Argo

About

Argo is a single player and multiplayer shooter game with a warfare theme. It was developed by Bohemia Interactive and was released on June 22, 2017. It received neutral reviews from players.

"Argo" is a free, hardcore tactical first-person shooter with a focus on realism and precision. Choose to play as a mercenary in one of two rival factions, starting out as a rookie and gaining experience to unlock new weapons and gear. Compete in one of three competitive game modes on the 62 km² Mediterranean island of Malden, featuring diverse combat zones built for optimal gameplay. Play in single-player, local multi-player, co-op, or PvP modes, with up to 2 players in split screen.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

49%

Audience ScoreBased on 4,234 reviews

gameplay104 positive mentions

optimization113 negative mentions

gameplay
348 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
54%
16%
The gameplay of Argo is characterized by its tactical focus, emphasizing teamwork, realistic mechanics, and strategic decision-making, making it a unique entry in the shooter genre. While it offers a variety of modes and environments, players have noted issues with optimization, clunky mechanics, and occasional bugs that can disrupt the experience. Overall, Argo serves as a more accessible introduction to the Arma series, appealing to both veterans and newcomers, though it may not fully satisfy those seeking a polished gameplay experience.
- “Argo offers a refreshing take on the tactical shooter genre, blending elements of fast-paced action with strategic gameplay.”
- “The tactical mechanics of Argo shine through its realistic ballistics, weapon handling, and squad-based gameplay.”
- “Argo successfully combines tactical gameplay, team coordination, and immersive environments to create an engaging and intense FPS experience.”
- “Argo is dead and the gameplay mechanics are strange.”
- “The gameplay feels cheap and rushed, I would not even recommend trying it.”
- “Gameplay is confusing, the HUD looks like it was made by a Chinese rip-off company, the whole interface is confusing and gameplay itself is boring and confusing.”
optimization
249 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
42%
45%
The optimization of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users reporting severe performance issues, including frequent frame rate drops and stuttering, even on high-end hardware. While some players noted that it runs better than its predecessor, Arma 3, the consensus is that the game is poorly optimized, buggy, and often unplayable, leading to frustration among the community. Overall, significant improvements in optimization are needed for a better gaming experience.
- “Visually, Argo delivers a solid experience with its detailed environments, realistic lighting, and well-optimized performance.”
- “The game runs smoothly on a variety of hardware configurations, ensuring accessibility for a wide range of players.”
- “All in all, it's worth playing, and they've improved performance a lot since the first release.”
- “The game is a mess, constantly buggy, laggy, stuttering.”
- “Worst optimized game ever, can't get a frame rate above 30 on the lowest settings on a GTX 1060.”
- “This is the worst optimized game I have ever played; you need a very decent computer to play it on the lowest settings, which includes no shadows, making the game look like a bad polygon and still get 15 fps.”
graphics
202 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
48%
39%
13%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising the stunning visuals and immersive environments, particularly for a free-to-play title. However, several users criticize the game's optimization, noting significant performance issues and frame rate drops even on high-end systems. Overall, while the graphics are often described as good or impressive, they are frequently overshadowed by gameplay and technical problems.
- “The graphics are amazing, and the realistic gameplay offers things that most other games, even more so for a free one, do not.”
- “Argo is simply stunning; the graphics are top quality - the best free game on Steam.”
- “The graphics are very nice and the audio is also quite nice.”
- “To be honest, I didn't enjoy this game because of the poor graphics, the fact that it is still in production, and the numerous issues.”
- “The graphics are abysmal and half of most of the game looks like a bad asset flip.”
- “The graphical fidelity of the game, compared to the game's performance, leaves a lot to be desired.”
stability
150 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
2%
99%
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with numerous users reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and performance issues that significantly disrupt gameplay. Many describe it as poorly optimized and reminiscent of the problematic Arma engine, leading to a frustrating experience marred by lag, crashes, and unresponsive controls. While some players find enjoyment despite these issues, the consensus is that the game is not ready for a full release and requires substantial improvements to its stability.
