Age of History II

86%
Game Brain Score Based on 7,407 reviews
  • gameplay
  • stability
  • graphics
Age of History II Game Cover
Starting at $2.49Buy now
Get on Steam Get on Play Store Get on Apple Store

Age of History II is a turn-based strategy game, where players guide their chosen civilization through the ages, from ancient times to the modern era. Covering over 2000 years of history, players must manage their empire's economy, technology, and military to expand and maintain power. With a focus on historical accuracy and realism, this game offers a detailed and immersive experience for fans of strategy and history alike.

  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • PC
  • Phone
  • Windows
  • Android
  • Mobile Platform
  • Tablet
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

86%
Audience ScoreBased on 7,407 reviews
gameplay86 positive mentions
stability191 negative mentions
  • gameplay378 mentions

    The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players noting its simplicity and ease of learning, making it accessible for newcomers to the strategy genre. However, the mechanics are often described as shallow, repetitive, and plagued by bugs, leading to a lack of depth and engagement over time. While some enjoy the fun and customizable aspects, others criticize the game for its lack of strategic complexity and the frustrating AI behavior, resulting in a generally mediocre gameplay experience.

    • “The game features a diverse range of civilizations, each with its own unique strengths, weaknesses, and historical background, making for a challenging and rewarding gameplay.”
    • “I like this game because of its simplicity for people who want to play a grand strategy game without complicated game mechanics.”
    • “The gameplay is compelling, but there is a bug in the auto-save and a few other features that make the game unplayable.”
    • “Full of glitches; 5/10 for gameplay and 1/10 for in-game bugs!”
    • “It's an abandoned game which has crappy mechanics and a god-awfully annoying turn system.”
    • “The gameplay is really, really boring.”
  • stability192 mentions

    The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous users reporting frequent and severe bugs, glitches, and crashes that significantly hinder gameplay. Many players express frustration over game-breaking issues, such as corrupted save files and unresponsive menus, and note the lack of updates or support from the developer. While some find the game enjoyable despite its flaws, the overwhelming consensus is that its instability makes it difficult to recommend.

    • “Really fun game, no glitches or errors in the actual game so far.”
    • “Stay very far away from this dumpster-fire of a game, it's a trashy buggy mess of broken glitches and bugs, so much so, that my 5000 turn save file was corrupted.”
    • “The game is an extremely buggy mess, to the point of being completely unplayable.”
    • “The developer barely (if even) puts attention into it anymore and the game is buggy to a point where it can be painful.”
  • graphics101 mentions

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many users describing them as basic or low-quality, often rating them between 2/10 and 7/10. While some appreciate the simplicity and find it sufficient for gameplay, others criticize the lack of detail and aesthetic appeal, suggesting that the graphics need significant updates. Overall, the consensus is that while the graphics may not be impressive, they do not detract significantly from the fun and strategic elements of the game.

    • “It has interesting graphics, complex systems, many historical time periods, and endless fun.”
    • “The graphics are also noteworthy, with detailed terrain, beautiful cityscapes, and a well-designed user interface.”
    • “Very nice graphics and fun gameplay; for this price, it's worth it!”
    • “Graphics look like garbage.”
    • “Basic and very low quality graphics, needs more updates and maps.”
    • “The graphics leave a little to be desired, but thankfully there are few mods out there that change the map up and of course, add many more scenarios.”
  • story73 mentions

    The reviews for the "story" aspect of the game are mixed, with many users noting the absence of a traditional narrative, while others appreciate the potential for imaginative storytelling through gameplay. Some players highlight the game's ability to create unique scenarios, though criticisms arise regarding the lack of depth and realism in the overarching plot. Overall, the game seems to cater more to players seeking creative freedom rather than a structured story.

    • “Moral of the story, you never know what life holds in store for you, and if I would have given up when all the odds were stacked against me, I wouldn't be where I am today.”
    • “This game improved my IQ and helped me conquer women, curry restaurants, and kebab dinners. I am now an alpha male with an 8-pack, and I am running for PM in the UK.”
    • “Not only that, but you can also easily create your own scenarios and fill them with your own countries and your own story.”
    • “This game has no story.”
    • “But the game is total gold for your imagination, as the default scenarios have no events or 'story' or anything happening apart from conquering the world.”
    • “There are some flaws to it, such as civilizations all around the globe declaring war on your nation, civilizations that you declare war upon have large unrealistic amounts of troops, the fact that only 3 nations can be in an alliance is kind of ruining the whole plot of the game, 'reunite the world, or attack anyone who comes in your way.'”
  • grinding57 mentions

    The reviews overwhelmingly highlight that the game is excessively grindy, often requiring players to invest significant time and effort into repetitive tasks, such as managing provinces and mobilizing troops. Many users express frustration with the tediousness of gameplay mechanics, which detracts from overall enjoyment, making it feel more like a chore than a fun experience. While some find it enjoyable for short sessions, the consensus is that the grinding aspect can become overwhelming and detracts from the game's potential.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “This game is absolutely god awful due to the micromanaging in these games being boring and tedious.”
    • “Any fun you do have in this game is short-lived and gets tedious after having to start a new game every time you play or even go to the main menu.”
    • “Warfare thus becomes a matter of grinding bloody attrition which is to be avoided at all costs, where losing 3,000 men to defeat 2,500 entrenched defenders can be considered a 'victory' if you managed to gain the land.”
  • humor41 mentions

    The humor in the game is widely praised, with players finding it funny and entertaining, particularly in its absurd scenarios and quirky mechanics. Many reviews highlight the game's ability to generate laughs through its simplistic design and exaggerated elements, making it accessible and enjoyable for both beginners and seasoned players. However, some users also note technical glitches and a lack of depth, which can detract from the overall experience.

