Skip to main content

Warface: Clutch

A middling contender in the most oversubscribed genre around. Trades too hard on being free.
Warface: Clutch Game Cover
60%Game Brain Score
story, gameplay
monetization, grinding
62% User Score Based on 29,410 reviews
Critic Score 54%Based on 2 reviews

Platforms

Nintendo SwitchXbox 360PCCloudPlaystation 4Xbox OneXboxNVIDIA GeForce NOWWindowsPlayStation
Warface: Clutch Game Cover

About

Warface: Clutch is a single player and multiplayer role playing shooter game with a warfare theme. It was developed by MY.GAMES and was released on July 1, 2014. It received neutral reviews from critics and mostly positive reviews from players.

"Warface: Clutch" is a contemporary MMO first-person shooter with PvP modes, PvE missions, and raids. The game features five classes and a vast customizable arsenal. The "Champion Trials" event has been added, including the "Custodian" PvP mode, thematic rewards, and event contracts. The "Tropical Trails" season is also underway .

Skip User Reviews

62%
Audience ScoreBased on 29,410 reviews
story432 positive mentions
monetization125 negative mentions

  • The game offers a fun co-op experience, providing humorous moments, especially when played with friends.
  • The graphics are impressive for a free-to-play title, with clean environments and immersive sound design that enhance the atmosphere.
  • The gameplay is fast-paced and engaging, with solid shooting mechanics that keep players entertained.
  • The grinding aspect is excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring hundreds of hours to unlock meaningful gear without spending real money.
  • The game suffers from a significant pay-to-win element, leading to frustration and imbalance between paying and non-paying players.
  • Numerous bugs, glitches, and performance issues detract from the overall experience, making the game feel poorly optimized.
  • story
    2,230 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story aspect of Warface is generally perceived as weak and lacking depth, with many players noting that it primarily revolves around repetitive co-op missions against an enemy faction called Blackwood. While some missions feature a basic narrative structure, they often feel generic and uninspired, leading to a sense of monotony. Overall, the game is more focused on gameplay mechanics and cooperative play rather than delivering a compelling storyline.

    • “The co-op missions are fun for the first few hours, then become extremely repetitive.”
    • “The co-op missions offer a great variety of difficulty.”
    • “The special operations are somewhat the same only the missions take longer and are much more difficult (a single co-op mission takes 5-20 mins where a special operation takes about 30-60 mins).”
    • “Yet, its story lacks depth compared to genre counterparts.”
    • “My grandma's knitting has more plot twists than the storyline.”
    • “The co-op missions are extremely linear, leaving you often with only one narrow path where enemies will run out of buildings once you trigger them - sometimes even behind you.”
  • gameplay
    2,174 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of Warface has received mixed reviews, with many players praising its fast-paced action, solid shooting mechanics, and cooperative elements, particularly in PvE modes. However, criticisms often focus on the game's repetitive nature, reliance on pay-to-win mechanics, and issues with matchmaking and server performance, which can detract from the overall experience. While some players find the mechanics engaging and the graphics impressive for a free-to-play title, others express frustration over clunky controls and a lack of innovation compared to other shooters in the genre.

    • “The gameplay is solid, the graphics are top-notch, and there’s a good variety of modes to keep you entertained.”
    • “It’s not just about running and gunning; you need to think quickly, communicate with your team, and make use of the game’s diverse mechanics.”
    • “The gameplay itself is incredibly fluid and responsive.”
    • “The character movement is clunky, matches are laggy, it feels half-baked and as a player and a game designer, it feels like the developers really don't care about it and fail to fix the core gameplay issues but would rather throw in content over it instead.”
    • “The gameplay loop is monotonous, with uninspired missions and bland gunplay that feels outdated and unresponsive.”
    • “From the poor optimization to the pay-to-win elements and lifeless gameplay, it’s a slog that’s hard to recommend to anyone.”
  • graphics
    1,985 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of Warface receive mixed reviews, with many players praising the game's visuals as impressive for a free-to-play title, particularly due to its use of the CryEngine. However, some users criticize the graphics as outdated or lacking compared to modern standards, noting that they can appear bland or glitchy at times. Overall, while the graphics are generally considered decent, there are calls for updates to enhance visual fidelity and performance.

    • “The graphics in this game are stunning, immersing me in a realistic battlefield that makes every firefight feel intense and authentic.”
    • “Built on the original Crytek engine, the visuals still hold up surprisingly well, with clean environments and punchy effects that give off that classic CryEngine vibe.”
    • “The overall presentation, with clean visuals and immersive sound design, enhances the tense atmosphere of each match.”
    • “The graphics are horrible (just look into their soulless eyes..), the combat is bland, the grind is unbelievable, and the game is completely pay to win; skill is optional.”
    • “The graphics look like shit; it’s a pay-to-win model with gameplay that feels like a cheap knockoff.”
    • “The graphics are very outdated and the shooting itself is poop.”
  • monetization
    391 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization model of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players labeling it as a "cash grab" due to its heavy reliance on microtransactions that often favor those willing to spend money, leading to a pay-to-win environment. While some users acknowledge that the game can still be enjoyable without spending, the aggressive promotion of in-game purchases and the imbalance created by purchasable advantages detract from the overall experience. Overall, the monetization practices are seen as detrimental to the game's longevity and player satisfaction.

