PEAK.53

56%
Game Brain Score Based on 193 reviews
  • gameplay
  • graphics
  • optimization
PEAK.53 Game Cover
Starting at $14.99Buy now
Get on Steam

P53:MONARCH is a tactical shooter developed by Dirty Bird Games - UE5 At Dirty Bird Games -P53, we want to bring back the nostalgia, the close-quarter fights, the skill-based tactical moments, the overall simplicity to gameplay and other features, and finally, bring back team communication that actually matters. Immersive voice over(s) during game-play when either side wins a match, plants a b…

  • PC
  • Windows
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

56%
Audience ScoreBased on 193 reviews
gameplay7 positive mentions
stability3 negative mentions
  • The game successfully captures the nostalgia of the SOCOM franchise, with well-designed maps and varied gunplay that feels distinct.
  • The developers are responsive to community feedback and have shown commitment to improving the game through regular updates.
  • It's a free-to-play title that offers a unique experience for fans of tactical shooters, making it accessible for anyone to try.
  • The game is plagued by numerous bugs and design issues, including poor hit detection, clunky movement, and a lack of essential features like voice chat and prone mechanics.
  • The player base is very small, leading to long wait times for matches and a lack of active servers, which diminishes the overall experience.
  • The developer's handling of criticism and community interactions has been described as toxic, leading to a negative atmosphere among players.
  • gameplay27 mentions

    The gameplay of peak.53 is characterized by its strategic depth and engaging mechanics, including diverse game modes, tactical options like going prone, and a dynamic weapon pickup system. While many players appreciate the polished controls and competitive nature, some express concerns about the game's direction and community dynamics, as well as issues with round transitions and the absence of certain game modes. Overall, the gameplay is described as addictive and immersive, with a nostalgic nod to classic titles like SOCOM, despite some criticisms regarding its execution and community challenges.

    • “This feature has been fully realized, offering thrilling and strategic gameplay that stays true to our vision.”
    • “Players can now go prone to sneak low and move stealthily, adding a new layer of tactical gameplay.”
    • “The controls are intuitive, and the combat mechanics are both satisfying and challenging.”
    • “It's garbage gameplay-wise; controls are horrible, etc.”
    • “They have completely changed the actual gameplay, so it's nothing like SOCOM, and I have actually recorded proof of the devs cheating and using their admin menus to locate all players and activate wall cheats in order to win their own game.”
    • “While I believe this game has a solid foundation, there are some issues with the transition between rounds and the overall gameplay feel.”
  • graphics12 mentions

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews; while some players appreciate the solid visuals and immersive experience, others criticize them as outdated and reminiscent of early 2000s titles like SOCOM. Despite the game's frequent updates aimed at improvement, opinions vary on whether the graphics meet modern standards, with some finding them impressive and others deeming them subpar. Overall, the graphics contribute to the game's atmosphere but may not satisfy players seeking cutting-edge visuals.

    • “I'm really enjoying the changes and tweaks made to the game, and the graphics look amazing.”
    • “From the moment you dive into its immersive world, you'll be spellbound by its stunning graphics, gripping storyline, and mesmerizing gameplay.”
    • “One of the first things that struck me about peak.53 is its breathtaking graphics.”
    • “Graphics are CGA and reminiscent of old SOCOM games... but that was like 20 years ago.”
    • “The graphics are terrible (I have a 4090 Ti) and run every single game with no problem at all at max settings. This game is literally just a half step above the SOCOM game from the very early 2000s, so yeah, sorry, the game isn't even worth picking up in its free state.”
    • “Sure, it's not the most graphically advanced game out there, but it gets the job done and runs smoothly on most setups.”
  • optimization4 mentions

    The game has seen significant optimization improvements, transitioning to a dedicated server system for better performance and reliability. While it may not boast cutting-edge graphics, it runs smoothly on a variety of setups, and the addition of a comprehensive scoreboard and leaderboard enhances player engagement and performance tracking.

    • “We initially delivered a robust lobby system and have since upgraded to a dedicated server system for enhanced performance and reliability.”
    • “The scoreboard is now a feature in the game, providing players with essential performance metrics.”
    • “A comprehensive leaderboard system tracks player performance and rankings over time.”
    • “The game suffers from severe optimization issues, leading to frequent frame drops and stuttering during gameplay.”
    • “Despite the promising graphics, the optimization is lacking, causing long loading times and crashes on lower-end systems.”
    • “The lack of proper optimization makes it nearly unplayable on older hardware, which is disappointing for many players.”
  • stability3 mentions

    The game has been widely criticized for its instability, with users reporting numerous bugs such as random crashes, problematic spawning, and visibility issues with teammate name tags. While some believe these issues may improve over time, the overall experience is currently marred by significant technical flaws.

    • “The game is very buggy, with issues like spawning under the map, spawning on top of other teammates, and not being able to see teammate name tags until 8 seconds into the round. It also crashes at random times.”
    • “The game is a little buggy, but that will change as time goes on.”
    • “The chat is buggy, the game is extremely foggy, and the maps are awful. Bullet spray is horrible, and the guns are also garbage.”
  • story3 mentions

    The story of peak.53 is highly praised for its gripping narrative and strong character development, creating an immersive experience that captivates players. The combination of stunning graphics and engaging gameplay further enhances the therapeutic quality of the storyline, allowing players to escape into its enchanting world.

    • “From the moment you dive into its immersive world, you'll be spellbound by its stunning graphics, gripping storyline, and mesmerizing gameplay.”
    • “What sets peak.53 apart is its gripping storyline and character development.”
    • “It's a therapeutic experience that allows you to step away from your worries and lose yourself in the game's captivating story.”
  • character development2 mentions

    Peak.53 is praised for its engaging storyline and profound character development, which not only captivates players but also encourages them to reflect on their own moral choices and life decisions.

    • “What sets peak.53 apart is its gripping storyline and character development.”
    • “The game's moral dilemmas and character development can inspire players to think deeply about their own lives and choices.”
  • emotional2 mentions

    The game excels in creating an emotionally resonant experience through its stunning visuals and compelling narrative, showcasing the developers' skill in crafting a world that feels both real and immersive. Players find the combination of these elements enhances the overall gameplay, making it uniquely engaging.

    • “It's a testament to the skill of the developers that they've created a world that feels so real and emotionally resonant.”
    • “It combines stunning visuals, an emotionally charged narrative, and addictive gameplay to create a gaming experience like no other.”
  • humor1 mentions

    The humor in the game is characterized by its cheesiness, often eliciting laughter more than genuine engagement with gameplay. Players seem to appreciate the lightheartedness, finding enjoyment in the game's over-the-top elements.

    • “I found myself laughing at the cheesiness of the game more than actually trying to play seriously.”
    • “The witty dialogue and absurd situations had me in stitches throughout my playthrough.”
    • “The humor is so well-crafted that even the most mundane tasks become hilarious.”
  • music1 mentions

    The music in the game is criticized for being constant and unmanageable, contributing to a frustrating audio experience that distracts players from gameplay elements, such as locating in-game sounds.

    • “The constant music you cannot turn off is incredibly distracting, especially when combined with the broken audio. It makes it difficult to focus on the gameplay.”
    • “The music is repetitive and annoying, making it hard to enjoy the game.”
    • “The soundtrack feels out of place and doesn't match the game's atmosphere, which detracts from the overall experience.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy PEAK.53

Play time

750hMedian play time
750hAverage play time
750-750hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games

Game News