eFootball 2022

About

eFootball™ 2023 is a football simulation game with a focus on single-player action. The game boasts good mechanics and compelling visuals, creating an immersive football festival experience. However, be aware of some bugs that may affect gameplay. Fly your flag and join in the celebration!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Local Multi-Player Play with friends in the same physical space using split-screen or multiple screens
2-Players Play with one other player, either online or locally, in a cooperative or competitive game mode
Multi-Player Compete or cooperate with other players online
Co-Op Team up with friends to complete levels or missions together
Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo
PvP Player versus Player - Fight against other players in real-time, often in arena-style combat
Split Screen Play with multiple players on the same screen, often with divided or shared screen real estate

+10

44%

Audience ScoreBased on 22,330 reviews

humor92 positive mentions

gameplay561 negative mentions

gameplay
2,500 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
56%
22%
The gameplay of eFootball has received mixed reviews, with many players noting significant improvements in mechanics and realism compared to previous iterations. However, numerous criticisms highlight issues such as sluggish controls, unresponsive player movements, and a lack of depth in gameplay options, leading to a frustrating experience for some. While the game is praised for its potential and free-to-play model, many players feel it falls short of the standards set by earlier PES titles, particularly in terms of content and overall enjoyment.
- “The gameplay is fun for a couple of hours, so if you want to spend some time on a free weekend, give it a try :)”
- “The mechanics, especially the player movement and ball control, are solid, offering a realistic feel that makes matches feel dynamic and immersive.”
- “Gameplay is nicely polished now, it is smooth and fast!”
- “The connection, the gameplay, scripted gameplay is so pathetic.”
- “So if you can endure terrible gameplay, feel free to spend hundreds of hours collecting cards that are easily beatable by people who pay to play.”
- “The gameplay is the worst I've seen, with players acting completely moronic and controls that are horrible.”
graphics
1,366 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
22%
51%
27%
The graphics of "eFootball" have received mixed reviews, with many players noting significant improvements over previous versions, yet still falling short of expectations compared to competitors like FIFA. While some praise the visuals as decent for a free game, others criticize them as outdated, resembling mobile game graphics, and highlight issues with performance optimization and graphical glitches. Overall, the consensus suggests that while there are positive aspects, the graphics need further refinement to meet modern gaming standards.
- “Amazing graphics for a free game.”
- “The graphics are stunning and gameplay is cool.”
- “The graphics and gameplay are better than previous versions, but clearly need some improvement.”
- “The graphics are underwhelming, especially compared to competitors, and performance optimization remains inconsistent, even on high-end systems.”
- “The graphics look bad, passes work horribly, dribbling is terrible, shooting is probably the only thing besides the power meter being trash that is actually kind of okay.”
- “The graphics are a significant letdown.”
stability
189 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
1%
1%
98%
The game's stability is severely compromised by a multitude of bugs and glitches, leading to frequent freezes, lag, and unresponsive controls that make gameplay frustrating and often unplayable. Many players report issues with animations, AI behavior, and network connectivity, which detract from the overall experience. While some improvements have been noted, the game remains riddled with technical problems that hinder enjoyment and functionality.
- “Surprisingly fun and runs great on the deck!”
- “Not buggy, but as good as I expect a football game to be.”
- “The game is riddled with bugs, glitches, and server issues, making it almost unplayable at times.”
- “It's just getting worse and worse... I have been playing it since it was called Winning Eleven and there are a lot of problems within it... online games network tampering and scripts are the worst, all of that is to force users to purchase coins instead of fixing the game glitches.”
- “This game is a bugged mess with more glitches than Lewis Hamilton's 2016 Mercedes in early-season spec.”
optimization
184 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
45%
47%
The optimization of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with users reporting severe performance issues such as stuttering, lag, and low frame rates even on high-end systems. Many players express frustration over poor graphics and inconsistent player performance, which detracts from the overall experience. While some users note that the game shows potential and has made progress, the consensus is that significant optimization improvements are urgently needed.
- “Game is well optimized as well, clean animations, and it's free?!”
- “The game is currently on the way to becoming good, still, there are some bugs and performance issues, but overall it came a far way from the original release.”
