Nine to Five is a tactical first-person shooter where smart teamwork triumphs over brute force and reflexes. In the game’s near-future world, it’s the corporations that rule, and being a mercenary for them is just another job.
Unique 3v3v3 gameplay concept that encourages teamwork and strategy.
Good graphics and potential for future updates to improve gameplay.
Fun to play with friends, offering a different experience compared to traditional FPS games.
Long matchmaking times due to a low player base, making it difficult to find games.
Clunky movement and gunplay, with issues in hit registration and audio feedback.
Pay-to-win elements present, as players can purchase weapons and upgrades with real money.
gameplay
219 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
24%
54%
22%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players criticizing its clunky mechanics, lack of variety, and unbalanced matches, leading to frustrating experiences. While some appreciate the innovative 3v3v3 format and potential for fun, others find the overall gameplay repetitive and marred by long matchmaking times and technical issues. Overall, the game shows promise but requires significant refinement and player engagement to enhance the experience.
“The 3v3v3 gameplay flowed well, the armor and utilities were effective and balanced.”
“What kept me hooked here was the innovative gameplay with gadgets and different armor kits, the map designs are great and so is the theme of the game.”
“The gameplay loop feels boring and uninteresting at some times.”
“The core gameplay mechanics feel awkward and unpolished.”
“The game suffers from a lack of variety in both maps and gameplay modes.”
“With clunky mechanics, lackluster graphics, matchmaking issues, repetitive gameplay, and a bland progression system, the overall experience is disheartening.”
graphics
99 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
32%
44%
24%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the visuals as decent or even good for a free-to-play title, while others criticize them as outdated, glitchy, and poorly optimized. Many users report issues such as frame drops, stuttering, and bland environments, suggesting that the graphics do not meet modern gaming standards. Overall, while there are positive remarks about the art style and potential, significant improvements are needed to enhance the visual experience.
“The game overall is awesome, and the graphics quality is impressive.”
“Cool game, realistic graphics, fun to play with friends.”
“Graphics are good, maps are solid, and guns feel nice.”
“The graphics lack the level of detail and sophistication that modern gamers expect.”
“Graphics break a lot, glitch out, and frame drops are often especially when combat comes.”
“The movement and gunplay feel awkward, the graphics look like something from 2016, and it's just a sad attempt to create a new cash cow.”
optimization
58 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
10%
47%
43%
The game's optimization is widely criticized, with many players reporting significant performance issues such as stuttering, low frame rates, and poor graphics quality, even on high-end PCs. While some users note that the game has potential and improvements have been made, the overall consensus is that it remains unoptimized and feels incomplete, detracting from the gameplay experience. Many recommend waiting for further updates before fully engaging with the game.
“Now it's like a different game, feels a lot smoother, optimization is alright and gunplay doesn't feel weird.”
“I recommend giving it a shot, if you have any issues with your performance, then the optimization is worth waiting for :)”
“Graphics are actually pretty good and performance is also smooth.”
“Not in its current state, it's very unoptimized.”
“Performance is horrible, stutters and big frame dips everywhere, even with the latest patch.”
“This game has a horrible optimization.”
stability
36 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability has been widely criticized, with players reporting numerous bugs, glitches, and performance issues, including lag and audio problems. While some acknowledge that these issues are expected in an early access title and appreciate the fun gameplay, many feel that the game is currently too unstable for a satisfying experience. Overall, the consensus suggests that significant improvements are needed to enhance stability and gameplay quality.
“Game is full of bugs and glitches and stutters while sprinting.”
“No point in playing yet there are too many bugs. Every time I load the game, the sound glitches in and out. Loads of people are having problems with it.”
“I don't even know why I bothered trying this. Bad gunplay, bad gameplay designs, bad servers, tons of glitches. Frankly, I'm not sure what the developers were thinking when they started this project.”
monetization
27 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
11%
30%
59%
The monetization in the game has been widely criticized as predatory and reminiscent of a cash grab, with many players feeling that microtransactions are heavily pushed before the core gameplay is polished. While some argue that the microtransactions can be ignored, others highlight a pay-to-win aspect that hampers progression for free players, making the overall experience feel clunky and unfinished. The presence of weapon modifications locked behind daily missions and RNG further exacerbates frustrations regarding the game's monetization strategy.
“Great monetization, terrible progression system for newer players.”
“If you are worried about monetization, do not worry about it as much as progression.”
“The microtransactions can also be completely ignored.”
“But now it looks like they just want to grab some money in microtransactions.”
“Also, the pay-to-win aspect is something that shouldn't exist anymore; it makes this game feel like a cash grab.”
“It's genuinely baffling how a game themed around how bad corporations are also has predatory microtransactions.”
grinding
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
5%
22%
73%
The grinding aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players noting that while it can be tedious and time-consuming, particularly for unlocking weapons and attachments, it is possible to achieve everything through dedicated play rather than spending money. Some users find the grind excessive, likening it to needing "a second life," while others appreciate the core gameplay enough to tolerate the grind. Overall, the experience varies significantly based on individual tolerance for grinding and the desire to invest time in the game.