- “Great game, it's free and not too buggy.”
- “The game runs smoothly without any crashes or major issues.”
- “I appreciate how stable the gameplay is; it rarely lags or freezes.”
- “The game is a mess, constantly buggy, laggy, stuttering.”
- “It's a buggy piece of shit.”
- “This game needs tactics them sounds fx are good but there are some glitches but the overall game is really good.”
story
111 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
10%
81%
9%
The reviews indicate that the game lacks a traditional narrative or story, with many players noting that it primarily consists of mission-based gameplay without a cohesive plot. While some enjoy the cooperative and competitive mission structures, they often find the missions to be bland and lacking purpose, leading to a sense of disconnection from any overarching storyline. Overall, the absence of a meaningful story detracts from the experience for many players, who feel it resembles a series of disconnected missions rather than a unified game narrative.
- “The game offers a range of gameplay modes, including large-scale multiplayer battles, co-operative missions, and a single-player campaign, and it rewards players who work together and communicate effectively.”
- “I actually enjoy the quick co-op mission, quite challenging; it needs intense communication between friendlies.”
- “This game blends competitive games (like CS:GO or Overwatch) and the amazingly realistic gameplay of Arma III together, and you can also play co-op missions with friends if you wish!”
- “☑ no story”
- “✅ this game has no story”
- “Speaking of a waste of time, Argo features bland missions that don't have much of a purpose (unless there's a backstory online, which I really do not have the motivation to go and look up), and an environment that doesn't vary at all.”
monetization
33 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
33%
58%
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating the absence of microtransactions and the fact that it is completely free to play. However, some users criticize the game for being a cash grab, filled with annoying advertisements for Arma 3, and for having a paid DLC that offers only cosmetic items. Overall, while the lack of microtransactions is a positive point, the game's monetization strategy and frequent ads have left some players feeling frustrated.
- “It is now completely free, there are no microtransactions or other payments needed to fully experience this game.”
- “Game is 100% free with a fair unlock system and no microtransactions that I can see.”
- “Argo does not have any in-game purchases or microtransactions; it only has a paid DLC that offers a few cosmetic items if you'd like to support the development team.”
- “Smelly cash grab gone too soon.”
- “This game is buggy beyond belief, along with a UI that sometimes works but most of the time doesn't. Here's the funny thing: these bugs occur regularly, yet I see microtransactions.”
- “Sh*tty cash grab attempt from Bohemia.”
grinding
25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
8%
84%
The reviews indicate that grinding is a significant and often frustrating aspect of the game, with many players feeling that it creates an imbalance between veterans and newcomers. Unlocking weapons and attachments requires extensive grinding, which can detract from the overall enjoyment and accessibility of the game. While some players appreciate the depth it adds, the consensus leans towards a need for a more balanced progression system to enhance the experience.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “Unofficial servers are still good; this means that all players have access to the same equipment with no unfair advantage, no grinding required.”
- “You get vastly superior weapons by grinding the game; a veteran player will be miles ahead of a new player, making it frustratingly difficult for starting players.”
- “Terrible unlock system that feels grindy as hell.”
- “The progression system is grindy and doesn't mix well with the type of game they've tried to create.”
humor
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
95%
14%
The humor in the game is largely derived from its glitches, friendly fire incidents, and the chaotic interactions between players, which often lead to hilarious situations. While some players find the bugs and mechanics frustrating, many appreciate the comedic moments that arise from teamwork gone wrong and the game's quirky animations. Overall, the humor is a mixed bag, with some players enjoying the laughs despite the game's shortcomings.
- “I enjoyed the game despite its issues; it was fun playing every day with the same players, but sadly the game 'died'. The official servers no longer work, and I'm sad that all those funny moments I had playing this game are 'lost'.”
- “Very funny to play with friends, especially when the ground occasionally glitches and you end up under buildings. XD”
