World of Tanks

About

"World of Tanks" is a popular free-to-play, massively multiplayer warfare shooter game set in the mid-20th century, with over 700 authentic tanks from 12 nations. The game offers strategic, fast-paced online action with up to 15 vs 15 players, and features realistic environments, varying terrain, and weather effects. Regular updates provide new content and special events, with enhanced graphics for Xbox One X.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

77%

Audience ScoreBased on 22,535 reviews

gameplay323 positive mentions

grinding434 negative mentions

The game features fast-paced and strategic tank battles that many players find engaging and fun.
World of Tanks Blitz is well-optimized for mobile devices and lower-end PCs, allowing for smooth gameplay even on less powerful hardware.
The variety of tanks and frequent content updates provide decent replayability, keeping the game interesting for many players.

The graphics are criticized for being cartoonish and outdated, with many players feeling they do not meet modern gaming standards.
The game has been labeled as pay-to-win, with aggressive monetization strategies that detract from the overall experience.
Players report numerous stability issues, including glitches, crashes, and lag spikes, which significantly impact gameplay.

gameplay
944 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
34%
58%
8%
The gameplay of World of Tanks Blitz is a mixed bag, with many players praising its fast-paced, strategic tank battles and engaging mechanics, while others criticize the heavy reliance on pay-to-win elements, poor matchmaking, and frustrating mechanics that detract from the overall experience. While some enjoy the simplicity and accessibility of the game, others feel that recent updates have introduced unbalanced features and monetization strategies that compromise gameplay quality. Overall, the game offers a fun experience for casual players, but its competitive integrity is often questioned due to its monetization practices and gameplay imbalances.
- “The gameplay is fast-paced and very exciting.”
- “World of Tanks Blitz is a fun and engaging tank battle game, with its strategic gameplay and variety of tanks.”
- “Gameplay is easy to learn, challenging to master - as it should be.”
- “It seeks to remove most of what players love about this game and replace those aspects with gimmicky mechanics clearly designed to fleece players for money.”
- “Overall, I do not recommend anyone picks up WOTB while the devs intend to implement all these terrible mechanics.”
- “The gameplay mechanics, like spotting and how the armor works, are all good, but the rest of the game is pay-to-win in the worst way, and it feels like a casino; utterly disgusting.”
graphics
926 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
41%
48%
11%
The graphics of "World of Tanks Blitz" receive mixed reviews, with many players acknowledging improvements due to the transition to Unreal Engine 5, yet expressing disappointment over the cartoonish aesthetic and outdated visuals compared to the original "World of Tanks." While some commend the game's optimization for mobile devices, allowing it to run smoothly on lower-end hardware, others criticize the graphics as lacking depth and realism, often likening them to early 2000s standards. Overall, players seem to desire a more significant graphical overhaul that aligns with modern gaming expectations while maintaining the core gameplay experience.
- “The graphics are great for a mobile game, considering the required specs, the graphics are pretty good.”
- “Graphics and gameplay: the graphics are impressive, especially considering they are also optimized for mobile.”
- “The graphics are amazing and the gameplay is incredibly fun.”
- “The graphics in this game are sub-calculator wrist watch at best.”
- “Worst game ever, graphics look like a pixel game you would see from the first Doom, the tanks are broken and it's a pay-to-have-fun game.”
- “This game looks like it's from 2012 because the graphics look like the last time they have been updated was in 2012.”
grinding
461 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
1%
5%
94%
The grinding aspect of the game is widely criticized for being excessively time-consuming and often feels like a "grind simulator," especially at higher tiers where progression can become tedious and frustrating. Many players express that while grinding is a core part of the experience, it can lead to a pay-to-win environment, as those who spend money can bypass much of the grind. Despite these frustrations, some players still find enjoyment in the grinding process, appreciating the sense of achievement that comes with unlocking new tanks and upgrades.
- “This game isn't pay-to-win, but if you are not grinding much, you can't get gold easily either. I don't know the easiest way, lol.”
- “The tanks are realistic, the game isn't grindy like others, and the extra game modes like mad games make it even more fun.”
- “Been playing this now for a good bit and I got to say, play it and give it a go. It's for your PC and your phones, and it works. 7v7 is awesome, fast games, not too grindy, but you will work for the good tanks. I will recommend this game to all who love World of Tanks and want to have a portable version.”
- “The grinding it takes to unlock these bundles seems to be increased as you have to unlock these bundles with new currency, making it much harder to progress.”
- “Money grabbing game unless you fork out £200 you won't get anywhere without grinding for hours on end; don't bother at all.”
- “The grind for free-to-play takes many months; I think it took me around half a year of relentless grinding to reach my first tier 10.”
monetization
298 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
