Ironsight

About

Ironsight is a multiplayer shooter game with warfare and science fiction themes. It was developed by Wiple Games and was released on December 18, 2019. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Ironsight is a free-to-play, multiplayer first-person shooter set in a dystopian world where two factions battle over the rare energy resource Trinitium. Featuring fast-paced PvP combat, compelling gameplay, and advanced military technology, it offers intense online warfare with beautiful visuals. However, the experience can be hindered by frequent grinding and numerous bugs.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

77%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,473 reviews

gameplay76 positive mentions

optimization15 negative mentions

The game offers a nostalgic Call of Duty experience with well-designed maps and solid gun mechanics.
It's a free-to-play game that is not pay-to-win, allowing players to unlock weapons and attachments through gameplay.
The fast-paced gameplay and variety of game modes provide an enjoyable experience for both casual and competitive players.

The game suffers from poor netcode, leading to issues like dying behind cover and inconsistent hit registration.
Matchmaking can be unbalanced, often pairing new players with high-level veterans, making it frustrating for beginners.
There are frequent reports of hackers in the game, which detracts from the overall experience.

gameplay
213 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
53%
11%
The gameplay of the game is generally well-received, with many players noting its similarities to classic Call of Duty titles, particularly Black Ops 1 and 2, and praising its gun mechanics and fast-paced action. However, some criticisms arise regarding balance issues, the presence of pay-to-win mechanics, and the need for weapon repairs, which can detract from the overall experience. Despite these concerns, players appreciate the accessibility and fun factor of the gameplay, especially for a free-to-play title.
- “The gunplay is great and everything is unlockable for free with a moderate amount of gameplay.”
- “Overall, the gameplay is solid and rewarding; the microtransactions are non-intrusive and there is no pay-to-win.”
- “Fast gameplay, fast matchmaking; I did not find hackers or bugs even in open beta, excellent mechanics, perks easy to use, and a lot of customization of weapons.”
- “The only thing that I didn't like was the fact that your character/player has stamina... it makes the gameplay kind of slow sometimes if you want to run to other places on the map.”
- “A horrible repair-item mechanic (you have to pay in-game currency to repair items, and some you can only have for a limited amount of time).”
- “In terms of gameplay, the game is very bland; it's not worth playing, even if you're looking for a free-to-play Call of Duty.”
graphics
104 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
55%
37%
8%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising their quality and smooth performance, especially on lower-end hardware. While some describe the visuals as vibrant and reminiscent of popular titles like Call of Duty, others note that they are not groundbreaking and could benefit from further optimization. Overall, the graphics are generally considered good for a free-to-play title, though some players express disappointment with the lack of significant updates and improvements over time.
- “This game's graphics are insane!”
- “I love the graphics and the fact it's so much like COD.”
- “The game has great visuals and gameplay is very close to COD.”
- “Graphics like from game maker, it's terrible.”
- “Extremely poor optimization for average graphics, pay-to-win weapons, crashes everywhere, poor mouse sensitivity configuration.”
- “The graphics somehow look grey and low quality on my dual-monitor RX 570 system, and it always resorts to my smaller primary monitor too.”
optimization
43 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
46%
35%
The game's optimization has received mixed reviews, with some players experiencing stable performance and high frame rates on mid to high-end PCs, while others report significant performance issues, including frame drops and lag, even on capable systems. Many users criticize the game's graphics optimization, noting that it does not match the performance demands, leading to a frustrating experience with bugs and server problems. Overall, while some players find the game runs smoothly, a substantial number highlight the need for substantial improvements in optimization and performance consistency.
- “Performance-wise it's pretty good though, reaching stable frames even on older computers and running flawlessly on newer ones.”
- “Performance is excellent on my mid-high end PC; any reasonable gaming PC should have this running smoothly.”
- “+great optimization, I run the game on max settings with solid 144fps on my PC: GTX 1070, i7 6700k, 16GB RAM, SSD.”
- “The game has terrible optimization, with performance issues even on high-end PCs. For example, on my i5 2400 with a GTX 1060, I struggle to maintain 85 fps, often dropping to 45-55 fps during matches.”
- “It's terribly unoptimized, leading to significant performance issues that detract from the overall experience.”
- “This game has a lot of bugs, including getting stuck, sound issues, and poor netcode, all contributing to a lack of smooth gameplay and bad optimization.”
monetization
43 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
7%
58%
35%
The game's monetization system has received mixed reviews, with many players criticizing it for being overly aggressive and reminiscent of typical free-to-play, pay-to-win models, particularly in its reliance on microtransactions for unlocking content. While some players appreciate that most items can be earned through gameplay, others feel that the grind is excessive and that the presence of cosmetic microtransactions detracts from the experience. Overall, the monetization approach is seen as a significant factor that could impact the game's longevity and player retention.
- “Its free, has minimal intrusive microtransactions (everything that can be bought in this game with AP (real money currency) can be easily earned in gameplay) to buy items you use game points.”
- “Overall the gameplay is solid and rewarding, the microtransactions are non-intrusive and there is no pay-to-win.”
- “Don't let the microtransactions scare you off from trying this one, as everything in the game can be unlocked for free aside from a few select skins.”
- “The monetization system is pretty greedy, but it seems like you'll get plenty of the normal earnable currency through normal gameplay.”
- “This game is terrible; it resembles a mobile game that is poorly made and filled with microtransactions, except it's on PC.”