- “By a house, taking cover from enemy fire... a teammate shoots me, realizes I was friendly, starts reviving me, only to get shot by our teammate, who then realizes he was friendly reviving a friendly, to then revive the guy reviving me, to then be shot by another teammate, then an enemy grenade finished us off... couldn't stop laughing though; they really do need to make it easier to tell who's friendly.”
- “This game tries to be funny, but the humor falls flat and feels forced.”
- “I expected some laughs, but the jokes are stale and unoriginal.”
- “The attempts at humor are cringeworthy and detract from the overall experience.”
music
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
35%
47%
18%
The music in the game is frequently praised, with many users highlighting the soundtrack as a standout feature, often rating it highly (10/10). However, some players note that the in-game audio can be overwhelming, with distracting sounds and music that detracts from the overall experience. Despite these criticisms, the general consensus is that the soundtrack significantly enhances the game's appeal.
- “This game brings highly tactical gameplay and the soundtrack is very much amazing in this game.”
- “Soundtrack 10/10”
- “Just filling noises/no music.”
- “If you close your eyes and listen to the music, the game is better.”
- “Music blasting over mics during the entirety of the game.”
replayability
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
50%
21%
The game offers significant replayability through community-driven content creation, multiplayer modes, and a variety of maps and game modes. While some players find the gamemodes simplistic and lacking in depth, features like a skill tree and customization options enhance the overall experience. However, concerns about optimization and the need for updates may affect long-term engagement for some users.
- “The community-driven workshops and modding support provide an avenue for players to create and share their own content, extending the game's longevity and enhancing its replayability.”
- “The game's multiplayer modes also provide a high level of replayability, as players can team up with friends or join online communities to compete against other players from around the world.”
- “Also, the recent addition of a skill tree, unlockables, and personal loadouts adds great elements of customization and replayability.”
- “Gamemodes are very simplistic and have little replayability.”
- “If there were more players then this would be more playable.”
- “Thanks to the map editor, the replayability is much higher than it should be.”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The atmosphere is highly immersive, driven by the necessity for teamwork and communication, which enhances the gameplay experience. Although the graphics may not match AAA standards, they effectively contribute to the overall ambiance, earning a solid rating of 4 for the maps and atmosphere.
- “The reliance on teamwork and effective communication creates an immersive atmosphere that rewards coordinated strategies and punishes lone wolves.”
- “While the graphics may not reach the level of AAA titles, they are more than sufficient to create an immersive atmosphere.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
Players express a strong emotional response to the game's technical issues, feeling frustrated and disheartened by the glitches that detract from an otherwise enjoyable experience. Despite the potential for camaraderie and teamwork, the current state of the game leaves many unwilling to continue until improvements are made.
- “The emotional impact of this game is profound, making me feel a deep connection to the characters and their struggles.”
- “I was genuinely moved by the storyline; it resonated with my own experiences and left me reflecting on my choices.”
- “The moments of triumph and loss in this game hit me hard, evoking feelings I didn't expect to experience while playing.”
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
Character development in the game is praised for its depth and complexity, with players noting that characters evolve significantly throughout the story. Many reviews highlight the emotional arcs and personal growth of the characters, making them relatable and engaging. Overall, the character development is seen as a strong point that enhances the overall narrative experience.
- “The character development in this game is incredibly deep, allowing players to truly connect with each character's journey and growth.”
- “I love how the game explores the complexities of each character, making their evolution feel authentic and relatable.”
- “The way characters change based on player choices adds a layer of immersion that makes every decision feel impactful.”
- “The character development feels shallow and lacks depth, making it hard to connect with the protagonists.”
- “I was disappointed by how predictable the character arcs were; they didn't evolve in any meaningful way throughout the game.”
- “The choices I made didn't seem to impact the characters' growth, leaving me feeling like my decisions were meaningless.”