Skip to main content

Pacific Navy Fighter C.E. (AS)

Pacific Navy Fighter C.E. (AS) Game Cover
87%Game Brain Score
story, graphics
monetization, stability
87% User Score Based on 1,731 reviews

Platforms

TabletAndroidPhoneMobile Platform
Pacific Navy Fighter C.E. (AS) Game Cover

About

Pacific Navy Fighter C.E. (AS) is a single player action game. It received positive reviews from players.

Naval carrier air combat in world-war 2 pacific command+fly bombers & fighters.

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Skip User Reviews

87%
Audience ScoreBased on 1,731 reviews
story21 positive mentions
monetization13 negative mentions

  • Engaging and unique blend of flight simulation, strategy, and command-level decisions providing deep gameplay.
  • Enjoyable and challenging dogfights with smooth controls and AI that behaves realistically.
  • Lightweight game with good replayability and offline play option (in older versions).
  • Historical battles and aircraft give a strong sense of immersion for WWII Pacific Theater fans.
  • Free to play with no intrusive pay-to-win mechanics and decent performance on various devices.
  • High potential for expansion with many players interested in additions like new planes, missions, and game modes.
  • Recent updates require internet connection to launch, frustrating users who prefer offline play.
  • Graphics are considered outdated by many players and could benefit from improvements.
  • Control scheme, especially tilt controls and aiming, is difficult for many users; lack of joystick option frustrates players.
  • Limited content currently with few aircraft types, missions, and no land-based battles or control over ships.
  • User interface and camera controls sometimes cause disorientation and unwanted automatic plane switching during battles.
  • Game suffers from bugs such as black screen on launch, crashes, and issues with landing mechanics preventing medal acquisition.
  • story
    180 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players appreciate the depth and variety in the game's missions, combining carrier operations, flying, and command decisions, but many feel the story content is limited with only a few historical missions. There is a strong demand for more diverse and historically accurate campaign missions, including notable battles like Pearl Harbor, Coral Sea, and Leyte Gulf, as well as land and ground attack scenarios. Overall, fans seek expanded story modes, more aircraft, ships, and mission types to keep the experience fresh and engaging.

    • “The mix of flying missions, aircraft carrier operations, and command-level decisions has real depth and never feels shallow.”
    • “This game is actually the brother of the original PNF game. Thank you developer for adding another PNF game where you can pick faction missions like quick flights, generated missions, and historical missions. This game was my favorite since I was 10 years old and I never uninstalled it.”
    • “I love the mission and the story of the war.”
    • “Also, once you damage the carrier, you get disqualified for that mission and all the other missions you have done which took me an hour to complete.”
    • “But it just gets so boring after a while... same missions same planes.”
    • “Even with the 'improvements' this game isn't as good as the first one... the ocean and planes are far too dark... no way points or flags to find the enemy... the new graphics really don't do anything but make it harder to see... the enemy planes are doing impossible turns... the cockpit looks like a 5 year old drew it... you can't take off from the carrier... timed missions???”
  • graphics
    144 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game are generally considered outdated and simple, with many users expressing a desire for more realistic, high-quality visuals and improved models for planes and ships. Despite their limitations, the graphics are often seen as charming or good enough, as the engaging gameplay compensates for visual shortcomings. Overall, players appreciate the game but frequently request graphic updates and enhancements in future versions.

    • “Graphics can be better, but overall a very good game. Enemies are actually tough, they fight back and even retreat if necessary, unlike some games where one plane can take on 50 enemies which removes the realism. First person perspective is a nice touch. I really enjoy this game.”
    • “The graphics are great, the planes are great, and the battleships are awesome. There was no problem in this game for me because it's offline and it's fun. I also like the squad bombers of my NPC plane; it's just so cool, and every time you die you change to another plane which is awesome. I love the formation of the planes like dive bombing and torpedo bombing.”
    • “Let me get to the point... this is the most decent game I've ever played on my phone. Smooth graphics and pleasant controls. But I have one wish: please add more planes like the Shinden and Raiden, also add roll maneuvering so we can literally dive-bomb. Overall this is a very nice game so I'm giving it 5 stars.”
    • “Even with the 'improvements' this game isn't as good as the first one. The ocean and planes are far too dark, no waypoints or flags to find the enemy, and the new graphics really don't do anything but make it harder to see. The enemy planes perform impossible turns, the cockpit looks like a 5-year-old drew it, you can't take off from the carrier, and there are timed missions.”
    • “Good but graphics are bad and plane control is terrible; others aspects are all good.”
    • “Horrible graphics and impossible to control.”
  • gameplay
    35 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is widely praised for its depth, smooth controls, and addictive mechanics, despite simple or outdated graphics. Players appreciate the historical accuracy mixed with arcade-style action and desire more content such as new campaigns, units, and improved aiming. Many hope for updates or sequels featuring enhanced graphics, refined mechanics, and expanded gameplay modes.

