Delta Force

"Delta Force, the classic tactical shooter series, is now a free-to-play game with modern team-based action. Experience large-scale battles with up to 64 players in Warfare mode, or go on intense extraction missions in Operations, including PvE Raid mode. The iconic Black Hawk Down campaign will also be available in early 2025. The game promises no pay-to-win and prioritizes fair play."

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Reviews

68%

Audience ScoreBased on 13,492 reviews

gameplay417 positive mentions

monetization55 negative mentions

gameplay
1,198 mentions
35 % positive mentions
58 % neutral mentions
7 % negative mentions
The gameplay of Delta Force has received mixed reviews, with many players praising its deep strategic elements, smooth mechanics, and engaging gunplay reminiscent of classic shooters like Battlefield. However, some criticisms highlight issues such as performance dips, unbalanced mechanics, and a lack of originality, often comparing it unfavorably to other titles in the genre. Overall, while the game offers a fun and immersive experience, it also faces challenges that could affect its long-term appeal.
- “Released years ago, this game still manages to captivate me with its deep strategic gameplay, wide-open maps, and satisfying gunplay.”
- “The controls are intuitive, and the variety of gameplay makes it fun even for newcomers.”
- “Delta Force offers great tactical gameplay with a variety of operators and solid mission design, making each match feel unique.”
- “The gameplay itself is incredibly disappointing.”
- “The gameplay is clunky, the animations are lazy, and practically no effort was put into establishing any sort of narrative or setting.”
- “Gameplay is massive shit and boring.”
graphics
777 mentions
48 % positive mentions
46 % neutral mentions
6 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game have received a mixed reception, with many players praising their impressive realism and detail, especially for a free-to-play title. While some reviews highlight stunning visuals and smooth performance, others note issues such as frame rate drops, optimization problems, and occasional graphical glitches. Overall, the graphics are generally considered solid, though not groundbreaking, and they effectively contribute to an immersive gameplay experience.
- “The graphics are stunning, with lifelike textures and detailed character models.”
- “The graphics are impressive for a free-to-play game; it's hard to believe it's not AAA.”
- “The graphics are solid, with well-designed environments and detailed textures.”
- “The graphics are terrible, the gameplay is awful, and there’s no clear direction on what to do or where to go.”
- “The graphics are outdated, and the animations aren't smooth.”
- “The graphics look decent but some things look bad.”
optimization
694 mentions
35 % positive mentions
41 % neutral mentions
24 % negative mentions
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its performance on mid-range and older systems, achieving stable frame rates and smooth gameplay. However, many users report significant issues, particularly with stuttering and frame drops, especially on AMD hardware, which detracts from the overall experience. While some updates have improved performance, a consensus remains that further optimization is needed to address these persistent problems.
- “The optimization is fantastic on my laptop; I’m getting a stable 60 fps, which is rare for modern games.”
- “The game is really well optimized and very enjoyable to play.”
- “The optimization is amazing; I can run the game comfortably at 120 capped fps on maxed out settings with DLSS on balanced at 1080p.”
- “Currently a lack of servers and region options cause lag, teleporting, and stuttering issues.”
- “The game performance is unplayable.”
- “I played the game in the open beta and I can safely say that the game was much better and more optimized.”
story
594 mentions
16 % positive mentions
80 % neutral mentions
4 % negative mentions
The game's story aspect is currently limited, with many players expressing a desire for a deeper narrative and character development. While the mission design is praised for its variety and tactical depth, the overarching storyline feels detached and lacks emotional engagement, often serving as a backdrop for multiplayer gameplay. Anticipation is high for the upcoming campaign mode, particularly the Black Hawk Down mission, which players hope will enhance the narrative experience.
- “The main storyline is really gripping. It's got this mix of action-packed missions and high stakes that keep you hooked.”
- “The plot ties missions to classified operations, giving you a sense of urgency and importance in each task.”
- “The world feels alive, and every corner has a story to tell.”
- “While the missions are well-crafted, some players might find the linear mission design a bit repetitive after a while.”
- “The missions are generally well-designed, but the lack of branching storylines or multiple approaches to objectives can make the experience feel more scripted.”
- “For me personally, the storyline seems a bit detached from the gameplay; it is also somewhat a placeholder for the multiplayer gameplay.”
monetization
160 mentions
6 % positive mentions
59 % neutral mentions
34 % negative mentions
The monetization model of the game is primarily cosmetic, featuring a battle pass system and various skins, which many players find fair and non-intrusive. While some reviews express concerns about aggressive monetization tactics and potential pay-to-win elements, the consensus is that microtransactions do not significantly impact gameplay, allowing players to enjoy the game without spending money. However, there are mixed feelings about the transparency and organization of the monetization system, with some players feeling overwhelmed by the options available.