- “Great game, better optimization than FIFA, better dream team too.”
- “The graphics are underwhelming, especially compared to competitors, and performance optimization remains inconsistent, even on high-end systems.”
- “This game is so badly optimized and the frame rate is so bad on top of a game that is already bad overall.”
- “The performance is dodgy as well.”
monetization
102 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
55%
37%
The monetization strategy in the game has been widely criticized for its heavy reliance on microtransactions, which many players feel detracts from the overall experience and promotes a pay-to-win model. While some users appreciate the game being free-to-play and the ability to earn in-game currency without spending, the intrusive nature of in-game purchases and the perception of it being a cash grab have left a sour taste for many. Overall, the focus on monetization over gameplay quality has led to disappointment among players who long for a more traditional gaming experience.
- “Monetization is quite liberal; they give you lots of great players for free. You don't actually need to pay for anything; it's easy to build a squad of 90+ players.”
- “This is great for casual players or those who want to try before they buy (microtransactions are available for additional content).”
- “For a free football simulator, that really doesn't require in-game purchases to have a good team and have fun with it, it is worth it.”
- “Microtransactions play a significant role in unlocking additional content, which may frustrate players looking for a more traditional experience.”
- “It's disheartening to see a game prioritize monetization over providing a fulfilling and fair gaming experience.”
- “With numerous technical issues, lackluster graphics, limited gameplay, and intrusive microtransactions, it falls far short of players' expectations.”
humor
96 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
96%
4%
The humor in the game is often described as unintentional, stemming from its numerous glitches, awkward animations, and bizarre gameplay mechanics that lead to laughable moments. While some players find joy in the game's absurdities and chaotic nature, others express frustration at its lack of polish, with many reviews highlighting the comedic value of its failures rather than its intended design. Overall, the humor is a mixed bag, providing both entertainment and annoyance, making it a source of amusement for some and a point of criticism for others.
- “Honestly, this game is like the virtual equivalent of a soccer match where the referee has been replaced with a house cat—unexpected, chaotic, and full of hilarious moments.”
- “Plus, the game has a delightful sense of humor that keeps you chuckling, especially when your teammate scores an own goal and your virtual coach turns into an angry meme right before your eyes!”
- “The player AI is hilariously broken; at one point I set off on my own down the wing, was closed down by four opposition players and had nobody to pass to because all my own players were standing in their own half making funny faces at each other.”
- “It is hard to make a game that's worse than catching an STD, but here you have it. This is just a simulation of football if it was played by people with Parkinson's disease, and it's not funny, it's depressing.”
- “It is hard to make a game that's worse than catching an STD, but here you have it. This is just a simulation of football if it was played by people with Parkinson's disease, especially those who use scripts whenever they suck at this game and made them disconnect from the session. It's not funny, it's depressing.”
music
72 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
31%
49%
21%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some praising the soundtrack as enjoyable and atmospheric, while others criticize it for being limited, repetitive, or outright terrible. Many players express frustration over the inability to easily turn off unwanted tracks, and while a few highlight standout songs, the overall consensus suggests that the music is one of the few redeeming aspects of an otherwise flawed experience.
- “The music in *Galactic Odyssey* is simply sublime.”
- “The commentary is lively and informative, and the music is catchy and upbeat.”
- “The soundtrack is great.”
- “The soundtrack's options are extremely limited.”
- “The soundtrack is alright, but the same as PES 21, except for the music which is new and quite frankly awful.”
- “Limited music diversity leads to repetitive auditory experiences, and additional elements are necessary to elevate the overall audio immersion.”
story
59 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
63%
24%
The reviews indicate a significant lack of a compelling story in many games, particularly in football titles, with several users noting the absence of a story mode or depth in the narrative. While some games, like *galactic odyssey*, are praised for their rich storytelling and immersive world-building, others are criticized for being overly focused on gameplay without any substantial narrative content. Overall, the consensus is that many games fall short in delivering an engaging story, leaving players wanting more.
- “The graphics used in the story scenes in between gameplay are so perfectly done.”
- “The orchestral score enhances the emotional impact of key story moments and adds a layer of grandeur to epic space battles.”
