Skip to main content

Gray Zone Warfare

Gray Zone Warfare Game Cover
69%Game Brain Score
gameplay, story
optimization, stability
69% User Score Based on 64,092 reviews

Platforms

PCCloudNVIDIA GeForce NOWWindows
Gray Zone Warfare Game Cover

About

Gray Zone Warfare is a multiplayer action adventure game. It was developed by MADFINGER Games, a.s. and was released on April 30, 2024. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

"Gray Zone Warfare" is a tactical FPS set in a quarantined Southeast Asian island, where players can explore, uncover secrets, and participate in high-stakes fights. The game features realistic ballistic simulation, and highly customizable weapons. Equipment is added to your character after every game reset, with types of equipment subject to change in future resets. Editions are upgradable, allowing users to pay only the difference when upgrading.

Skip User Reviews

69%
Audience ScoreBased on 64,092 reviews
gameplay2.1k positive mentions
optimization3.6k negative mentions

  • optimization
    13,964 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of "Gray Zone Warfare" has received significant criticism from players, with many reporting severe performance issues, including stuttering, low frame rates, and frequent crashes, even on high-end systems. While some users have managed to achieve stable performance through specific settings adjustments, the overall consensus is that the game is currently poorly optimized, particularly for lower-end hardware. Players are hopeful for future updates to address these issues, but many recommend waiting until the game is more polished before purchasing.

    • “The developers seem to be actively working on the optimization, but unless you have a high-end computer, odds are you will have frame drops and stuttering that impact your gameplay.”
    • “I believe the devs are dedicated to smart, methodical updates, optimizations, and community-conscious improvements.”
    • “The game has a lot of potential, but it still needs to be optimized.”
    • “The game is poorly optimized, rendering it unplayable even on low graphic settings.”
    • “This game is a buggy mess, it has poor performance optimization, it doesn't look the best.”
    • “The performance issues are so pronounced that they overshadow any potential enjoyment the game might offer.”
  • gameplay
    5,420 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of "Gray Zone Warfare" has received mixed reviews, with many players praising its core mechanics and immersive experience, while others criticize its performance issues and repetitive gameplay loop. Players appreciate the tactical elements, realistic gunplay, and the unique extraction mechanics, but express frustration over bugs, server stability, and the lack of variety in missions. Overall, while the game shows promise and has a solid foundation, it requires significant optimization and content updates to enhance the gameplay experience.

    • “The gameplay loop is very fun, completing missions to earn cash and using said cash to build your loadout to exactly what you want and then running back out there against the NPC combatants but always on the lookout for other enemy factions.”
    • “The core gameplay loop is fantastic, whether you're focusing on tasks or just jumping onto a helicopter and seeing where it takes you, you'll always manage to have fun.”
    • “The gameplay is engaging and fun.”
    • “I am trying to love this game so much but its mechanics are so f***ing broken.”
    • “The loot you get kind of sucks for the amount of work you do and the risk you take; the gameplay is dry, tedious, and repetitive.”
    • “The gameplay loop is very repetitive and shallow, although the quests are quite varied and detailed so I think they did good there, but you will very quickly realize it's just: call heli, transport to ao, walk and do task, rtb with very little in the environment to make the downtime between the fob and your ao feel alive/challenging.”
  • story
    4,982 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story aspect of "Gray Zone Warfare" is currently minimal, primarily conveyed through a series of quests that often feel repetitive and formulaic, such as fetch and kill missions. Players have noted that while the quests provide some context and hints, they can be vague and lead to frustration, especially when key items required for mission completion are difficult to obtain. Overall, the narrative lacks depth and cohesion, with many players expressing a desire for more engaging story elements and varied mission objectives as the game develops.

