Snik

About

Snik is a single player casual puzzle game. It was developed by Cleverweek and was released on September 4, 2015. It received neutral reviews from players.

Snik is an extremely hard game that will test your reflexes, timing, aiming and planning ahead in a simple, minimalist interface.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

48%

Audience ScoreBased on 46 reviews

music8 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

The game features a simple and minimalistic design that some players find appealing.
Achievements can be unlocked easily by completing levels, making it accessible for completionists.
The music is enjoyable and adds a calming atmosphere to the gameplay.

The difficulty curve is inconsistent, making it frustratingly hard to achieve three stars on levels.
Controls can feel unresponsive and imprecise, leading to a frustrating gameplay experience.
Many players find the game repetitive and lacking in engaging content, leading to boredom.

music
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
53%
27%
20%
The music in the game is generally described as relaxing and enjoyable, with some users appreciating its calming qualities, particularly in the main menu. However, it is criticized for being repetitive, looping too quickly, and for the absence of sound effects, leading to dead silences during gameplay. Overall, while the music has its merits, its implementation could be improved to enhance the gaming experience.
- “I relaxed for 5 minutes to this music long enough to realize that I was going to be okay.”
- “This game is clean and simple with nice simple graphics and good relaxing music.”
- “The music becomes really great to calm you and don't get angry haha.”
- “The game features dead silences during levels and royalty free classical music on the piano for the main menu.”
- “Royalty free music.”
- “No sound effects present, and the music stops completely once the song ends (but maybe that's a good thing).”
graphics
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The graphics of the game are described as minimalistic and simplistic, often reduced to dots of color with little to no animation. While some users found the visuals acceptable after adjusting the settings, many criticized them as poor and lacking depth, contributing to an overall uninspiring aesthetic. Despite the low price point, the graphics do not enhance the gameplay experience, leaving players wanting more.
- “This game is clean and simple with nice simple graphics and good relaxing music.”
- “If you are having trouble getting the ball to react smoothly, maximize the graphics settings.”
- “After adjusting the graphics so that the game works I no longer regret buying it, per se, since it was only $0.50 when I bought it.”
- “Minimalistic visuals are fine when the gameplay is interesting, but there's none of that here.”
- “Visuals are just dots of color with no animation whatsoever.”
- “There isn't much to say about the graphics; you can see it from the requirements and videos/images, plain and simple, lots of moving/static balls on a white background.”
gameplay
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
37%
27%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating its minimalistic design and clever mechanics, while others criticize it for being slow, unintuitive, and lacking depth. The difficulty spikes too quickly, making it challenging to achieve high scores without extensive analysis, leading to frustration for some. Overall, it is seen as a casual experience that leans more towards skill-based puzzles, with a rating of 7/10.
- “Design is minimalistic, and that makes this game based on gameplay alone, and I like that.”
- “Nice music and a very cool gameplay idea.”
- “The game mechanics are clever in their simplicity, but I found the mouse clicking to direct your ball to be a bit sketchy at times.”
- “I wanted something more from gameplay... more interactive and more brain-teasing.”
- “The difficulty rises way too quickly and it's impossible to get three stars on each level, unless maybe you want to spend hours analyzing the game mechanics.”
- “Slow mechanics, not really intuitive.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The game is noted for lacking a traditional narrative, with some users emphasizing that it has no story at all. However, one review suggests a moral lesson about perseverance and the unpredictability of life, hinting at a thematic depth despite the absence of a structured storyline.
- “The moral of the story is that you never know what life holds in store for you. If I had given up when all the odds were stacked against me, I wouldn't be where I am today.”
- “This game has no story.”
- “0 (no story)”
- “Moral of the story, you never know what life holds in store for you, and if I would have given up when all the odds were stacked against me, I wouldn't be where I am today.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users highlight that the game offers high replayability, with many considering it infinitely replayable or nearly so, suggesting a strong incentive to revisit the game multiple times.
- “The game is infinitely replayable, offering new experiences with each playthrough.”
- “Every run feels fresh and exciting, making it hard to put down.”
- “The variety of choices and outcomes ensures that no two games are ever the same.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is consistently praised, with users finding it genuinely funny and enjoyable.