    • “The game's regular updates and fair monetization are commendable aspects that contribute to its longevity.”
    • “Plus, the microtransactions are fair and don't feel pay-to-win, which is a big plus in my opinion.”
    • “Despite the in-app purchases, even if you don't spend real money on this game, you'll simply still have fun, and could still be an elite player!”
    • “This game was fun until 2020, then microtransactions, new maps, and all the bad updates ruined everything.”
    • “The monetization leans a little heavy, and at times it feels like progression favors those willing to spend.”
    • “This game is just a terrible cash grab. The only saving grace to Warface is its co-op modes.”
  • grinding
    336 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The grinding aspect of the game is widely criticized for being excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring players to invest hundreds of hours to unlock meaningful gear without spending real money. Many reviews highlight a significant pay-to-win element, where players who spend money can easily outpace those who rely solely on grinding, leading to frustration and a sense of imbalance. While some players find enjoyment in the grind, the overwhelming consensus is that the system is poorly designed, making it a major barrier to fully enjoying the game.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “A bit grindy at times.”
    • “One long, tedious grind.”
    • “The grind to unlock meaningful gear without spending money is tedious and time-consuming.”
    • “You can't get permanent guns without grinding for weeks, if not months, same for armor.”
    • “After almost 2 years downloaded the game just to find out that all the items I spent years grinding are useless...even in PvE easy or normal.”
  • stability
    282 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is widely criticized, with users reporting numerous bugs, glitches, and performance issues that significantly detract from the overall experience. Many players experience frequent crashes, lag, and unresponsive menus, leading to frustration and a perception that the game is poorly optimized and plagued by a lack of developer support for fixing these issues. Additionally, the presence of cheaters and a pay-to-win model further complicates gameplay, making it feel unbalanced and less enjoyable.

    • “It is smooth, looks great, runs great, and I have had no issues with it whatsoever.”
    • “The game runs absolutely smooth, not a single crash or glitch I've experienced.”
    • “It's almost bug free and the game itself feels so smooth.”
    • “This game is a buggy nightmare, the ping thing or whatever it's called that gives players better speed, the map layouts that have overused camping areas, the constant cheaters, the pay-to-win weapons, and I don't even get to keep half of them or if I want all that I have to spend 50 dollars on a weapon skin just to keep it, plus that's all the loot boxes. Why make me spend all that money and time to grab even low or mid-grade items if I only get 3 bloody hours with it?!”
    • “This game became an absolute money grabber regarding gameplay (pay-to-win OP guns, like literally unplayable if you are not willing to spend loads of money) and now the game keeps crashing every 5 minutes, it freezes the main menu over your actual gameplay. In ranked, you are often facing an enemy team with ping higher than Snoop Dogg, etc. I have a few thousand hours and have no reason to come up with random stuff.”
    • “This is a buggy mess and the developers should be ashamed of themselves.”
  • optimization
    253 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users reporting severe performance issues, including stuttering frame rates, crashes, and poor user interface design. While some players noted that it runs well on lower-end systems, the overall consensus is that the game is poorly optimized, leading to a frustrating experience even on decent hardware. Frequent complaints about lag, connection problems, and the game's reliance on microtransactions further exacerbate the optimization issues.

    • “The game is well optimized; at least what I have seen, but I get semi motion sickness from this game which should be fixed engine-wise.”
    • “This game has some beautiful graphics, and it's still very well optimized, even when you're running on the higher graphic settings!”
    • “The game is amazing for a free-to-play title, the graphics are awesome and the game seems very well optimized and runs smoothly on lower performance machines.”
    • “The game's optimization is practically nonexistent, making it a nightmare to play on even decent hardware.”
    • “I uninstalled it because it was so poorly optimized that it wouldn't be playable on a gaming laptop (mid-priced).”
    • “This game is a complete scam, horrible connection, horrible performance, horrible gameplay.”
  • humor
    150 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is often described as unintentional, stemming from its numerous glitches, absurd mechanics, and the presence of hackers, which players find both frustrating and amusing. Many reviews highlight the game's ability to provide funny moments, especially during co-op missions with friends, despite its serious tone and gameplay issues. Overall, while the game has its flaws, players appreciate the humor that arises from its chaotic and sometimes ridiculous situations.

    • “I would definitely recommend this game since there are a lot of things a user can do in order to have some funny, carefree hours.”
    • “It's funny, good to play with friends.”
    • “The funny thing is, the cheaters don't get banned from the game even though there is a report button!”
    • “Not funny, didn't laugh.”
    • “Actually not funny, but I like games like that.”
    • “No point in me even saying pros considering this game is so aimbot/hack infested it's not funny.”
  • music
    67 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising the soundtrack for its ability to enhance the gaming experience and pump up adrenaline during intense moments, while others find it lackluster or overly generic. Sound effects, including gunfire and explosions, are generally considered decent, but many players note that the music is often minimal or absent during gameplay. Overall, while the audio quality is acknowledged as acceptable, it does not stand out significantly in comparison to other aspects of the game.

