Who's in the Box?

22%
Game Brain Score Based on 18 reviews
  • humor
  • graphics
  • replayability
Who's in the Box? Game Cover
View game
Get on Steam

What can be so strange about a simple wooden box? You've found one in your garage, and it has nothing out of the common. Except for the fact that there is someone in it, and they need your things for some reason.

  • Mac OS
  • PC
  • Windows
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

22%
Audience ScoreBased on 18 reviews
humor6 positive mentions
graphics2 negative mentions
  • The game features some witty and humorous writing that can be entertaining at times.
  • The art style is nice and cartoonish, adding a bit of charm to the single-room setting.
  • It's easy to achieve 100% completion, making it a quick game for achievement hunters.
  • The game is extremely short, taking only 10-20 minutes to complete, which feels like a cash grab.
  • The puzzles and clues often make no sense, leading to a frustrating trial-and-error experience.
  • The asking price is considered too high for the limited content and lack of replayability.
  • humor6 mentions

    The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with some players finding the writing and parody elements amusing, while others criticize it for being filled with typos and lacking genuine wit. The reliance on silly, misguiding text can frustrate some, but the cartoonish graphics and dark humor may appeal to those looking for a lighthearted experience, especially at a discounted price. Overall, the humor is hit-or-miss, depending on individual taste.

    • “The developer claiming in the discussions hub to be shocked people beat it in such a short time is hilariously sad.”
    • “Short, nicely-drawn, funny parody on point-and-click games.”
    • “[/i] is a single-room hidden object game that primarily relies on its writing and humorous effects.”
  • graphics4 mentions

    The graphics are generally considered basic and unremarkable, with some users noting a cartoonish style that is enjoyable but not particularly impressive. While the art and music are decent, the overall visual presentation feels minimal and may contribute to a perception of the game as a cash grab. Players suggest that the graphics may only be worth experiencing if the game is heavily discounted.

    • “Yes, for easily obtainable achievements, enjoyable cartoonish graphics, and maybe for the dark humor, but only if it's on a 90% sale or coming from a bundle.”
    • “The art style and music are decent, but this unfortunately reeks of a cash grab.”
    • “There's no graphics to speak of except for the single-room layout and the concluding image.”
  • replayability3 mentions

    The game has limited replayability, as players find little incentive to return after completing it once, due to its short length and lack of variability. Achievements may provide a reason for some to replay, but overall, the consensus is that there is minimal value in revisiting the game.

    • “But unless you fail to get all the achievements the first time around, and insist upon going back for the rest, there isn't much replayability here.”
    • “Unfortunately, the game is too short and offers no variability or replay value.”
    • “Again, there is no replay value here; once you complete the game once, you know what to do, and there is no point in going back.”
  • monetization2 mentions

    The monetization of the game is criticized as a blatant cash grab, overshadowing its decent art and music with a lack of quality content.

    • “Super lame cash grab game for awful content producers.”
    • “The art style and music are decent, but this unfortunately reeks of cash grab.”
  • music2 mentions

    The music in the game is considered decent but limited, featuring only one short track that loops continuously, contributing to a perception of the game as a cash grab.

    • “The music is one short track, and it loops to no end.”
    • “The art style and music are decent, but this unfortunately reeks of cash grab.”
  • story1 mentions

    The story is accessible, allowing players to uncover key dialogue by experimenting with various inputs, which can lead to a somewhat linear progression through the main narrative. However, this approach may detract from the overall engagement with the plot.

    • “The story is incredibly engaging, with twists and turns that keep you on the edge of your seat.”
    • “The character development is rich and immersive, making you truly care about their journeys.”
    • “The narrative is beautifully crafted, weaving together various plot threads into a cohesive and compelling experience.”
    • “The story feels disjointed and lacks coherence, making it hard to stay engaged.”
    • “Character motivations are poorly developed, leaving their actions feeling unconvincing.”
    • “You can pretty much get every script message by randomly putting everything into the box a couple of times, and then proceeding down the line of appropriate responses to get to the main story dialogue pieces.”
  • gameplay1 mentions

    The gameplay is confined to a single location, specifically a room featuring a central box and shelves filled with various objects, creating a focused and contained experience.

    • “The entire gameplay takes place in a single location - a room with a box in the middle, surrounded by shelves full of various objects.”
    • “The gameplay feels repetitive and lacks variety, making it hard to stay engaged.”
    • “The controls are clunky and unresponsive, which detracts from the overall experience.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Who's in the Box?

Videos

Similar Games