Last Man Standing

About

Last Man Standing is a multiplayer survival shooter game. It was developed by Free Reign Entertainment and was released on March 29, 2017. It received neutral reviews from players.

Last Man Standing is an adrenaline fueled non-stop shoot out where players must outwit, outgun and outplay opponents to ultimately be crowned the Last Man Standing in a massive dynamic warzone. Players are thrown into the battlefield with up to 100 other players fighting each other and searching the environment for weaponry and attachments to enhance your tactical style and get the edge in competi…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

56%

Audience ScoreBased on 6,499 reviews

gameplay140 positive mentions

optimization107 negative mentions

The game is free to play, making it accessible to a wider audience.
Gameplay is fast-paced and can be fun, especially when played with friends.
Offers a variety of weapons and customization options.

The game is plagued with hackers, making it frustrating to play.
Long loading times and frequent crashes hinder the overall experience.
Gameplay mechanics are unbalanced, with issues like instant healing and poorly designed armor.

gameplay
421 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
53%
14%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its fast-paced and engaging mechanics, while others criticize its bugs, poor optimization, and unbalanced features. Many users appreciate the fun factor and potential for enjoyment, especially in multiplayer settings, but express frustration over issues like long loading times, inconsistent mechanics, and the presence of hackers. Overall, while the game offers a decent experience for a free-to-play title, it requires significant improvements to reach its full potential.
- “The gameplay is fast-paced and intense, with the shrinking play area forcing players closer and closer together as the game progresses.”
- “Gameplay is tight and very creative, playing into the plot perfectly.”
- “The gameplay is amazing; for what you have, it is amazing.”
- “Awful movement, mechanics, gameplay, customization, map, and much more.”
- “Crashes/freezes and stuttering during gameplay, often during crucial fights.”
- “Gameplay is terrible.”
graphics
400 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
35%
46%
19%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising them as decent or even impressive for a free-to-play title, while others criticize them as outdated or poorly optimized. Many users report issues with performance, including lag and low frame rates, especially on lower-end systems, suggesting that the game requires a more powerful setup to run smoothly. Overall, while the visuals can be appealing, significant optimization and improvements are needed to enhance the gaming experience.
- “The graphics are pretty decent and the maps are big and varied, which keeps things interesting ✨”
- “The graphics are great too.”
- “When you turn the graphics on ultra, the game looks very realistic and very beautiful.”
- “The graphics are ugly and the sounds are just weird.”
- “The game is buggy, graphics are bad and I don't think anybody plays it anymore.”
- “Complete dog shit, the graphics are shit, when you look at the sky you go blind, when you go inside you can't see anything because it's too dark.”
optimization
291 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
46%
37%
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting significant performance issues such as low frame rates, crashes, and long loading times, particularly on lower-end systems. While some users noted improvements and decent performance on higher-end PCs, the overall consensus is that the game requires substantial optimization work to enhance stability and playability. Comparisons to other battle royale games like PUBG highlight that this game is often seen as less optimized, leading to frustration among players.
- “It is free-to-play and is optimized very well, unlike some other games... cough... PUBG... cough, and it has great graphics!”
- “The game runs smoothly as well with only a few bugs or glitches.”
- “Great optimization of the game.”
- “Extremely poor optimization of the game; they should have done something about it before releasing.”
- “The game's optimization is so bad that you probably won't be able to run it on any system with a low-profile GPU.”
- “Very bad optimization; long loading times and often crashes, not worth playing.”
stability
139 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
5%
95%
The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous players reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and performance issues such as crashes and freezes during gameplay. While some users acknowledge that the game can be enjoyable despite these problems, many express frustration over the lack of ongoing support and optimization, leading to a generally unstable experience. Overall, the consensus is that while the game has potential, its current state is marred by significant technical issues.
- “I am using a GTX 1070 OC paired with Ryzen 5 1600, and it runs great on the highest settings, so I don't think it will be too hard to run.”
- “Great free-to-play game; runs great on an old i5 2400 with an R9 270, 8GB RAM running at high settings 1080p above 60fps.”
- “Other than that, the game runs great, better than PlayerUnknown's.”
- “The game is really buggy and it's not worth the time.”
- “Crashes/freezes and stuttering during gameplay, often during crucial fights.”
- “Games literally take forever to start, no one joins, and it's buggy as hell.”
monetization
39 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
51%
41%
The monetization model of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many users labeling it as a cash grab due to the prevalence of overpriced microtransactions, primarily for cosmetic items. While some players appreciate that the game is not pay-to-win, the overwhelming presence of microtransactions and ads has led to concerns about the developers' commitment to improving the game. Overall, the monetization strategy is seen as exploitative, with many reviewers advising against spending money on in-game purchases.
- “This game is pretty fun, and in-game purchases are for cosmetics only, so this game is not pay-to-win.”
