Split or Steal

About

Split or Steal is a single player and multiplayer casual simulation game. It was developed by Rootpew and was released on January 31, 2020. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Have you ever wanted to devote your time and energy to amassing a small fortune, and then place total trust in a complete stranger to not steal it all away from you?

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

77%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,066 reviews

gameplay13 positive mentions

grinding11 negative mentions

The game offers a unique social experience, allowing players to engage in trust-building and deception, making each match feel intense and personal.
It's a simple yet addictive game that can be played casually, making it a great way to pass the time while interacting with others.
The community is generally friendly and supportive, with active engagement from the developer, which enhances the overall experience.

The game suffers from a lack of depth and can become repetitive quickly, as many players choose to split without engaging in meaningful conversation.
There are significant issues with matchmaking and server stability, leading to frustrating experiences for players trying to find matches.
The karma system heavily punishes stealing, which discourages players from taking risks and can lead to a dull gameplay experience.

gameplay
62 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
74%
5%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players criticizing its simplistic mechanics and lack of depth, leading to boredom over time. While some find the social interactions and high-stakes decisions engaging, others feel that the game fosters mistrust and is marred by unbalanced systems and repetitive actions. Overall, there is a consensus that the game requires significant improvements and updates to enhance the gameplay experience and maintain player interest.
- “Good game with addicting gameplay.”
- “Really fun game, has good grinding mechanics and is fun to mindgame.”
- “While the game mechanics are rather simple, the high stakes of the game make something so simple very intense.”
- “The gameplay loop is exclusively, enter match, mash the split button, and walk away with your cash.”
- “Almost zero gameplay.”
- “Interesting concept, but getting bored quickly due to shallow game mechanics.”
graphics
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
63%
16%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the unique art style and overall visual appeal, while others criticize the user interface for being cluttered and overwhelming. Additionally, there are complaints about performance issues, such as lag and bugs, despite the game not being graphically intense. Overall, while the visuals are enjoyable for some, they are not a primary focus for many players.
- “Nice art style and easy to understand matches are there from the start.”
- “That being said, the visuals are still a pleasure to look at and the art style is unique.”
- “Fun game, well made and an enjoyable art style.”
- “Horrible UI graphics.”
- “For such a simple low graphic game, it is way too laggy and full of bugs.”
- “Too much useless graphics for an eventually not so useful game.”
humor
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is widely praised, with players finding it hilarious due to its quirky premise, amusing character names, and entertaining community interactions. Many reviews highlight the game's charm and the comedic elements that enhance the overall experience, making it a fun and engaging choice for players. However, some mention that while the humor is strong, the execution may not always meet expectations.
- “This game is hilarious lol.”
- “The way the characters look, the funny names the characters are given, the people that play the game, the organizations, and so much more add an incredible amount of charm to this game.”
- “Game is simple but the community is funny as hell, it's oddly amusing to play.”
grinding
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be both addictive and monotonous, with many expressing a desire for tools to alleviate the repetitive nature of the grind. While some enjoy the straightforward mechanics and the thrill of accumulating rewards, others feel that the focus on monetary gain detracts from the satisfaction of progress. Overall, the community engagement helps to enhance the experience, even as the gameplay can become repetitive.
- “Would be very helpful if there were built-in tools that relieve the monotony of grinding, but it probably clashes with developer intentions, which is understandable.”
- “Finally, given that everyone just splits, the game feels like you're grinding for hours doing nothing but watching your cash and karma rise.”
- “It seems as though he's putting more emphasis on making money rather than rewarding people who spent hours a day grinding away for the same goal - to become richer.”
story
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
40%
30%
The game's story is largely criticized for its absence, with many players likening it to a mindless experience similar to "Temple Run." While some users mention an "epic story," the overall sentiment suggests a lack of narrative depth and social context, leading to a disconnection in player interactions.
- “Epic story”
- “Like playing Temple Runners for the story”
