Medic: Pacific War

About Medic: Pacific War

Medic: Pacific War is a single player tactical shooter game with warfare and historical themes. It was developed by Hypnotic Ants and was released on June 4, 2026. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Become a medic - the true hero of war. Survive the horrors of the battlefield, dodge the bullets, and bring salvation to the wounded. Be their last hope in the chaotic reality of the Pacific Front. Patch, revive, and carry them to change the course of the battle! Be ready to make hard choices!

+16

Skip Games Like Medic: Pacific War

Looking for games like Medic: Pacific War? Here are top tactical shooter recommendations with a warfare and historical focus, selected from player-similarity data — start with Six Days in Fallujah, Wild West Legacy or Tank Squad.

84%10.8kreviews

Six Days in Fallujah

2023

Survival Shooter

44%1.5kreviews

Wild West Legacy

2024

Open World Role Playing

76%393reviews

Tank Squad

2025

Tactical Shooter

92%843reviews

All Quiet in the Trenches

2024

Survival Role Playing

52%238reviews

Land of War: The Beginning

2021

Shooter

63%715reviews

GreedFall: The Dying World

2024

Open World Role Playing

63%422reviews

Ferocious

2025

Survival Shooter

63%650reviews

War Hospital

2021

Role Playing

58%464reviews

Contain

2024

Tactical Shooter

76%1.6kreviews

Edge Of Eternity

2021

Role Playing

More games like Medic: Pacific War

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

65%Audience ScoreBased on 104 reviews

gameplay16 positive mentions

graphics5 negative mentions

Unique perspective as a WWII combat medic offering a refreshing alternative to typical war shooters.
Engaging medical treatment mechanics requiring resource management and strategic decision-making.
Developers are active and responsive, continuously releasing updates and improvements.

Poor optimization and frequent performance issues including crashes and frame drops.
Subpar AI-generated voice acting and awkward, repetitive dialogue that hinder immersion.
Limited content with only two missions currently, alongside bugs and clunky gameplay elements.

