World of Tanks
- April 28, 2021
- Wargaming Group Limited
- 24h median play time
Get on Steam
Get on Apple Store"World of Tanks" is a popular free-to-play, massively multiplayer warfare shooter game set in the mid-20th century, with over 700 authentic tanks from 12 nations. The game offers strategic, fast-paced online action with up to 15 vs 15 players, and features realistic environments, varying terrain, and weather effects. Regular updates provide new content and special events, with enhanced graphics for Xbox One X.
Reviews
- The game offers a fun and addictive arcade experience with quick matches and a variety of tanks.
- It's a great option for casual players, allowing for enjoyable gameplay without the need for significant financial investment.
- The absence of artillery and the shared progression between mobile and PC platforms are appreciated features.
- Matchmaking can be frustrating, often resulting in unbalanced teams and mismatched tank tiers.
- The game has a significant pay-to-win aspect, with many players feeling pressured to spend money to remain competitive.
- There are numerous technical issues, including crashes and glitches, which detract from the overall experience.
- graphics20 mentions
- 55 % positive mentions
- 30 % neutral mentions
- 15 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game are generally described as decent to very good, with many players appreciating the visual quality and artwork. However, some users note that the graphics may not compete with higher-end titles, particularly due to its mobile origins, and suggest that improvements are still needed. Overall, while the graphics are acceptable and enjoyable for most, there are calls for enhancements, especially for PC players.
“Awesome game, great graphics.”
“Great graphics, tight and close-up fighting, and just a whole lot of fun; win or lose.”
“Its fun, addictive, excellent graphics.”
“Since it's derived from a mobile platform (you can still play with mobile players), graphics performance can't compete with World of Tanks, but it's acceptable and getting better with every update (placebo maybe?).”
“Graphics are kinda meh, but don't let the graphics stop you from playing.”
“Controls are floaty, graphics are bad, maps are tiny, tank balance is a complete mess.”
- gameplay9 mentions
- 56 % positive mentions
- 11 % neutral mentions
- 33 % negative mentions
Gameplay reviews highlight a mix of experiences, with some players praising the smooth mechanics, cross-platform features, and variety of tanks, while others criticize issues like crashes, unbalanced gameplay, and glitchy controls. Overall, the game is seen as enjoyable for those familiar with its mechanics, though it may not match the depth and graphics of the original version.
“Great game, love the cross-platform mechanics.”
“A very interesting game with smooth gameplay and somewhat balanced tanks.”
“It's a fun game if you understand the mechanics and know the characteristics of each tank and how to maneuver with them.”
“Crash after 5 minutes of gameplay, again and again.”
“The controls of this game can get glitchy at certain times during gameplay.”
“The mechanics of cover, sidescraping, penetration, camouflage, spotting, etc. work the same as in World of Tanks on PC.”
- grinding3 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be excessive, particularly at higher tiers where the costs for research and upgrades escalate significantly. Many feel that the imbalance in gameplay forces them to either invest considerable time grinding or spend real money to expedite progress, leading to frustration.
“Either you spend a lot of time grinding for some particular tanks at certain levels that you're fond of, or you purchase in-game currency to speed up the process.”
“At tier V, the price and cost of research quickly escalate, making the game feel excessively grindy.”
“Absolutely unbalanced gameplay and tons of grinding. If you want decent gameplay, go play the actual World of Tanks, the non-Steam version.”
- stability3 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The stability of the game has been criticized by PC users, who report frequent crashes and total freezes, along with numerous glitches that detract from the overall experience. While some players find the game enjoyable, the prevalence of technical issues remains a significant concern.
“As a PC user, be prepared for numerous crashes and total freezes.”
“There are so many glitches that need to be fixed.”
“In my opinion, the game is good, but the number of glitches and the presence of a problematic community is quite concerning.”
- story3 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- -100 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The story aspect of the game is criticized for its tedious mission structure, which can significantly prolong the time required to progress and re-equip characters, with some players estimating it could take years without engaging in missions. However, completing the initial missions can yield substantial rewards, such as over 1000 gold, which some players find beneficial.
“The story is engaging and keeps you invested in the characters and their journeys.”
“The narrative is rich and immersive, making every mission feel meaningful.”
“The plot twists and character development are truly impressive, adding depth to the gameplay.”
“Good luck reequipping them - it will only take you ten to fifty years if you don't play the frustrating missions.”
“If you do play the missions, it will take you 1 to 5 years.”
“If you finish the first five missions, you get 1000+ gold (that's pretty decent).”
- optimization2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- -100 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The game's optimization is generally acceptable, especially for players transitioning from mobile platforms, though it doesn't match the graphics performance of World of Tanks. Updates are reportedly improving performance, making it a suitable choice for those who enjoy the gameplay without the time investment required by its predecessor.
“If you like World of Tanks but don't want to waste a bunch of time progressing or don't have the performance to play World of Tanks, this game is for you.”
“Since it's derived from a mobile platform (you can still play with mobile players), graphics performance can't compete with World of Tanks, but it's acceptable and getting better with every update.”
“Since it's derived from a mobile platform (you can still play with mobile players), graphics performance can't compete with World of Tanks, but it's acceptable and getting better with every update (placebo maybe?).”
“If you like World of Tanks but don't want to waste a bunch of time progressing or don't have the performance to play World of Tanks, this is for you.”
- monetization1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -500 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The monetization model includes in-game purchases, but these do not provide significant advantages to players and are not necessary for progression or competitiveness in matches.
“While in-game purchases exist, they don't seriously advantage one player over another in matches, and they are not required to progress or be strong in matches.”
“The monetization model is fair and balanced, allowing players to enjoy the game without feeling pressured to spend money.”
“I appreciate that the game offers cosmetic items for purchase, but they don't impact gameplay, making it a more enjoyable experience.”
“The monetization system feels overly aggressive, pushing players to spend money to enjoy the game fully.”
“It's frustrating that essential features are locked behind paywalls, making it hard to progress without spending real money.”
“The game constantly bombards you with offers and ads, which detracts from the overall experience.”
