Predecessor

78%
Game Brain Score Based on 6,174 reviews
  • gameplay
  • graphics
  • optimization
Predecessor Game Cover
View game
Get on Steam Get on Xbox Games Store Get on Epic Games Store

![bundle_header_epic.jpg](https://cdn2.unrealengine.com/egs-epicbundle-omedastudios-editions-g2-00-707x232-c1bdfeef0680.jpg) # Begin your Predecessor journey with the Epic Bundle and get: - 29 Heroes - Supporter Discord Role - Supporter Profile Icon - Epic Bundle Profile Icon - 4,000 Platinum (Premium currency) **4 Exclusive Skins** - Construction Steel Skin (Common) - Inquisitor Gideon Skin (C…

  • Windows
  • Cloud
  • NVIDIA GeForce NOW
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

78%
Audience ScoreBased on 6,174 reviews
gameplay327 positive mentions
monetization33 negative mentions
  • Predecessor captures the essence of the original Paragon, providing a nostalgic experience for fans.
  • The gameplay is smooth and engaging, with a unique third-person perspective that enhances the MOBA experience.
  • The developers are actively updating the game and listening to community feedback, showing commitment to improvement.
  • Matchmaking is severely flawed, often pairing inexperienced players with highly skilled ones, leading to unbalanced games.
  • The community is toxic, with frequent instances of players quitting or being abusive towards others.
  • There are significant technical issues, including crashes and performance problems, which detract from the overall experience.
  • gameplay743 mentions

    The gameplay of Predecessor has received mixed reviews, with many players praising its smooth mechanics and engaging core experience reminiscent of the original Paragon. While the game excels in providing a fun and dynamic gameplay loop, some users have noted issues such as a lack of content, unbalanced heroes, and a slow pace that can detract from the overall experience. Overall, the developers' focus on refining gameplay first is appreciated, but there are still areas needing improvement as the game progresses through early access.

    • “Most beautiful MOBA (massive online battle arena) and has the gameplay to match!”
    • “The gameplay is smooth, pretty, and dynamic - even though it can be a little bit heavy on your hardware (especially when playing on high settings).”
    • “The gameplay is fantastic, but there are many features missing outside of the raw gameplay.”
    • “The gameplay is boring.”
    • “The gameplay feels overall very sluggish and slow.”
    • “The game is so unbalanced that it is unbelievable... the gameplay is just sad, slow as anything and not fun at all.”
  • graphics303 mentions

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many praising the stunning visuals and smooth performance, particularly highlighting the use of Unreal Engine 5. However, some users criticize the graphics as subpar compared to previous titles like Paragon, noting issues such as blurriness and a cluttered UI that detracts from the overall experience. Overall, while the graphics are generally considered good, there are calls for further refinement and optimization.

    • “The graphics are stunning, although oceanic server is yet to be added; gameplay is smooth and crisp.”
    • “The graphics are gorgeous, it feels responsive, the pacing is good, and it does the best job of any game I've played of placing shooter-like combat into an otherwise traditional MOBA.”
    • “The graphics are incredible; the response time on moves and abilities is impeccable and the pacing of the game is pretty good.”
    • “It's shit, no idea where the funding from Epic Games went, because this is cheap, not satisfying to play. They seem to not realize that the core game is not good, bad graphics, messy UI and abilities, clusterf**k.”
    • “The graphics are subpar at best.”
    • “The game as it is right now is soooo dreadfully boring, and somehow all the clutter in the graphics just makes it feel worse.”
  • optimization118 mentions

    The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its smooth performance and graphics, while others report significant issues such as stuttering, crashes, and poor controller support. Many users note that while the game runs well on higher-end systems, it struggles on lower-end setups, and there are calls for further improvements in performance and overall optimization. Overall, the game shows potential but requires substantial work to address the various optimization concerns raised by the community.

    • “The overall optimization of the game is great, runs at 120 on highest setting on my 1080ti setup without a hitch.”
    • “Graphics are great, controls feel tight, constant high fps, overall a very well optimized game.”
    • “Great game, amazing optimization, and the gameplay is fun.”
    • “The game is terribly optimized.”
    • “I don't think I've ever played a more poorly optimized game.”
    • “Optimization is terrible and matchmaking is even worse.”
  • monetization67 mentions

    The monetization strategies of the game have drawn significant criticism, with many players labeling them as greedy and exploitative, particularly due to overpriced bundles and non-refundable microtransactions. While some reviewers acknowledge that the game offers enjoyable gameplay, they express concern that the monetization practices overshadow the overall experience, leading to perceptions of it being a cash grab. Despite some positive remarks about transparency and community engagement from the developers, the consensus leans towards a need for substantial improvements in the monetization approach.