    • “This game has a lot of potential. We're hoping for a huge update; the concept and gameplay are great. Hoping for more campaigns, custom battles, distinct warship skins, more ground targets, and land-based aircraft. I've been playing since 2015, almost ten years now, and hope this feedback is heard to benefit both creators and gamers.”
    • “A simple game, but the gameplay depth is just incredible.”
    • “Amazing game, reenacts historical battles accurately while having an arcade-style gameplay (like a single Zero shooting down a fleet of bombers).”
    • “I hope you make a sequel to this with better graphics, physics, controls, and mechanics.”
    • “Update please: new graphics, improved aiming, aiming sight, gameplay, new planes, and nations.”
    • “The plane glitches when I tilt directions during gameplay.”
  • monetization
    15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's monetization relies heavily on ads, which are generally present after battles or in menus, causing annoyance for many players. While some appreciate the absence of in-game purchases and forced popups, others criticize the intrusive nature of ads and the removal of offline play, which seems aimed at increasing ad revenue.

    • “As a WWII fanatic, this is the only offline game that I enjoy since there are no in-game purchases and currency systems.”
    • “There were no ads.”
    • “Ah yes, instead of adding more content and missions, they made the game offline-incompatible to push annoying ads that you can't avoid.”
    • “So many ads, it's online only. Please make it offline because of terrible ads.”
    • “The ads are fine, but the way they are inserted is really, really intrusive.”
  • stability
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game experiences frequent stability issues, including freezing, crashing, and lagging, especially on certain Android devices and after updates. Additionally, bugs and glitches—such as AI malfunctions—impact gameplay, though the core mechanics and controls remain well-received.

    • “It freezes or crashes when I start the game or doesn't respond. Fix it and I'll give five stars.”
    • “Since the new Android update, this game freezes, lags, and loads slowly on my Sprint Note 5.”
    • “It gets a little buggy on my Note 3 after I'm down to just a few planes, but the premise, the layout, and the controls are flawless!”
  • music
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users generally praise the game's music, expressing strong enthusiasm and a desire for an official soundtrack release and more music options. While some note a lack of music during certain gameplay moments, most appreciate the overall sound design alongside other audio elements.

    • “I need this music!”
    • “I love the graphics, sound, new planes, music and missions.”
    • “I've been playing this game for almost, I don't know how long, but it's awesome. Small request: could there be more music options and more missions?”
    • “Screen is too dark, fonts are too small, cannot drop bombs, there was no music playing in the actual war or in the previous version.”
    • “And most importantly, please release this game's soundtrack.”
  • replayability
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users praise the game for its excellent and rare 3D replayability, highlighting a consistently great experience that encourages multiple playthroughs.

    • “I genuinely had a great experience and the replayability is amazing.”
    • “It has excellent replay value and is rare in the sense that it's in 3D.”
  • humor
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users find the humor in the game enjoyable, often arising from quirky or unexpected situations, contributing to a fun and engaging experience even after long-term play.

  • atmosphere
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere is praised for its lively and engaging feel, brought to life by impressive AI actions that enhance the overall fun and immersion.

    • “Great fun with wonderful AI actions that make the whole atmosphere come alive!”
  • optimization
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users feel the game needs better performance optimization, particularly during missions and when using weapons and planes.

    • “I think it needs some performance improvements regarding missions, weapons, and planes.”
  • emotional
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users did not express emotional reactions in the provided text; instead, they focused on control issues affecting gameplay.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Pacific Navy Fighter C.E. (AS)

Skip Games Like Pacific Navy Fighter C.E. (AS)
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Pacific Navy Fighter C.E. (AS) is a action game.

Pacific Navy Fighter C.E. (AS) is available on Phone, Tablet, Android and Mobile Platform.

Pacific Navy Fighter C.E. (AS) was developed by DotSight Software.

Pacific Navy Fighter C.E. (AS) has received positive reviews from players. Most players liked Pacific Navy Fighter C.E. (AS) for its story but disliked it for its monetization.

Pacific Navy Fighter C.E. (AS) is a single player game.

Similar games include Pacific Navy Fighter, Warplanes: WW2 Dogfight, Sky On Fire : 1940, Wings of Steel, US Conflict — Tank Battles and others.