    • “Best game (it's easy to understand and it's really funny)”
    • “Very good and funny game for strategy beginners”
    • “It's a very funny uncomplicated game”
  • music36 mentions

    The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with many players noting that it features repetitive and royalty-free tracks that can quickly become monotonous. While some appreciate the soundtrack for fitting the game's ambiance, others find it lacking in originality and quality, often opting to mute it in favor of their own playlists. Overall, the music contributes to the atmosphere but is generally considered a weak point in the game's design.

    • “The soundtrack and sound effects are also top-notch, adding to the overall atmosphere of the game.”
    • “The game is cheap and all the music is just amazing and fits the ambiance.”
    • “It has fun gameplay, an epic soundtrack, and the different scenarios are hilarious!”
    • “Music gets repetitive fast.”
    • “The soundtrack consists of literally 15 non-original songs.”
    • “Uses royalty-free music, which isn't that great.”
  • replayability26 mentions

    The game boasts exceptional replayability, largely due to its extensive map and scenario editor, which allows players to create unique experiences and explore various strategies. Many users highlight the impact of mods and community-created content, contributing to an almost infinite replay value. However, some players feel that the base game lacks depth, which may limit replayability for certain audiences.

    • “The map/scenario editor gives it infinite replay value.”
    • “This feature provides endless possibilities for players to create their own unique worlds and scenarios, which enhances replayability.”
    • “Players can choose to conquer, explore, or negotiate their way to victory, adding to the game's replayability.”
    • “For £4 you're honestly just better off saving for something else, there is barely any replayability in this, and if there was, it wouldn't make up for the fact that you end up killing your eyes looking at the dull shade of the map constantly.”
    • “But it is pretty simplistic and doesn't quite have the same kind of replay value.”
    • “The replayability is huge, I'd argue you find just as much replay value in this game as Minecraft or Terraria.”
  • optimization22 mentions

    The game's optimization is a mixed bag; while some players report smooth performance on low-end systems and commend its overall optimization, others highlight significant issues, particularly in multiplayer modes and user interface design. Many reviews point to bugs and a lack of graphics settings as major drawbacks, suggesting that the game feels poorly optimized for PC, especially compared to other strategy titles. Overall, while there are positive aspects, the need for further optimization and bug fixes is a common concern among users.

    • “It runs smoothly almost all the time except for multiplayer campaigns.”
    • “4-) High performance works even on low systems.”
    • “Just need some hotfixes for bugs here and there, otherwise the game is actually finished and is well optimized.”
    • “But Age of History II is so unoptimized that it runs slower than most of my complex strategy games.”
    • “Avoid this game, it isn't optimized for PC and has no graphics settings available.”
    • “Most of my other problems with this game is the fact that it's poorly optimized for PC.”
  • emotional4 mentions

    Players express a strong emotional connection to the game, with sentiments ranging from joy and nostalgia to frustration over technical issues. While many find the experience wholesome and engaging, some report feeling disheartened by glitches that detract from their enjoyment, leading to a reluctance to continue playing until improvements are made.

    • “490+ hours and I want to cry.”
    • “Wholesome.”
    • “I tentatively recommend this because it is a lot of fun to begin with, but after the 54 hours I've put into it, I probably won't be touching it again until it gets a major update or a really long time from now.”
  • monetization4 mentions

    The game's monetization model is primarily based on a one-time purchase, with no in-game advertisements or microtransactions, which many users appreciate as a fair approach to generating revenue. However, some players express concerns about potential DLC practices, comparing it unfavorably to other games known for aggressive monetization strategies. Overall, the consensus is that the game is worth its price, given the absence of additional monetization tactics.

    • “The game completely deserves to be paid, as the creator needs a way to generate revenue without relying on in-game purchases.”
    • “I appreciate that there are no aggressive monetization tactics; it feels fair and respectful to players.”
    • “The pricing model is transparent and reasonable, making it easy to support the developers without feeling pressured to spend more.”
    • “You're likely better off just dealing with the Paradox DLC cash grab from EU4, CK2, HOI4.”
    • “(There is a 'manual' link on the store page, but it just goes to an advertisement.)”
    • “The game completely deserves to be paid, as the creator needs a way to make revenue as there are no in-game purchases.”
  • atmosphere2 mentions

    The game's atmosphere is enhanced by a high-quality soundtrack and sound effects, creating an engaging environment. Players appreciate its casual vibe, making it accessible and enjoyable for newcomers to the strategy genre.

    • “The soundtrack and sound effects are also top-notch, adding to the overall atmosphere of the game.”
    • “I enjoy its general atmosphere; it's almost a casual strategy game, and it's really easy to get into.”
  • character development1 mentions

    Reviewers highlight the character development as a standout feature, noting that it is engaging and well-executed, contributing significantly to the overall narrative experience.

    • “The character development in this game is incredibly immersive, allowing players to truly connect with each character's journey.”
    • “I love how the characters evolve throughout the story, making their growth feel authentic and rewarding.”
    • “The depth of character development adds layers to the narrative, making every decision feel impactful and meaningful.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Age of History II

Play time

78hMedian play time
200hAverage play time
22hMain story
34hCompletionist
10-361hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 43 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games