Ironsight

About

Online FPS game, near future background, Resource Warfare between Military Forces and PMC. More than 50 kinds of original weapons with customization option. Use Peripheral objects, Tactical drones, Active objects to experience dynamic warfare.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

77%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,517 reviews

gameplay77 positive mentions

optimization15 negative mentions

Fast-paced gameplay reminiscent of classic Call of Duty titles.
Free-to-play model with no pay-to-win mechanics; all weapons can be unlocked through gameplay.
Good variety of weapons, maps, and game modes, providing a fun experience.

Severe issues with netcode, leading to deaths behind cover and inconsistent hit registration.
Low player base resulting in unbalanced matchmaking, often pitting new players against high-level veterans.
Frequent crashes and launcher issues, making the game unplayable for some users.

gameplay
216 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
54%
11%
The gameplay of the game is generally well-received, with many users noting its similarities to classic Call of Duty titles, particularly Black Ops 1 and 2, and praising its gun mechanics and fast-paced action. However, some players express concerns about balance issues, the impact of free-to-play mechanics, and the presence of hackers, which can detract from the overall experience. While the game offers enjoyable mechanics and solid graphics, it also faces criticism for certain gameplay elements, such as weapon durability and monetization practices.
- “The gun mechanics are surprisingly good.”
- “It's fun and really reminds me of Black Ops 1 and 2 in terms of gameplay and mechanics.”
- “The gunplay is great and everything is unlockable for free with a moderate amount of gameplay.”
- “The only downside is that primary weapons have durability mechanics with a slight repair cost and thrown weapons and special ammo aren't permanent (still cheap though).”
- “In terms of gameplay, the game is very bland; it's not worth playing, even if you're looking for a free-to-play Call of Duty.”
- “I don't have any issues on connection, but a lot of people have problems trying to play this game and getting disconnected every time. The gameplay of this game is poorly bad, with ghost shots everywhere, enemies seeing you first before you turn a corner, and I have a lot of problems with aim punch when I get shot, so I can't have a good experience with this game overall.”
graphics
104 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
55%
38%
8%
Overall, the graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising them as "great" or "decent," especially in comparison to free-to-play titles. Some users highlight the vibrant art style and smooth performance, while others criticize the graphics for being dated or lacking optimization. Despite the varying opinions, the consensus is that the visuals contribute positively to the gameplay experience, even if they don't reach the standards of top-tier titles.
- “This game's graphics are insane!”
- “I love the graphics and the fact it's so much like COD.”
- “The game has great visuals and gameplay is very close to COD.”
- “Graphics like from game maker, it's terrible.”
- “A poor man's COD, horrible movement, not fluid, weapons are bad, the recoil is so weird, the graphics are horrible; you can do better than waste time on this.”
- “Extremely poor optimization for average graphics, pay-to-win weapons, crashes everywhere, poor mouse sensitivity configuration.”
optimization
44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
18%
48%
34%
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players reporting stable performance and high frame rates on mid to high-end PCs, while others experience significant performance issues, including frame drops and lag, even on powerful systems. Many users criticize the game's graphics optimization and server stability, noting that it struggles with bugs and inconsistent performance across various maps. Overall, while some players find the game runs smoothly, a substantial number highlight serious optimization problems that detract from the experience.
- “Performance-wise it's pretty good though, reaching stable frames even on older computers and running flawlessly on newer ones.”
- “Performance is excellent on my mid-high end PC; any reasonable gaming PC should have this running smoothly.”
- “+great optimization, I run the game on max settings with solid 144fps on my PC: GTX 1070, i7 6700k, 16GB RAM, SSD.”
- “The game has terrible optimization, with performance issues even on high-end PCs.”
- “Every single map released since is either way too big, way too convoluted, or simply terrible for performance.”
- “This game also comes packed with bad graphics, poor performance no matter what hardware you play on, terrible laggy servers, and a toxic player base.”
monetization
44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
7%
59%
34%
The game's monetization system has received mixed reviews, with many players criticizing it for being overly greedy and reminiscent of typical free-to-play, pay-to-win models, particularly in its reliance on microtransactions for unlocking content. While some players appreciate that most items can be earned through gameplay, others feel that the grind is excessive and that the presence of cosmetic microtransactions detracts from the overall experience. Despite these concerns, a few players noted that the game does not feature pay-to-win mechanics, making it somewhat more accessible than other titles in the genre.
- “Its free, has minimal intrusive microtransactions (everything that can be bought in this game with AP (real money currency) can be easily earned in gameplay) to buy items you use game points.”
- “The microtransactions are only for skins, so there are no pay-to-win mechanics.”
- “Overall the gameplay is solid and rewarding, the microtransactions are non-intrusive and there is no pay-to-win.”
- “The monetization system is pretty greedy, but it seems like you'll get plenty of the normal earnable currency through normal gameplay.”
- “This game is terrible; it resembles a mobile game that is poorly made and filled with microtransactions, except it's on PC.”
- “The microtransactions are pretty bad; you have to pay to experience a lot of the content.”
story
37 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
84%
8%
The game's story aspect is criticized for its lack of depth, with many players noting that the missions feel like a basic framework rather than a compelling narrative. While there are some PvE quests and operations, they are often described as simplistic and unengaging, lacking the richness of a traditional campaign. Overall, players express a desire for a more developed storyline and additional co-op missions to enhance the gaming experience.
