Argo

About

Argo is a single player and multiplayer shooter game with a warfare theme. It was developed by Bohemia Interactive and was released on June 22, 2017. It received neutral reviews from players.

Argo is a hardcore tactical first-person shooter, in which you fight across unrestricted terrain, and where a single bullet is all it takes. Master your craft to rank up and become (in)famous on the battlefield.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

49%

Audience ScoreBased on 4,196 reviews

gameplay103 positive mentions

optimization106 negative mentions

Free to play tactical first-person shooter with realistic team-based gameplay similar to Arma 3.
Engaging game modes including 5v5 objective-based matches and cooperative Combat Patrols against AI.
Good weapon customization, diverse maps, satisfying gunplay, and strong emphasis on teamwork and strategy.

The game is officially dead with servers shut down and very low to no active player base.
Poor optimization causing lag and low frame rates even on decent hardware, plus bugs and glitches affecting gameplay.
Steep learning curve, unfriendly to new players due to limited tutorials and slow progression system that puts newcomers at disadvantage.

gameplay
343 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
56%
14%
Argo offers a tactical, realism-focused gameplay experience derived from the Arma series but simplified for faster, smaller-scale matches emphasizing teamwork and strategy. While praised for its authentic mechanics, diverse modes, and immersive maps, the game suffers from clunky controls, bugs, optimization issues, and a low player base, which can impact enjoyment. Overall, it serves as a good introduction to Arma-style tactical shooters but has notable limitations compared to its predecessor.
- “It also emphasizes realistic mechanics—like weapon sway, vehicle driving, and team communication—so every move feels significant.”
- “Argo delivers a refreshing and engaging gameplay experience, placing a strong emphasis on team coordination and strategic decision-making.”
- “The tactical mechanics of Argo shine through its realistic ballistics, weapon handling, and squad-based gameplay.”
- “Argo is dead and the gameplay mechanics are strange.”
- “Terrible game mechanics are terrible the graphics are fine but besides that graphics are the only good thing about it everything else is an absolute mess.”
- “Garbo, horrid performance, unoptimized, I have a GTX 10 series GPU and stutter with 30 fps with everything to low, gunplay is horrible, gameplay is horrible, teammates are team killing, buggy, and glitchy.”
optimization
243 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
42%
44%
Optimization for Argo is widely criticized, with many reporting severe performance issues, frequent frame drops, stuttering, and lag even on mid to high-end hardware. While some users note it runs better than Arma 3, the overall consensus highlights poor engine efficiency, inconsistent frame rates, and a need for substantial optimization improvements to ensure smoother gameplay.
- “Visually, Argo delivers a solid experience with its detailed environments, realistic lighting, and well-optimized performance.”
- “The game runs smoothly on a variety of hardware configurations, ensuring accessibility for a wide range of players.”
- “It's optimized very well and runs smoothly with a decent computer.”
- “Worst optimized game ever, can't get a frame rate above 30 on the lowest settings on a GTX 1060.”
- “This is the worst optimized game I have ever played; you need a very decent computer to play it on the lowest settings, which includes no shadows making the game look like bad polly, and still get 15 fps; some files are missing during install.”
- “Garbage, horrid performance, unoptimized; I have a GTX 10 series GPU and stutter with 30 fps with everything on low; gunplay is horrible, gameplay is horrible, teammates are team killing, buggy, and glitchy.”
graphics
199 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
48%
40%
12%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many praising their high quality and realism, especially impressive for a free-to-play title, often compared positively to Arma 3. However, others criticize the graphics as outdated, unoptimized, and poorly performing on various systems, leading to frequent frame drops and lag. Overall, while the visuals are generally considered good and immersive, performance and optimization issues detract from the experience for many players.
- “The graphics and controls of this game are better than PUBG.”
- “Argo is simply stunning; graphics are top quality - the best free game on Steam - just needs battle royale to be even better 10/10.”
- “The graphics are amazing, and the realistic gameplay offers things that most other games, even more so for a free one, do not.”
- “The graphics are abysmal and half of most of the game looks like a bad asset flip.”