    • “The missions in this game drive the story, but most of them are super time-gated because every person in the squad has to kill 20 people in a town of only 20 people with respawn timers set to 20 minutes.”
    • “The quests are interesting and puzzling as well as informative to the game's lore.”
    • “The quests feel a bit too linear and I'd rather be sent all over the place instead of the same one over and over until getting sent to the next region, but that's just details, really.”
    • “The missions in this game drive the story but most of them are super time gated because every person in the squad has to kill 20 people in a town of only 20 people with respawn timers set to 20 minutes.”
    • “The quests are your typical fetch quests or shoot this many people.”
    • “The quests are repetitive, short, and, well, you guessed it, boring.”
  • graphics
    4,580 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics in "Gray Zone Warfare" are a mixed bag, with many players praising the stunning visuals and attention to detail, particularly in environments and character models, thanks to the use of Unreal Engine 5. However, numerous reviews highlight significant optimization issues, leading to poor performance and low frame rates, especially on mid-range and older graphics cards. Players often report needing to adjust settings extensively to achieve playable performance, with some experiencing crashes and graphical glitches, indicating that while the potential for beautiful graphics exists, the current state of the game requires further refinement and optimization.

    • “The graphics are incredible with Unreal Engine.”
    • “The level of immersion is mind-blowing, with stunning graphics and smart AI that challenge you at every turn.”
    • “The graphics are beautiful, and the controls feel amazing.”
    • “Enemies everywhere so you just get shot in the head while looting and the performance of this game is horrible to say the least, enemies from over 100 away can barely see them because it's blurry as hell no matter what graphic setting I have it on or get below 40 fps to sharpen everything up, this shouldn't be happening on a 3070ti, which most recent games have performed amazingly for me.”
    • “Graphics were very muddy and hard to even see enemies in the background.”
    • “The graphics are still terrible and grainy and stutters, the devs release gameplay with graphics looking clear and beautiful but it's not at all what you see when you actually play the game.”
  • stability
    2,822 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability has been widely criticized, with players reporting numerous bugs, glitches, and performance issues, including frequent crashes and significant frame rate drops. Many users acknowledge that these problems are typical for an early access title, but express frustration over the extent of the instability, which often makes the game unplayable. While some players find enjoyment in the gameplay despite the bugs, the consensus is that the game requires substantial optimization and fixes before it can be recommended for a smooth experience.

    • “The improvements the team has made since launch are awesome and it runs great for me.”
    • “When the game first launched it was horrible, but the devs quickly put out some patches and it runs great now.”
    • “Game runs great for what it currently is for hours straight.”
    • “The game is constantly unstable, laggy, buggy as hell, and every time you load up for your first mission of the day make sure you give it like 10 minutes to warm up and stop being choppy.”
    • “Game is not even in an alpha state, don't waste money on a laggy, buggy game.”
    • “There are so many glitches, bugs and not to mention performance atrocious.”
  • grinding
    410 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Grinding in the game is often described as tedious and frustrating, primarily due to the reliance on rare key drops and repetitive tasks that can lead to significant time investment without satisfactory rewards. Many players feel that the experience is exacerbated by performance issues, long wait times for transportation, and the risk of losing hard-earned gear, making solo grinding particularly challenging. While some enjoy the grind when playing with friends, the overall sentiment suggests that the current mechanics need refinement to enhance enjoyment and reduce monotony.

    • “The game itself is stunning and the tasks are not tedious for the moment.”
    • “Very detailed environments, I enjoy walking the jungle and exploring; it's not tedious, mechanics of the game work well and have good function, very impressed for early access!”
    • “Gunplay is good and smooth for a milsim, just enough to be fun and not tedious.”
    • “The loot you get kind of sucks for the amount of work you do and the risk you take; the gameplay is dry, tedious, and repetitive. The only thing it really has going for it is that it is semi-realistic in some aspects.”
    • “After countless hours grinding for keys with no luck due to poor game design and horrible drop rates, players are required to wait a ridiculous amount of time for a helicopter for their 'fast' travel system.”
    • “The missions are tedious and poorly structured, requiring players to search extensive areas with minimal guidance, which quickly becomes monotonous.”
  • monetization
    390 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized as a blatant cash grab, with many players expressing disappointment over its early access release and lack of essential features like toggle ads and key bindings. Reviewers have noted that the game feels rushed and unpolished, capitalizing on the negative sentiment surrounding other titles in the genre, particularly Escape from Tarkov. Overall, the sentiment is that the game prioritizes profit over quality, leading to a negative reception regarding its pricing and monetization practices.

