Supremacy 1914

About

Supremacy 1914 is a multiplayer casual strategy game. It was developed by Bytro Labs GmbH and was released on July 16, 2019. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

"Supremacy 1914 is a massively multiplayer simulation game set in World War 1, where up to 500 players can join as nations and fight for victory in real-time, with historically accurate troops and resources. Choose the territory of your country, each with different advantages, and use diplomacy, resources, and war to develop your nation and become a serious contender on the world stage. Experience historical and fictional battles over weeks with the possibility of role-playing as historical figures."

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

69%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,203 reviews

gameplay9 positive mentions

monetization8 negative mentions

Engaging strategy gameplay that requires long-term planning and tactical thinking.
Strong community aspect with opportunities for alliances and diplomacy.
Free to play with the option to earn in-game currency through gameplay.

Heavily pay-to-win model that gives significant advantages to players who spend money.
Extremely slow-paced gameplay, with actions taking hours or even days to complete.
Frequent server issues and bugs that disrupt the gaming experience.

gameplay
58 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
72%
12%
The gameplay of this mobile strategy game has received mixed reviews, with many players criticizing its repetitive mechanics, slow pacing, and heavy reliance on pay-to-win elements, which detracts from the overall experience. While some appreciate the strategic depth and real-time decision-making, others find the outdated graphics and tedious wait times for actions to be significant drawbacks. Overall, the game offers engaging mechanics but suffers from issues that can make it feel unbalanced and frustrating.
- “The real-time gameplay gives every decision weight, and the political side of the game adds a unique twist.”
- “The gameplay is very fun and in-depth.”
- “It is a relatively easy game to learn, but requires some mechanics to be used in a strategic manner.”
- “What really hurts the experience is how much the premium currency impacts gameplay.”
- “The graphics are outdated, and the gameplay feels repetitive after just a few hours.”
- “There is nothing about the mechanics that make the tedious nature of the game worth the time investment.”
monetization
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
15%
45%
40%
The monetization model of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players labeling it a "cash grab" due to its heavy reliance on microtransactions that disrupt gameplay balance. While some premium currency can be earned through gameplay, the system heavily favors paying players, leading to frustration and a sense that the game prioritizes profit over player experience. Overall, the free-to-play model, combined with long wait times and aggressive ad promotions, detracts from the potential enjoyment of the game.
- “However, the free-to-play model, with its in-game purchases, can sometimes disrupt the balance, giving paying players a potential edge.”
- “Although it has in-game purchase options, it doesn't feel at all necessary.”
- “The premium currency can be earned by winning or, of course, through in-game purchases.”
- “But as it stands, the heavy emphasis on microtransactions overshadows what could’ve been a compelling long-term strategy experience.”
- “The only way to win or even survive is through microtransactions.”
- “Look, this game is just a mobile game (or a browser RTS game) and relies on microtransactions and long wait times. Honestly, this game could have been better. If you want a good RTS set in WW1, I suggest buying Hearts of Iron 4 and downloading the Great War mod because all you will be doing is waiting for hours on end. It's just a cash grab that could have taken the base of their game and made it paid for without long wait times. I had a better time waiting for the game to come out than playing it. Do not download.”
graphics
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
35%
47%
18%
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with some players criticizing them as outdated and unbalanced compared to previous versions, while others appreciate the transition from minimalistic designs to more polished and visually appealing graphics. Despite some technical issues, such as crashes, many players find the graphics functional and suitable for the gameplay style, emphasizing map details and unit movements over high-end visuals. Overall, the game's graphics seem to cater to a specific demographic, balancing between nostalgia and modern aesthetics.
- “Graphically, 'Supremacy 1914' leans towards functional rather than flashy, with a focus on map details and unit movements over high-end visuals, which is typical for games of this genre.”
- “The mechanics are still the same; only the graphics are way more appealing now.”
- “I have to say the game has come quite a long way from its minimalistic approach in the past to a very polished and even graphically appealing game. This is very exciting to see.”
- “The graphics are outdated, and the gameplay feels repetitive after just a few hours.”
- “Now you can't customize your nation's flags and leaders, you can't win against anyone without heroes or special units, you are basically a third-grade player without a 'premium account', and they have taken away the old graphic style without any single reason to change it for a bunch of AI slop.”
