Skip to main content

Order of Battle: World War II

Order of Battle: World War II Game Cover
78%Game Brain Score
story, gameplay
optimization, stability
78% User Score Based on 1,856 reviews

Platforms

PCMac OSPlaystation 4Xbox OneXboxWindowsPlayStation
Order of Battle: World War II Game Cover

About

Order of Battle: World War II is a single player and multiplayer tactical turn-based strategy game with warfare and historical themes. It was developed by The Artistocrats and was released on April 30, 2015. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Order of Battle: World War II is a turn-based strategy game that simulates various battles and campaigns throughout the duration of World War II. Players can choose to control either the Axis or Allied powers, commanding vast armies across multiple types of terrain and environments. With a focus on historical accuracy and strategic depth, the game offers a challenging and immersive experience for fans of the genre.

Skip User Reviews

78%
Audience ScoreBased on 1,856 reviews
story18 positive mentions
stability13 negative mentions

  • Engaging gameplay that combines land, air, and naval combat, providing a rich strategic experience.
  • Offers a variety of campaigns covering lesser-known theaters of WWII, enhancing historical immersion.
  • The supply and efficiency mechanics add depth to the strategy, requiring careful planning and resource management.
  • The game is misleadingly advertised as free-to-play, as only the tutorial is accessible without purchasing additional campaigns.
  • DLC prices are considered excessively high, making the total cost for all content prohibitive for many players.
  • The AI can be slow during turns, leading to frustrating wait times, especially in larger battles.
  • story
    247 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is primarily conveyed through a series of well-crafted missions that simulate historical WWII scenarios, offering a mix of primary and secondary objectives that can impact future gameplay. While the narrative provides a backdrop for the strategic gameplay, it lacks depth and is often overshadowed by the mechanics, leading to a somewhat disjointed experience. Players appreciate the engaging mission design and the sense of progression, but many express frustration over the limited free content and the necessity to purchase additional campaigns for a fuller experience.

    • “One of the best WWII strategy games available, well worth buying all the DLC - it's a lot of fun and tells a great story!”
    • “While not overly long, the campaigns have been unexpectedly immersive and it has been as fun to follow the story as it has been simply playing each scenario in their own rights.”
    • “It gives you a feeling of story and a real attachment to certain units as they level and gain heroes/commanders.”
    • “While the scenarios are well-crafted, the storytelling is limited, serving primarily as a backdrop to the gameplay.”
    • “The only free part of the game is the tutorial and the first mission of every campaign.”
    • “Overall, it's a very promising game, but the lack of a true campaign limits replayability and dampens my enthusiasm for playing much more than a few missions.”
  • gameplay
    242 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of this turn-based strategy game is generally praised for its depth and accessibility, offering a mix of naval, air, and ground combat mechanics that enhance strategic planning. Players appreciate the engaging scenarios and the introduction of supply and efficiency mechanics, although some criticize the high cost of DLCs and the repetitive nature of certain gameplay elements. Overall, while the game retains familiar mechanics from the Panzer series, it introduces enough innovation to keep it interesting for both novice and experienced players.

    • “After playing a lot of Panzer Corps 2, I've really come to admire the mechanics of this game: a relatively smart AI, no more suicide charges by unit after unit with no chance of winning, tactical maneuvering, units withdraw, rest, and heal.”
    • “The gameplay is simple, quick, and fun, allowing for a variety of strategies and approaches to each scenario.”
    • “The game mechanics are solid and different units have different strengths, making for an engaging and strategic experience.”
    • “Overall, if you invest in some gameplay you will recognize that this is quite a bad game and not really what is advertised.”
    • “The gameplay is repetitive, and it is telling that a free open-source game like Open General has so much more depth and detail.”
    • “The game is riddled with bugs that have been reported by many users but were never fixed or keep coming back and break the gameplay.”
  • graphics
    163 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players noting that while they are decent and sometimes impressive, they do not stand out as exceptional. Some users appreciate the historical accuracy and detail in the visuals, while others criticize them as mediocre or outdated, especially compared to newer titles. Overall, the graphics are generally considered satisfactory for the genre, with a blend of attractive art design and functional aesthetics, but they may not meet the expectations of players seeking cutting-edge visuals.