- “The microtransactions are pretty bad; you have to pay to experience a lot of the content.”
story
37 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
84%
8%
The game's story aspect is criticized for lacking depth, with many players noting that the missions feel like a basic framework rather than a compelling narrative. While there are some PvE quests and operations, they are often described as simplistic and unengaging, with players expressing a desire for more substantial story content and co-op missions. Overall, the game is seen as needing significant improvements in its storytelling to enhance player engagement.
- “The devs also keep the game fresh and updated with new content updates; these large updates give us maps, balance changes, skins (character customization, full skins that change the playable character, like a robot or a SWAT officer and weapon skins), new weapons, and missions to reach goals that offer us rewards (similar to season passes, but with free-to-play rewards and with more rewards for the ones that buy the pass).”
- “Some things that are good about this game are how you can train in the missions tab by fighting bots, and its gun library is small but really good because, well, it's in beta 1.0.”
- “What an absolute pleasure... the first free-to-play FPS game I ever played was 'Wolfenstein's Enemy Territory'... now in the year 2020 this game is here... 100% equal gameplay regardless of level and 100% free to play... there is no weapon or attachment in the game that can't be gained by grinding bot missions.”
- “There is nothing special in this mission to learn about the game, and I guess creating this mission took half a day or less (seriously, I thought this mission was a joke).”
- “It's good and all, it just has no story mode, so you can't say you're going to play story mode and be a robot or soldier with guns mowing down the enemy. It needs to have a story mode like Warface or Metro.”
- “There are PvE quests and a few operation quests, but not much more than that.”
grinding
25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
4%
92%
The reviews highlight a mixed sentiment regarding grinding in the game. While some players find the grind for weapons and attachments tedious and reminiscent of pay-to-win mechanics, others appreciate that all items can be earned through gameplay without feeling excessively burdensome. Overall, the game is seen as moderately grindy, with some players enjoying the challenge while others express frustration over the time investment required to unlock content.
- “Grinding to unlock weapons and attachments seems well thought-out and not too grindy overall; I've only played a few hours and I've already got a good number of options to choose from.”
- “It's extremely tedious to unlock weapons to where it almost feels pay to win.”
- “I had to do a lot of grinding for tons of hours just to unlock a gun, but then later it would just disappear out of my inventory upon logging in to my next session.”
- “Waaaaaaaay too grindy and money hungry.”
stability
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
87%
The game's stability is frequently criticized, with users reporting numerous bugs, server crashes, and gameplay freezes that significantly hinder the experience. While some players appreciate the game's potential and enjoy its mechanics, many express frustration over the persistent glitches and poor netcode, suggesting that it requires patience and further development to reach its full potential. Overall, the game is described as very buggy, especially in its early stages, leading to a mixed reception regarding its stability.
- “Runs great on even the most potato-like PCs.”
- “Runs great.”
- “It is buggy sometimes and the servers are crashing.”
- “Whenever I try to load into a match, the screen just freezes, although I can hear everything as if nothing was wrong.”
- “Gameplay is greatly affected by the horrible client-side/server-side setup, too many glitches and annoyances caused by this.”
humor
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is a standout feature, with players finding joy in the absurdity of gameplay moments, such as bots behaving comically and the hilarity of playing with friends. Many reviews highlight the game's ability to provide laughter through its chaotic mechanics and the often ridiculous performance of both players and AI. While some issues are noted, the overall sentiment is that the game offers a fun and entertaining experience, especially in casual play.
- “You get shot behind cover (way behind cover) so massively late it's hilarious more than sad.”
- “It's a really funny game, it's like Call of Duty; you can spend hours playing this game. I really recommend it, and it's free!”
- “Funny game”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
25%
50%
The music in the game evokes nostalgia, drawing comparisons to classic titles like Counter-Strike and Unreal Tournament, enhancing the emotional experience for players. However, it's noted that there is no in-game music, which may detract from the overall atmosphere.
- “Good graphics, music, and gameplay.”
- “It pulls together so many feels from some real favorites over the years (Counter-Strike way back when it was just a mod, Dirty Bomb, hell - the music even reminds me of Unreal Tournament).”
- “Also, there is no in-game music.”
character development
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Character development features unique and appealing designs that may particularly resonate with younger audiences due to their edgy aesthetic.
- “The character designs are quite cool, and I believe younger players will appreciate the edgy aesthetic.”
- “The depth of character development really allows players to connect with the story on a personal level.”
- “I love how the characters evolve throughout the game, making each decision feel impactful.”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the reviews reflects a deep personal connection to the publisher, Aeria Games, which evokes nostalgia but also frustration due to its history of poor monetization practices and the negative impact on game quality. Reviewers express concern for the game's future, fearing it may suffer the same fate as previous titles, despite acknowledging the developers' efforts and the game's current appeal. Overall, there is a mix of hope and skepticism regarding the game's longevity under Aeria's management.
- “This game touched me on a very personal level. I never thought I would play a game published by Aeria Games again, but the genuine COD gameplay keeps it going for now.”
- “The developers seem like a pretty wholesome bunch, and they did a good job on the gameplay side of things. I hope this game doesn't meet the same fate as others.”
- “It's a very weird company that never learns from its mistakes, but I appreciate the effort put into this game despite the challenges it faces.”