- “Some parts of the game cause graphics crashes where the game then 'restarts' and locks up.”
story
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
77%
23%
The reviews indicate that the game primarily emphasizes gameplay over story, with many users noting a lack of narrative depth. While some mention that there is a story present, it often feels secondary to the gameplay mechanics, leading to a perception of randomness in mission outcomes and a focus on conflict without substantial storytelling.
- “Only gameplay, doesn't include a story.”
- “There is a story, but most of the game is focused on gameplay.”
- “Moral of the story: I'm in a bloody conflict that shouldn't be happening. I have triple his territory easily and multiple allies on all sides of him, yet he's holding everyone off by dumping hundreds into a free game.”
grinding
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Reviews indicate that the grinding aspect of the game can be tedious and slow-paced, appealing primarily to patient strategy fans, while many players find it unfulfilling and repetitive. The mechanics do not seem to justify the time investment required for grinding, leading to a generally negative perception of this feature.
- “It can be a bit grindy sometimes, but it adds to the overall experience.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding, but it's worth it for the rewards.”
- “Grinding can feel a bit repetitive at times, yet it enhances the game's depth.”
- “The slow pace might appeal to patient strategy fans, but for most players, it quickly becomes tedious.”
- “There is nothing about the mechanics that make the tedious nature of the game worth the time investment.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
humor
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is described as hilariously chaotic, with players finding amusement in absurd scenarios, such as leading pigeons in a war setting and the comedic elements of its gameplay mechanics. Some users highlight the game's ability to provoke laughter through its interactions and the absurdity of its monetization strategies, while others note that its humor has led to it being banned in certain regions. Overall, the game is seen as a source of entertainment, particularly in its satirical take on serious themes.
- “Feels like leading a pack of pigeons during WW1, hilariously chaotic!”
- “Funny communism game.”
- “Suggest that to everyone else, can be quite funny to mess with them a little here and there.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
50%
The music in the game is generally well-received, enhancing the gameplay experience with inspiring and immersive soundtracks that evoke a sense of leadership. However, some players feel that the game lacks sufficient background music and sound effects, leading to a less engaging audio experience overall.
- “The in-game music fits the gameplay perfectly.”
- “The soundtracks are either inspiring or somber enough to immerse myself as a general/ruler of a nation.”
- “The music, graphics, and sound effects are nice, adding depth to the strategies for what units to train and the diplomatic interactions.”
- “The game is missing background music, sound effects, and overall sound design; it's not completely mute, but it lacks depth in audio.”
- “In-game music does not fit the gameplay.”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is significantly compromised, with frequent lag, glitches, and freezing issues that often require players to restart. Users have reported unintended exploits due to these glitches, such as duplicating items and encountering persistent error messages. Overall, the stability issues detract from the gameplay experience.
- “Because of lag and glitches, I was able to get my hero to level 2 and duplicate 20 morale-raising items of plus 10 from the tutorial, and also 4000 gold. I wasn't doing this on purpose; it just happened. I also got an error 1040, and the game kept going even with the error.”
- “Computer glitches always.”
- “Lots of glitches; had to restart the game often because features freeze up a lot.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users generally find the replayability of the game to be high, citing various choices, multiple endings, and diverse character builds that encourage multiple playthroughs. Many appreciate the dynamic gameplay elements that change with each session, enhancing the overall experience. However, some note that certain aspects may feel repetitive after several runs.
- “The game lacks meaningful choices, making replayability feel pointless.”
- “Once you've completed the main story, there's little incentive to play again.”
- “The game doesn't offer enough variety in gameplay to warrant multiple playthroughs.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's optimization has been widely criticized, with users reporting severe issues that significantly impact performance and gameplay experience. Many describe the optimization as "horrible" and "real bad," indicating a need for substantial improvements. Additionally, concerns about pay-to-win elements further detract from the overall experience.
- “But there's a lot of pay-to-win, and the servers or how the game is optimized is completely terrible; there's no other way to describe it.”
- “Real bad optimization.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game is perceived as catering to individuals with fragile egos, suggesting that it may evoke feelings of trauma or distress in players who struggle with the concept of losing.