42%
52%
The monetization strategy of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players labeling it as excessively aggressive and predatory. Frequent pop-up ads, microtransactions, and a pay-to-win model have created a frustrating experience, often overshadowing gameplay enjoyment. While some players appreciate the ability to earn premium currency through gameplay, the overall sentiment is that the game prioritizes profit over player experience, leading to a perception of it being a blatant cash grab.
- “While in-game purchases exist, they don't seriously advantage one player over another in the matches, and they are not required to progress or be strong in matches.”
- “Despite the ridiculous amount of in-game purchases, it's good fun, generally speaking.”
- “However, the microtransactions are not overly intrusive, and dedicated players can progress without spending real money.”
- “Wargaming's proposed 'overhaul' is overly ambitious, removes skill from the game, forces a paywall behind practically everything (and don't let them delude you into thinking anything is 'free.' Chances are, you'll still have to pay for it.), adds new features and complexities that nobody wanted, nor asked for, and is continuing to pursue a death-spiral of monetization.”
- “The game is also a shameless cash grab at every single turn begging for your money with poorly implemented DLC and boosts.”
- “This game is only about microtransactions.”
story
182 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
77%
14%
The reviews overwhelmingly indicate that the game lacks a meaningful story, with many players expressing frustration over the absence of a narrative or campaign mode. Instead, the focus is primarily on completing daily and weekly missions, which are often criticized for being repetitive and overly grindy. While some players appreciate the gameplay mechanics and rewards associated with missions, the consensus is that those seeking a rich storyline will be disappointed.
- “The story mode is interesting and well set up for you to learn some great views on characters and tanks while offering an easier route than PvP.”
- “Overall a nice 7/10; it has the best story I’ve ever seen in a game, but the Panzer arc was a little bit flat.”
- “This game has many challenges and missions; I like this because it has a goal to complete that can be very challenging sometimes. It also is a very great game for the fact that you fight on a team and can choose to team up with a friend in a platoon.”
- “What storyline? But hey, who needs plot when you've got explosions?”
- “Wargaming completely lost the plot of the game and is just trying all sorts of nonsense to squeeze some more money out of it.”
- “If you like a plot, story, etc., then this isn't the game for you, but if you like to go to war and fight, you will probably like it.”
optimization
125 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
62%
11%
The game's optimization is generally praised for its ability to run smoothly on both high-end and low-end PCs, with many players reporting excellent performance even on older hardware. However, some users have experienced significant performance issues and glitches, particularly after updates, indicating that further optimization is needed to enhance gameplay consistency. Overall, while the game is well-optimized for mobile and lower-spec devices, there are notable concerns regarding its performance on certain PCs, especially in terms of stability and graphical fidelity.
- “3000+ hours man, it's been long 8 years (almost 9), this game is one of the best optimized games of all time, started from a potato PC, and it still worked great.”
- “Performance-wise, the game is very optimized and runs well even on low-end PCs; I would recommend it if you're looking for a more arcade-style of gameplay.”
- “The game runs smoothly at max settings on a £200 laptop, so the optimization is there.”
- “Many users are experiencing performance issues, making gameplay frustrating.”
- “Poorly optimized; had smooth FPS all the time before, now it's extremely choppy with only 5-30 FPS maximum.”
- “I think the PC version is poorly optimized, in many cases choppy performance when you needed it most.”
humor
107 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
97%
3%
The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with many players finding it amusing due to chaotic gameplay, funny glitches, and the absurdity of certain mechanics, such as matchmaking and tank performance. However, some users express frustration with the game's balance and pay-to-win elements, which detracts from the overall enjoyment. Overall, while the game can provide hilarious moments, it also risks becoming tedious or frustrating for some players.
- “Like a hamster in a tank - hilariously chaotic yet surprisingly competent.”
- “The controls are clunky, and the matchmaking system seems to have a sadistic sense of humor, pitting you against opponents who clearly sold their souls for better tanks.”
- “My god, I was playing and laughing aloud that 'is this a joke?!'.”
- “But sometimes it's not funny :)”
- “The standard tech tree is just not funny as it was, and lately they have taken away the competitiveness of tier X levels by inserting more and more fantasy tanks.”
- “In tiers 6-8, it's not funny; it's downright sad.”
stability
58 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
10%
2%
88%
The game's stability is frequently criticized, with players reporting numerous glitches, crashes, and lag spikes that significantly impact gameplay. While some updates have improved performance, many users still experience frustrating bugs that disrupt their gaming experience. Overall, the game's stability remains a major concern, detracting from its otherwise enjoyable aspects.
