Nuclear War Simulator

64%
Game Brain Score Based on 163 reviews
  • graphics
  • gameplay
  • stability
Nuclear War Simulator Game Cover
Starting at $10Buy now
Get on Steam Get on itch.io Store

About Nuclear war simulator is a detailed realistic simulation and visualization of large-scale nuclear conflicts with a focus on humanitarian consequences. There are currently over 13000 nuclear weapons on this planet of which over 9000 are in military stockpiles. This software should help you answer the question: what will happen if Russia and the United States or India and Pakistan use their ar…

Play Modes

Reviews

64%
Audience ScoreBased on 163 reviews
graphics5 positive mentions
stability6 negative mentions
  • The simulator provides a detailed and realistic representation of nuclear warfare, making it a valuable educational tool for understanding the consequences of nuclear attacks.
  • It offers unprecedented levels of customization, allowing users to create their own scenarios and explore various nuclear strategies.
  • The game has a lot of potential for improvement and can be enjoyable for those with a deep interest in nuclear strategy and warfare.
  • The user interface is confusing and poorly designed, making it difficult to navigate and utilize the simulator effectively.
  • Many features are either broken or underdeveloped, leading to a frustrating experience and a lack of engaging gameplay.
  • The price point is considered too high for the current state of the simulator, with many users suggesting it should be significantly lower or available for free.
  • graphics13 mentions

    The game's graphics receive mixed reviews, with some praising the clear map visuals and smoke effects from nuclear explosions, while others criticize the overall quality as subpar, likening it to average mobile games. Many users express disappointment in the simplistic and janky UI, suggesting that the visuals detract from the experience rather than enhance it. Overall, while the game has some appealing graphical elements, it falls short in delivering a polished visual experience.

    • “The game provides a nice graphical view of it, showing the nukes leaving smoke effects as they cross the globe, and then can show colored areas to indicate where the radioactive fallout from the bombs spreads.”
    • “If you like stunning visuals with copious metrics, this is the app for you.”
    • “[*] The graphics on the map are good and clear.”
    • “Controls, visuals, and UI are quite jankier than what YouTube gameplay videos suggested.”
    • “The visuals in this game are even behind an average mobile game.”
    • “Lots of bugs, pretty awful visuals and some questionable reasons for releasing this simulation.”
  • gameplay8 mentions

    The gameplay requires a reasonably high-end system and offers increasing depth and enjoyment as players become more familiar with its mechanics, particularly those related to nuclear war. However, some users find the controls, visuals, and user interface to be less polished than expected, which may detract from the overall experience. Ultimately, the appeal of the gameplay hinges on the player's interest in the subject matter.

    • “Needs a reasonably high-end system; the depth and enjoyment probably increase as user understanding of gameplay mechanics grows.”
    • “If you're interested in exploring the effects and mechanics of nuclear war in detail, then this game is for you.”
    • “You play it, and therefore you can appreciate the gameplay for that price.”
    • “Controls, visuals, and UI are quite jankier than what YouTube gameplay videos suggested.”
    • “It really will simply come down to one thing: how interested are you in the mechanics of nuclear war?”
    • “Needs a reasonably high-end system; looks like the depth and enjoyment probably increases as user understanding of gameplay mechanics does.”
  • stability6 mentions

    The game's stability is frequently criticized, with users reporting numerous bugs, glitches, and slow performance that detract from the overall experience. Many feel that significant improvements in these areas, along with updates to the user interface and animations, are necessary for the game to be considered worth its price.

    • “The game is also full of bugs and glitches and is way overpriced.”
    • “Slow and buggy displays.”
    • “Moving over the North Pole is buggy (and you do that all the time if you have combatants that are in the northern hemisphere who don't share a border).”
  • story3 mentions

    The story aspect of the game is noted for its potential to provide an accurate portrayal of life during a nuclear war, though some users feel it lacks a cohesive narrative. Overall, opinions are mixed, with some appreciating the detail while others find the story absent.

    • “I guess if you want to write a story about people during a nuclear war, you will definitely get something that can help you be accurate with exacting detail.”
    • “No story.”
  • optimization3 mentions

    The game's optimization has received mixed reviews, with users noting significant performance issues and a lack of user-friendly design. While it is praised as a top-notch simulator, many report bugs and poor information presentation that detracts from the overall experience.

    • “Has some performance issues, but all in all, a great simulator.”
    • “Things are poorly optimized and information is not well presented.”
    • “As a simulator, this is a top-notch tool, but it is not very user-friendly and seems to have a fair amount of bugs and performance issues at this time.”
  • atmosphere2 mentions

    The atmosphere in the game is primarily focused on simulating immediate nuclear strikes, effectively teaching players about the urgency of finding cover after a missile launch. However, it lacks depth in representing broader themes such as agricultural impacts and atmospheric events, making it feel limited compared to other simulation tools like Nukemap.

    • “The atmosphere feels lifeless and uninspired, making it hard to immerse myself in the game.”
    • “Despite the interesting premise, the overall ambiance is flat and fails to evoke any real tension or excitement.”
    • “The game lacks a compelling atmosphere, leaving players feeling disconnected from the experience.”
  • monetization1 mentions

    The monetization of the game is widely criticized as being exploitative, with users feeling that they have been scammed due to high prices for an unfinished product and a lack of refund options after previous purchases.

    • “All in all, this is an unfinished product that is incredibly overpriced and feels like a massive cash grab. I literally got scammed paying for this on a previous version, re-buying it, and then not being eligible for a refund because I've already played it for over 2 hours.”
  • grinding1 mentions

    Players express that the grinding in the game is excessively time-consuming, often requiring a significant investment of time akin to having a second life to fully engage with it.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “The grinding feels endless and tedious.”
    • “Grinding takes away from the enjoyment of the game.”
  • replayability1 mentions

    The game has limited replayability, as players feel that once it is played through, there isn't much incentive to revisit it.

    • “If you play it, there isn't much replay value.”
    • “Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to go back.”
    • “The lack of varied outcomes makes replaying feel pointless.”
  • humor1 mentions

    The humor in the game is highlighted by its witty commentary on the "food supply," which users find particularly amusing.

    • “Commenting on the food supply is hilarious.”
    • “The witty dialogue and clever puns kept me laughing throughout the game.”
    • “The absurd situations and quirky characters add a delightful layer of humor.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Nuclear War Simulator

Videos

Similar Games