Military Conflict: Vietnam

About

Military Conflict: Vietnam is a tactical shooter game set during the Vietnam War. The game features a variety of weapons and vehicles from the era, and allows players to engage in large-scale battles in a variety of environments. Players can choose to fight on either the US or Viet Cong side, and must use strategy and teamwork to complete objectives and emerge victorious.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

88%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,098 reviews

gameplay62 positive mentions

optimization10 negative mentions

The game features a diverse and extensive weapon roster, providing players with a satisfying gunplay experience.
It offers a nostalgic arcade-style gameplay reminiscent of classic FPS titles like Call of Duty and Day of Defeat.
The developers are actively updating the game and engaging with the community, showing a commitment to improving the overall experience.

The player base is very low, making it difficult to find populated servers for multiplayer matches.
Some maps are poorly designed, leading to issues like spawn camping and lack of variety in gameplay.
The game suffers from performance issues and bugs, particularly on certain maps, which can detract from the overall experience.

gameplay
148 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
42%
55%
3%
The gameplay of "Military Conflict: Vietnam" is described as a highly addictive blend of casual and hardcore mechanics, reminiscent of titles like Call of Duty and Counter-Strike, featuring smooth gunplay and a diverse weapon pool. While the game offers enjoyable single-player and bot modes, some players note a lack of multiplayer engagement and repetitive elements. Overall, the mechanics are praised for their accessibility and fun factor, making it a solid choice for fans of arcade-style FPS games.
- “This game is awesome, with great gameplay and maps.”
- “Fast paced and fun, addictive, and awesome gameplay.”
- “The guns sound and feel great, the gamemodes are time-tested classics, the bots put up a good fight and the gameplay is straight arcade fun whether on or offline.”
- “Game has a lot of details, like really cool weapons, but the gameplay is really bad. The game tries to be like Call of Duty but still aims for realism with low time-to-kill. The main problems for me are the wanky movement, static spawns (c'mon, it's 2023!), weird weapon balancing, and no hitmarkers. Sadly, right now the game is really bad and boring.”
- “The worst gameplay I have experienced is with maps that have hardcoded respawn points.”
- “The gameplay had me on the fence.”
graphics
80 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
48%
49%
4%
The graphics of the game are generally well-received, showcasing solid visuals that effectively utilize the aging Source engine, though some players note a dated appearance compared to modern AAA titles. While many appreciate the nostalgic aesthetic and well-defined visuals, there are criticisms regarding blurriness and a lack of polish in certain areas. Overall, the graphics are considered above average for an indie title, with a good balance of atmosphere and gameplay, though there is room for improvement.
- “The graphics are quite appropriate and prove that the source engine has aged gracefully.”
- “Graphics are a noticeable improvement over the classic Day of Defeat Source with a nice touch of modernization.”
- “Visually speaking overall, I think the game has hit the sweet spot for looks, as unlike a lot of FPS games being released these days, it doesn't apply a hundred different special effect filters onto the screen, which would muddy the image and make it hard to discern what you need to shoot.”
- “The graphics are laughable for $20. I think 'Men of Valor' from the early 2000s had more accurate representations of uniforms and kit for both sides. I mean, the M1 helmet looks like a popcorn bowl; this is something 'Call of Duty 1' did better two decades ago.”
- “The big point of contention for probably a lot of people in this day and age, given what you've likely seen on the store screenshots, is that for a new game in 2022, graphically from a technical standpoint it looks dated or it isn't as photo-realistic as the new 'Call of Duty' or whatever tactical shooter you've been following.”
- “Also, I can't seem to make the graphics less blurry. Even if I shut those settings down, it's still blurry.”
optimization
40 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
10%
65%
25%
Overall, the game's optimization has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting significant performance issues, particularly on certain maps and lower-end hardware. While some users have managed to achieve playable frame rates through adjustments, the consensus is that the game requires further optimization, especially for platforms like the Steam Deck. As it is still in early access, there is hope that future updates will address these performance concerns.
- “This is a pretty good Vietnam-themed shooter that I shelved a bit ago due to issues with resolution and performance. However, upon some heavy troubleshooting with my computer and tinkering with the game's settings, I no longer have issues running this game at 3200x2000!”
- “The game is very well optimized like most source games, and I'm very surprised that my younger brother with an Intel HD 4600 could play the game at 30 frames a second with the lowest graphical settings and the lowest resolution possible.”
- “Edit: Performance on deck is getting better.”
- “Only real complaint as of now is the large performance decrease on Vong Canh Hill (the one with a lot of foliage and tunnels) which I had to decrease my resolution to 1024 by 768 to get frames between 10 and 20.”
- “Clearly the deck can run this game at 60fps on default settings, so again this screams lack of optimization for everyone to hear.”
- “Not the best optimized game (it runs on the Source engine, but at 4k on high settings with a 3070 I'm barely reaching 60fps.”
music
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
50%
14%
The music in the game has received high praise for its well-composed soundtrack that effectively captures the Vietnam War era, enhancing the overall gameplay experience. Players appreciate the inclusion of diverse musical elements, including suggestions for adding more iconic Vietnam War tracks. Overall, the soundtrack is described as a standout feature, contributing significantly to the game's atmosphere and enjoyment.
- “The soundtrack is the bomb with that guitar solo.”
- “Great game, satisfying gunplay and decent graphics with one hell of a soundtrack, give it a try at least!”
