Warface: Clutch
- July 1, 2014
- MY.GAMES
- 40h median play time
A middling contender in the most oversubscribed genre around. Trades too hard on being free.
"Warface: Clutch" is a contemporary MMO first-person shooter with PvP modes, PvE missions, and raids. The game features five classes and a vast customizable arsenal. The "Champion Trials" event has been added, including the "Custodian" PvP mode, thematic rewards, and event contracts. The "Tropical Trails" season is also underway .
Reviews
- story2,237 mentions
- 19 % positive mentions
- 75 % neutral mentions
- 6 % negative mentions
The story aspect of Warface is generally perceived as lacking depth and engagement, with many players noting that the narrative is minimal and often overshadowed by gameplay mechanics. While the game features co-op missions that change daily and some players appreciate the tactical teamwork required, the overarching plot is described as simplistic and uninspired, primarily revolving around the conflict between the Warface faction and the Blackwood organization. Overall, the storyline does not significantly enhance the gaming experience, leading to a focus on the gameplay rather than a compelling narrative.
“The co-op missions are fun, but only if you have good guns.”
“The special operations are somewhat the same only the missions take longer and are much more difficult (a single co-op mission takes 5-20 mins where a special operation takes about 30-60 mins).”
“The co-op missions offer a great variety of difficulty.”
“Yet, its story lacks depth compared to genre counterparts.”
“My grandma's knitting has more plot twists than the storyline.”
“The co-op missions are relatively dull, at least for the first 4 missions, and most of the people you queue in with are complete mongoloids.”
- gameplay2,187 mentions
- 44 % positive mentions
- 46 % neutral mentions
- 10 % negative mentions
The gameplay of Warface is characterized by a mix of fast-paced action and tactical elements, with mechanics that encourage teamwork and strategic play. While many players appreciate the smooth shooting mechanics and variety of modes, the game is often criticized for its pay-to-win elements, clunky movement, and repetitive mission design, which can detract from the overall experience. Despite these issues, the graphics and core gameplay mechanics are generally well-received, making it a decent option for fans of free-to-play shooters.
“The gameplay revolves around precise shooting mechanics and smart use of cover, with a variety of weapons and gadgets to suit different playstyles.”
“Warface offers a fast-paced and intense multiplayer experience with its blend of first-person shooter action and battle royale mechanics.”
“The gameplay is solid, the graphics are top-notch, and there’s a good variety of modes to keep you entertained.”
“Gameplay is so clunky, even my grandma's hip replacement moves smoother!”
“The gameplay loop is monotonous, with uninspired missions and bland gunplay that feels outdated and unresponsive.”
“From the poor optimization to the pay-to-win elements and lifeless gameplay, it’s a slog that’s hard to recommend to anyone.”
- graphics2,003 mentions
- 59 % positive mentions
- 33 % neutral mentions
- 9 % negative mentions
The graphics of Warface have received mixed reviews, with many players praising the game's aesthetics and visual quality, particularly for a free-to-play title. While some commend the detailed environments and character models, others criticize the graphics as outdated or lacking compared to modern standards, often likening them to games from previous generations. Overall, the consensus suggests that while the graphics are decent and can run well on lower-end systems, they do not fully meet the expectations set by the game's CryEngine pedigree.
“The overall presentation, with clean visuals and immersive sound design, enhances the tense atmosphere of each match.”
“The graphics in this game are stunning, immersing me in a realistic battlefield that makes every firefight feel intense and authentic.”
“With beautiful graphics and regularly updated content, this game offers a visually appealing experience for players.”
“However, the game's graphics and overall presentation feel dated compared to other modern shooters.”
“The visuals were clearly never updated to keep up with the times and everything looks pretty much as I'd expect from a free game made in 2012.”
“The graphics are horrible (just look into their soulless eyes..), the combat is bland, the grind is unbelievable, and the game is completely pay to win; skill is optional.”
- monetization386 mentions
- 8 % positive mentions
- 60 % neutral mentions
- 32 % negative mentions
The monetization model of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players labeling it as a blatant cash grab that heavily emphasizes pay-to-win elements. While some users acknowledge that microtransactions are common in free-to-play games, they argue that the aggressive nature of these purchases creates an unbalanced experience, making it difficult for non-paying players to compete effectively. Overall, the game's reliance on microtransactions has led to a negative perception, overshadowing its potential and gameplay quality.
“Plus, the microtransactions are fair and don't feel pay-to-win, which is a big plus in my opinion.”
“No pay-to-win: despite being free-to-play, Warface takes a relatively fair approach to monetization.”
“Despite all the microtransactions, it's pretty playable.”
“The game now is so pay to win... it's honestly a cash grab at this point.”
“This game had everything to be one of the best Call of Duty competitors of all time, but the developers decided to ruin it with pay-to-win microtransactions, making the game unbalanced and not fun to play anymore.”
