 2/10, there was like one okay-ish menu song.”
- “No music when in game.”
- “Make no mistake that it is still the same damn game, with some music and a graphical upgrade.”
replayability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The game offers some replayability through playable vehicles and character customization, but overall, many users find its replay value to be poor and unengaging.
- “Yes, there are playable vehicles and also character customization.”
- “The replayability is just terrible.”
- “Replay value?”
- “”
atmosphere
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
25%
Users praise the game's atmosphere for its intense, immersive combat experience, enhanced by next-gen graphics and realistic sound effects. Many note it effectively captures a Battlefield-like feel, contributing to engaging multiplayer matches. Overall, the atmosphere is seen as a strong and improved element of the game.
- “Where Red Crucible really steps up is through its intense multiplayer matches, that, coupled with next-gen graphics and realistic weapon/vehicle sounds, creates a fantastic combat atmosphere.”
- “The reason that I think it feels like Battlefield is because of the atmosphere it creates.”
- “Nice game, good gameplay, and atmosphere.”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional responses to the game are mixed: some players feel intense frustration and discomfort due to poor gameplay mechanics, while others experience deep, poignant moments that evoke strong feelings of sadness and reflection.
- “Tears welled up his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”
- “I was about ten years old when my mother told him, "If you ever want to see your grandchildren grow up, you have to stop immediately." Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”