Armored Warfare

If you're looking for a tactical war game where you're sitting behind the controls of a steel behemoth, then this is for you. There's a lot to grasp, and it'll take a lot of time to learn, but it's worth giving a go.

63%Game Brain Score

gameplay, story

grinding, optimization

63% User Score Based on 2,270 reviews

Critic Score 65%Based on 2 reviews

Platforms

View Game

Buy NowGet on Steam

Buy NowGet on Epic Games Store

About

Modern Military Hardware - Use steel giants to wipe the enemy from the face of the earth! Operate the most powerful tools of destruction invented by mankind: heavily armed tanks and artillery.In Armored Warfare you will be able to drive and do battle in the mightiest armored vehicles from dozens of countries around the world. Read on below for more information about the vehicles you'll be driving …

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

+14

63%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,270 reviews

gameplay68 positive mentions

grinding92 negative mentions

gameplay
232 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
64%
7%
The gameplay of Armored Warfare is generally well-received, with many players appreciating its blend of modern tank mechanics and a more relaxed approach compared to competitors like World of Tanks and War Thunder. While the graphics and core mechanics are praised, some users note issues with server performance, grind intensity, and repetitive gameplay, particularly in PvE modes. Overall, the game offers a satisfying experience for those seeking casual tank combat, though it suffers from balance issues and a lack of player engagement in PvP.
- “Comparing it to similar titles, Armored Warfare impresses with its detailed graphics and dynamic gameplay mechanics.”
- “I really enjoy the gameplay of this game and you don't have to tryhard play to grind and research new tanks.”
- “Gameplay is a great alternative to World of Tanks and War Thunder.”
- “Quite disappointing, for starters, such good models being wasted on HP-based World of Tanks style gameplay.”
- “The gameplay is extremely average, again falling short of competition. The one saving grace of the game is the PvE mode, which is somewhat engaging and the only actual active game mode.”
- “Gameplay itself is equally bad, basically a ripoff of World of Tanks' childishly simple approach... tiny maps, no strategy, just wheel up to the middle and blast at each other until the hitpoints are all gone.”
story
195 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
78%
4%
The game's story aspect is a mixed bag, with some players appreciating the interesting narrative involving corporate conflicts and mercenary operations, while others find the storyline lacking depth and coherence. Many reviews highlight the repetitive nature of missions and the grind required to progress, which detracts from the overall engagement with the story. Despite these criticisms, some players enjoy the cooperative PvE missions and special operations that add a layer of context and challenge to the gameplay.
- “The story of this game is quite interesting; it involves corporations gaining too much power and going to war with one another by contracting private military companies, and you (Black Company) are here to stop this madness and maintain peace.”
- “This might sound pretty simple, but the story goes a bit deeper than that, and special ops missions develop it, being updated every once in a while with a new chapter.”
- “The game has great potential because the graphics are really nice, the tanks are interesting, and it offers a cool backstory that adds depth to the gameplay.”
- “However, it falls short in terms of storyline and atmosphere, making it a mixed bag overall.”
- “Game isn't really hooking at first; you're thrown into a story that you have no idea where it begins, and be ready to be bored by the amount of grind that is needed for the higher tier tanks.”
- “Not much story or lore from what I could tell... seems pretty bland, but it's nice to see a game with a variety of tanks and upgrades to even offer PvE in the first place.”
graphics
184 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
54%
38%
8%
Overall, the graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising the impressive visuals and attention to detail, particularly in tank models and environments. However, some users note issues with optimization and dated graphics compared to newer titles, leading to performance problems and a lack of customization options. Despite these criticisms, many still find the graphics enjoyable and a significant improvement over similar games like World of Tanks.
- “Graphics so good, you'll forget it's not your real car.”
- “Amazing graphics, actually able to test a tank and see if you like it before you buy it and overall good.”
- “The graphics are awesome and you know when you're playing that kids are not on there.”
- “The game graphically is a bit behind but doesn't run awful.”
- “Graphics are not up to my liking as compared to Armada but is nostalgic.”
- “This game plays and looks terrible compared to what it was; they dumbed down the graphics so much it's ridiculous, features that were great were removed.”
grinding
98 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
2%
4%
94%
The grinding aspect of the game receives mixed feedback from players. While many appreciate that the early tiers (1-6) offer a smoother and less tedious progression compared to competitors like World of Tanks and War Thunder, they also note that grinding becomes significantly more challenging and time-consuming at higher tiers, often requiring premium purchases to expedite progress. Overall, players find the grind manageable but repetitive, with some expressing frustration over the need for extensive grinding to unlock higher-tier tanks and the impact of seasonal events on gameplay.
- “The tech tree is quite big, and the grind isn't as tedious as in WT.”
- “The things that I liked about this game are the PvE content, and it's not that grindy compared to other famous tank games out there.”
- “The game is fun but repetitive and the grinding is a nightmare.”
- “After tier 6 it's really grindy and they basically want you to pay real money to progress.”
- “You need to feel the game sucking you in and gaining something in return for your time, else you'll be stuck in a hell-circle of blunt grinding, wasting energy & time.”
optimization
53 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
49%
38%
