STAR WARS: Battlefront Classic Collection

20%
Game Brain Score Based on 6,085 reviews
  • graphics
  • stability
  • monetization
STAR WARS: Battlefront Classic Collection Game Cover
It’s time for an attack of nostalgia when the 2000s strike back.
Starting at €34.14Buy now
Get on Steam Get on Xbox Games Store

"Star Wars: Battlefront Classic Collection" is a compilation of the classic Star Wars Battlefront games, including STAR WARS Battlefront and STAR WARS Battlefront II, with bonus maps and heroes. The collection features campaign modes, galactic conquest, and multiplayer battles with up to 64 players on massive locations from the Star Wars universe. Play as various iconic characters and troops, and drive vehicles such as speeder bikes and Star Destroyers.

Play Modes

Reviews

20%
Audience ScoreBased on 6,085 reviews
graphics57 positive mentions
stability398 negative mentions
  • The nostalgic charm of the original Battlefront titles remains a strong draw for fans.
  • The updates have addressed many of the early concerns, such as server stability and balancing issues.
  • The variety of modes and maps offers plenty of replayability.
  • The game is buggy, dead, and abandoned, with no active multiplayer servers.
  • Many players report significant issues with controls, hit detection, and overall gameplay experience.
  • The game is overpriced for what it offers, especially compared to the original versions available on Steam.
  • graphics421 mentions

    The graphics in this remastered collection have received mixed reviews, with many players noting only minor improvements over the original titles. While some appreciate the upscaled textures and enhanced lighting, others criticize the lack of significant graphical upgrades, citing issues like graphical glitches and a larger file size without corresponding enhancements. Overall, the consensus suggests that while the visuals are somewhat better, they do not justify the price or the transition from the original games, with many recommending the use of mods for a superior experience.

    • “The graphics, while retaining that classic feel, have been polished, making the game visually appealing.”
    • “Game runs awesome; graphics look better than the original games, and if you don’t play online and just play the story mode and instant action, this game is great.”
    • “The graphics upgrade is beautiful, and the new heroes are a blast to play.”
    • “Graphics look even worse.”
    • “The gameplay graphics are somehow worse than the original PS2 version, an absolute waste of money.”
    • “The graphics haven't really been upgraded.”
  • stability415 mentions

    The game's stability has been widely criticized, with numerous reports of bugs, glitches, and server issues rendering it nearly unplayable. Many players have experienced significant problems in both single-player and multiplayer modes, including audio and visual glitches, lag, and connectivity issues. Overall, the consensus is that the game feels unfinished and is not worth the price, with many recommending the original versions instead.

    • “This game runs great in single player.”
    • “During the matches, I faced no glitches or errors that made it unplayable.”
    • “The game actually runs great and I love being able to re-enjoy a childhood classic of mine.”
    • “This game is buggy, dead, and abandoned.”
    • “The launch of this game was so buggy and ill-prepared that the original 2005 Battlefront 2 is more active than this.”
    • “Game is a buggy mess in single-player.”
  • monetization353 mentions

    The monetization aspect of the game has been overwhelmingly criticized as a blatant cash grab, with many reviewers expressing disappointment over the lack of effort and quality in the release. Players feel that the game exploits nostalgia without delivering meaningful improvements or functionality, leading to a consensus that it is not worth the $35 price tag, especially when the original versions are available for much less. Overall, the sentiment is clear: avoid this game and consider the original titles instead.

    • “It was a chance to show how games can rock without all the unlocks and microtransactions.”
    • “This was clearly a cash grab and wasn't even tested by the developers beforehand... oh and speaking of cash, $35 for this is an absolute joke!”
    • “This is possibly the biggest cop-out, cash grab, disappointing, broken promise of a game that has ever been released by a washed-up, uninterested, honorless game studio.”
    • “This game is a cash grab feeding on nostalgia.”
  • gameplay165 mentions

    The gameplay of the Star Wars™: Battlefront Classic Collection has been widely criticized for its numerous bugs, poor performance, and lack of significant improvements over the original games. Many players report issues such as laggy multiplayer, unresponsive controls, and graphical glitches, leading to a frustrating experience that often feels less polished than the original versions. While some appreciate the nostalgic elements and single-player modes, the overall consensus is that the game suffers from a lack of modernization and quality control, making it difficult to recommend, especially for those seeking a robust online experience.