- “Do not waste your time downloading this game. I am a massive Arma fan and this game is just such false advertisement. This game just wasted my time and the graphics are terrible compared to all the Arma games. I had the game on highest settings and barely hit 12 fps and on the lowest settings I had 26-28 ping which isn't what I like to see, so do not waste your time.”
- “The blocky graphics and low resolution textures in this game, even on the highest settings, simply cannot compete.”
stability
150 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
1%
99%
The game is widely criticized for being buggy, glitchy, and poorly optimized, with frequent crashes, lag, and issues like spawning glitches, stuck characters, and hit registration problems. Despite its potential and enjoyable gameplay for some, stability issues significantly detract from the overall experience, making it feel unfinished and frustrating for many players. Ongoing updates and community feedback are expected to address these problems over time.
- “The game is a mess, constantly buggy, laggy, stuttering.”
- “This leaves us with a game where some entire game modes consistently don't even work, the ones that do likely won't allow you to have any progression, and the gameplay experiences that are largely enjoyable get interrupted by insane moments like your entire team starts randomly spawning out in the middle of the ocean, or you respawn inside of a rock and have to kill yourself, or the AI glitches through walls and blasts your whole team.”
- “The performance is terrible, bugs and glitches are plentiful, controls and menus are way too complex and not user friendly.”
story
111 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
10%
81%
9%
The game lacks an official story mode, offering instead a variety of standalone mission types and cooperative scenarios without a cohesive narrative. Players can create custom missions using an editor, but overall, the missions are often described as bland, repetitive, and lacking meaningful rewards or progression tied to story elements. While some enjoy the quick tactical gameplay with friends, the absence of a structured story and mission variety leads to a less engaging experience compared to the main Arma series.
- “Combat patrol immerses players in cooperative scenarios where they must complete various missions.”
- “The game offers a range of gameplay modes, including large-scale multiplayer battles, cooperative missions, and a single-player campaign, rewarding players who work together and communicate effectively.”
- “This game blends competitive games like CS:GO or Overwatch with the amazingly realistic gameplay of Arma III, and allows you to play co-op missions with friends.”
- “Speaking of a waste of time, Argo features bland missions that don't have much of a purpose (unless there's a backstory online, which I really do not have the motivation to go and look up), and an environment that doesn't vary at all.”
- “Co-op missions are poorly made. Some missions are so easy you can just walk to the objective, complete it, and walk to the extraction with no combat. Other missions are so difficult you spawn and instantly die. Co-op missions provide no XP at all.”
- “The fact that if you don't finish the mission you get no exp/credits. Every game mode, including the 10vAI co-op mission requires objectives to win, and players simply ignore them. If there aren't team killers, there will be griefers who go outside of the mission area and just run/swim around the map so that the mission never completes.”
monetization
33 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
33%
58%
The game is praised for having no microtransactions and a fair progression system, with only optional paid cosmetic DLC available. However, many users criticize intrusive and repetitive in-game advertisements promoting Arma 3, and some mention monetization feels like a cash grab. Overall, the monetization is considered unobtrusive in terms of in-game purchases but marred by annoying ads.
- “It is now completely free, with no microtransactions or other payments needed to fully experience this game.”
- “No microtransactions, and especially no purchases to bypass in-game progression.”
- “The game is 100% free with a fair unlock system and no microtransactions that I can see.”
- “- Annoying in-game advertisements for the premium content of the game, which you have to pay for.”
- “Made by the same people that made Arma III just to make more money through microtransactions.”
- “Sh*tty cash grab attempt from Bohemia.”
grinding
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
13%
83%
Grinding is a significant and often frustrating aspect of the game, requiring extensive time investment to unlock better weapons and equipment, which creates a steep advantage for veteran players over newcomers. The grind-heavy progression, including a tedious skill tree and costly weapon unlocks, diminishes accessibility and balance, leading to player frustration and a smaller player base. Some appreciate the milsim appeal despite the grind, but overall, the game's need for less grind and improved progression balance is a common critique.