The game's optimization has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with players reporting severe performance issues, frequent crashes, and poor server stability. Many users express frustration over the game's inability to run smoothly even on high-end hardware, citing unpolished graphics and lag during gameplay. Overall, there is a strong consensus that significant optimization improvements are urgently needed to enhance the gaming experience.
- “Somehow the in-game performance and launcher improve.”
- “The available options to tune your gaming experience in terms of performance is really a welcome addition to assure that your FPS will not hinder much while gaming.”
- “If this game has a good update (performance, bug fix, new physics, more tech tree) I would recommend it.”
- “In a way, the whole thing feels not only unoptimized, but unpolished and shallow even with consideration to the scope and situation it originated from.”
- “The game's performance needs some improvements; I wish it would be more optimized for mid to lower-end PCs.”
- “The optimization is horrendous and the monetization is super aggressive.”
monetization
47 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
36%
57%
The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized as aggressive and predatory, with many players likening it to a cash grab similar to that of War Thunder and World of Tanks. While some users appreciate that it is not entirely pay-to-win, the prevalence of microtransactions, high prices for in-game items, and constant prompts to spend money have left a negative impression. Overall, the monetization approach is seen as exploitative, detracting from the game's potential and player experience.
- “Unlike its competition, Armored Warfare does not come with premium ammunition or pay-to-win vehicles, with most in-game purchases only going towards either cosmetic changes or progression acceleration in one form or another.”
- “The game's monetization is not predatory at all; I need to give it to them.”
- “The grinding is comfortable and definitely way better than World of Tanks and War Thunder because you can play PvE all day long without the game monetization holding you back.”
- “There's also a massive amount of microtransactions and you're constantly reminded to pay money.”
- “The game itself is mediocre at best, and the monetization strategy is perhaps the strangest, most absurd one I've ever encountered.”
- “But the absolute trash monetization scheme is a blatant insult to the community and only serves to hunt whales for the game to suck what money they can from it.”
stability
33 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
94%
The game's stability is widely criticized, with players reporting frequent crashes, bugs, and glitches that significantly hinder gameplay. Issues include account migration failures, freezing during matches, and problematic matchmaking, leading to a frustrating experience. While some users appreciate the gameplay mechanics, the overall consensus is that the game suffers from severe stability problems that detract from its potential.
- “The game is really good in terms of gameplay; it's smooth, the shooting mechanics are solid, and it looks and runs great.”
- “There are no glitches or bugs.”
- “No, it's a buggy mess and hangs/crashes a lot.”
- “Have to change reviews since recent updates it doesn't load and freezes on startup, tends to crash my computer. Now I don't know if the game has bugs or not; I will change my review if the bugs get repaired.”
- “Ok, so now I have a lot of hours on the game. It's good in many ways: PvE great, PvP great. The bad: the game freezes up a lot. Exit to garage freeze, exit to desktop restart game next time same thing, and it repeats.”
humor
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
89%
11%
The humor in the game is described as a mix of intentional and unintentional comedy, with players finding amusement in the game's quirky physics, matchmaking absurdities, and the often ridiculous behavior of both the game mechanics and other players. While some elements, like the main menu character, are criticized for being unfunny, the overall experience is seen as entertainingly chaotic, with players sharing laughs over the game's flaws and unexpected moments. However, the humor can be hit-or-miss, with some aspects leading to frustration rather than laughter.
- “I recommend to anyone to play this funny game.”
- “PVP is hilariously busted and empty.”
- “For some reason, my M60 tank switches to the machine gun at unexpected times and I find myself fighting off a laughing enemy in a main battle tank with 7.62 machine gun rounds.”
- “Let me turn off that annoying, unfunny main menu guy, and then I'll recommend this to someone.”
- “It is not funny.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The music in the game features a cool rap soundtrack that enhances the experience, complemented by bouncy suspension elements. However, some users noted a lack of sound effects and additional musical variety. Overall, the soundtrack is well-received but could benefit from more depth.
- “The rap soundtrack and bouncy suspension create an engaging atmosphere.”
- “The music is cool and adds to the overall experience.”
- “The soundtrack is impressive and enhances the gameplay.”
- “The soundtrack is lacking in variety and doesn't enhance the gameplay experience.”
- “There aren't enough sound effects and the music feels repetitive.”
- “The rap soundtrack feels out of place and doesn't fit the game's atmosphere.”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional response to the game is overwhelmingly negative, with users expressing frustration over the grind and toxicity, particularly in PvP. A player transitioning from World of Tanks feels disheartened by the game's current state, despite previously enjoying its graphics and achievements.
- “I came over from World of Tanks after playing that game since January 2013. It had become quite toxic and pay-to-win, which was heartbreaking because the graphics are quite good and I have 13 tier 10s with a rather expansive list of accomplishments and medals.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The atmosphere of the game is described as a mixed experience, with some users appreciating the good maps and relaxed player environment, while others feel it lacks depth in storyline and overall ambiance.
- “Good maps, solid fun, and maneuverable vehicles create a more relaxed player atmosphere.”
- “However, it falls short in terms of storyline and atmosphere, making it a mixed bag overall.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the game highly replayable due to its enjoyable mechanics, balanced pacing, and rewarding PvE elements, making it a compelling experience without excessive grinding.
- “The game feels good, isn't overly grindy, and is quite replayable with very well-done PvE and rewards.”