- “Yeah, the game is fun, and the battles are great. The maps are cool, and there are many tanks. There's always a lobby ready to go, with little to no glitches or hackers.”
- “Fun game, graphics are nice, smooth, and crisp. No glitches to speak of.”
- “Also runs great on old and cheap hardware.”
- “I rushed forward to help them, only to be met with a half-second input delay and an average framerate of 16, with full half-second freezes every other second.”
- “The game is so buggy.”
- “Each update this game keeps tanking (pun intended) it gets worse each update, very very bad matchmaking, glitchy and buggy, ghost tanks, on-target shots do no damage or bounce they just disappear.”
music
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
59%
18%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing dissatisfaction over the shift from a traditional soundtrack to a techno style that they find jarring and unchangeable. While some appreciate the immersive sound effects, such as tank treads and engine roars, others long for the return of the original soundtracks, citing them as superior and more enjoyable. Overall, the current music is often described as forgettable and not fitting the game's atmosphere.
- “Music director: deadmau5”
- “Soundtrack is really good, just like the original World of Tanks version.”
- “Sounds and music 10/10”
- “Music used to be an actual soundtrack; it was forcefully changed into some weird techno thing, and you aren't allowed to change it.”
- “When you start the game, you can instantly tell that it was made by Russian developers. The vibe and music all remind me of the crappy Soviet era.”
- “Its graphics, music, and variety of tanks are a downgrade, but all of the main lines are there.”
replayability
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
42%
42%
16%
World of Tanks Blitz offers a mixed replayability experience, with many players appreciating the variety of tanks and frequent content updates that enhance engagement. However, some users express dissatisfaction with the limited complexity of battles and slow progression, leading to boredom after a relatively short playtime. Overall, while the game has potential for replayability, it may not sustain long-term interest for all players.
- “World of Tanks Blitz offers decent replayability, thanks to its variety of tanks and game modes.”
- “The replay value in World of Tanks Blitz is solid, thanks to the game's variety of tanks and battle modes.”
- “Despite it being a tank simulator (if you can even call it that with the futuristic tanks it has in the end-game), it leaves a lot to be desired, but still marginally fun with little to no replay value because of an insanely slow progression system.”
- “Hundreds of unlockable vehicles, separated across 8 different nations and spanning 60 years of armored history provide for a replayable experience, and a chaotic battlefield, though at the cost of a hefty grind to get them.”
- “3: lower tiers are more playable due to higher HPs and more moderate damage, making for more engaging play, whereas in big WoT, low tiers are just there to get through and forget about, or to go back and terrorize less experienced players, which is a dick move.”
emotional
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional responses to the game are mixed, with some players expressing deep disappointment and frustration over its flaws, while others find joy and nostalgia in their experiences. The game elicits strong feelings, ranging from heartwarming moments to feelings of despair, highlighting a significant emotional investment from its community. Overall, the emotional spectrum reflects both attachment and disillusionment, making it a polarizing experience for players.
- “Seeing his face light up after the game finished downloading was heartwarming.”
- “This game means a lot to me and it hasn't changed much which is really heartwarming, merry Christmas!”
- “It's heartbreaking to see how this game ended up.”
atmosphere
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
33%
33%
The game's atmosphere has shifted from a gritty WWII setting to a colorful, casino-like environment, leading to a perception of a toxic and pay-to-win atmosphere. Players express disappointment over the loss of community and communication features, which has contributed to a negative experience, while some still appreciate the game's attempts to create varied and celebratory environments. Overall, the atmosphere is viewed as diminished and less enjoyable compared to its earlier iterations.
- “The game does a commendable job of capturing the gritty, atmospheric feel of tank warfare.”
- “Lobby with atmospheres for different celebrations and events - even adding Easter eggs on most of the maps in the game for players to explore.”
- “But the game’s atmosphere has drastically changed from a WWII era to a colorful, shiny casino where everything has a price.”
- “If you get the game in its current state, prepare to deal with poor tank sets, commanders, a horrible grind experience, and a pay-to-win game atmosphere.”
- “As a result, there's a lot of swearing and a very negative atmosphere all over.”
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players express concern that the new commander system disrupts game balance and prefer character development that emphasizes a strong historical context over overly polished designs.
- “The new commander system in WG's game will seriously upset the balance, and players are looking for a game with a strong sense of history, not overly 'correct' character designs.”
- “Character development feels shallow and lacks meaningful progression; it doesn't engage players in a way that makes them care about their characters.”
- “The characters are one-dimensional and fail to evolve throughout the game, making it hard to connect with their stories.”