Ghost of Dragon

About

Ghost of Dragon is a single player role playing game. It was developed by Meta Interaction and was released on October 26, 2022. It received neutral reviews from players.

Ghost of Dragon is a semi-idle role-playing game. Players can build battle teams with unique heroes, flexible equipment, soul gems and powerful pets; the unique resident system provides players with great freedom for town management, whether it is forging equipment, capturing pets, refining soul gems, or collecting materials, players will have a much finer control over their idle play experience.G…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

43%

Audience ScoreBased on 58 reviews

graphics4 positive mentions

gameplay3 negative mentions

The game features a much deeper and more complex story compared to its predecessor, Dragon Cliff, with significantly improved English translation and coherent dialogue.
Battle graphics are well-done with distinct 3D visuals, and town management is more engaging than in Dragon Cliff.
The game has more content than Dragon Cliff and introduces new mechanics that some players find enjoyable, making it a fun idle RTS-RPG experience.

The game has been abandoned by the developers, with no updates or communication for over two years, leading to frustration among players.
Many players feel that the game lacks the unique charm and engaging gameplay of Dragon Cliff, with some mechanics feeling overly complicated and unbalanced.
The English translation is still rough in places, and some quests are poorly explained, making it difficult for non-Chinese speakers to fully enjoy the game.

graphics
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
12%
38%
Overall, the graphics are generally praised for their distinct 3D design and improvements over previous titles, though some players express a preference for the charm of pixel art. While the battle graphics are highlighted as particularly well-executed, there are mixed feelings about character designs and the art style, with some finding it underwhelming. Additionally, the game is noted to be CPU intensive, which may affect performance for some users.
- “The battle graphics are very well-done and more distinct 3D instead of charming but generic pixel art.”
- “The concept is similar to the first game but graphically this is superior.”
- “The graphics are great, the translation is absolutely amazing.”
- “The main story is completely done, and the post-game's only issue is having a placeholder graphic.”
- “I think they should have stuck with the pixel graphics; this game is very CPU intensive for what it is doing.”
- “Similar to the company's other idle game, but with much better graphics, though it's not enough to make it worth the price.”
story
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
14%
43%
The story is described as deeper and more complex, drawing comparisons to "Dragon's Cliff," though some players find the pacing slower and the character designs unappealing. While the main narrative is complete, the English translation has some flaws, and certain quests lack clear instructions, leading to frustration. Overall, the game appeals to fans of the original but may require improvements in execution and presentation.
- “It's a much deeper and more complex story that is definitely reminiscent of Dragon's Cliff.”
- “This game is for people who really liked the story, theme, and mechanics of Dragon's Cliff.”
- “The translation is of acceptable quality, the graphics are good, the storyline isn't bad.”
- “The main story is completely done, and the post-game's only issue is having a placeholder graphic.”
- “There is kind of a story now with quite some text.”
- “English translation not perfect and some quests don't tell you how to do them, leaving you unable to progress. The pacing of the game feels slower than the older game, Dragon's Cliff, and the art style is lackluster; none of the characters look appealing.”
gameplay
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The gameplay is characterized by a solid combat system with overlapping mechanics, though it leans more towards a semi-idle RTS than a traditional turn-based RPG. While fans of Dragon's Cliff may appreciate the thematic and mechanical similarities, some players find the pacing slower and the English translation lacking, leading to confusion with quests. Overall, the game features improvements and additional mechanics, but opinions on the art style and character design vary.
- “This is a fun game that has mechanics similar to Dragon Cliff in all the core ways.”
- “Even better than Dragon Cliff, though I generally prefer western fantasy. The art is beautiful in this game, and I like the system improvements and additional mechanics from the last game.”
- “It's actually a quite good implementation of combat with a lot of overlapping mechanics, but it feels more like a semi-idle RTS than a semi-idle turn-based RPG.”
- “The English translation is not perfect, and some quests don't provide clear instructions, leaving you unable to complete them. There are also a few mechanics that seem to be just for show and do nothing. The pacing of the game feels slower than the older game, Dragon's Cliff. The art style is mediocre; none of the characters look appealing or make me want to engage with them. That's just my preference, but I'd wait and see if it gets any better in the future.”
- “This game is for people who really liked the story, theme, and mechanics of Dragon's Cliff.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players seeking a charming atmosphere and nostalgic pixel art may find themselves disappointed, as the game's ambiance does not meet these expectations.
- “Those who played it for the charming atmosphere and nostalgic pixel warriors will be disappointed.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers generally appreciate the music in the game, noting that it reflects a significant amount of effort and contributes positively to the overall experience.
- “I can tell there's a lot of work being done, and the graphics and music are pretty good.”