- “Unofficial servers are still good; this means that all players have access to the same equipment with no unfair advantage, no grinding required.”
- “You get vastly superior weapons by grinding the game; a veteran player will be miles ahead of a new player, making it frustratingly difficult for starting players.”
- “The controls are quite choppy most of the time; getting a hit on a person with your weapon is near impossible and the leveling system is terrible and requires great grinding to level up. Not to mention the skill tree system meaning you can't just buy attachments for your weapons, and most of them don't even work sometimes no matter how on aim you are. I just wouldn't recommend this.”
- “The progression system is grindy and doesn't mix well with the type of game they've tried to create.”
humor
21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
95%
5%
The humor in the game is largely derived from unintentional bugs, funny ragdolls, and chaotic friendly fire incidents, which some players find amusing despite frustrating gameplay elements. While a few moments of levity occur during glitches or team mishaps, overall humor is inconsistent and often tied to the game's technical issues rather than deliberate comedic design.
- “Very funny to play with friends, especially when the ground occasionally glitches and you end up under buildings xd.”
- “Argo is apparently something between CS and Arma, which I find hilarious.”
- “By a house, taking cover from enemy fire... teammate shoots me, realized I was friendly, starts reviving me, to get shot by our teammate, who then realized he was friendly reviving a friendly, to then revive the guy reviving me, to then be shot by another teammate, then an enemy grenade finished us off... couldn't stop laughing though, they really do need to make it easier to tell who's friendly.”
music
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
35%
47%
18%
The music in the game is widely praised for its quality and is considered an excellent soundtrack that enhances the gaming experience. However, some users find the in-game audio, including announcers and music, occasionally intrusive or overwhelming. Overall, the soundtrack is a standout aspect despite some audio-related frustrations.
- “The soundtrack is very amazing in this game.”
- “Soundtrack 10/10.”
- “The music is nice.”
- “Just filling noises / no music.”
- “Also, I can't forget that this game is packed with bugs and annoying announcers that make you wonder why you're fighting the opposing team in the first place, as ear rape music plays over the game itself.”
- “The community is absolutely horrible, a whole team just sitting at spawn killing each other, AI that looks exactly like you on the battlefield, and music blasting over mics throughout the entire game.”
replayability
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
50%
21%
The game offers strong replayability through community-driven content, modding support, and a variety of maps and multiplayer modes, which enhance customization and longevity. However, simplistic game modes and limited player base may reduce ongoing engagement for some, while optimization and updates are needed to fully realize its potential. Overall, it appeals to fans of tactical combat simulations seeking a more accessible but replayable experience.
- “The community-driven workshops and modding support provide an avenue for players to create and share their own content, extending the game's longevity and enhancing its replayability.”
- “The game's multiplayer modes also provide a high level of replayability, as players can team up with friends or join online communities to compete against other players from around the world.”
- “There is also plenty of variety in being able to choose a decent range of maps over 3 game modes which gives the game good replayability.”
- “Gamemodes are very simplistic and have little replayability.”
- “If there were more players then this would be more playable.”
- “Thanks to the map editor the replayability is much higher than you should be.”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The atmosphere is immersive and engaging, driven by teamwork and communication that encourage coordinated play. Although the graphics aren't AAA-level, they effectively support the game's strategic and collaborative environment.
- “The reliance on teamwork and effective communication creates an immersive atmosphere that rewards coordinated strategies and punishes lone wolves.”
- “While the graphics may not reach the level of AAA titles, they are more than sufficient to create an immersive atmosphere.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express mixed emotions, appreciating the game's potential for fostering unity and teamwork, but feeling frustrated and discouraged by glitches, bugs, and unbalanced grinding mechanics that detract from the experience.
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The character development is noted but lacks detail or depth in the provided feedback, indicating that it may be present but not a standout feature in the game.