- “The devs also keep the game fresh and updated with new content updates; these large updates give us maps, balance changes, skins (character customization, full skins that change the playable character, like a robot or a SWAT officer and weapon skins), new weapons, and missions to reach goals that offer us rewards (similar to season passes, but with free-to-play rewards and with more rewards for the ones that buy the pass).”
- “Some things that are good about this game are how you can train in the missions tab by fighting bots, and its gun library is small but really good because, well, it's in beta 1.0.”
- “What an absolute pleasure... the first free-to-play FPS game I ever played was 'Wolfenstein's Enemy Territory'... now in the year 2020 this game is here... 100% equal gameplay regardless of level and 100% free to play... there is no weapon or attachment in the game that can't be gained by grinding bot missions.”
- “There is nothing special in this mission to learn about the game, and I guess creating this mission took half a day or less (seriously, I thought this mission was a joke).”
- “It's good and all, it just has no story mode, so you can't say I'm going to play story mode and be a robot or soldier with guns mowing down the enemy. It needs to have a story mode like Warface or Metro.”
- “There are PvE quests and a few operation quests, but not much more than that.”
grinding
25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
4%
92%
The reviews highlight a mixed sentiment regarding grinding in the game. While some players find the grind for weapons and attachments tedious and reminiscent of pay-to-win mechanics, others appreciate that all items can be earned through gameplay without feeling excessively burdensome. Overall, the game is seen as moderately grindy, with some players enjoying the challenge while others feel it detracts from the experience.
- “Grinding to unlock weapons and attachments seems well thought-out and not too grindy overall; I've only played a few hours and I've already got a good number of options to choose from.”
- “It's extremely tedious to unlock weapons to where it almost feels pay to win.”
- “I had to do a lot of grinding for tons of hours just to unlock a gun, but then later it would just disappear out of my inventory upon logging in to my next session.”
- “Waaaaaaaay too grindy and money hungry.”
stability
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
88%
The game's stability is frequently criticized, with users reporting numerous bugs, server crashes, and freezing issues that hinder gameplay. While some players appreciate the overall experience, many express frustration over the game's technical problems, including glitches and poor netcode, which detract from its potential. Overall, players are advised to approach the game with patience due to its ongoing stability issues.
- “Runs great on even the most potato-like PCs.”
- “Runs great.”
- “It is buggy sometimes and the servers are crashing.”
- “Whenever I try to load into a match, the screen just freezes, although I can hear everything as if nothing was wrong.”
- “Gameplay is greatly affected by the horrible client-side/server-side setup, too many glitches and annoyances caused by this.”
humor
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is a standout feature, with players finding joy in the absurdity of gameplay moments, such as bots behaving comically and the hilariously poor performance of teammates. Many reviews highlight the fun of playing with friends and the unexpected, often ridiculous situations that arise during matches, making it an entertaining experience despite its flaws. Overall, the game is described as a lighthearted and amusing take on familiar mechanics, perfect for casual play.
- “You get shot behind cover (way behind cover) so massively late it's hilarious more than sad.”
- “It's a really funny game, it's like Call of Duty; you can spend hours playing this game. I really recommend it, and it's free!”
- “Then there is co-op vs. bot; it's funny to see how the bots work - for example, shooting at you while looking in a completely different direction - but check it out on your own.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The music in the game evokes nostalgia, drawing comparisons to classic titles like Counter-Strike and Unreal Tournament, enhancing the emotional experience for players. However, it's noted that there is no in-game music, which may detract from the overall atmosphere.
- “Good graphics, music, and gameplay.”
- “Also, there is no in-game music.”
- “*sad music starts playing*”
- “It pulls together so many feels from some real favorites over the years (Counter-Strike way back when it was just a mod, Dirty Bomb, hell - the music even reminds me of Unreal Tournament).”
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Character development features appealing designs that may resonate more with younger audiences due to their edgy aesthetic, though opinions on their depth and growth vary.
- “The character designs are quite cool, and I believe younger players will appreciate the edgy aesthetic.”
- “The depth of character development really allows players to connect with the story and the characters on a personal level.”
- “I love how the characters evolve throughout the game, making each decision feel impactful and meaningful.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The emotional aspect of the reviews reflects a deep personal connection to the publisher, Aeria Games, and a sense of disappointment regarding its history of poor monetization practices and the negative impact on game quality. Reviewers express concern for the current game's future, hoping it doesn't suffer the same fate as previous titles, while acknowledging the developers' efforts and the game's enjoyable gameplay. Overall, there is a mix of nostalgia, frustration, and cautious optimism regarding the game's potential.
- “This game touched me on a very personal level, and I never thought I would play a game published by Aeria Games again. The emotional connection I felt while playing was genuine, and it kept me engaged despite my concerns about the publisher's history.”
- “The gameplay is so immersive that it evokes a range of emotions, making me feel connected to the characters and their stories. It's rare to find a game that can pull at your heartstrings while also providing solid gameplay.”
- “I was surprised by how emotionally invested I became in the storyline. The characters felt real, and their struggles resonated with me, making the experience unforgettable.”