Aeonic

About

Aeonic is a single player and multiplayer action game with a historical theme. It was developed by Hayk Khachatryan and was released on November 5, 2024. It received negative reviews from players.

Aeonic is a very simple text-based adventure. No real gameplay. You just go through slides representing eras of history, each of slides with text and an illustration. You also have two choices on most of the slides which lead to different outcomes for the era. Some choices lead to different endings. That's it. More of an interactive book than a game. If you want to appreciate this project t…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

19%Audience ScoreBased on 207 reviews

atmosphere3 positive mentions

music2 negative mentions

Ambitious and unique concept exploring human history and speculative futures through a broad timeline.
Accessible text-based narrative with simple decision-making mechanics appealing to fans of interactive fiction.
Some players find the idea thought-provoking and enjoy the contemplative storytelling and replayability.

Poor execution with disjointed, AI-generated text and images that lack cohesion, immersion, and polish.
Choices feel meaningless as they don’t produce lasting consequences or meaningful impact on the overall story.
Overwhelming walls of text with no sound, minimal interactivity, and presentation akin to a slideshow rather than a game.

story
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
76%
12%
The story attempts a poetic, speculative exploration across multiple eras but suffers from being overly brief, shallow, and poorly structured, often resembling disjointed AI-generated content. While it offers a unique concept-driven experience focused on storytelling, many players find the narrative lacks depth, meaningful choices, and engaging delivery, resulting in a disappointing and fragmented experience.
- “This approach gives it a distinctive identity, especially for players who enjoy story-driven experiences over action-heavy gameplay.”
- “Overall, Aeonic offers a focused and concept-driven experience that emphasizes storytelling and imagination.”
- “Rather than grounding itself in a single storyline or setting, the game stretches across multiple eras, presenting players with scenarios that span from primitive beginnings to speculative futures.”
- “Each era is generally too short, which makes the overall story feel shallow.”
- “It has about 10 minutes worth of 'content' in it, in a game that can't decide if it wants to be PC or mobile since half the instructions are 'tap here'. The entire game is an AI-written PowerPoint presentation with AI images, that pretends to have a story where your decisions matter but they hardly change anything other than the dialogue. After playing it two times with different choices, they just have a bit of different dialogue but follow the exact same beats with the exact same images.”
- “The biggest issue lies in how the story is delivered. Rather than pulling you into the story, the game overwhelms you with poorly structured exposition.”
gameplay
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
72%
14%
The gameplay is minimalistic and primarily focused on narrative progression through choice-based scenarios, lacking traditional mechanics like exploration, puzzles, or combat. While this simplicity creates an accessible, story-driven experience that some find immersive, others criticize it as repetitive, passive, and lacking engagement or mechanical depth. Overall, it appeals mainly to players seeking a straightforward, contemplative narrative rather than conventional gameplay.
- “Instead of relying on traditional gameplay mechanics, it focuses on narrative progression, placing the player in a series of scenarios that span from ancient times to speculative futures.”
- “This approach gives it a distinctive identity, especially for players who enjoy story-driven experiences over action-heavy gameplay.”
- “The simplicity of the mechanics makes it accessible, allowing players to focus entirely on the narrative without needing to learn complex systems.”
- “No real gameplay, just AI-generated images and gibberish text.”
- “Within a few minutes, you’ve already experienced the full extent of its 'gameplay,' if you can even call it that.”
- “Clicking through prompts that don’t matter isn’t gameplay—it’s a chore.”
graphics
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
58%
21%
The graphics, primarily AI-generated, are widely criticized for feeling uncurated, disconnected, and lacking purpose, often failing to complement the text or enhance immersion effectively. While they provide a basic backdrop for the game's timeline exploration concept, the visuals ultimately come across as uninspired and detract from the overall experience.
- “These visuals provide a backdrop that enhances immersion, giving players a sense of place as they move from one era to another.”
- “Instead of relying on flashy graphics, the game uses imagination as its greatest strength.”
- “Instead of reinforcing the narrative, the visuals sometimes feel like loosely connected illustrations, offering context without fully grounding the player in the world being presented.”
- “The game is a bad novel with poorly written text and AI-generated graphics.”
- “The text and visuals often feel like they were paired by someone who didn’t even bother to check if they made sense together.”
- “Even the visuals, which seem like the only thing it could possibly rely on, collapse under their own emptiness.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
25%
50%
Users criticize the game for lacking any music or sound effects, expressing disappointment over the missed opportunity to include AI-generated or royalty-free music to enhance immersion.
- “I'm not sure why the developers didn't bother to add sound to the game given that music could also have been AI generated, just like the rest of this game's content, and there are huge libraries of royalty-free music and sound online.”
- “Not even a loop of AI music to assault my ears.”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's atmosphere is generally consistent and engaging, supported by descriptive writing and complementary elements, though some images occasionally fall short in reinforcing a cohesive tone.
- “While the gameplay itself remains minimalistic, these elements work together to create a consistent atmosphere.”
- “The writing is descriptive, engaging, and often surprisingly atmospheric.”
- “While these images occasionally enhance the atmosphere, they are not consistently effective in establishing a cohesive tone.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The grinding aspect is characterized by repetitive farming tasks, with limited engaging options such as new farming methods or animal domestication. However, poor presentation, including distracting visuals and cumbersome interface design, detracts from the overall experience.
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game offers excellent replayability, driven by multiple outcomes and varied choices that lead to different interpretations and endings. This encourages players to revisit the game to explore all possibilities.
- “The presence of multiple outcomes also adds an element of replayability, as different choices can lead to different interpretations of events and endings.”
- “Replayability is also excellent.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is widely criticized as flat and unremarkable, lacking creativity and failing to leave any memorable impact.
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users criticize the monetization as overly aggressive and feel the game's pricing is unjustifiably high compared to the value offered, describing it as a cash grab.
- “More effort was put into making the burger I bought today, which cost less than this pitiful cash grab.”