- “- not pay to win in the least - the only microtransactions are for character cosmetics.”
- “This game is filled with a surprising amount of content and is definitely worth a try... thank you to the devs that made a free game with only microtransactions to buy cosmetics.”
- “Uninspired, absolute cash grab.”
- “This game is a poor man's PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds with even worse animations, gun sounds, map design, microtransactions out the ass, graphics that look like a budget Xbox 360 game, and the most cancerous loading times I've seen in a while for a free-to-play game.”
- “I believe it's clear here that the devs aren't concerned with balancing the game or making it fun - just slowly transforming it into another cash grab using microtransactions.”
humor
29 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
97%
10%
The humor in this game is widely praised, with players highlighting its funny taunts, hilarious moments during gameplay, and the comedic interactions among friends. Many reviews note that the game's absurd situations, such as unexpected kills and quirky mechanics, contribute to a lighthearted atmosphere, making it a fun experience, especially in squad play. Overall, the community's humor and the game's entertaining elements make it a recommended choice for those looking for a good laugh while gaming.
- “This game is just hilarious and I really suggest you should try it out, fun as hell.”
- “This game is meant for squad play because there can be some pretty funny moments to laugh with your friends :D.”
- “10 out of 10 game, just too much fun with friends trolling everybody with voice chat.”
- “The humor in this game falls flat and feels forced.”
- “I expected a lot of laughs, but the jokes just didn't land.”
- “The attempts at humor are cringeworthy and detract from the overall experience.”
story
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
69%
12%
The game's story is largely considered minimal or non-existent, with many users likening it to gameplay experiences that prioritize action over narrative, such as "Temple Run." Some reviews mention a creative background that enhances the gameplay, while others suggest that players seeking a deep story should look elsewhere. Overall, the focus seems to be more on gameplay mechanics than on a compelling narrative.
- “The epic story of this game is Dante's Inferno... but he's fighting for his life in an epic survival/horror way!”
- “Gameplay is tight and very creative, playing into the plot perfectly.”
- “Good game overall, well made with a great backstory. I recommend it to YouTubers and other such enthusiasts.”
- “☑️ this game has no story”
- “X what story?”
- “Check it in google, if you are not familiar with this story, the text box is not long enough to fill you into the details and I don't want to bore you to death.”
grinding
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
87%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring a significant investment of time to earn new gear and cosmetics. The progression system is criticized for being slow, with many feeling that the grinding detracts from the overall enjoyment, especially due to poor controls and long loading times. Overall, the experience is described as repetitive and frustrating, making it difficult to recommend the game to others.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “All you have to do is keep running; nothing special about it, but I don't recommend this game to others. It has too much grinding and running, and it's just a waste of time.”
- “Grinding for cosmetic gear is tedious.”
music
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The music aspect of the game has received largely negative feedback, with players noting a lack of in-game music and a boring main menu. Many users are frustrated by the overwhelming noise from other players, including loud music and chatter, which detracts from the experience. Overall, the absence of a proper soundtrack and the chaotic audio environment have left players feeling unsatisfied.
- “The game could use a soundtrack.”
- “Lots of people are talking together and some are playing music, so basically people are just having a good time before killing each other.”
- “In that 10 minutes you just have nothing to do; there is no music in the game.”
- “In that 10 minutes you just have nothing to do, there is no music in the game; when you spectate someone, you don't hear anything.”
- “There's apparently in-game music and there's an option for its volume; however, I have never been able to hear it.”
- “And the main menu in the game feels very boring; it may take some background music, otherwise the players need something to talk to each other in the main menu.”
replayability
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
24%
38%
Overall, the game is considered to have strong replayability, with users noting its infinite replayability potential and a leveling system that enhances the experience. While some mention bugs typical of open-world games, the combat's smoothness and the game's alpha status suggest that it still offers a compelling reason to return.
- “Infinitely replayable.”
- “There is a leveling system that enhances replayability.”
- “Despite some bugs, the game has good replayability and shows potential as it is only in alpha.”
- “Replayability: if you're using hacks and bots, maybe.”
- “Does it have replayability?”
- “There is a leveling system for replayability.”
atmosphere
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The atmosphere of the game has been criticized for feeling artificial and failing to immerse players, with a score of 3/10. In contrast, players noted that other games like PUBG successfully create a more engaging and authentic atmosphere.
- “You get a feeling you are playing something fake and you can't get into the atmosphere of the game.”
- “Overall atmosphere: 3/10”
- “Last man standing has the right control (for example, aim to zoom) and PUBG has the right atmosphere and feel.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional response to the game is overwhelmingly negative, with players expressing frustration and disappointment to the point of wishing for the developers to face dire consequences for their work. This sentiment highlights a strong disconnect between player expectations and the game's execution.