“The game's predatory monetization system corrupts the game at all levels.”
- grinding334 mentions
- 1 % positive mentions
- 6 % neutral mentions
- 93 % negative mentions
The grinding aspect of the game is widely criticized for being excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring players to invest weeks or even months to unlock meaningful gear without spending real money. Many reviews highlight a significant pay-to-win element, where players who spend money can easily outpace those who rely solely on grinding, leading to frustration and a sense of imbalance. Overall, while some players find enjoyment in the grind, the overwhelming consensus is that it detracts from the overall experience, making it feel more like a chore than a rewarding gameplay mechanic.
“You'll need a second life for grinding.”
“A bit grindy at times.”
“One long, tedious grind.”
“The grind to unlock meaningful gear without spending money is tedious and time-consuming.”
“Free-to-play players can unlock less than 10% of the guns in the game, and the guns you can unlock take months of grinding per gun.”
“Grinding for decent weapons, armor, etc. takes ridiculous amounts of time and will make you want to spend some of that money in your wallet.”
- stability287 mentions
- 3 % positive mentions
- 1 % neutral mentions
- 97 % negative mentions
The stability of the game is widely criticized, with players reporting numerous bugs, glitches, and crashes that significantly hinder gameplay. Many users experience issues such as freezing, lag, and unresponsive menus, alongside complaints about unbalanced gameplay and a lack of effective anti-cheat measures. Overall, the game's stability is described as a major drawback, making it frustrating and often unplayable for many users.
“It is smooth, looks great, runs great, and I have had no issues with it whatsoever.”
“The game runs absolutely smooth, not a single crash or glitch I've experienced.”
“It's almost bug free and the game itself feels so smooth.”
“This game is a buggy nightmare, the ping thing or whatever it's called that gives players better speed, the map layouts that have overused camping areas, the constant cheaters, the pay-to-win weapons, and I don't even get to keep half of them or if I want all that I have to spend 50 dollars on a weapon skin just to keep it, plus that's all the loot boxes. Why make me spend all that money and time to grab even low or mid-grade items if I only get 3 bloody hours with it?!”
“This game became an absolute money grabber regarding gameplay (pay-to-win OP guns, like literally unplayable if you are not willing to spend loads of money) and now the game keeps crashing every 5 minutes, it freezes the main menu over your actual gameplay. In ranked, you are often facing an enemy team with ping higher than Snoop Dogg, etc.”
“This is a buggy mess and the developers should be ashamed of themselves.”
- optimization255 mentions
- 35 % positive mentions
- 38 % neutral mentions
- 26 % negative mentions
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting severe performance issues, including stuttering, crashes, and poor frame rates, even on decent hardware. While some users noted that the game runs smoothly on lower-end systems, others expressed frustration over its lack of optimization for higher settings and the overall user experience. Overall, the consensus suggests that significant improvements are needed to enhance gameplay stability and performance.
“The game is well optimized, at least from what I've seen, but I get semi-motion sickness from this game, which should be fixed engine-wise.”
“This game has some beautiful graphics, and it's still very well optimized, even when you're running on the higher graphic settings!”
“The game is amazing for a free-to-play title; the graphics are awesome, and the game seems very well optimized and runs smoothly on lower performance machines.”
“The game’s optimization is practically nonexistent, making it a nightmare to play on even decent hardware.”
“From the poor optimization to the pay-to-win elements and lifeless gameplay, it’s a slog that’s hard to recommend to anyone.”
“The game is poorly optimized with no FOV slider, no ADS sensitivity adjustment.”
- humor148 mentions
- 97 % positive mentions
- 1 % neutral mentions
- 2 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is often described as unintentional, stemming from its numerous glitches, poor server performance, and the absurdity of gameplay mechanics, such as ragdoll physics and the presence of cheaters. Players find amusement in the chaotic nature of PvP and PvE modes, often enjoying the game more when playing with friends, despite its flaws. Overall, while the game has serious issues, many players appreciate its comedic elements, making it a source of laughter amidst frustration.
“I would definitely recommend this game since there are a lot of things a user can do in order to have some funny, carefree hours.”
“Honestly, I play this because it's so bad it's funny.”
“The funny thing is, the cheaters don't get banned from the game even though there is a report button!”
“Not funny, didn't laugh.”
“Actually not funny, but I like games like that.”
“No point in me even saying pros considering this game is so aimbot/hack infested it's not funny.”
- music71 mentions
- 25 % positive mentions
- 70 % neutral mentions
- 4 % negative mentions
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising the soundtrack for its ability to enhance the gaming experience and pump up adrenaline during intense moments, while others find it lackluster or repetitive. Sound effects, including gunshots and explosions, are generally considered decent, but the overall musical composition is often described as "meh" or "bare bones," with some players opting to listen to their own music instead. Despite these criticisms, many appreciate the audio quality and sound design, noting that it complements the gameplay well.