    • “For $35 with no microtransactions thrown in my face and this game running better at launch than most AAA developers, this game is hands down a steal if you are one for immersion and graphics.”
    • “It also has great potential to offer monetization through customization of cosmetics, maybe gun skins, who knows.”
    • “The current state is promising, and with continuous improvements, it could easily rival games like Escape from Tarkov, especially considering the recent criticisms of Tarkov's monetization strategies.”
    • “I'm disappointed that this has turned into another indie cash grab.”
    • “This was a cash grab, and I'm pissed I spent money on it.”
    • “In short, this game is an uncooked mess that is even too raw for 'early access.' It feels like a half-hearted attempt or a cash grab to prey upon gamers eager for this genre.”
  • humor
    270 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is frequently highlighted by players, who find amusement in the game's glitches, AI behavior, and chaotic interactions with both enemies and teammates. Many reviews mention hilarious moments stemming from unexpected situations, such as AI getting stuck or making absurd comments, as well as funny encounters with other players, particularly through proximity chat. Overall, while the game has its share of performance issues, the community's lightheartedness and the comedic elements of gameplay contribute to a fun and entertaining experience.

    • “The hilarious interactions with other faction members, playing duos and squads in PvE with friends, exploring the enormous and absolutely stunning map, and slaughtering countless AI is just good old-fashioned fun.”
    • “I missed my first shot, aggro'd the AI, and he quite literally one-tapped me with his first bullet and put me into a coma; the sheer ridiculousness of the situation just made me laugh my ass off rather than be upset.”
    • “The faction system and VoIP has led to some hilarious and intense interactions.”
    • “The amount of times I've had this stupid game's server just randomly forget my progression mid-game (the timing couldn't be any better while doing my missions) and end up re-doing all my tasks again and again and again and again... for like the 10th time is honestly not funny at this point.”
    • “That's not funny.”
    • “This game sucks so much; it's not funny. It crashed while I had full gear, and it already happened twice.”
  • atmosphere
    162 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere of the game is widely praised for its stunning visuals, immersive sound design, and attention to detail, creating a rich and engaging experience for players. Many reviewers highlight the game's ability to evoke a sense of tension and authenticity, particularly in its combat scenarios and environmental design. However, some players note that while the atmosphere is impressive, it can be marred by technical issues and repetitive gameplay elements.

    • “The attention to detail in the woodland combat scenarios is particularly notable, providing a thrilling and authentic atmosphere for players who enjoy tactical engagements.”
    • “From the moment you step onto the quarantined island, the game envelops you in a dense, atmospheric experience where every decision carries weight.”
    • “With its stunning visuals, immersive atmosphere, and intense combat, it's a game that's sure to please fans of the genre.”
    • “I understand it's part of the jungle atmosphere, but man, it's ear-piercing. Even if you go underground into a bunker, the sounds persist.”
    • “It tries to present a real atmosphere, but fails; they go so detailed it looks blurry.”
    • “Right now, it lacks atmosphere and depth as well as complexity, but I think this is a title that will be worth keeping your eye on.”
  • replayability
    128 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's replayability is a mixed bag, with some players praising its dynamic mission system and branching storylines that promise high replay value, while others criticize the lack of depth and repetitive tasks that can lead to boredom after a few hours. Many reviewers note that the game is still in early access and requires significant optimization and content updates to fully realize its potential for replayability. Overall, while there are elements that could enhance replay value, the current state of the game leaves much to be desired.