    • “The historical accuracy of the planes and ships is impressive, and the level of detail in the graphics is a real treat.”
    • “Excellent WWII tactical game with outstanding visuals, especially the nicely detailed armored vehicles.”
    • “The graphics and animations are a step above Panzer Corps.”
    • “Overall gameplay is clunky; graphics are mediocre, actually a giant step backward from the old Close Combat series.”
    • “The overall experience is lacking; graphics are quite mediocre, no voice-overs, no videos, nothing but some tiny vague and dull text and grainy black and white pictures to accompany the objectives or game events.”
    • “I just never got into this game; didn't like the scale, the graphics are deplorable and it's become nothing but a DLC fest.”
  • replayability
    33 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game boasts exceptional replayability, with a variety of campaigns, customizable difficulty settings, and a robust scenario editor that enhances the overall experience. Many users rate its replayability highly, often scoring it between 9/10 and 10/10, citing the engaging gameplay and numerous scenarios as key factors. However, some players note that the reliance on DLC for additional content can be a drawback, potentially limiting replayability for those unwilling to invest further.

    • “Replayability is a major strength, with numerous campaigns, customizable difficulty settings, and a rich selection of scenarios to explore.”
    • “Each of the missions will give you about half an hour's worth of gameplay if you're particularly quick, but the campaigns feature a little more than a dozen more missions to enjoy, with optional secondary objectives to complete that will affect future missions along with five levels of difficulty, all of which help increase overall replayability.”
    • “Overall, a great game with solid replay value.”
    • “Overall, it's a very promising game, but the lack of a true campaign limits replayability and dampens my enthusiasm for playing much more than a few missions.”
    • “The developers are obviously not as concerned with making the game more playable as with making more money: instead of fixing the problem, they devoted their limited resources into making one DLC after another and shamelessly ask you to pay more cash.”
    • “While its narrative and presentation may not break new ground, its gameplay and replayability make it a standout title for World War II enthusiasts.”
  • music
    21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with many players noting that while the sound effects are solid and fitting for the World War II theme, the soundtrack itself is often described as generic and lacking depth. Some users experienced technical issues, such as music stopping or restarting unexpectedly, which detracted from the overall experience. Overall, the music serves its purpose but leaves room for improvement, particularly in terms of variety and engagement.

    • “The sound and music are fitting, with appropriate battle sounds and a soundtrack that complements the World War II theme.”
    • “Atmospheric WWII soundtrack.”
    • “I like the game graphics along with the great sound effects and music.”
    • “Sounds are good, maybe a bit loud, and the music is a bit lacking, but it's not bad, I don't think at least.”
    • “Sounds are really solid with satisfying tank explosions, machine gun fire, and battleship fire, etc. Music-wise, it's pretty lacking, and it would be nice to have a nice soundtrack to listen to while playing this game.”
    • “The music does the job, but remains very generic.”
  • optimization
    20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization has received significant criticism, with many users reporting performance issues, particularly on older hardware. Players have experienced lag, crashes, and slowdowns during larger battles, leading to frustration and a lack of recommendations. While some users found performance acceptable on mid-range PCs, the overall consensus highlights that the game suffers from serious optimization problems that detract from the experience.

    • “Performance is okay on a mediocre PC on Windows 10 (dual core, 8 GB and 2 GB AMD graphic card) when I set the graphics to normal/good.”
    • “All in all, this is, in my opinion, the definitive PG-alike game that falls short of perfection due to the stability and performance issues.”
    • “Like most of these games, you find out that a certain combination of troops works for you so that after a while you crank out the same type of troops for optimal performance.”
    • “Looking at the error logs, they are very vague, and I believe the crashing is due to the memory usage of the game being extremely unoptimized.”
    • “Found the graphics performance poor to the point that the game was unplayable.”
    • “All the good sides, however, are irreparably ruined by its abysmal performance (ironically, all the pros of the game make the cons all the more aggravating).”
  • stability
    16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is a significant concern among users, with many reporting frequent crashes, framerate drops, and AI-related glitches that hinder gameplay. While some players have had a smooth experience on certain systems, the overall consensus highlights persistent bugs and a lack of effective developer support for troubleshooting issues. This has led to frustration, as players encounter unresolvable scenarios and prolonged turns due to AI malfunctions.