“The soundtrack for this game is amazing and will get your blood pumping.”
“Great gunplay, music, and game sounds are excellent, and it manages to be a realistic military shooter with futuristic and fun elements like the cyborg missions.”
“The game has a lot of fun, cool music, and a very nice visual style.”
“The music is bare bones and there when it's needed.”
“The music in the game is rather cheesy and seemed very poorly done, the controls aren't bad, pretty typical layout.”
“Soundtrack sucks, gameplay's fun, everything else is meh.”
- emotional31 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The emotional responses to the game reflect a deep sense of disappointment and nostalgia, with many players expressing heartbreak over its decline from a once-wholesome experience to a frustrating and imbalanced environment. While some players still find moments of connection and enjoyment, the overwhelming sentiment is one of sadness and regret, as they mourn the loss of what the game used to be and feel let down by its current state. Overall, the emotional impact is marked by a mix of fond memories and profound disillusionment.
“Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”
“It's very heartbreaking to see what this game has become over the years.”
“The complex and emotional story had me in awe.”
- replayability26 mentions
- 42 % positive mentions
- 46 % neutral mentions
- 12 % negative mentions
The game's replayability is a mixed bag, with some players praising its potential for infinite replay value, especially in multiplayer modes, while others criticize the lack of active players and limited content, which hampers the experience. Many users note that while there are fun challenges and modes, the overall replayability suffers due to connectivity issues and a perceived pay-to-win model. Overall, the game shows improvement but still has significant room for enhancement in keeping players engaged long-term.
“If you're after a budget-friendly FPS with serious replay value, Warface is a solid pick.”
“It has a ton of replay value and is fun to play with friends.”
“This crown system is where I find most of the replayability, constantly trying to form teams capable of hitting the highest speedrun target time or putting together all-knife runs to try and hit the kill score target.”
“The only thing I managed to finish was the tutorial because later on, neither the PvE nor PvP were playable due to the lack of players.”
“However, the replayability is absolute shit.”
“So what if the game has a dozen of PvP or PvE modes if only a couple of them are playable since you won't find players.”
- atmosphere8 mentions
- 25 % positive mentions
- 38 % neutral mentions
- 38 % negative mentions
The game's atmosphere is characterized by clean visuals and immersive sound design that heighten the tension during matches, showcasing Crytek's signature style. However, player interactions can create a harsh environment, particularly regarding cultural tensions, and the sexualization of female characters detracts from the otherwise realistic atmosphere. Additionally, poor voice acting undermines the immersive experience, leaving some players feeling disconnected.
“Graphics and atmosphere: Crytek’s touch is evident here.”
“I would recommend it to mainly people 20-30+ who are looking for a highly interactive game with a mostly laid-back atmosphere.”
“The overall presentation, with clean visuals and immersive sound design, enhances the tense atmosphere of each match.”
“Player atmosphere is quite harsh, I would say, especially when it comes down to cultural differences.”
“The voiceovers of all characters and the guide leading you through the game are horrible, lacking any emotional depth, which spoils the atmosphere from the start.”
- character development4 mentions
- 75 % positive mentions
- -50 % neutral mentions
- 75 % negative mentions
Character development in the game is criticized for being virtually non-existent, with players noting a lack of meaningful progression and a reliance on an unbalanced unlock system. Despite appealing character designs, the overall experience is marred by poor voice acting and a gameplay structure that feels more like a grind or pay-to-win scenario, detracting from any potential growth or depth in character arcs.
“The character development in this game is incredibly engaging, allowing players to truly connect with their characters and see them grow throughout the story.”
“I love how the character arcs are thoughtfully crafted, making each character feel unique and their journeys meaningful.”
“The depth of character customization and progression adds a layer of immersion that keeps me invested in the game.”
“Rubbery voice acting and character design, sketchy balance, really, really, really gamey unlock system, and so on; yet even with all these glaring flaws we still haven't covered the damning nail in the coffin: once you get high enough in level to unlock the sai gry, the game basically becomes a giant sweatfest that's either pay-to-win or grind-to-not-lose, neither of which are very entertaining in the long run.”
“Everything of real value expires; there's no character development or progression.”
“Don't be fooled by screenshots, as try hard as the character design is, sweet as OG Chuck Taylors are.”
Critic Reviews
Warface review
A middling contender in the most oversubscribed genre around. Trades too hard on being free.
58%Warface Review
Warface is a pretty, competent shooter with a poor free-to-play model than doesn’t do anything to stand out from the crowd, and in an age with an overabundance shooters and a number of excellent free-to-play titles, that simply isn’t good enough.
50%