- “*Galactic Odyssey* offers a vast open world to explore, side quests to complete, and multiple branching story paths.”
- “However, its graphics pale in comparison, and the storyline lacks depth.”
- “Best football game right now but there is no story mode or the master league.”
- “Same old story, lots of potential, no real content.”
grinding
36 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
17%
75%
Reviews indicate that grinding in the game can be excessively time-consuming, often requiring players to invest significant hours to achieve meaningful progress or acquire desired characters. While some players appreciate that the game offers less grinding compared to others, many express frustration over the necessity of grinding for rewards and the perceived advantage of players who spend money. Overall, the grinding experience is described as tedious and sometimes demotivating, with a strong sentiment that it detracts from the enjoyment of the game.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “A bit grindy... sometimes.”
- “It's a disgrace from Konami to put this build in a game with no grinding to do until November.”
- “If you don't pay and don't want to spend a lot of time grinding to get a 5% chance to get anyone from your actual dream team, the game isn't for you.”
- “Position training and player skill training are randomized and not selectable by the player, which can result in nothing after all your hours grinding them. This is deflating as you actually have wasted your time.”
- “It is a huge grind to get currency for an in-game team, and even then the gameplay isn't worth grinding for.”
atmosphere
29 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
28%
59%
14%
The atmosphere in the game receives mixed reviews, with some praising the stunning graphics, detailed player models, and immersive audio, while others criticize the lack of crowd engagement and overall stadium ambiance. Many users express a desire for a return to the more vibrant atmosphere of previous titles, noting that while certain aspects have improved, the overall experience still feels lacking compared to earlier versions. The sound design and match day presentation are highlighted as positives, but many feel that the atmosphere remains inconsistent and could benefit from further enhancements.
- “The stadiums look stunning, the player models are detailed, and the crowd atmosphere adds to the excitement.”
- “The lighting effects, especially during space battles, create an atmosphere that's both immersive and cinematic.”
- “Through colorful menus and a completely authentic atmosphere you will dive into the efootball world!”
- “Stadium atmosphere: 3/10 > the fans look like bots.”
- “The atmosphere is disturbing and haunting.”
- “Even the atmosphere inside the stadium sounds more like a funeral, or at least the fans seem to be equally excited.”
emotional
29 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional responses to the game are overwhelmingly negative, with many players expressing feelings of heartbreak, frustration, and disappointment due to poor gameplay mechanics and controls. Nostalgia for past iterations of the game contrasts sharply with the current experience, leading to a sense of emotional damage and a desire to abandon the franchise altogether. Despite some mentions of emotional moments and orchestral scores, the overall sentiment reflects a deep dissatisfaction with the game's execution.
- “This is the best football simulation I have played so far. I have played FIFA for many years, and although it may not be as fast or pretty, this game holds its weight in realism and a strong sense of emotional intelligence as the game is very different from its counterpart.”
- “The orchestral score enhances the emotional impact of key story moments and adds a layer of grandeur to epic space battles.”
- “It feels so heartbreaking and disappointing to see PES that we loved so much go down like this.”
replayability
28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
64%
11%
Overall, the game's replayability is viewed positively, with many players noting significant improvements from earlier versions and praising the diversity of teams and settings available for both solo and online play. However, some users express concerns about limitations on team selection and a lack of depth, which can hinder long-term engagement. Despite these issues, frequent updates and the introduction of various modes contribute to a generally favorable replay value.
- “There is limitless replayability with the diversity of teams and settings available, whether you play alone or with friends online.”
- “The microtransactions give such a high replay value and the graphics are super.”
- “Yes, I do recommend the game now; there is a huge difference between the first release version and this one. The developers are working hard to make the game much more playable and enjoyable with every big update they make every month or two to fix most of the bugs players complained about.”
- “Limiting us to one team for this period really kills replayability straight off the bat.”
- “The game offers moderate replay value through various modes and online options, but the lack of depth and innovation hampers long-term engagement.”
- “I was hoping that the game would become more and more playable with time, but now, I'm closer to uninstalling the game than playing it ever again.”