- “Turns out if you don't reply or lag or just not give a damn and continue with your game, they will ban you for automated play. This is the story of Macpham that happened 2 weeks ago; he later got unbanned after community uproar.”
- “This game has no story.”
- “Like playing Temple Run for the story.”
- “There's no actual social element to this game because there's no story or setup to these interactions.”
monetization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized for its heavy reliance on microtransactions, which many players find annoying and indicative of a cash grab mentality. Users report a cluttered interface filled with ads and uncreative design, detracting from the overall experience. Overall, the monetization approach is seen as a significant drawback, leading to frustration among players.
- “The game features a variety of microtransactions that enhance the experience without feeling overly aggressive.”
- “The monetization model is well-balanced, allowing players to enjoy the game without feeling pressured to spend.”
- “Microtransactions are present, but they are not intrusive and offer meaningful options for customization.”
- “Oh, and it just wants to farm you for microtransactions.”
- “The monetization tactic for this game is annoying.”
- “I would advise you not to play this game; it's a low-quality indie game that can't even fully exit the process when you close it. Bad coding and probably just some form of a cash grab, the moderators are limited in their actions, thus allowing trolls to continuously abuse the system.”
replayability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
17%
33%
Overall, users highlight that the game offers infinite replayability, making it a compelling choice for repeated playthroughs. However, some express concerns about its long-term replay value compared to other titles, suggesting that while it is engaging, it may not sustain interest indefinitely.
- “Infinitely replayable”
- “✅ infinitely replayable”
- “It might not be as replayable or longstanding as some other games, but as an experiment and a statement, split or steal cannot be overlooked.”
- “I haven't played long, but I'm worried about replayability for a few reasons.”
- “It might not be as replayable or longstanding as some other games, but as an experiment and a statement, 'Split or Steal' cannot be overlooked.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The music in the game has been criticized for being boring and overly loud, with some players noting that it feels generic, as it relies on stock audio rather than original compositions. Additionally, the audio levels can lead to a disjointed experience, detracting from overall enjoyment.
- “Boring, loud music, and at low levels people just force split.”
- “Understandably, the devs used low-poly assets for the art and stock music for the audio.”
emotional
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game is mixed; while some players appreciate its curated feel and wholesome elements, others note the potential for emotional abuse among players. Overall, the game's simplicity invites emotional investment, though reactions vary significantly.
- “Not really relevant, but it made me feel like this game is genuinely being curated.”
- “I see potential in the concept; the game is incredibly simple and tries to invest emotionally in it.”
- “Very wholesome.”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The atmosphere is described as enjoyable and inclusive for all ages, thanks to the prompt removal of users who violate community guidelines by moderators.
- “The atmosphere is incredibly immersive, drawing you into the game's world with stunning visuals and sound design.”
- “Every corner of the game is filled with detail, creating a rich atmosphere that makes exploration a joy.”
- “The haunting soundtrack perfectly complements the eerie visuals, establishing an atmosphere that keeps you on the edge of your seat.”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability has been criticized for being quite buggy, with users highlighting issues such as poor execution, UI problems, and matchmaking glitches. Overall, these stability concerns detract from the overall experience.
- “Though, I'd say it's a bit buggy.”
- “Unfortunately, the execution is extremely buggy.”
- “Ignoring the bad UI and matchmaking glitches (as I think others have covered it thoroughly), I'd like to mention something I don't think has been covered.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
Players appreciate the game's optimization, particularly noting the introduction of deeper mechanics related to organizations and efficient building routes after extended playtime. This suggests that the game rewards investment in understanding its systems for improved performance.
- “After playing for 10 hours, I was introduced to even deeper aspects of the game, including organizations and optimized building routes.”
- “The optimization features in this game allow for a seamless experience, making resource management and building strategies incredibly satisfying.”
- “I love how the game encourages players to find the most efficient paths and strategies, enhancing the overall gameplay experience.”
- “The game suffers from severe optimization issues, making it frustrating to play even on high-end hardware.”
- “I constantly experience lag and frame drops, which ruins the immersion and enjoyment of the game.”
- “The lack of optimization means that even simple tasks can lead to long loading times and crashes.”