    • “The graphics are good, the monetization is respectable, and the balance also feels really well done.”
    • “I love the gameplay-first approach; not enough game companies seem to do that anymore instead of focusing on monetization.”
    • “The devs seem very open about things like monetization methods, etc.”
    • “The monetization is pretty greedy with very overpriced bundles, but they have acknowledged it and their response was to make even more overpriced bundles while not changing the currency pack prices.”
    • “The monetization is totally unacceptable; the cosmetics are of such low quality and too expensive for what they offer.”
    • “It's a blatant cash grab that feels exploitative, to say the least.”
  • stability53 mentions

    The stability of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting frequent freezes, crashes, and various bugs that disrupt gameplay. While some users have experienced smooth performance and minimal issues, others have faced significant problems, particularly with camera glitches and matchmaking failures. Overall, the game appears to be in a state of early access, with ongoing stability concerns that need to be addressed for a more polished experience.

    • “Performance-wise, the game runs great. I don't have a super-powered rig (RTX 2070, i7-9700k, 64GB RAM), and it runs like a dream on max settings through Proton (Manjaro, kernel 5.15.93-1, KDE Plasma, X11).”
    • “Pretty well polished game, runs great with my system.”
    • “Good state of the game for an early access. The game runs great, it is a lot of fun, and no bugs!”
    • “Lately I have been waiting for a lobby and all 10 players click accept and the game either freezes or doesn't start and goes back to matchmaking.”
    • “I've had this game for months now and it constantly crashes pretty much every game and it's not on my side either; it's their buggy game. They have had thousands of reports from me every time it crashes and won't even bother to reply to me or try and fix it. Then you log back in to play the next day or a few hours later and they ban you for being AFK when I clearly was not; your game crashed and kicked me out.”
    • “It's incredibly frustrating to be in the middle of a heated match only to be abruptly disconnected due to server instability or encounter game-breaking glitches that render the gameplay unplayable.”
  • grinding35 mentions

    Players express frustration with the grinding mechanics in the game, describing it as tedious and time-consuming, often feeling that their efforts in farming do not yield proportional rewards. Many feel that the matchmaking system exacerbates the grind, leading to unbalanced matches where skilled players struggle to progress. While some appreciate the complexity of character abilities and the potential for strategic play, the overall sentiment leans towards grinding being a significant barrier to enjoyment.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “Game feels stiff and is crowded with people that have been grinding for years.”
    • “This is absolutely tedious and frustrating! I have the feeling that they are doing it on purpose, just to create anger within the players.”
    • “Most of the game was spent farming until every 5 minutes when everyone decides it's 5v5 teamfight time.”
  • music21 mentions

    The music in the game has received mixed to negative reviews, with many players finding it generic and uninspiring, often failing to enhance the gaming experience. While some appreciate the main menu theme, overall, the soundtrack is described as lacking depth and variety, contributing to a sense of lifelessness in gameplay. Critics have called for improvements in both the music and sound effects to create a more immersive atmosphere.

    • “That theme song was like no other.”
    • “Game music is great.”
    • “Especially the main menu music.”
    • “The music is serviceable, fills up the silence but doesn't rouse the mood or immerse into the world.”
    • “It is literally built upon a dead game, that was sold for parts so that's a bit ironic but like the sounds, effects, whole UI, music are very generic.”
    • “Feels unbelievably lacking, the music or lack thereof is so terrible it's just literally the sound of wind.”
  • character development18 mentions

    Character development in the game receives mixed reviews, with many praising the character design and graphics as visually appealing and well-balanced, while others criticize certain designs as unattractive or overly influenced by pop culture aesthetics. Some players appreciate the unique gameplay mechanics and character diversity, but note that the depth of personalities and lore could be improved. Overall, the character design is seen as a strong point, though opinions vary on its artistic direction.

    • “The graphics and character designs are stunning, adding to the overall appeal.”
    • “I love the graphics, art/character design, overall feel of the game.”
    • “Predecessor doesn't feel so childish as Smite, with cool looking and sounding character designs where each character (so far) stands out.”
    • “Some of the ugliest character designs and art direction I've ever seen, like a mobile game ad come to life.”
    • “Overprime is a truly terrible mess of grindy mobile action-oriented gameplay with a disastrous privacy policy and absolute cringe new character designs based on the hideous K-pop aesthetic.”
    • “The character design feels inspired by Santa Alley rip-offs of the Avengers.”
  • story16 mentions

    The reviews indicate a mixed reception regarding the story aspect of the game. While some players appreciate the nostalgic connection to the original Paragon and express excitement for its revival, others criticize the lack of depth and development in character backstories, noting that many narratives feel generic and underwhelming. Overall, the game's story seems to be a point of contention, with some players longing for more engaging storytelling elements.

