Skip to main content

Breach & Clear

Breach and Clear provides a strategic RPG-style look into the world of Special Operations that provides an unusual spin on both the Strategic RPG genre and the military gaming world. Breach and Clear is a solid title worth playing.
Breach & Clear Game Cover
78%Game Brain Score
story, gameplay
grinding, stability
81% User Score Based on 1,568 reviews
Critic Score 68%Based on 2 reviews

Platforms

LinuxPCTabletAndroidMac OSPhoneiPadMobile PlatformiPhoneWindowsPlayStationPlaystation Vita
Breach & Clear Game Cover

About

Breach & Clear is a single player survival role playing shooter game with a warfare theme. It was developed by Mighty Rabbit Studios and was released on March 21, 2014. It received mostly positive reviews from critics and positive reviews from players.

"Breach & Clear" is a tactical strategy simulation game that allows players to build and customize their Special Operations team, plan and execute advanced missions, and engage in battle with a variety of enemies. With full customization options, players can tailor their soldiers' perks, tactics, camo, armor, and inventory, and utilize consumables like UAV Drones and Breaching Charges to gain an advantage. Every soldier and decision counts in this methodical, turn-based game. The Steam version includes all premium content from the original mobile game at no additional cost.

Skip User Reviews

81%
Audience ScoreBased on 1,568 reviews
story49 positive mentions
grinding24 negative mentions

  • Engaging tactical gameplay that rewards careful planning and execution.
  • Extensive customization options for characters and weapons, allowing for varied strategies.
  • Multiple game modes and difficulty levels provide replayability and challenge.
  • Repetitive missions and lack of narrative depth can lead to boredom after a few hours.
  • Clunky user interface and controls can hinder the overall experience.
  • Graphics and animations feel dated and lack polish, resembling a mobile game port.
  • story
    545 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its absence, with many reviewers noting that it lacks a cohesive narrative or overarching campaign, making the experience feel modular and repetitive. Players engage in a series of tactical missions that focus on gameplay mechanics rather than storytelling, resulting in a collection of scenarios that can feel disconnected and uninspired. While the tactical gameplay and mission variety are appreciated, the lack of a compelling story or character development leaves many feeling unengaged after a short period of play.

    • “The game has a lot of potential, and I recommend it for anyone who enjoyed the original Rainbow 6 and all the planning that happened before the mission.”
    • “You get to command a squad of four elite soldiers in various missions, and the ability to upgrade your team with new weapons and equipment adds depth to the gameplay.”
    • “Each mission places you in control of a small squad, and your missions will take you across the globe, from Afghanistan and Russia to China and Germany, with a variety of objectives to complete.”
    • “The absence of a proper story or overarching campaign leaves the experience feeling modular, like a collection of training exercises rather than a unified military operation.”
    • “The game is just a set of similar missions in different settings, with no overarching story or goals.”
    • “There is no real story to speak of in Breach & Clear.”
  • gameplay
    301 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of "Breach & Clear" is characterized by solid core mechanics that emphasize tactical decision-making over reflexes, appealing to fans of military strategy games. However, many players find the gameplay repetitive and lacking depth, with limited mission variety and simplistic mechanics that may not sustain long-term engagement. While the game offers enjoyable tactical elements and customization options, it suffers from a lack of innovation and can feel tedious after extended play.

    • “Despite its relatively modest production values, Breach & Clear captures a style of military gameplay rarely seen outside of complex simulation titles, focusing not on reflexes but on deliberate decision-making and the satisfaction of seeing a perfectly executed plan unfold.”
    • “The gameplay is amazing; the strategic choices you make in a single turn can mean life or death for your squad.”
    • “The tactics-based gameplay is pretty fun in an almost Hotline Miami kind of aspect, in that you'll want to restart the mission again and again to better refine your approach.”
    • “The core mechanics are strong, but the game leans heavily on them without enough escalation or narrative drive to sustain long-term engagement.”
    • “Mission structure rarely evolves beyond variations of 'eliminate all hostiles' or 'defuse the bomb,' and while the environments span different global locations, they seldom feel meaningfully distinct in gameplay terms.”
    • “The gameplay itself feels tedious as you continue on through its somewhat repetitive missions of pointing your guys at enemies and watching them do their thing.”
  • graphics
    196 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game are generally considered dated and reminiscent of mobile ports, with many users noting a lack of polish and detail. While some appreciate the decent performance on lower-end systems, others criticize the simplistic and sometimes janky visuals that detract from the overall experience. Despite these shortcomings, a few players find the graphics acceptable for the gameplay style, emphasizing that they do not significantly hinder enjoyment.