- “Military Conflict: Vietnam is one of the best indie first-person shooters you will ever experience in a lifetime. The music is really well composed with the game's theme revolving around its time period in the mid 50's to late 60's to early/mid 70's.”
- “You will absolutely be able to watch your comrades die without feeling like Private Chris Taylor and having that platoon soundtrack play in your head louder and louder with every game you play.”
- “Adding more known Vietnam War music maybe for the loading screen or randomized for the main menu.”
- “Military Conflict: Vietnam is one of the best indie first-person shooters you will ever experience in a lifetime, but the music is really well composed with the game's theme revolving around its time period in the mid 50's to late 60's to early/mid 70's.”
monetization
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
10%
90%
The monetization aspect of the game is generally viewed positively, as it is priced affordably and avoids battle passes or microtransactions, appealing to players who prefer traditional game funding models. However, the game's visibility is hampered by poor advertising, resulting in a small player base and limited engagement, particularly during its early access phase. Players express hope that increased marketing efforts could enhance the game's reach and community.
- “It's pretty cheap, and I want to support developers who create games in the good old way without battle passes or microtransactions.”
- “The game is dead, very few players, lack of advertisement and the price tag are to be blamed.”
- “However, it suffers from a lack of advertising, a small yet dedicated playerbase and the problems that come with being in the early access stage.”
- “The game advertising was handled poorly; at peak this week, only 24 people played the game.”
humor
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's humor is highlighted by its small, friendly community that enjoys playful antics and funny interactions, particularly through voice chat. Players appreciate the comedic elements, such as amusing character voices and absurd gameplay moments, like bunny hopping with a flamethrower. However, the limited player base may hinder the overall experience despite the positive reviews.
- “The small community that it has is full of funny and friendly people that just want to goof off in the game.”
- “Voice chat is hilarious and all around a great game.”
- “Anyhow, bunny hopping with a flamethrower at full sprint is funny.”
atmosphere
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
30%
10%
The game effectively captures an immersive Vietnam-era atmosphere, enhanced by realistic graphics, sound design, and a diverse array of weapons. While the tactical gameplay and movement mechanics are praised, some reviewers feel that the atmosphere falls short in conveying the true horrors of the conflict. Overall, it offers a thrilling and engaging experience reminiscent of classic war films.
- “The Vietnam-era atmosphere is immersive, and every match is a thrilling, tactical challenge.”
- “Wide range of weapons that I have never seen in any Vietnam War game before, realistic experience on the battlefield and atmosphere which I recall from many war movies about that era.”
- “The movement is perfect, the guns feel great and the overall atmosphere, be it the maps or the sound design, is pretty much on point.”
- “While the gameplay is certainly punishing and does reward guerilla tactics, the atmosphere doesn't really sell one of the nastiest and most grotesque armed conflicts in human history.”
story
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
40%
30%
The story aspect of the game is currently limited, with players expressing a strong desire for a more developed single-player campaign that includes engaging narratives and missions. Many users draw comparisons to classic titles like Call of Duty: World at War, highlighting the potential for a compelling story if a campaign were to be implemented. Overall, there is anticipation for future content that could enhance the storytelling experience.
- “Apparently a campaign is coming soon, I cannot wait! I hope it is at least 2-3 hours worth of playable content and has a good story; that would be fantastic. As a single-player bot game, it's awesome.”
- “Hidden gem! If they made a single-player campaign with ambushes and a compelling story, it would sell a million units, I'm sure.”
- “I play single-player games with a story usually, and that's what I thought this was going to be.”
- “I play single player games with a story usually and that's what I thought this was going to be.”
- “Hidden gem and if they made a single player campaign with ambushes and story, it would sell a million units, I am sure.”
- “It's Black Ops 1 if they actually had more than 2 missions in Vietnam.”
stability
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is frequently criticized, with users reporting numerous bugs and glitches that hinder the experience. While some players have managed to resolve performance issues through troubleshooting, the overall consensus indicates that the game remains unstable, particularly in its early access phase. Additionally, players recommend joining the game's Discord for support due to these ongoing issues.
- “Very buggy and glitchy with barely any players.”
- “The game is really buggy, and you need to be in the Discord to ask for support.”
- “Source engine glitches.”
replayability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The game is praised for its high replayability, providing an infinite amount of content to explore, making it a great value at just $15 USD. Many users highly recommend it for those who prioritize replayability in their gaming experience.
- “The game offers high replayability and is a great value at just $15 USD.”
- “I really recommend this game, especially if you value replayability.”
- “This offers an infinite amount of replayability.”
grinding
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players appreciate the lack of traditional grinding elements such as battle passes and weapon unlocks, which enhances the enjoyment of the game. Many express a willingness to engage in ranked play, indicating that the game has potential for competitive grinding in the future.
- “No battle pass or boring grinding, no weapon unlocks.”
- “No battle pass or boring grinding, no weapon unlocks.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game is characterized by its wholesome and enjoyable experience, free from exploitative market practices, which contributes to a positive and uplifting atmosphere for players.