“A bit grindy sometimes.”
“You'll need a second life for grinding.”
“Not to mention a very tedious ranking system that acts like you're going to be farming shipment for kills twelve hours a day for the next three weeks of spring break.”
“From what I can tell, it's grindy as hell to get weapons.”
story
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
68%
16%
The game's story is largely criticized for being bland and lacking depth, with many users noting the absence of characters and a compelling narrative. The overarching theme revolves around a tired critique of corporate culture, but it fails to provide meaningful context or engagement. Overall, the storytelling is seen as minimal and uninspired, overshadowed by gameplay mechanics and microtransaction issues.
“The game is variations of attack/defend where you're given mission details and progression through a 'black operation' style debriefing in the 'toxic positive' corporate kind of patronizing.”
“The reason why I give this map a higher rating is mainly because the map is so huge and layered, that it honestly feels like 2-3 maps in one, which gives the missions some nice variety.”
“Oh, and yes, the game about greedy corporations and toxic corporate culture has predatory microtransactions and unethical practices like locking your weapon modifications behind daily missions and RNG, how ironic.”
“The theme and story of the game is quite bland, more or less revolving around one tired joke of 'corporate mentality bad', with little to no context given.”
“Starting with least important: story and lore are extremely boring, with no characters in the game, neither playable nor NPCs, so storytelling possibilities are going to be extremely limited in the future.”
“The game about greedy corporations and toxic corporate culture has predatory microtransactions and unethical practices like locking your weapon modifications behind daily missions and RNG; how ironic.”
humor
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
88%
38%
The humor in the game is hit or miss, with some players finding amusement in broken animations and unexpected glitches, such as hilarious teleportation kills. While certain moments, like a fast-paced tutorial and quirky character interactions, elicit laughter, others feel the overall comedic elements fall flat, especially when waiting for matches. Overall, the humor seems to be more appreciated in shared experiences among friends rather than as a core feature of the game.
“Finished the tutorial faster than the narrator could speak; that was kind of funny.”
“Bad internet results in hilarious kills involving teleportation, explosions, and flying.”
“I still had some fun here, but that mostly came down to me and my friend laughing at the broken animations.”
“Not funny, didn't laugh.”
“The jokes fell flat and felt forced.”
“I expected more clever humor, but it was mostly cringeworthy.”
replayability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
20%
40%
Overall, opinions on replayability are mixed; while some players find the game highly enjoyable and worth revisiting, others feel it lacks elements that encourage repeated play. The recent update has improved stability, but it hasn't significantly enhanced the game's replay value for all users.
“All in all, you should seriously give this game a chance; it's insanely fun and has very good replayability.”
“Awesome game! The graphics are nice, the game is very replayable, and it's just good overall.”
“The game lacks replayability; there's nothing that keeps me wanting to come back.”
“As of the rogue shift update, the game is still not worth your time, but it is now stable and more playable.”
music
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
60%
The music in the game has been widely criticized for being lackluster and poorly integrated, often overshadowing important sound effects like footsteps and explosions. Players feel that the audio experience detracts from gameplay, making it difficult to engage with the game's mechanics and atmosphere effectively. Overall, the sound design, including the music, is seen as a significant flaw that diminishes the overall enjoyment of the game.
“I opened the game, queued up for matchmaking and waited until the main menu music looped.”
“The HUD, the sounds, the music, and the gunplay.”
“For some reason, in a game that has some competitive personalities, there is 'music'/'sfx' during the action phase loud enough to drown out sounds that are supposed to relay information to you... why?”
“The audio is really lacking; footsteps are overly quiet, and if you want to hear them, you have to turn your in-game music off while having sound effects and main volume at max. Even then, you can only hear people within 3 meters of you, and explosions sound like dropping plastic on the floor.”
“In a game that has some competitive elements, the music and sound effects during the action phase are loud enough to drown out important sounds that are supposed to relay information to you.”
“The menu is poorly designed, the music is terrible, and the overall audio experience is unsatisfactory, making it feel like you're playing a lifeless game.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a strong emotional connection to the game, with one reviewer noting it evokes the feeling of a real 9 to 5 job. However, this sentiment is contrasted by criticism of the gameplay, which is described as exceedingly sloppy.
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
50%
The game's atmosphere is highly praised for its concept, world design, and user interface, creating an engaging environment. However, this positive experience is somewhat overshadowed by frustrations with the gameplay mechanics, particularly the feel of the guns and movement.
“This game has a great concept and atmosphere as well.”
“I love the atmosphere and aspects of the world; I love the UI and menus, and I love the idea of it.”
“I love the atmosphere and aspects of the world, I love the UI and menus, I love the idea of it... but I hate the gameplay, mainly the guns. The guns feel terrible to use, and the movement just isn't great.”