Megatect

About Megatect

Megatect is a single player and multiplayer casual platformer game with a science fiction theme. It was developed by Timedrop Studios and was released on September 8, 2015. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Essentially, Megatect is a multiplayer map builder without limitation! Use a plethora of blocks, objects, and wires to create your own challenge maps, arenas, new sport, whatever you can dream up!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip Games Like Megatect

Looking for games like Megatect? Here are top casual platformer recommendations with a science fiction focus, selected from player-similarity data — start with Brickadia, GameGuru Classic or DRONE The Game.

86%994reviews

Brickadia

2025

Casual Shooter

73%1.5kreviews

GameGuru Classic

2015

Shooter

51%1.4kreviews

DRONE The Game

2018

Shooter

68%359reviews

RPG World - Action RPG Maker

2020

Role Playing

33%1.1kreviews

TUG

2014

Role Playing Shooter

46%586reviews

Blockscape

2014

Casual Role Playing

42%753reviews

Project Genom

2016

Open World Role Playing Shooter

63%280reviews

On a Roll

2017

Sport

39%317reviews

Lifeless

2016

Open World Shooter

64%2kreviews

Minimum

2014

Shooter

More games like Megatect

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

71%Audience ScoreBased on 28 reviews

graphics4 positive mentions

optimization3 negative mentions

Innovative sandbox building gameplay combining shooter mechanics, offering creative freedom similar to a mix of Minecraft and Quake.
Visually appealing with polished graphics, good lighting, and a unique art style that enhances the building and shooting experience.
Active developer engagement with steady updates and community interaction, demonstrating passion and progress despite being a one-person team.

Game is abandoned or development stalled with lost source code and long gaps in updates, leading to a lack of new content and incomplete features.
Multiplayer functionality is limited and inconvenient, requiring IP connections without official servers, causing difficulty in finding players or public matches.
Technical issues such as poor optimization, server shutdowns, login problems, and occasional crashes reduce playability and discourage a broader user base.

graphics
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
24% positive mentions, 58% neutral mentions, 18% negative mentions
The game's graphics receive mixed feedback, with some praising its sleek, unique, and solid visual style, including reflective textures and a distinctive art design. However, others criticize the minimalist, low-polygon retro look as lazy or unpolished and highlight significant performance and optimization issues that hinder gameplay on less powerful hardware. Overall, while the visuals can be impressive, they are marred by technical shortcomings.
- “The graphics, although not spoken about much in this review, are quite amazing and look very sleek.”
- “The possibilities this game brings with it make it even more fun to build houses. Unlike in Minecraft, the graphics and textures of blocks, corners, and glass seem solid and have a nice reflecting touch.”
- “Overall, this game is actually pretty beautiful. After switching to my preferred graphics processor, I got around 50 fps, which is a lot better than before. It isn't amazing but significantly improved.”
- “The lack of textures is a method that lazy developers often use to disguise their lack of talent or interest in doing the graphics properly, trying to pass it off as "art" or "we made it look bad on purpose," which gamers should not have to put up with.”
- “I am sad to say I do not recommend this game due to poor optimization. Most games I usually get at least 150 FPS, but at minimum graphics settings (one above off) at 1920x1080 resolution, I got a steady 10 FPS. The graphics looked great, and the concept was good, but the game is unplayable without an extremely powerful computer.”
- “I had made a previous review without realizing that I had forgotten to set my Nvidia graphics card as my preferred graphics processor.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The game suffers from poor optimization, causing extremely low performance even on mid-range PCs despite decent graphics and concept. It requires a very powerful computer to run smoothly and lacks user-friendly multiplayer features. Overall, optimization issues significantly hinder playability for many users.
- “I am sad to say I am not recommending this game just due to the poor optimization. Most games I would usually get at least 150 fps, but at the minimum value for each graphics option (1 above off) with my base resolution of 1920x1080 I got a steady 10 fps. The graphics seemed to look great, and the game also seemed to have a great concept, but in reality it is just unplayable without an extremely good computer.”
- “This game needs to be more optimized for lesser PC users. I wouldn't even consider my PC to be among those, yet this game needs open servers so people can just join and play instead of needing an IP to play multiplayer.”
- “Aside from a dated level editor with bad optimization tied to a barebones boomer shooter, there's really nothing here to see.”
gameplay
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
The gameplay is engaging and enjoyable, seamlessly blending a futuristic "build your dream" theme with versatile mechanics. Players can either focus on creative platform building or embrace complex technical challenges using wiring, traps, and logic to outsmart others, offering diverse and stimulating experiences.
- “The theme of a futuristic, 'build your dream' platform works very well with the mechanics that have been established.”
- “Or maybe you prefer the more technical way and like building technical highlights through wiring, traps, and complicated logical mechanics to stun your friends as well as your opponents with your wit?”
- “Fun gameplay.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 100% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
Users mention the music but provide no additional details or opinions, leaving the aspect "music" largely unspecified.