Skip to main content
Alexia Crow Game Cover

About

Alexia Crow is a single player action game. It was developed by Questtracers and was released on May 4, 2015. It received negative reviews from players.

An adventure game with hand-painted graphics and an intriguing story. It's up to you to escape from the mysterious Cave Of Heroes by solving brain-bending puzzles. Explore a game world based on Ancient Greek mythology in this fascinating and thought-provoking journey.

Skip User Reviews

37%
Audience ScoreBased on 49 reviews
music3 positive mentions
story7 negative mentions

  • The game features a nice painterly art style with surreal qualities that can catch the player's interest.
  • Puzzles are creative and varied, offering some challenge and requiring logical thinking.
  • The voice acting and music receive some praise and add decent atmosphere to the experience.
  • The gameplay is plagued by a clunky and finicky user interface with poor cursor alignment and frustrating controls.
  • The game is very short, incomplete with only two out of three chapters available on Steam, and the story is incoherent and unengaging.
  • Technical issues and bugs, including crashes and game-breaking glitches, along with lack of hints or guidance, make progression frustrating and trial-and-error rather than fun.
  • story
    22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story is widely criticized for being incoherent, poorly scripted, and lacking depth or engagement, with many users finding it confusing or nonsensical. Some note a sudden, odd shift in plot elements, while a few appreciate its quirky charm or interesting concepts despite weak execution. Overall, the narrative is seen as a weak point, overshadowed by better gameplay elements like puzzles.

    • “I love this game; it has, for a low budget project, a great charm of old Greece and a strange story about Atlantis and time travel.”
    • “Story gets a bit odd in the second chapter, but that is a plus for me.”
    • “Interesting story -> check.”
    • “The story, if you want to call it that, is an incoherent mess, the voice acting incredibly poor and the puzzles way too easy that the pot plant on your desk could possibly solve them while you are afk.”
    • “There are some decent puzzles in this game (episodes 1+2), however - a terrible script and very poor voice acting make this game's story dip between comically bad and downright cringeworthy.”
    • “So, the game isn't finished, the click-boxes for things don't always line up that well and storyline seems to be 'I fell down a hole... then things stopped making sense!'.”
  • graphics
    10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics are generally described as low-resolution, rugged, and muddy, reflecting a simple, casual style typical of older browser games. While not impressive or highly polished, the art style has a painterly charm and each puzzle features a distinct look, though some users note graphical issues and bugs. Overall, the visuals are serviceable but not a standout aspect of the game.

    • “I personally like the art style.”
    • “Graphically this game isn't going to blow you away, but I do have to hand it to the developers for giving every single puzzle a different look and feel to it.”
    • “I really like the artwork, it has a nice painterly feel.”
    • “The graphics are ugly, the sound effects are poor, and the voice acting is laughably bad, often breaking any remaining immersion.”
    • “The graphics are muddy, the interface a bit buggy and the game is too short.”
    • “The story is mediocre, the graphics are a bit rugged, the music and sounds are ok.”
  • gameplay
    7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay offers enjoyable puzzles but feels underdeveloped, with some mechanics and presentation lacking polish. It provides a relatively short experience, relying partly on trial and error, and certain interactions could be more intuitive. Overall, it shows promise but needs refinement and expansion.

    • “There will be a third episode included in the future, but even then it's around an hour and a half of gameplay.”
    • “I don't know if this was done intentionally or not, and maybe this tactic inflates the gameplay a little bit because of the fact that there is a trial and error element to it, but in the end the puzzles were fun.”
    • “But a great start that needs to be fleshed out and maybe take a step back and re-examine the gameplay.”
    • “Puzzle presentation and mechanics lack refinement compared to the somewhat decent art.”
    • “While trying not to include spoilers, which would completely ruin any gameplay this game has, some of the interactions could have been more intuitive.”
  • music
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is generally well-received, described as solid and deserving of credit, with ratings around 8.5/10. While not exceptional, it is considered decent and fitting with the overall experience, contributing positively amidst other mixed aspects like story and graphics.

    • “It sounds good and solid, and the music also deserves a good nod for credit.”
    • “Music: 8.5/10”
    • “The story is mediocre, the graphics are a bit rugged, but the music and sounds are okay.”
  • stability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game suffers from multiple stability issues, including buggy interface elements and glitches with mouse functions, making gameplay occasionally frustrating. Additionally, the lack of skippable cut-scenes further hampers the overall experience.

    • “The cut-scenes really need to be skippable, and there are definitely glitches, especially with the mouse functions in relation to the background (sometimes you need to be a little off-position in order to make the function work).”
    • “Just a buggy mess with a weak story, and mediocre puzzles.”
    • “The graphics are muddy, the interface a bit buggy and the game is too short.”
  • optimization
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users report performance issues and frequent bugs affecting the game's optimization, leading to a subpar and sometimes unstable experience.

  • replayability
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game offers little to no replayability, as players generally lose interest once they complete it.

    • “There's no replay value once you get through the game, so that's it.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Alexia Crow

5h Median play time
5h Average play time
5-5h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Alexia Crow
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Alexia Crow is a action game.

Alexia Crow is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 5 hours playing Alexia Crow.

Alexia Crow was released on May 4, 2015.

Alexia Crow was developed by Questtracers.

Alexia Crow has received negative reviews from players. Most players liked Alexia Crow for its music but disliked it for its story.

Alexia Crow is a single player game.

Similar games include Through Abandoned, Hare In The Hat, Frankenstein Master of Death, Crystals of Time, Sherlock Holmes: The Silver Earring and others.