Toribash Next

About

Toribash Next is a single player and multiplayer tactical shooter game. It was developed by Nabi Studios and was released on January 24, 2024. It received negative reviews from players.

Toribash Next is the sequel to Toribash, a turn-based sandbox fighting game. Toribash allows players to create their own moves during a match, using 3D physics tools. Toribash Next features weapons, four-player battles and a new replay editor, plus more customization and modding options.

Skip User Reviews

35%

Audience ScoreBased on 258 reviews

humor2 positive mentions

stability13 negative mentions

Innovative physics-based fighting game with deep control over character movements, allowing for creative and strategic gameplay.
Supports multiplayer matches with up to 4 players, adding variety and social gameplay elements not present in the original.
Good potential for modding that could enhance replayability and allow customization, with improved weapon mechanics and some quality-of-life improvements over the original.

Currently suffers from numerous bugs, glitches, crashes, and poor optimization, making it often unplayable or frustrating to play.
Physics and controls feel sluggish, clunky, and less satisfying compared to the original, with inconsistent joint mechanics and inaccurate movement feeling floaty or spongy.
Lack of many features that made the original popular, such as comprehensive mod support, AI opponents, proper tutorials, stable servers, and content; also missing transfer of items/progress from the original game.

graphics
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
68%
16%
The graphics are widely criticized for being low-quality, outdated, and visually unappealing, with many users noting poor ragdoll physics, lack of detail, and confusing visual effects that hinder gameplay clarity. Despite some mild appreciation for multiplayer visuals and cosmetics, most consider the graphics a downgrade compared to the original game, with limited customization options and performance issues exacerbating the negative experience.
- “The only somewhat redeeming quality is the graphics and ability to play with multiple players at once.”
- “The visuals are another big point I've noticed and I don't hate it, but I agree with others saying it causes some legibility issues and makes it hard to tell what's going on.”
- “As a prior player, I find the experience generally worse than the original, with simplified graphics missing features, nonliquid blood effects, and a wireframe cube visual for gripping that is difficult to see during four-player fights.”
- “It's an online-only turn-based fighting game, combining laughably bad ragdoll physics with laughably bad graphics.”
- “Toribash Next is a seven-year ode to disappointment and incompetence; the physics are about as believable as a cat on a unicycle, the graphics look like they were lifted from a lost '90s CD-ROM game, and the UI is a labyrinth designed by someone who hates humanity.”
- “As a prior player, the experience is generally worse than the original as well, with simplified graphics that are missing features, seemingly no dismemberment by default, non-liquid blood effects that make it barely there, the visual for gripping has become a wireframe cube (which makes it actually pretty difficult to see amidst four-player fights), and the cosmetics I've accumulated over 17 years are gone.”
stability
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is widely criticized for being buggy and unstable, with frequent physics glitches and crashes that hinder playability. Many users find it less polished and more frustrating compared to the original, describing it as unfinished and lacking essential features like autosave. While there is potential for improvement, current stability issues significantly detract from the experience.
- “Buggy to the point where it can be hard to actually play the game.”
- “As it currently stands, it's a buggy mess that is borderline unplayable (the dev is working to fix it, we'll see how it goes). I will change my review to positive if this game gets fixed, but as of right now, I just can't recommend it.”
- “Broken as all hell and has no autosave function to stop you from losing those buggy replays forever.”
gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
24%
38%
The gameplay offers a unique and innovative combat concept that some players find refreshing, but it is also criticized for being confusing, clunky, and lacking polish. Issues such as poor physics, sluggish controls, matchmaking difficulties, and numerous bugs detract from the overall experience, limiting its competitive viability and enjoyment.
- “The game can be hard to understand at first, and some of the mechanics feel a bit weird, but the overall concept is really good.”
- “I absolutely love Toribash; it is such a breath of fresh air when it comes to unique combat mechanics. I wish it would make its way to console so it could truly soar.”
- “The standard four mods do not highlight the game's strengths, albeit they show improved weapon and modding mechanics.”
- “I absolutely love Toribash; it is a breath of fresh air when it comes to unique combat mechanics. However, the second game lacks an enormous amount of content and it is difficult to find a match at this moment. As time goes on, I hope it gets more love and polish.”
- “The gameplay feels clunky and uninspired, like trying to dance with two left paws.”
- “Right now, it's Toribash with a shader and more unstable gameplay (and no mods).”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The game's monetization is heavily criticized for its intrusive microtransactions and battle pass, giving the impression of a cash grab rather than an improved experience. Additionally, the lack of item transfer from the original game further frustrates players, undermining the game's overall value.
- “Even after that, this still isn't really free as the game is infested with mobile app store-like microtransactions.”
- “Instead of building upon the strengths of the original game, it feels like a lazy cash grab - a pale imitation of its former self.”
- “But hey, at least we have microtransactions.”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The game's optimization is generally criticized for poor performance, slower reaction times, and bugs that hinder playability, making it feel like a downgraded, mobile-lite version of the original. Despite some improvements, it lacks customization options and features, resulting in a less polished and less enjoyable experience.
- “Poor optimization and bugs make the game unplayable even though it came out 6 years after it was supposed to.”
- “Main negatives to me are the inclusion of a needless cash shop, the performance, lack of features like a tutorial and worse (see: slower and heavier) reaction timing on the moves.”
- “It tries to achieve what the original did but with worse graphics, economy, customization and performance.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is largely unintentional, with glitches like ghost previews causing laughable moments. However, some users suggest that other games, such as "Burn Your House Simulator," offer more genuinely funny experiences.
- “Ghost previews are so hilariously bad they glitch out of existence when simulating grabbing things.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's music suffers from poor sound mixing, with original tracks altered in a way that negatively affects their quality and stereo balance.
- “This game's sounds are all mixed horribly, which is most evident in the music.”
- “Each song that appears in the game is ripped from the original game, which would be nice if they didn't completely change how they sound and screw with the stereo levels.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the game's emotional experience mixed, with humorous or unexpected moments like scoring points through unconventional actions. However, technical issues such as unlimited FPS causing hardware concerns can distract from immersion and enjoyment.
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users find that the game offers high replayability, keeping the experience fresh and engaging each time they return.
- “It gives the game a lot of extra replayability and makes it feel fresh every time you come back.”