- “Monetization model is currently very fair: no pay-to-win mechanics and a very generously priced battle pass system, alongside cosmetics like weapon, vehicle, and operator skins.”
- “Even though it’s free to play, there's no need to worry about microtransactions giving players an unfair advantage.”
- “The monetization has no hints of pay-to-win and seem reasonably priced.”
- “The monetization has no hints of pay-to-win and seems reasonably priced.”
- “For a title aiming to revive a classic name like Delta Force, it’s disappointing to see such a focus on monetization and invasive systems over quality.”
- “The menus are a cluttered mess packed with microtransactions, and just trying to navigate them is a headache.”
stability
134 mentions
30 % positive mentions
2 % neutral mentions
68 % negative mentions
The stability of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players reporting smooth performance and minimal bugs, while others experience frequent crashes, freezes, and various glitches that hinder gameplay. Many users note that while the game runs well on higher-end systems, it can be problematic on lower-end hardware, and issues like lag, UI bugs, and inconsistent performance are common. Overall, the game shows potential but requires further optimization to address the numerous stability concerns highlighted by players.
- “Great game, no glitches unlike Battlefield. Very stable game, graphics are good, and the game runs smooth!”
- “The game is very polished for an early access title, runs great, and gives me a Battlefield 4 vibe.”
- “Genuinely have not had performance issues at all; the game runs great and is really fun both solo and with friends.”
- “Somehow from almost a fully polished game from beta, they managed to release a buggy, crashing mess.”
- “Constant random freezes, stutters, and soft locks that often turn into hard locks.”
- “The game is unplayable; tunnel sections have buggy floor collision, causing rubber banding, and switching guns takes forever.”
grinding
59 mentions
5 % positive mentions
20 % neutral mentions
75 % negative mentions
The reviews indicate a mixed perception of grinding in the game, with some players appreciating the balance between progression and grind, noting that leveling up and unlocking weapon attachments can be satisfying without feeling overly tedious. However, others express frustration with the grindy nature of certain aspects, particularly in ranked modes and the battle pass, suggesting that it can feel excessive and time-consuming. Overall, while some find the grinding enjoyable and rewarding, others feel it detracts from the experience, especially for those with limited playtime.
- “The battle pass is going fairly quick, which is good because it's not grindy like some games. In each game I've played, I've leveled up the pass, which is a plus for many people with limited time.”
- “Leveling weapons is actually not tedious at all since they provide lots of XP boosts.”
- “Other than that, the game has a few issues, but generally, it's really good for a free-to-play game. So far, most of the paid content doesn't really give much advantage to players; all weapons and operators can be unlocked through playing, and it's not that grindy to unlock them.”
- “It's going to feel grindy anyway before you even put in the battle pass.”
- “Weapon stuff locked behind hours of grinding to get even less recoil on your weapons and better TTK.”
- “Spent hundreds of hours grinding in the beta just to have to regrind all the weapon attachments again.”
humor
53 mentions
96 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
4 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with players finding amusement in its chaotic gameplay, absurd bugs, and the irony of its anti-cheat system. Many reviews highlight the game's ability to create funny moments, especially when playing with friends, while also poking fun at the game's shortcomings and the community's reactions. Overall, the humor is often described as both entertaining and frustrating, making for a uniquely chaotic experience.
- “The best game to play for a funny time with friends.”
- “Buy it if you want a military experience that leaves you laughing harder than it leaves you sweating.”
- “He’s the teammate who accidentally throws a grenade at the team instead of the enemy, walks into his own tripwire, or decides to 'go loud' during a stealth mission because he thought it would be 'funny.'”
- “Am I missing some unfunny joke here?”
- “In A/D mode, sometimes it's not funny with bad spawns and chaos. The close-quarters battles need some fixing; you cannot see the movements, and I don't understand why allies and enemies have the same uniforms. Fix your spawns in A/D; it's horrific.”
replayability
48 mentions
38 % positive mentions
56 % neutral mentions
6 % negative mentions
The game boasts high replayability due to its fast-paced combat, diverse gameplay options, and multiple mission paths, allowing players to approach objectives creatively. Features like a random mission generator, character upgrades, and multiplayer modes further enhance its longevity and replay value. While the game offers a wealth of replayable content, some players express concerns about potential limitations after extended playtime.
- “The multiple routes and paths I can take to complete missions really add to the replayability.”
- “The ability to use destructible cover, explosive objects, and terrain for tactical advantage adds a lot of replayability.”
- “Massive replayability: the variety of modes ensures there’s always a new way to test your skills or explore fresh strategies.”
- “It would be nice to see more variety in mission structure for added replayability.”
- “A bit more freedom in how missions unfold would enhance replayability.”
- “The variety of career choices encourages replayability.”
atmosphere
37 mentions
43 % positive mentions
49 % neutral mentions
8 % negative mentions
