Skip to main content
Gamecraft Game Cover

About

Gamecraft is a single player simulation game. It was developed by Freejam and was released on May 10, 2019. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Gamecraft is a game maker, where you can build your own physics games from blocks and components without the need to write code. You can also play many games that have been created and shared by others in the community.

Skip User Reviews

76%
Audience ScoreBased on 436 reviews
graphics8 positive mentions
gameplay23 negative mentions

  • Offers a versatile and fun sandbox for building and creating games, with advanced physics and logic systems enabling complex and creative constructions.
  • Features an active and supportive development team with regular updates during its active period, and a community generating diverse user-created content and games.
  • Intuitive and innovative tools that allow players of varying skill levels to build, share, and play a variety of custom games and creations.
  • Development was abandoned, leading to an unfinished and unpolished experience with recurring bugs, crashes, and lack of promised features such as multiplayer.
  • Controls and physics are often clunky or difficult to master, with limited optimization leading to performance issues even on capable hardware.
  • Limited player base and community content compared to similar titles; game has been delisted and is no longer supported or available for purchase.
  • gameplay
    49 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Gameplay in this game revolves around mechanical building and creativity, drawing heavy comparisons to Scrap Mechanic, often seen as either a simpler or less polished alternative. Players appreciate the easy-to-understand mechanics and potential for elaborate contraptions, though many note it lacks polish and features compared to established titles. While promising and fun for fans of mechanical sandbox games, it currently feels like an early-stage clone needing more content, updates, and unique elements to stand out.

    • “The mechanics are laid out in a basic, easy-to-visualize, and easy-to-understand format.”
    • “Even so, with enough understanding of logic gates and mechanical pieces, you can build incredibly elaborate contraptions and games.”
    • “The building mechanic is simple and direct, but the complexity is in the hand of the player.”
    • “Gameplay looks very similar to Roblox, but if you want to play Roblox why should you play this?”
    • “It's just a blatant ripoff of Scrap Mechanic.”
    • “Currently the mechanics and parts offered are far too similar to a successful game called Scrap Mechanic, while the movement in the game highly resembles another successful game called Minecraft.”
  • graphics
    18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics feature a cartoony art style with a wide variety of blocks and generally good textures, drawing comparisons to games like Garry’s Mod and Roblox but with mixed opinions on quality. While some praise the overall visuals and realistic effects, others note limited graphics options, lack of customization, and potential performance issues on lower-end hardware. There are calls for improvements such as enhanced graphical settings and upgrades to modern rendering pipelines.

    • “I love the scaling options on all of the blocks and cartoony art style with a wide variety of blocks to choose from!”
    • “The music sets the perfect atmosphere, the graphics fit with it really well, the controls are amazing, the physics simulation is outstanding.”
    • “This game is great, realistic, has great graphics, and is very promising!”
    • “Kind of Garry's Mod with worse graphics.”
    • “Contains no in-game options of any kind, so no control rebinding or reducing graphical options to make it run faster.”
    • “Because my graphics card does not support shader model 5.”
  • stability
    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is generally poor, with frequent bugs, glitches, and freezes making it often unplayable. While some see issues as typical for early development, many criticize ongoing lack of updates and insufficient attention to fixing persistent problems.

    • “Runs great.”
    • “Last update was 2020, and this thing is a buggy mess, not quite as bad as Freejam's other failure, Cardlife, but the playerbase is even smaller!”
    • “Freezes a bit every few seconds making the game pretty unplayable.”
    • “The game itself is a big terrarium for bugs and glitches.”
  • optimization
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Optimization is a mixed aspect for the game, with some praising its impressive performance for an early title, while others report high CPU/GPU usage leading to stuttering, freezes, and poor performance on higher-end or bigger creations. Overall, optimization appears typical of many Unity games, causing issues especially with larger or more complex scenes.

    • “To hear that this game is one of the first published games with it is amazing and the performance is unreal.”
    • “(You'd expect there to be better optimization for a game that would attract a very similar crowd to that of Roblox.)”
    • “Performance-wise, this is like any other typical Unity game on a simple map with a few objects. I'm seeing a lot of CPU and GPU usage, so there will be performance issues on bigger creations.”
    • “This game, RobocraftX, is a stuttering mess and something I won't play because there are much better alternatives.”
    • “Performance was really bad, playing on Linux Manjaro with an RX 580 at 1080p.”
  • music
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is highly praised for its quality and atmospheric fit, with some users highlighting it as one of the best music systems they've encountered. However, there are mixed experiences, as some note the presence of only one looping track or even a lack of music, leading to a dull and silent ambiance. Overall, the soundtrack is considered a strong positive element that enhances the gameplay and immersion.

    • “The best music box systems I have ever seen exist here; not to mention the building system. Sad to see it retired so soon. I guess the world just wasn't ready for a game like this, or it just didn't get out there, so people didn't know about it. Either way, I give it a good 20/10.”
    • “The music sets the perfect atmosphere, the graphics fit with it really well, the controls are amazing, the physics simulation is outstanding.”
    • “Same for the RC Royale soundtrack.”
    • “There's no music whatsoever, just an uncomfortable and dull silence throughout the entire experience.”
    • “There's only one music track and it loops the whole game.”
    • “To see what I mean, play any game involving a vehicle and listen to all the clanging and scraping while no music plays in the background.”
  • grinding
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game is noted to be somewhat grindy and occasionally tedious, requiring careful planning. Additionally, frequent updates that alter gameplay may render past progress and grinding efforts obsolete, potentially diminishing the reward of hard work.

    • “The game is really basic and can be tedious as you have to plan ahead.”
    • “Looks like it has potential, but it feels like a repeat of continuous issues reminiscent of the original Robocraft, where builds become obsolete every second update, making any hard work or grinding a total waste of time.”
    • “A bit grindy sometimes.”
  • monetization
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users perceive the monetization strategies of Freejam, particularly in Robocraft and Robocraft 2, as poorly received, contributing to dissatisfaction and negative feedback in recent years.

  • story
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    It seems the story texts are missing. Could you please provide the user reviews related to the story so I can summarize them for you?

  • replayability
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Replayability is limited, as the core 3D break-out gameplay becomes repetitive and loses its appeal after a few sessions.

    • “Gamecraft struggles with replay value because there is only so much 3D Breakout you can play before it becomes boring.”
  • atmosphere
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users praise the game's atmosphere, highlighting the perfect music and fitting graphics that create an immersive experience, complemented by excellent controls and outstanding physics simulation.

    • “The music sets the perfect atmosphere, the graphics fit with it really well, the controls are amazing, the physics simulation is outstanding.”
  • humor
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is generally perceived as unfunny and unhelpful, with some users expressing frustration rather than amusement.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Gamecraft

4h Median play time
4h Average play time
4-4h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Gamecraft

Games Like Gamecraft

Brickadia Image
Games like Brickadia
Space Engineers 2 Image
Games like Space Engineers 2
Main Assembly Image
Games like Main Assembly
Logic World Image
Games like Logic World
Scrap Mechanic Image
Games like Scrap Mechanic
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Gamecraft is a simulation game.

Gamecraft is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 4 hours playing Gamecraft.

Gamecraft was released on May 10, 2019.

Gamecraft was developed by Freejam.

Gamecraft has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its gameplay.

Gamecraft is a single player game.

Similar games include Brickadia, Space Engineers 2, Main Assembly, Logic World, Scrap Mechanic and others.