    • “Look up the story of predecessor and you will be fully onboard.”
    • “I've loved the story of Omega from the start, and predecessor is the resurrection of one of my favorite games.”
    • “So I am pretty sure everyone knows this game is a third-party revival of the OG Paragon, a game that was epic, fun, and overall a great take on 3rd person MOBA inspired by Smite with its own story and awesome groundwork.”
    • “Just as an example, the character Shinbi, who is an idol in Paragon (and will be in Predecessor), has been massively altered and her backstory has been made a lot more generic.”
    • “If you do not know the backstory of this game, it was originally developed by Epic Games and it failed.”
    • “There's not much visual storytelling in terms of events in the game, so you'll totally not notice your core being taken.”
  • humor14 mentions

    The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with players finding amusement in both the game's quirky bugs and the chaotic nature of the community. While some enjoy the unpredictable antics of teammates and the absurdity of matchmaking, others highlight the toxicity and trolling that can overshadow the fun. Overall, the humor often stems from the unpredictable interactions and the absurd situations that arise during gameplay.

    • “Also, the game has some funny bugs, such as texts not appearing as they are supposed to in-game.”
    • “Playing in a five-stack will get you unforgettable crazy team fights, clutches, and funny moments.”
    • “They use an AI chat monitor that is hilarious; I've trained it so that when I say 'hi' in the draft lobby, I'm chat banned for the entire game.”
    • “The matchmaking is a complete disaster; it's not funny at all, and I don't even know where to begin with that one.”
    • “The jokes in the game fall flat and feel forced, making it more cringeworthy than humorous.”
    • “I expected a lot of laughs, but the humor is so stale that it feels like a bad sitcom from the '90s.”
  • emotional11 mentions

    Players express a deep emotional connection to the game, often reminiscing about their experiences with Paragon and feeling a mix of joy and heartbreak at its revival. While some find the game fun and nostalgic, others struggle with the emotional volatility it brings, highlighting the intense feelings associated with both the gameplay and community interactions. Overall, the emotional impact of the game is significant, evoking tears of joy and a longing for the past.

    • “I never thought I would experience the feeling that game made me feel again, but wow, after 4 years, Omeda Studios managed to impress me so much with not only nailing the feeling of the game but also balance-wise.”
    • “Literally cried of joy when I saw this launched. Paragon was my favorite game ever, and losing it was heartbreaking. I was worried that first playing it wouldn't be fun or that my rose-colored glasses tainted the game, but no, I really enjoy this game.”
    • “It's taken some heartbreaking years for the feel of Paragon to come back into our lives, and I must say with a tear in my eye, it's back!”
  • atmosphere4 mentions

    The game's atmosphere is praised for fostering teamwork and strategic play, reminiscent of NHL hockey, while also offering a visually stunning map. However, some players feel let down by the overall quality and nostalgic expectations, contrasting the enjoyable aspects with a more negative MOBA environment.

    • “Highly recommend if you enjoy a teamwork atmosphere; this is the closest I have found to a game that can replace the rotation and covering teammates, reading plays, timing, and skilled shots. It all comes together nicely here.”
    • “The bittersweet love of playing Paragon again in a MOBA atmosphere of hate and fun.”
    • “The map is very atmospheric and beautiful.”
    • “In general, I think that I was misled, playing on my nostalgia and love for the original Paragon, but in fact, it does not provide even a fraction of the quality and atmosphere that I was counting on.”
  • replayability3 mentions

    Overall, the game is praised for its high replayability, largely due to its diverse character roster that adds depth and variety to gameplay. However, some users feel that the addition of more playable characters could enhance the experience further.

    • “Great game, very smooth, fun, with a great replayability factor.”
    • “The diverse character roster adds layers of depth, ensuring endless replay value.”
    • “The game lacks meaningful choices, making replayability feel pointless.”
    • “Once you've completed the main story, there's little incentive to play again.”
    • “The repetitive gameplay mechanics diminish any potential for replay value.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Predecessor

Play time

87hMedian play time
372hAverage play time
8-500hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 23 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games