Wizards' Clash

About

"Wizards' Clash" is a fantasy-themed turn-based card game that offers easy-to-learn gameplay while still featuring unique mechanics. Players collect and strategically use magical cards to battle opponents in a richly detailed world. With its accessible design and depth of strategy, "Wizards' Clash" is an engaging and entertaining experience for both new and seasoned card game enthusiasts.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

64%

Audience ScoreBased on 22 reviews

graphics3 positive mentions

gameplay3 negative mentions

The game features excellent graphics and a colorful aesthetic that enhances the overall experience.
It offers a variety of levels and maps, keeping the gameplay engaging and preventing boredom.
The game is easy to learn and provides a fun, fast-paced card battling experience with clever tactical options.

The game requires excessive grinding to progress, as the difficulty escalates without proportional rewards.
There is no option to edit or customize your deck, leading to frustration as players accumulate unwanted cards.
The gameplay can become tedious and repetitive, with long battles and slow animations that detract from the experience.

gameplay
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
17%
50%
The gameplay has been criticized for its lack of replay value, absence of deckbuilding options, and limited strategic depth, leading to a low rating of 1/10. While the fixed deck concept and single-use stock cards offer some tactical elements, the overall experience feels unoriginal and lacks addictive qualities, with many reviewers calling for additional mechanics and multiplayer features.
- “I like the idea of your deck being fixed through gameplay, but you can purchase single-use stock cards for when you are in a tight spot.”
- “I don't know if this is the first build, but if it is, then it's just missing multiplayer, deck builder, customizable towers, replayability, and gameplay that is addictive.”
- “The gameplay itself has no replay value at all as there are no deckbuilding options, classes, or different decks.”
- “Gameplay = 1/10; there is no strategy or uniqueness to the game.”
- “If the above issues were fixed and maybe some extra mechanics were added, I wouldn't have a problem with the $5-10 range.”
grinding
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and repetitive, often requiring significant time investment to earn gold for upgrades and spells. While not overly difficult, the lengthy battles and necessity to farm resources detract from the overall enjoyment, leading some to feel that grinding adds little value to the gameplay experience.
- “In order to counter it, you have to buy upgrades from the market, but they are very expensive, and hence the grinding.”
- “It's not that the game is particularly hard, but it can become tedious and repetitive with battles lasting over 10 minutes on average to that rare time of 20 minutes for me.”
- “I came up with an idea, and sank well half of my playtime into farming gold; I don’t like grinding… it adds nothing to gameplay.”
story
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
20%
60%
The story is generally considered dull and unengaging, with players feeling that it lacks depth and fails to enhance the gameplay experience. Many reviewers express indifference towards the plot, suggesting that it is overshadowed by gameplay mechanics and the limited rewards for replaying missions. Overall, the narrative does not seem to be a strong point of the game.
- “It seems like it has deck-building capabilities, but the developers decided to focus on the fantastic storyline.”
- “There is no reliable way to earn money for upgrades outside of pressing forward, as replaying past missions gives you a petty 50gp on average.”
- “You get the same gold for repeating the one fight before the final boss, and even if you repeated the level 1 mission.”
- “The plot is kind of dull - but who cares about the plot for this price?”
graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
50%
The graphics received mixed reviews, with some praising the excellent quality and medieval aesthetic, while others criticized the lack of unique animations and found certain elements, like the dragon animation, to be laughable. Overall, the feedback highlights a disparity in visual execution, leading to a low score from some users.
- “The graphics are excellent.”
- “The graphics are reminiscent of the Middle Ages, beautifully crafted.”
- “It's beautifully done with impressive graphics.”
- “Scores: graphics = 2/10. There are no unique spell animations, and I literally laughed at the dragon animation.”
- “Easy to operate, but the graphics look like they belong to the middle ages.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
150%
The game lacks replayability due to the absence of deckbuilding options, class diversity, and multiplayer features, leading to a gameplay experience that feels static and unengaging. Reviewers express a desire for more customizable elements to enhance replay value.
- “The game offers endless replayability with its diverse strategies and multiple paths to victory.”
- “Each playthrough feels fresh and exciting, thanks to the variety of choices and outcomes available.”
- “I love how the game encourages experimentation, making me want to replay it to try different approaches.”
- “The gameplay itself has no replay value at all as there are no deck-building options, classes, or different decks.”
- “Once you complete the game, there’s little incentive to play through it again since the story doesn’t change.”
- “The lack of variety in missions and objectives makes replaying the game feel tedious and uninteresting.”