SimpleRockets 2

The story aspect of the game is largely centered around its career mode, which features a variety of missions that range from simple tasks to complex challenges. While some players appreciate the integration of tutorials within missions and the sense of progression, many criticize the repetitive nature of the missions, lack of guidance, and unbalanced tech progression that can lead to frustration. Overall, the narrative experience is seen as lacking depth compared to competitors like Kerbal Space Program, with calls for more diverse and engaging mission content.

The gameplay of this game is often compared to Kerbal Space Program (KSP), with many players appreciating its focus on creativity and simplified mechanics, making it more accessible for newcomers to orbital mechanics. While some users find the building mechanics cumbersome and unintuitive, others praise the robust rocket design system and the immersive experience it offers, allowing for extensive customization and experimentation. Overall, the game provides a rewarding experience for those interested in aerospace simulation, despite some noted bugs and a steep learning curve.

Overall, the game's optimization is praised for its smooth performance across various devices, including lower-end hardware, and for significantly improved load times compared to its predecessor. While many players appreciate the detailed performance metrics and the ability to customize engine parameters, some report occasional performance issues with complex builds. Despite these minor drawbacks, the game is generally regarded as well-optimized, providing a satisfying experience for both casual and advanced users.

The game's stability is a mixed bag, with many users reporting significant bugs and glitches, particularly in the physics and user interface, which can lead to frustrating gameplay experiences. While some players have noted that it runs well on lower-end systems and has improved over time, others have experienced frequent freezes and crashes, especially during complex actions like docking. Overall, the game is still in early access, and while it shows potential, its current state is deemed too unstable for a full recommendation.

The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it calming and well-suited to the game's atmosphere, while others criticize it for being repetitive and lacking variety, often describing it as bland or forgettable. Many users noted that the soundtrack consists of only a few tracks, which can lead to a feeling of dryness and a desire for more engaging music. Overall, while the ambient soundscapes can enhance the experience, they often fail to leave a lasting impression.

The atmosphere in the game has received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the realistic graphics and atmospheric effects, such as re-entry heating and condensation on wings. However, many feel that the atmospheric mechanics are less engaging compared to similar games like Kerbal Space Program, citing issues like limited time warp, poor engine performance for atmospheric launches, and a lack of detailed information about atmospheric parameters. Overall, while the visual aspects are praised, the gameplay experience related to atmosphere could benefit from further development and complexity.

Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and repetitive, particularly due to the need for extensive vehicle customization and the limited quicksave options during risky missions. While some appreciate the satisfaction of completing complex builds, many express frustration with the slow progression through the tech tree and the monotonous nature of certain missions, which can feel like forced farming rather than enjoyable gameplay. Overall, the grinding can detract from the fun, making it feel like a chore rather than a rewarding experience.

The humor in the game is largely criticized for its absence, with many reviewers noting a lack of engaging or funny characters, particularly in comparison to titles like Kerbal Space Program (KSP). While some players find moments of humor in missions or descriptions, these attempts often fall flat, leading to a perception that the game feels more like a serious simulation than an entertaining experience. Overall, the humor aspect is seen as a significant shortcoming, detracting from the game's potential charm and immersion.

The emotional aspect of the game is mixed; while some players feel a sense of achievement and engagement from the engineering mechanics, others find the lack of humor, charm, and artistic elements limits emotional immersion. The game has potential for deeper emotional investment, but currently falls short compared to more established titles like Kerbal Space Program. Overall, it evokes a range of feelings from frustration to a sense of accomplishment, but lacks a strong emotional connection.

Juno: New Origins is criticized as a cash grab from mobile developers, lacking the depth of a true PC game while attempting to capitalize on the popularity of Kerbal Space Program. Despite its monetization strategy, some users find value in the game, considering it a worthwhile purchase.

Users express a desire for improved replayability, particularly highlighting the need for tutorials to be accessible for repeated playthroughs. This suggests that while the game may have engaging content, the ability to revisit learning elements could enhance the overall experience.