    • “The graphics are decent for one of the nicer mobile-type games out there, and performance seems good and stable.”
    • “The game offers some really nice graphics and a nice yet simplistic aesthetic which is pleasant all the same and has some amazing attention to detail even though it is a little rough around the edges.”
    • “The graphics are surprisingly good, gunfight scenes look great and are intense.”
    • “The graphics and animations are pretty bad, and this one could have really benefited from better graphics to take away from the more shallow parts of the game.”
    • “The graphics are dated and the music/sounds leave much to be desired, but the gameplay remains solid and harder difficulties are challenging.”
    • “The graphics are simply outdated, and the variety of animations is very limited.”
  • replayability
    72 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's replayability is a mixed bag, with many players appreciating the variety of difficulty levels, mission types, and random enemy placements that enhance replay value. However, some reviewers noted that the reliance on grinding, limited content, and repetitive gameplay can diminish long-term interest. Overall, while there are elements that encourage replaying, such as different strategies and unlocks, many feel the game lacks substantial replayability after initial playthroughs.

    • “Excellent gameplay, intuitive interface, and compelling mission design that ensures replayability.”
    • “The multiple difficulties help amp up the replayability.”
    • “With a variety of gameplay modes and missions to choose from, the game has more than decent replay value.”
    • “Heavily reliant on RNG (accuracy + evasion), enemies are quite dumb and won't open doors when noise is made, requires a lot of grinding to get necessary equipment, replaying old missions is considered 'replayability' and is required for other difficulties; it gets old pretty quick.”
    • “I'd recommend the game if it's on sale for a couple bucks, but I'd definitely say it doesn't have a whole lot of replay value.”
    • “Because of its existent but faltering replayability (and the fact that you earn everything you need for a good squad fairly quickly), it does get old quickly and doesn't feel very fleshed out.”
  • music
    30 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the subdued and tactical soundtrack that enhances the gameplay experience, while others criticize its repetitiveness and limited variety, noting that it can become annoying over time. While a few users highlight the soundtrack as outstanding and fitting for the game's tone, many suggest that it lacks depth and can detract from the overall enjoyment. Overall, the sound effects are described as adequate, but the music often leads players to prefer listening to their own playlists instead.

    • “The subdued presentation suits the game’s methodical tone, and the subtle soundtrack combined with sparse but sharp sound effects lends a professional, almost tactical calm to each mission.”
    • “Outstanding soundtrack and audio.”
    • “This game is a fun turn-based strategy game with a very good soundtrack and lots of things to customize.”
    • “The only two things I didn't like were that the music is only one song for each world and can get quite repetitive, and that the game is too short!”
    • “It's a fun semi-difficult game with okay graphics and an eh soundtrack.”
    • “I play this muted because the sounds and music are atrocious.”
  • grinding
    25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and repetitive, often requiring them to replay missions multiple times to acquire better gear and level up characters. While some enjoy the casual entertainment value, many feel that the grind for achievements and equipment can detract from the overall experience, leading to a sense of monotony over time. The navigation through menus and the need for extensive grinding to optimize teams further contribute to the game's tediousness.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “Eventually I got to the point where the game started to feel too grindy and I couldn't proceed without repeating old missions multiple times in order to get better gear that would give me a fighting chance.”
    • “The game does get old once you have almost all the best gear and it kind of feels like grinding.”
    • “Some achievements are a bit grindy; if you want to go for 100% completion, you will need at least 60+ hours.”
  • optimization
    23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, the game's optimization is generally well-received, with smooth performance on a variety of hardware, including older machines and integrated graphics. However, some users noted that the mobile version suffers from poor optimization, resulting in choppy gameplay. While the interface is optimized for touch controls, it can feel clunky on PC, and there are minor bugs that can interfere with the experience.

    • “On the plus side, the optimization seems to be decent, so loading times are swift and the performance is very good, even on older machines.”
    • “When you combine great performance on integrated graphics, with great touch controls and short missions, you get a great little game on your mobile or in-bed setup with a 13-inch laptop or smaller.”
    • “The interface design feels clearly optimized for touch controls, making the PC version occasionally clunky to navigate.”
    • “I enjoyed the game because it has replayability value and comes with some challenge, but the weapons could be more optimized and there were some lame bugs that interfered with the gameplay.”
    • “When it finally came out for Android, I bought it (a second time) only to find it was slow, poorly optimized, choppy, and hard to play.”
  • stability
    17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is a mixed bag, with numerous users reporting various glitches and bugs that detract from the overall experience, such as freezing issues and graphical anomalies. While some players find the game runs well enough and can overlook minor technical problems, others express frustration over persistent bugs that feel unaddressed, leading to a sense of an unfinished product. Overall, the game exhibits a lack of polish, with many players noting that it could benefit from further refinement.

