Strategic Command WWII: War in Europe
- June 5, 2017
- Fury Software
- 143h median play time
Get on SteamStrategic Command WWII: War in Europe is a turn-based strategy game set in World War II. Players can choose to lead any of the major powers and manage military, economic, and technological developments. The game features realistic strategic warfare, including land, air, and sea battles, as well as diplomacy and production management. It offers several scenarios, allowing players to focus on different theaters of the war.
PC
Windows
Reviews
- The game offers a great blend of complexity and accessibility, making it enjoyable for both casual and hardcore strategy gamers.
- The AI is competent and adapts well to player strategies, providing a challenging experience in both single-player and multiplayer modes.
- It captures the essence of classic board games like 'Third Reich' and offers a rich historical context with numerous strategic options.
- The naval mechanics are poorly implemented, leading to unrealistic outcomes and frustrating gameplay experiences.
- There are significant historical inaccuracies in scenarios and campaigns, which can detract from the overall immersion and enjoyment.
- The game can become tedious in the mid to late stages, with long AI turn times and issues related to unit supply and reinforcement.
- gameplay25 mentions
- 12 % positive mentions
- 76 % neutral mentions
- 12 % negative mentions
The gameplay is praised for its seamless integration of mechanics, allowing players to quickly immerse themselves without feeling overwhelmed, despite some complexity in underlying systems like supply and terrain. While it shares similarities with other strategy games, it offers a balanced mix of combat, diplomacy, and tactical considerations, resulting in a solid and engaging experience with high replayability. Overall, the game emphasizes strategic depth and intelligent design over flashy graphics, making it a strong choice for fans of the genre.
“The movement and logistics are integrated so well that after only a few turns, the player is completely unaware of the underlying mechanics.”
“There's a lot of strategy involved, and the way the game mechanics work, there are important tactical considerations to weigh.”
“Otherwise its tired nature palls - mechanics, basic strategy and clunky UI.”
“In addition, supply is very important but it is obtuse as a game mechanic.”
“You see, this game doesn't concentrate its effort on shiny graphics and cool animations; instead, it focuses on what's important for a grand strategy game: its gameplay mechanics, enemy AI, and overall design, and it is brilliant in these aspects.”
- graphics8 mentions
- 38 % positive mentions
- 25 % neutral mentions
- 38 % negative mentions
The game's graphics are minimalist and serviceable, with some users noting occasional glitches, but they do not detract from the overall experience. While the visuals may not be impressive or flashy, the focus on gameplay mechanics and depth has garnered praise, making it a standout title despite its unremarkable graphics.
“Speaking of graphics, don't be thrown off by the style; the game is extremely deep... I seriously could not stop playing, tons of missed sleep and unattended business over my playthrough.”
“Do not let the graphics fool you; this is a classic like Panzer General but with more complexity.”
“You see, this game doesn't concentrate its effort on shiny graphics and cool animations; instead, it focuses on what's important for a grand strategy game: its gameplay mechanics, enemy AI, and overall design, and it is brilliant in these aspects.”
“Especially due to its minimalist graphics.”
“Graphics glitch.”
“You won't be wowed by graphics or anything, but this is a gem of a game.”
- replayability3 mentions
- 33 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 67 % negative mentions
Players highlight the game's high replayability due to its engaging mechanics and strategic depth, particularly in player-versus-player modes. The ongoing tension between immediate actions and long-term planning encourages multiple playthroughs, making it a solid choice for strategy enthusiasts.
“In conclusion, this game is a solid strategic game with good mechanics, some depth, very high replayability, and a smart design that excels in PBEM, only slightly hampered by some minor flaws.”
“I have started and restarted a campaign as the Axis, so I cannot really say much about long-term replayability.”
“The tension between current theater actions, the need to build units that come far down the road, and research keeps the game tense and replayable.”
- grinding2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be somewhat tedious, particularly due to limited freedom and control while managing navy and transports. However, many agree that the effort is ultimately rewarding, contributing to the overall excellence of the game.
“A little tedious and players have a ridiculously low level of freedom and control.”
“Sometimes it can be a bit tedious moving around all of your navy and transports, but in the end it is worth it, because this is an excellent game.”
- atmosphere2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- -150 % neutral mentions
- 150 % negative mentions
The atmosphere in the game is characterized by a distinct and immersive experience, with engaging campaigns that offer a variety of events, diplomatic choices, and intense battles. Players appreciate the depth of conflict and the long-term strategic elements that enhance the overall ambiance, whether playing as the Axis or Allies.
“The Axis and Allies both have a highly distinct atmosphere in the way their respective campaigns play.”
“The best hours spent in a computer game, with a lot of events, alternatives, and diplomatic options. The long campaign, challenging battles, and the best atmosphere of conflict on both the Axis and Allies sides!”
“The atmosphere feels flat and uninspired, lacking the depth needed to immerse players in the game world.”
“Despite the potential for a rich setting, the atmosphere is dull and fails to evoke any real emotion or engagement.”
“The game's atmosphere is inconsistent, making it difficult to feel connected to the story or the characters.”
- stability2 mentions
- 50 % positive mentions
- -100 % neutral mentions
- 150 % negative mentions
Overall, users report that the game runs well even on older hardware, but some experience minor bugs and glitches, along with inaccuracies in the manual that can impact gameplay against human opponents.
“I have an ancient computer and it runs great.”
“There are a couple of annoying bugs and glitches that can really impact gameplay, along with some inaccuracies in the manual that can cost you the game against a human player.”
“The game suffers from frequent crashes and stability issues that make it frustrating to play.”
“I encountered several game-breaking bugs that completely ruined my experience.”
- story1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The game features an epic story that captivates players with its grand narrative and engaging plot.
“The game features an epic story that captivates players from start to finish.”
“The narrative is rich and immersive, drawing you into a world filled with complex characters and unexpected twists.”
“The storytelling is masterfully crafted, making every decision feel impactful and meaningful.”
- optimization1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The optimization of the game has been criticized for poor performance, with notably long AI turn times and delays during game saves, leading to a frustrating experience for players.
“The performance is terrible; AI turns take an eternity, and even saving the game requires two long waits.”
“Optimization is lacking; the game runs sluggishly, making it frustrating to play.”
“The game suffers from severe optimization issues, leading to frequent lag and long loading times.”
