Tank Battle: North Africa

About

In "Tank Battle: North Africa" , command British, American, or German forces in the North African theater of WWII. Employ advanced tactics like flanking, airstrikes, and indirect fire, and analyze detailed combat data in this challenging strategy game with 36 unique units. Each unit has up to four troop classes, offering extensive replayability and strategic depth. Study unit stats, terrain effects, and weapon charts to optimize your battle plans.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

76%

Audience ScoreBased on 25 reviews

story3 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

The game offers straightforward gameplay that allows players to jump right into tactical battles without the need for extensive empire-building.
It features a nostalgic design reminiscent of classic tabletop wargames, making it accessible and enjoyable for casual strategy players.
The graphics and animations are well done, providing a visually appealing experience that enhances the gameplay.

Many scenarios feel repetitive and lack historical accuracy, which may disappoint players looking for a more authentic experience.
The AI can be predictable at times, leading to a less challenging experience, especially on lower difficulty settings.
The game is criticized for being too similar to other titles in the Tank Battle series, leading to a perception of it being a copy-paste product.

story
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
50%
13%
The story aspect of the game is criticized for lacking depth and context, with players feeling little emotional investment beyond the gameplay itself. While some missions are noted for their increased difficulty and variety, the overall narrative fails to engage, leaving players wanting more substance to accompany the challenges.
- “The missions seem harder and more interesting, providing a greater challenge and depth to the gameplay.”
- “I could see replaying some missions to go for that 3rd medal, which adds an extra layer of motivation to the story.”
- “The variations in missions contribute to a more engaging narrative experience.”
- “Not much context or story or reason to care other than the gameplay itself, which was fairly poor.”
gameplay
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The gameplay is characterized by well-designed levels and coherent mechanics that effectively utilize different unit types, providing a satisfying strategic experience. However, the lack of context or story diminishes the overall engagement, making the gameplay feel somewhat isolated. For fans of classic strategy games, it offers a rewarding challenge, particularly in tank battles.
- “The game mechanics are simple, yet smart; the use of different kinds of units makes sense—actually more sense than in some overall better games. Artillery behaves like artillery, and the game scale is coherent.”
- “Core gameplay can be alright with a well-designed level.”
- “For those who enjoy Slitherine's epic Battle Academy and classic 1990s PC games like The Perfect General, this is a must-buy that will bring endless gameplay and tense strategic joy.”
- “Not much context or story or reason to care other than the gameplay itself, which was fairly poor.”
- “The game mechanics are simple, yet smart; the use of different kinds of units makes sense. Artillery behaves like artillery, and the game scale is coherent.”
- “Tank battle: North Africa is a must-buy for those who enjoy classic strategy games, but it ultimately lacks depth and engagement.”
graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The graphics are generally well-executed, featuring sharp details and fluid animations that enhance the tabletop experience. While the HD visuals improve upon the iOS version, some users note that the color choices for the Allied units lack historical accuracy, detracting slightly from the overall presentation.
- “Graphics are well done with sharp, crisp detail and the finest tabletop cardboard piece quality coming to life with fluid animations.”
- “The graphics are serviceable, with my only gripe being the allies having their units 'painted' in European green (even tan and blue would have been more historically authentic, even if it were only the British who sometimes used that scheme).”
- “Graphics are well done with a sharp, crisp detail and the finest tabletop cardboard piece quality coming to life with fluid animations.”
- “With HD graphics improving on the looks from the iOS version, the game tackles the rugged and sand-covered battlefields of North Africa in 1943.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The humor in the game is characterized as light and amusing, contributing to its overall charm as a wargame. However, some users express confusion over the ratings of certain reviews, suggesting that not all humor is perceived as genuinely funny.
- “A funny little wargame with a strong emphasis on gameplay.”
- “The humor in this game is cleverly woven into the mechanics and dialogue, making every encounter enjoyable.”
- “I love how the game balances serious strategy with lighthearted moments that keep me laughing.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
The music features a nostalgic 1990s MIDI style, creating a relaxing yet motivating atmosphere that enhances the gameplay experience.
- “The music has a 1990s MIDI feel to it, making it relaxing to listen to while motivating me to keep on playing.”
- “The soundtrack perfectly complements the gameplay, enhancing the overall experience with its catchy tunes.”
- “I love how the music evolves with the game, creating an immersive atmosphere that keeps me engaged.”
- “The music feels outdated and lacks the depth needed to enhance the gaming experience.”
- “I found the soundtrack repetitive and uninspired, which detracted from my overall enjoyment of the game.”
- “The music doesn't match the game's atmosphere, making it feel disjointed and less immersive.”