    • “If you want a breath of nostalgia with improved graphics and gameplay, then this game is all for you.”
    • “The gameplay overall feels better than the original in my opinion -- aiming is smoother, shooting actually hits your reticle, and I love having controller support.”
    • “Overall the updated graphics look great, it still has the same gameplay feel, and finally galactic conquest!”
    • “There are so many bugs it's practically unplayable (janky walking mechanics, sometimes you encounter an invisible barrier that isn't there, speakers start to play unbearable sounds when janky walking mechanics start happening).”
    • “Constant crashing, multiplayer is laggy to the point of being unplayable, no significant alterations to the base gameplay of the original.”
    • “The gameplay is somehow worse than the original; I even booted up the old one on my PS2 and it played better!”
  • story160 mentions

    The story aspect of the remastered Battlefront games has received significant criticism due to the removal of crucial cutscenes, particularly the end-of-mission cinematics in Battlefront II, which many players feel leaves the narrative feeling incomplete and disjointed. While some players enjoy the nostalgic single-player experience and find the campaigns engaging, the frequent crashes, bugs, and missing content detract from the overall enjoyment, leading many to recommend playing the original versions instead. Overall, the remaster fails to deliver a cohesive storytelling experience, undermining the legacy of the original games.

    • “Despite a lot of people being upset with the launch of this game and online features not working properly, I have enjoyed every minute of playing the story mode on both games and galactic conquest, reliving my childhood.”
    • “In roughly 10 hours, I played through the entire story-driven campaign and I had a blast.”
    • “If you're interested in playing the story, this version is perfect, even though it's missing some cutscenes, the single player feels way better to play than the original one.”
    • “The story campaigns are mostly untouched, but for some reason parts of narrations/cutscenes are no longer here, making everything very awkward and confusing.”
    • “The ending cutscene after missions are missing, which is completely unacceptable.”
    • “Not only is the story getting broken for one who goes through at least battlefront 2 on this, it's basically half missing.”
  • optimization111 mentions

    Overall, the optimization of the game has received significant criticism, with many players reporting severe performance issues, including stuttering, lag, and crashes, particularly in multiplayer modes. While some users experienced smooth gameplay in single-player, the multiplayer aspect is often described as unplayable due to poor server performance and connection problems. Despite some graphical improvements, the general consensus is that the game is poorly optimized for modern hardware, leading to a frustrating experience for many players.

    • “The performance is buttery-smooth, and that's about all I can say positively about this until they fix the multitude of bugs and networking errors.”
    • “Pro: it is very optimized, and runs very smoothly.”
    • “The positive aspect is that the game is smooth as butter and isn't as janky as trying to play the original copies on PC as far as performance is concerned.”
    • “Finally getting a 'remake' of one of the best Star Wars games ever, but it seems history keeps repeating itself and we are sent another bugged, unoptimized, cash grab game.”
    • “This is a poorly optimized mess and an embarrassment to what I consider some of the greatest Star Wars games ever made.”
    • “The game shipped on launch with poor multiplayer performance, only 3 servers, Battlefront 1 menu audio is wrong, Battlefront 2 cutscenes are broken.”
  • music62 mentions

    The music in the game has been widely criticized for numerous audio bugs, including incorrect pitch, missing tracks, and poor sound mixing, which detracts from the overall experience. Many players expressed disappointment over changes to iconic tracks, such as the loading and victory music, which are often described as off-key or altered in ways that feel unnecessary. Despite these issues, some reviewers still appreciate the nostalgic value of the original soundtrack, particularly John Williams' compositions, which remain a highlight amidst the audio problems.

    • “John Williams' music is the only reason this review isn't a flaming bantha turd.”
    • “The epic battles in this game are of such a grand scale that they will leave you breathless, your heart pounding with excitement as you fight alongside your fellow rebels or stormtroopers or droids or clones. The attention to detail is staggering, from the intricately designed maps to the authentic sound effects and music that transport you directly into the Star Wars universe.”
    • “Nostalgia hits harder than the soundtrack.”
    • “The second I heard that they changed the loading music for Battlefront 1, I chucked my controller across the room and got a refund.”
    • “This game launched with rampant audio bugs in the singleplayer front, from ear-raping random explosions, hero mode's music being bugged on certain maps, and the fact that half the music and end fight themes are pitched downwards.”
    • “The audio isn't mixed well, has low music volume, and there's been changes to sounds too.”
  • humor27 mentions

    The humor in the game is largely derived from its numerous technical issues and glitches, which players find amusing despite their frustration. Many reviews highlight the absurdity of the broken multiplayer experience and the incompetence of the developers, leading to a mix of laughter and disbelief at the game's failures. Overall, while the game is criticized for its shortcomings, the chaotic nature of its problems has provided some unintentional comedic moments for players.

