War Trigger 3

About

War Trigger 3 is a single player and multiplayer open world shooter game with warfare and historical themes. It was developed by Rocketeer Games Studio, LLC and was released on December 22, 2015. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Compete with friends or players from around the globe using some of the world's deadliest modern weapons and vehicles. Play with up to 24 players in 6 unique arenas designed for infantry, vehicle, and air combat.

Skip User Reviews

61%

Audience ScoreBased on 75 reviews

gameplay3 positive mentions

monetization3 negative mentions

The gameplay can be fun and entertaining, especially with friends.
The game has a nostalgic value for long-time players and offers a variety of weapons and vehicles.
Despite its flaws, some players find it addictive and enjoyable for short play sessions.

The game is heavily criticized for its pay-to-win mechanics, making it difficult for free players to compete.
There are numerous technical issues, including crashes, poor graphics, and unbalanced gameplay.
The developers are perceived as neglecting the game, focusing more on monetization than fixing bugs or improving the experience.

graphics
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The graphics in the game have received largely negative feedback, with many users citing poor quality, glitches, and a lack of detail. While the game is accessible for lower-end systems, the overall aesthetic is considered subpar, leading to frustration among players. Some users have expressed a desire to revert to older, simpler games due to the disappointing graphical experience.
- “In rc2, I could get 120 fps on high graphics with 12 to 53 ping.”
- “The graphics are simple enough that just about anyone with a computer could play this without a hiccup, which is great as not everyone can afford a high-end system.”
- “The only noticeable difference is aesthetics; the vector P, for example, has an optical sight with a skull for a reticle.”
- “Good game, but the problem is the graphics are so bad.”
- “The graphics are bad, there are annoying glitches, and there's definitely a pay-to-win aspect.”
- “Not only is it the most useless clunky user interface that I have ever seen, but the graphics are so poor I am thinking about downloading Pac-Man and reverting to it.”
gameplay
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
25%
The gameplay is generally enjoyable and fun, but users have reported significant issues with crashing that detracts from the overall experience.
- “I love the gameplay of the game, but the crashing is just way too high. Fix the game.”
- “Okay, this is not a bad game, as far as gameplay goes.”
- “Overall, the gameplay is fun.”
- “I love the gameplay of the game, but the crashing is just way too high. Fix the damn game.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization model is criticized for making the game feel not truly free, as players are required to make numerous in-game purchases to fully enjoy the experience.
- “Though it's basically not even free because of all the necessary in-game purchases.”
- “The monetization model feels exploitative, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending money.”
- “I feel pressured to spend money just to keep up with other players, which ruins the experience.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is characterized by its amusing glitches and a vibrant community, which adds a lighthearted touch to the overall experience, reminiscent of a budget version of Battlefield.
- “It's a poor man's Battlefield with a touch of hilarious glitchiness and an active community.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is marred by poor graphics and frequent glitches, which detract from the overall experience. Additionally, players have noted a pay-to-win (p2w) element that further complicates gameplay stability.
- “The graphics are bad, there are annoying glitches, and there's definitely a pay-to-win aspect.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music aspect received negative feedback, with users expressing frustration over the overall user interface and graphics, suggesting that these elements detracted from the gaming experience.