    • “One of the standout features of Grayzone Warfare is its replayability.”
    • “Replayability is high, thanks to the game's dynamic mission system and branching storylines.”
    • “The branching storylines and morally ambiguous choices add layers of depth and replayability, inviting you to explore the consequences of your actions and forge your own path through the chaos of war.”
    • “The game gets boring after a few hours, which is a real problem because a game of this nature should have replay value.”
    • “The game lacks replayability and the available content seems insufficient.”
    • “Game tasks; actually tried to give it a go, smashed out a lot of tasks, I'm level 20, only tasks are go here, pick this up, drop it off to base, such a wasteful time sink, there's no way these tasks are replayable, having the same tasks at each point of interest is lame.”
  • emotional
    62 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional aspect of the game is highlighted by its gripping narrative and the sense of community among players, which fosters a wholesome and supportive environment. Many players express a deep emotional connection to the gameplay, with moments of joy and heartbreak, although some criticize the game's technical issues that detract from the overall experience. Overall, the game evokes strong feelings, both positive and negative, making it a memorable experience for many players.

    • “The gripping narrative adds emotional weight, making every choice matter.”
    • “From its flawless gameplay mechanics to its stunning visuals and emotionally resonant storytelling, Grayzone Warfare is a triumph in every sense of the word.”
    • “It was one of the most wholesome shooter experiences I’ve ever taken part in.”
  • music
    60 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's music is generally praised for its intensity and thematic relevance, enhancing the overall experience during critical moments. However, some players note that the soundtrack can be infrequent and occasionally overwhelming, with issues related to volume control and the removal of certain tracks. Many recommend incorporating Vietnam-era music to further enrich the gameplay atmosphere.

    • “The soundtrack is intense and appropriately thematic, heightening the tension during critical moments.”
    • “The game's soundtrack complements the intense action and strategic planning, with music that dynamically shifts based on the situation.”
    • “Bombing over the treetops in the little bird while listening to Vietnam era music will never not be fun!”
    • “Edit: 2 months later and no updates, just a small hotfix that removed some music.”
    • “On first launch, you get taken to a character creation screen with loud obnoxious music and no way to get to the options to turn off the music/mute the audio until you have finished character creation.”
    • “- game starts, blasts my eardrums heavily with music; cannot turn music down as cannot see settings until character selection complete.”
  • character development
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Character development in "grayzone warfare" is highly praised for its depth and emotional resonance, effectively challenging players to reflect on their own beliefs and values. The game combines stunning visuals and realistic animations with expertly crafted storytelling, creating a rich narrative experience that feels both fresh and engaging.

    • “Through its expertly crafted storytelling and masterful character development, grayzone warfare delves into themes that resonate on a deeply personal level, challenging players to confront their own beliefs and values in ways that few games dare to attempt.”
    • “Animations, gunplay, character development while like Tarkov still feels fresh.”
    • “Character development”
    • “Character development is lacking and feels superficial.”
    • “The character development doesn't offer enough depth to engage players.”
    • “There is a noticeable absence of meaningful character development throughout the game.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Gray Zone Warfare

15h Median play time
117h Average play time
5-60h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 758 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Gray Zone Warfare

Games Like Gray Zone Warfare

Incursion Red River Image
The Forever Winter Image
SCUM Image
Deadside Image
The Front Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Gray Zone Warfare is a action adventure game.

Gray Zone Warfare is available on PC, Windows, Cloud and NVIDIA GeForce NOW.

On average players spend around 117 hours playing Gray Zone Warfare.

Gray Zone Warfare was released on April 30, 2024.

Gray Zone Warfare was developed by MADFINGER Games, a.s..

Gray Zone Warfare has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its optimization.

Gray Zone Warfare is a multiplayer game with local co-op support.

Similar games include Incursion Red River, The Forever Winter, SCUM, Deadside, The Front and others.