gameplay
46 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
35% positive mentions, 54% neutral mentions, 11% negative mentions
The gameplay centers on immersive and thoughtful medical mechanics that offer a unique, intense experience, particularly appealing to those interested in historical and simulation elements. However, it is currently hindered by clunky controls, repetitive actions, bugs, and performance issues typical of early access, requiring further polish and content updates to reach its full potential. Overall, the core gameplay is promising and engaging but needs refinement to improve flow and variety.
- “As someone who's a combat medic by trade IRL, the treatments and gameplay are definitely pretty accurate for what is depicted, especially for the time period.”
- “Healing mechanics, enemy mitigation, and resource management are generally well thought out, always keeping the player pressured and requiring some thinking ahead.”
- “Everything except for the length of the game... the intensity of treating wounded military personnel makes for an amazing gameplay experience as the player performs different types of minigames to stabilize wounded personnel before carrying them to an extraction point.”
- “A 20-year-old game Medal of Honor: Pacific Assault has a more immersive medic system, better atmosphere, better pacing, and more actual gameplay.”
- “It needs content, systems, optimisation, and actual gameplay, not surface-level tweaks.”
- “Gameplay was clumsy and rough in third person, easily got turned around when trying to treat NPCs.”
story
33 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
15% positive mentions, 76% neutral mentions, 9% negative mentions
The story is praised for its engaging premise, historical accuracy, and emotional depth, particularly centered around significant WWII events like Pearl Harbor. However, it is currently limited by having only two missions available, with some players noting linearity, technical issues, and underdeveloped dialogues that detract from the experience. Many reviewers are optimistic about future content and improvements, hoping for expanded narrative depth and better voice acting.
- “The premise of this game is pretty good; I like the gameplay and the story so far.”
- “The story begins during one of the most significant events of World War II: the attack on Pearl Harbor.”
- “Its blend of medical simulation, historical storytelling, moral decision-making, and battlefield survival creates an experience that feels both educational and emotionally engaging.”
- “The story doesn't fully make sense, with you purposefully disregarding other wounded to save one person.”
- “At the end of the first mission you explicitly just walk over casualties looking for your guy.”
- “The dialogues and story need a whole revamp.”
graphics
31 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
10% positive mentions, 74% neutral mentions, 16% negative mentions
The graphics receive mixed reviews, with many users describing them as outdated, messy, or comparable to early 2000s or last-generation console quality, often requiring significant lowering of settings to maintain playability. Despite lacking modern polish and facing optimization issues, some appreciate the detailed uniforms and atmospheric elements, though overall the visuals are considered mediocre and in need of improvement.
- “First, I love the graphics, it's great, but the voices on a lot of the characters are just too funny!”
- “The graphics could definitely use a bit of modern polish, but the atmosphere is intense and the attention to detail on the uniform is excellent.”
- “But even with inferior graphics settings, it's obvious that the developers did their homework as people have appropriate uniforms for 1941 and 1942, and US Army soldiers can be seen fighting with M1 Garand rifles while the US Marines are armed with Thompson M1 submachine guns.”
- “This game is a complete mess; graphics are messy and don't always render, running very poorly.”
- “The graphics and optimization obviously need an overhaul; the game feels like an old Medal of Honor or Call of Duty from the early 2000s.”
- “The graphics are pretty bad, the sound design is abysmal, and the dialogue is laughably bad and created using AI.”
optimization
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13% positive mentions, 44% neutral mentions, 43% negative mentions
Optimization for the game is widely criticized, with many users reporting poor performance, frequent stuttering, lag, and graphical issues even on low settings, making the experience frustrating especially on mid-range or lower-end hardware. However, a few players with high-end systems report smooth gameplay, suggesting optimization is heavily dependent on the user's setup and remains a significant area needing improvement.
- “Finally, we have some concerns about performance. I've included my specs to assist with diagnosis, but from my playthrough, there were a lot of blurry textures regardless of quality settings, constant audio-to-animation desync, and terrible scripted cuts that can either break your immersion or completely break your controls, forcing a quit to menu or, at worst, restart of the game to continue.”
- “Cool gameplay hindered by abysmal performance.”
- “Optimization is pretty rough too (+60 fps with upscaling and frame generation).”
- “Also the optimization is atrocious; play on the lowest settings if you want to play this game past Pearl Harbor.”
- “The game is incredibly unoptimized and buggy, so I just can't personally recommend it.”
- “Like it is to the point where even after setting all the graphic settings to 0, it wasn't enough to stop the freezing and stuttering, so the focus on performance should be a main priority before moving on.”
stability
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The game is notably unstable and buggy, with frequent glitches such as treatment issues and freezes disrupting gameplay, typical of an early access title. Performance is unoptimized, controls feel unreliable, and repetitive voice acting further detracts from the experience. Overall, stability significantly hampers enjoyment at this stage.
- “Very buggy as expected of an early access game, the most horrid being unable to treat the casualties. I've yet to find a cause or a fix other than loading the save or leaving the level or game, usually resorting to just dragging them towards the aid station and hoping they don't die on the way there.”
- “The game is incredibly unoptimized and buggy, so I just can't personally recommend it.”
- “Idk if there are grenades or bombs but when you are in the middle of healing a guy and the game freezes and suddenly you are in the bomb radius you just can't react fast enough.”
atmosphere
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50% positive mentions, 50% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
The atmosphere of Medal of Honor: Pacific Assault is praised for its intense immersion and authentic battlefield tension, enhanced by detailed visuals and sound design that prioritize realism over spectacle. Despite its age and dated graphics, the game's atmospheric elements, such as ambient noises and uniform details, effectively create a convincing and engaging war experience.
- “The noise of distant artillery, aircraft overhead, desperate calls for help, and the constant tension of battlefield conditions help create a convincing atmosphere.”
- “The graphics could definitely use a bit of modern polish, but the atmosphere is intense and the attention to detail on the uniform is excellent.”
- “The game runs perfectly smooth on my end, and the visual atmosphere holds up great during the chaotic bombardment sequences.”
emotional
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
The game delivers a powerful emotional experience by focusing on the human impact of war, allowing players to feel genuinely connected to the lives they strive to save. Its blend of medical simulation and moral decision-making creates memorable, emotionally charged moments that deepen the narrative beyond typical procedural gameplay. This unique approach provides an educational yet heartfelt exploration of warfare's often overlooked emotional consequences.
- “This human-centered approach gives the narrative a stronger emotional impact, as players witness the consequences of war through the lives they are trying to save.”
- “Running around the airfield trying to save people felt intense and made me feel like I was actually making a difference.”
- “Its blend of medical simulation, historical storytelling, moral decision-making, and battlefield survival creates an experience that feels both educational and emotionally engaging.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
The humor in the game is largely driven by its unintentionally bad voice acting, which players find genuinely amusing and preferable over AI-generated voices. This comedic aspect adds an entertaining charm, despite the poor quality.
- “Voice acting is hilariously bad but is way better than AI.”
- “It is genuinely hilarious how bad the voice acting is, but you know what, I prefer this over AI voices.”
- “First, I love the graphics it's great, but the voices on a lot of the characters are just too funny!”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 33% negative mentions
The music is praised for enhancing immersion and being well-composed, though overall sound balancing issues cause gun sounds and music to be quieter compared to overly loud voice lines.
- “Music was mostly on point, adding to the immersion.”
- “Guns still seem muffled in comparison to voice lines; when all volumes are at 100, you'll notice that music and gun sounds are soft in the background while the voice lines are very loud.”
- “Guns still seem muffled in comparison to voice lines. When all volumes are at 100, you'll notice that music and gun sounds are soft in the background while the voice lines are screaming in your eardrums.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50% positive mentions, 50% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
The game offers decent replayability through its main campaign and additional arena mode, though technical issues like poor optimization may affect the overall experience.
- “Beyond the main campaign, the inclusion of an arena mode adds replay value.”
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 100% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
Character development is praised for its authentic design and mission structure that accurately reflect the historical period, enhancing the overall immersion and storytelling.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Medic: Pacific War

Some of these are affiliate links — if you buy through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Medic: Pacific War is a tactical shooter game with warfare and historical themes. Common tags for Medic: Pacific War include first-person, 3D, realistic, world war ii, life sim and others.

Medic: Pacific War is available on PC, PlayStation 4, Windows and PlayStation.

Medic: Pacific War was released on June 4, 2026.

Medic: Pacific War was developed by Hypnotic Ants.

Medic: Pacific War has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked Medic: Pacific War for its gameplay but disliked it for its graphics.

Medic: Pacific War is a single player game.

Similar games include Six Days in Fallujah, Wild West Legacy, Tank Squad, All Quiet in the Trenches, Land of War: The Beginning and others.

Medic: Pacific War

Platforms

Games Like Medic: Pacific War

Six Days in Fallujah

Wild West Legacy

Tank Squad

All Quiet in the Trenches

Land of War: The Beginning

GreedFall: The Dying World

Ferocious

War Hospital

Contain

Edge Of Eternity

Reviews

gameplay

story

graphics

optimization

stability

atmosphere

emotional

humor

music

replayability

character development

Buy Medic: Pacific War