    • “The soundtrack for this game is amazing and will get your blood pumping.”
    • “Great gunplay, music, and game sounds are excellent, and it manages to be a realistic military shooter with futuristic and fun elements like the cyborg missions.”
    • “Graphics, map design, sound, and music are top notch.”
    • “The music is bare bones and there when it's needed.”
    • “The music in the game is rather cheesy and seemed very poorly done, the controls aren't bad, pretty typical layout.”
    • “Soundtrack sucks, gameplay's fun, everything else is meh.”
  • emotional
    31 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional responses to the game reflect a deep sense of disappointment and nostalgia, with many players expressing heartbreak over its decline from a once-wholesome experience to a frustrating and imbalanced environment. While some players still find moments of joy and connection within the community, the overwhelming sentiment is one of sadness and regret, as they mourn the loss of what the game used to be and feel let down by its current state. Overall, the emotional impact is marked by a mix of fond memories and profound disillusionment.

    • “Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”
    • “It's very heartbreaking to see what this game has become over the years.”
    • “The complex and emotional story had me in awe.”
  • replayability
    25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's replayability is a mixed bag, with some players praising its infinite replay potential and enjoyable challenges, particularly in PvE modes. However, others criticize the limited PvP experience due to player shortages and pay-to-win mechanics, which detract from long-term engagement. Overall, while there are elements that encourage replay, many feel the game lacks sufficient variety and balance to sustain interest over time.

    • “If you're after a budget-friendly FPS with serious replay value, Warface is a solid pick.”
    • “It has a ton of replay value and is fun to play with friends.”
    • “This crown system is where I find most of the replayability, constantly trying to form teams capable of hitting the highest speedrun target time or putting together all-knife runs to try and hit the kill score target or whatever.”
    • “The only thing I managed to finish was the tutorial because later on, neither the PvE nor PvP were playable due to the lack of players.”
    • “This is the only time when you actually get the amount of money and XP that is needed to progress, so it has very low replayability value.”
    • “The missions I played in co-op were scripted, so replay value is limited.”
  • atmosphere
    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's atmosphere is characterized by clean visuals and immersive sound design that heighten the tension during matches, with sound effects intensifying the combat experience. However, some players find the social dynamics and character portrayals, particularly the sexualization of women and negative player interactions, detract from the overall atmosphere. Additionally, the quality of voice acting has been criticized for lacking emotional depth, further impacting immersion.

    • “Crytek's touch is evident in the graphics and atmosphere.”
    • “The overall presentation, with clean visuals and immersive sound design, enhances the tense atmosphere of each match.”
    • “The sound effects, from gunfire to explosions, further enhance the intensity of battles and contribute to the overall atmosphere.”
    • “Into the game - voice overs of all characters and the character that's leading you through the comm are horrible, total garbage, like there's no feeling in it, like a machine, spoils the atmosphere from the start.”
  • character development
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Character development in the game is criticized for being virtually nonexistent, with players noting a lack of meaningful progression and a reliance on a grind-heavy unlock system that detracts from the overall experience. Despite attempts at character design, the voice acting and balance issues further undermine any potential for depth in character growth.

    • “The character development in this game is incredibly engaging, allowing players to form deep connections with their characters as they evolve throughout the story.”
    • “I love how the character arcs are thoughtfully crafted, making each character's journey feel unique and meaningful.”
    • “The progression system for character development is well-balanced, providing a satisfying sense of growth and achievement as you unlock new abilities and traits.”
    • “Rubbery voice acting and character design, sketchy balance, really, really, really gamey unlock system, and so on; yet even with all these glaring flaws we still haven't covered the damning nail in the coffin: once you get high enough in level to unlock the sai gry the game basically becomes a giant sweatfest that's either pay-to-win or grind-to-not-lose, neither of which are very entertaining in the long run.”
    • “Everything of real value expires, there's no character development or progression.”
    • “Don't be fooled by screenshots, as try hard as the character design is, sweet as OG Chuck Taylors are.”
Skip Critic Reviews
Skip Game Offers

Buy Warface: Clutch

40h Median play time
248h Average play time
9-211h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 170 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Warface: Clutch

Games Like Warface: Clutch

Survarium Image
Line of Sight Image
Heroes & Generals Image
Delta Force Image
Ironsight Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Warface: Clutch is a role playing shooter game with warfare theme.

Warface: Clutch is available on Nintendo Switch, PC, PlayStation 4, Xbox One and others.

On average players spend around 248 hours playing Warface: Clutch.

Warface: Clutch was released on July 1, 2014.

Warface: Clutch was developed by MY.GAMES.

Warface: Clutch has received neutral reviews from players and neutral reviews from critics. Most players liked this game for its story but disliked it for its monetization.

Warface: Clutch is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include Survarium, Line of Sight, Heroes & Generals, Delta Force, Ironsight and others.