    • “Multiplayer is hilariously broken and I would say it's worth the $35 just for the dumpster fire alone.”
    • “It's so random it actually made me laugh; it might as well be the mascot for this game's failures.”
    • “I'm refunding this for obvious reasons that have been covered by thousands of other people before me, but I'm leaving a positive review because it's really, really funny watching people spawn in by the dozens into multiplayer games then disappear because they lose connection.”
  • grinding21 mentions

    Reviews highlight that grinding in the game can be excessively tedious, with many players finding the achievement system frustrating due to its repetitive nature and clunky menus. While some enjoy the nostalgia of grinding for achievements, the overall experience is marred by technical issues and a cumbersome user interface that complicates gameplay. Many users express that the grinding process feels unnecessarily prolonged and lacks the engaging quality found in previous titles.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “Spent hours grinding for award weapons shortly after launch, then the first update broke them and they still haven't been fixed as of this review, even though update two has come out since...”
    • “Unfortunately most of them are for grinding medals in-game, about the worst achievements I could imagine.”
    • “The UI is absolute crap, having to select each and every battlefield one by one is beyond tedious, and the menus don't even look appealing.”
  • emotional20 mentions

    The emotional responses to the game are overwhelmingly negative, with many players expressing deep disappointment and frustration, often leading to tears. Reviewers lament the destruction of their nostalgic experiences, citing poor execution, missing content, and technical issues that marred their enjoyment. The overall sentiment reflects a profound sense of betrayal from a beloved franchise, leaving players heartbroken over what they perceive as a failed revival of their childhood favorites.

    • “It made me cry.”
    • “The absolute disappointment I felt while playing this was heartbreaking.”
    • “Aspyr defined my childhood with titles such as 'Star Wars: The Force Unleashed' and 'Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic', and it is heartbreaking to see them release a great new collection of 2 legendary games, but then tragically fail.”
  • replayability14 mentions

    Overall, the replayability of the games is mixed; while there are various modes and maps that enhance replay value, many players feel that the experience is hindered by server issues and performance problems. Community support has helped maintain some activity, but the older versions are often regarded as more enjoyable and playable than the newer releases. Despite some improvements, the general sentiment suggests that replayability remains a concern, with many players preferring the original titles.

    • “The variety of modes and maps offers plenty of replayability, and the community support has been encouraging, with active players bringing life back to the game.”
    • “Hell, the Halo 3 Battlefront mod is a great play that had vastly more effort and is immensely more playable.”
    • “Battlefront 1 feels more playable than 2, which I'm glad about because it's the better of the two.”
    • “Overall: 6/10 ⭐ story: 9/10 ⭐ gameplay: 7/10 ⭐ atmosphere: 7/10 ⭐ graphics: 6/10 ⭐ audio: 7/10 ⭐ performance: 4/10 ⭐ replayability: 3/10”
    • “The original BF2 looks better with mods and is 1000 times more playable than this 'remake' - if you can even call it that.”
    • “The 19-year-old version is more playable, big cash grab.”
  • atmosphere4 mentions

    The atmosphere of the game is a mixed bag, with some players appreciating the nostalgic level design while others criticize the modern enhancements, such as upscaled textures, which detract from the original's charm. Overall, the atmosphere received a moderate rating of 7/10, indicating that while it has its strengths, it falls short in certain areas compared to the original experience.

    • “The atmosphere, character customization, gameplay, gunplay, and graphics blow this 20-year-old game out of the water and is free (with Game Pass that I already own).”
    • “This should have been easy profit for Aspyr; all they had to do was make the older games work better with modern systems. No one asked for the 70 GB upscaled textures, which look terrible in many cases. The visual atmosphere in maps like Mygeeto looks worse; the fog, for instance, looks better in the original.”
    • “The atmosphere and level design are exactly what you remember.”
    • “The atmosphere, character customization, gameplay, gunplay, and graphics (obviously) blow this 20-year-old game out of the water and is free (with Game Pass that I already own).”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Critic Reviews

67% average critic score

Buy STAR WARS: Battlefront Classic Collection

Play time

4hMedian play time
16hAverage play time
1-6hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 16 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games