    • “Runs great on my iMac with Big Sur.”
    • “All I can say is that I have every DLC and the game runs great, so don't be turned off by these complaints that really have nothing to do with the game itself.”
    • “The game runs great, is easy to learn, and the gameplay is tremendously well done.”
    • “Too buggy... couldn't even get past the first practice map without it crashing several times.”
    • “There's clear framerate drops and freezes as the AI takes its turn, and it is agonizingly slow while doing so.”
    • “If you get this game, you will be setting yourself up for extreme frustration as you encounter scenarios which can't be won because the victory conditions are unobtainable, turns which never end because of AI glitches, units which don't function properly, updates which don't fix longstanding glitches, and developers who ignore bug reports in Steam discussions and who don't provide an email for directly reporting bugs because they want to direct traffic directly to their own website where you must register and receive spam.”
  • grinding
    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious, particularly due to the slow movement of units and repetitive gameplay, which can lead to frustration during longer scenarios. While some appreciate the strategic depth and resource management elements, many feel that the grind detracts from the overall enjoyment, especially when progress feels stalled or when frequent restarts are necessary to succeed. Despite these criticisms, some players still find the experience enjoyable, particularly in the context of the game's strategic challenges.

    • “With a few of them, I had to restart 2 or 3 times to get a force mixture that would allow me to win, but it was fun and not tedious.”
    • “A grinding, non-strategy strategy game.”
    • “In almost every scenario, after maybe 15 turns or so, the AI movement becomes tediously slow, where occasionally the music will stop entirely, the game will freeze up, then the AI suddenly moves again 20 seconds later.”
    • “Missions and gameplay can be tedious and repetitive, with no progress being made.”
  • monetization
    10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviews highlight a mixed perception of the game's monetization strategy, with some players criticizing it as misleading and cash-grabbing, particularly regarding advertising and DLC content. However, others appreciate the absence of microtransactions, suggesting that the developers have opted for a more straightforward approach to monetization despite the need for income. Overall, while there are concerns about the game's financial practices, the lack of microtransactions is seen as a positive aspect by some players.

    • “As the developers have stated, they need a source of income and we should actually be glad that they didn't make the choice to implement microtransactions or some blatant money grab just so that you could play some other levels.”
    • “There are no microtransactions!!!”
    • “But I'd only buy OOB if you like the Pacific campaign; or are obsessed with naval warfare - and prefer not to play world of microtransaction ships!!”
    • “Cash grabbing, stingy, microtransaction bastards!”
    • “Feels like a cash grab.”
    • “The DLC breakout is a clear monetization strategy and I think it will only hurt them.”
  • humor
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is derived from its nostalgic reliance on outdated tropes from the original Panzer General, creating a blend of absurdity and charm as players engage with the simplistic mechanics and whimsical portrayal of military operations. Users find the experience both amusing and ridiculous, highlighting the game's ability to evoke laughter through its retro style and quirky gameplay.

    • “It's both stupid and hilarious at the same time...”
    • “He gladly explained to me the rules by which those funny toy soldiers fight each other, and soon I carried out my first 'operation' in the People's General game, capturing Khabarovsk with Chinese troops.”
    • “First Panzer General created the basic formula and it's hilarious how almost nothing has changed since then - the only new feature this game adds is supply & efficiency; otherwise, you will recognize all the tropes from that 30-year-old game.”
  • atmosphere
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviewers note that while the game may lack the character and atmosphere of classic 8-bit titles, it does feature an atmospheric WWII soundtrack that enhances the overall experience.

    • “- Atmospheric WWII soundtrack”
    • “Games I played in the 8-bit era had more character and atmosphere than Order of Battle.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Order of Battle: World War II

30h Median play time
225h Average play time
9-200h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 26 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Order of Battle: World War II

Games Like Order of Battle: World War II

Panzer Corps Image
Unity of Command 2 Image
Sudden Strike 4 Image
Strategic Mind: Blitzkrieg Image
Hex of Steel Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Order of Battle: World War II is a tactical turn-based strategy game with warfare and historical themes.

Order of Battle: World War II is available on PC, Mac OS, PlayStation 4, Xbox One and others.

On average players spend around 225 hours playing Order of Battle: World War II.

Order of Battle: World War II was released on April 30, 2015.

Order of Battle: World War II was developed by The Artistocrats.

Order of Battle: World War II has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its story but disliked it for its optimization.

Order of Battle: World War II is a single player game with multiplayer support.

Similar games include Panzer Corps, Unity of Command 2, Sudden Strike 4, Strategic Mind: Blitzkrieg, Hex of Steel and others.