The game's atmosphere is widely praised for its immersive and intense qualities, effectively capturing the essence of a battlefield with realistic sound design, dynamic weather effects, and detailed environmental design. Players appreciate the tension created during combat and stealth missions, which enhances the overall experience and keeps them engaged. While some critiques mention inconsistencies in sound mixing, the overall consensus is that the atmosphere significantly contributes to the game's appeal, making players feel deeply involved in the action.
- “The battlefield atmosphere is on point, and the immersion is really strong.”
- “The environmental design brings each mission to life, with every detail—like weather or terrain—reinforcing the atmosphere.”
- “The dynamic lighting and weather effects significantly enhance the overall atmosphere.”
- “The atmosphere is generally pretty chill, but it’s clear that the community takes competitive play seriously.”
- “The atmosphere’s built on tension—whether you’re sneaking or preparing for an assault, you feel like anything could go wrong.”
- “The battlefield atmosphere, gunplay, physical of this game is bad compared to the Battlefield series.”
music
24 mentions
33 % positive mentions
54 % neutral mentions
13 % negative mentions
The music in the game is generally praised for its ability to enhance the gameplay experience, transitioning smoothly from chill to high-energy tracks that match the game's pace. Players appreciate the immersive soundtrack that adds tension during stealth missions and elevates adrenaline during battles, although some have noted issues with the volume and quality of certain tracks. While many enjoy the main theme and sound design, there are mixed opinions, with a few players finding the music underwhelming or distracting.
- “The music moves smoothly from chill to high-energy, matching the pace of the game.”
- “The music fits the mission perfectly, adding tension during stealth and pumping up the adrenaline during battles.”
- “I love the main theme music; the lobby music is so beautiful and relaxing. I just love everything about this game... best shooting game released of the year.”
- “Audio: music off, everything else turned up.”
- “The music is just pure garbage, thank god you can mute the music; unfortunately, you can't mute the constant spamming voice, which ruins the experience!”
- “It's like a mobile shooter game with constant loud noise, music, and horrid gunplay.”
emotional
15 mentions
87 % positive mentions
-7 % neutral mentions
20 % negative mentions
Overall, players feel that the game lacks emotional depth and impactful storytelling, with many scenes described as flat or forced. There is a desire for rewards tied to key plot points to enhance emotional engagement, but the focus on mission objectives often overshadows personal struggles and character development. The thin single-player campaign fails to leave a lasting emotional impact, leading to disappointment among players seeking a more immersive experience.
- “It’d be cool if some of the rewards were linked to key plot points or player choices, giving them more emotional impact.”
- “You don’t see a lot of personal struggles or complex emotional growth, which could have been an interesting touch.”
- “Thin single-player campaign: while enjoyable, the story lacks emotional depth and fails to leave a lasting impact.”
- “Those games are a terrible rip-off of everything. There are only three games in this entire thing, two of which can only be played and are not even interesting at all. They have a very boring storyline, and the graphics and animations are pretty terrible. The game is not interesting at all, and it's like if you want to play a crappy version of Battlefield 2042, here's your game. The gameplay mechanics are god-awful; the recoil for the machine gun turrets is horrendously terrible. I've never seen anything this bad in a game before. There's no stabilization for the turrets, and it takes too many rounds just to kill someone. This game is seriously not worth it. I would rather play Battlefield 2042 than this, but sadly I'm forced to play it because nothing else is decent on the market. Playing this game feels worse than anything I've ever played; it's on the same scale as if No Man's Sky first got released.”
- “The game is broken and full of cheaters. The extraction mode is a heavy slop, and the battlefield mode is low intensity and boring. The story lacks depth, and there is a noticeable lack of polish. The operators feel 'woke' and uninteresting, and there is no balance in gameplay. The absence of PvE modes is disappointing, and I have little hope for the campaign. Overall, multiplayer gaming feels dead.”
- “This game is seriously not worth it. It may just be me complaining in general, but if you really played this game and have experienced actual Battlefield games, you would see where I'm going with this. It does not feel like a Battlefield game at all.”
character development
11 mentions
9 % positive mentions
64 % neutral mentions
27 % negative mentions
Character development in the game is criticized for its lack of depth and originality, with many reviewers noting that the character designs are clichéd and reminiscent of typical military shooters. The absence of a compelling story and unique character traits detracts from player engagement, while the inclusion of cringe-worthy voice lines further diminishes immersion. Overall, the character customization options are seen as limited, leading to a repetitive co-op experience.
- “Even though the world is immersive in terms of visuals and sound, the lack of a deep story or character development can make it hard to stay fully engaged for long.”
- “The character design choices in this game are just bewildering - they read like the most stereotypical 'diversity hire' lineup imaginable.”
- “There's little to stop and admire in each round—character designs lack aesthetic appeal, environment art is uninspired, and the overall visual quality of the game is subpar.”