    • “Runs great.”
    • “The game still freezes after the first mission is completed and tells me I failed.”
    • “The main reason I dislike this game is because it has many unfixed glitches/bugs, and it just feels unfinished.”
    • “First and foremost, in my 20+ hours I've found so many glitches, little things that aren't necessarily game-ruining, but are very annoying; especially if you're a perfectionist like me (I have to get 4 stars on every mission).”
  • humor
    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is generally well-received, with players finding it both funny and relaxing, often highlighting the comedic elements in the intro and gameplay. While some aspects, like repetitive voice lines, can wear thin, the overall playful tone and amusing cosmetic options contribute to a lighthearted experience. Despite some frustrations with controls, many players enjoy the humor enough to overlook these issues.

    • “The intro alone is hilarious enough to soothe some of the regret of me spending money on this 'simulation game'.”
    • “I find the game quite funny and relaxing; you might even spend a lot of hours in a row, especially when you will be hunting for the 'perfect game' (no injury, as fewest rounds as possible) and so on.”
    • “This game tries to come across serious, but when you play it, it tries to be playful and funny.”
  • monetization
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game is somewhat misleading, as it initially presents itself as a straightforward experience but is actually tied to upgrading squads through a marketplace that resembles the mobile version's microtransaction model. While the mobile version relies heavily on in-app purchases, these elements have been awkwardly removed from the current version, leading to confusion about the game's true nature and monetization approach.

    • “The mobile version was designed with microtransactions, but they were clumsily removed for this version.”
    • “Since the mobile version is free, it is tied down by in-app purchases.”
    • “I appreciate that there are no microtransactions in this version, as they have been stripped out from the mobile version.”
    • “It is not obvious in the beginning that the marketplace is not just advertising for Breach & Clear addons, but also to upgrade your squads.”
    • “The mobile version was designed with microtransactions, and those features were clumsily removed for this version.”
    • “It's important to note that, contrary to its advertising and the game's intro, Breach & Clear is not a simulation.”
  • atmosphere
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Despite some visual limitations, the overall atmosphere of the game remains intact and engaging for players.

    • “The atmosphere is incredibly immersive, drawing you into the game's world.”
    • “Every sound and visual element contributes to a hauntingly beautiful atmosphere.”
    • “The game's atmosphere is rich and layered, making exploration feel rewarding and engaging.”
    • “These visual limitations, however, do not fully undermine the atmosphere.”
  • emotional
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players seeking emotional engagement may find the game's minimalist approach lacking, as the repetitive nature can dull narrative tension. However, the loss of a well-developed character can evoke strong emotions, impacting both the player's experience and the dynamics of their squad.

    • “The XP was a lot higher for playing in this mode, and losing a character that you had almost played through the entire campaign with and had his skills almost at a 100 was quite emotional at first.”
    • “And the act of losing one in battle can not only affect players emotionally but also can affect the squad's dynamics as you lose the benefits that that experienced soldier had.”
  • character development
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Character development in the game is seen as lacking depth and immersion, with users noting a need for a more engaging campaign story and background context for missions. While character and weapon customization options are available, the overall execution feels limited and unpolished, detracting from the potential for meaningful character growth.

    • “The menus all look fine, the character design is acceptable and allows for customization, and the weapons themselves are customizable with special functions and color choices.”
    • “I would love to see a manual first-person camera available, though, and some more immersive character development and/or a polished campaign story.”
    • “There is no background story around the various missions, the user interface isn't very polished, the movement system is limited, the character development is not too interesting, the graphics are just okay, and the maps are quite small.”
Skip Critic Reviews
Skip Game Offers

Buy Breach & Clear

12h Median play time
18h Average play time
7-24h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 17 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Breach & Clear

Games Like Breach & Clear

Door Kickers Image
Door Kickers 2 Image
Breach & Clear: Deadline Rebirth Image
Gears Tactics Image
XCOM: Enemy Unknown Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Breach & Clear is a survival role playing shooter game with warfare theme.

Breach & Clear is available on PC, Mac OS, Phone, iPad and others.

On average players spend around 18 hours playing Breach & Clear.

Breach & Clear was released on March 21, 2014.

Breach & Clear was developed by Mighty Rabbit Studios.

Breach & Clear has received mostly positive reviews from players and mostly positive reviews from critics. Most players liked this game for its story but disliked it for its grinding.

Breach & Clear is a single player game.

Similar games include Door Kickers, Door Kickers 2, Breach & Clear: Deadline Rebirth, Gears Tactics, XCOM: Enemy Unknown and others.