Tap Tap Legions

About

Constant fun and excitement! Bloody fighting from the start. Epic battles within 5 seconds!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

52%

Audience ScoreBased on 147 reviews

graphics3 positive mentions

grinding11 negative mentions

Fun for achievement hunting and can be enjoyable for short play sessions.
Graphics are decent for a mobile port and the gameplay can be engaging with quick decision-making.
It's free to play, allowing players to experience the game without spending money, and it offers a unique twist on the clicker genre.

Gameplay becomes repetitive and grindy, especially after the initial levels.
Heavy reliance on microtransactions and pay-to-win mechanics can hinder progression without spending real money.
Poorly designed mobile port with frustrating controls and a lack of meaningful content beyond the first few levels.

grinding
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
92%
The grinding aspect of the game is generally viewed as a necessary but tedious element, particularly for acquiring gold to upgrade troops. While some players find the grind manageable and enjoyable, others criticize it for becoming excessive and frustrating, especially with mechanics that hinder progress. Overall, the game offers a unique experience despite the grind, but players should be prepared for a significant investment of time.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “Game was enjoyable till it became a ridiculous and tedious grind, coupled with the unnecessary annoyance of the introduction of enemies that would toss stones to cover up the clickables, forcing you to click several times on them to remove them, only to have them do it again repeatedly.”
- “What's here doesn't cut it even by my standard, and I've been very tolerant of bad grinding idle games.”
- “A bit grindy to get in-game money to upgrade your troops if you don't want to spend real money.”
gameplay
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
33%
42%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with many users finding it repetitive and lacking depth, often comparing it unfavorably to older games. While some appreciate the fun factor in short bursts, the overall consensus suggests that the mechanics are underwhelming and hindered by poor performance and microtransactions.
- “And the gameplay itself is a lot of fun.”
- “I recommend this game to others, not because it has the best quality gameplay, but because it is a free-to-play game that has, in my opinion, about an hour of fun playability before it becomes boring.”
- “Better gameplay feature.. can you make it drop cards so people play this more.”
- “Very repetitive and boring gameplay.”
- “The game runs poorly, has no story of interest, the mechanics are something stolen from a 15-year-old flash game on Neopets, and there's absolutely no redeeming features of note.”
- “Fairly boring and repetitive gameplay along with microtransactions (can't complain too much because it's free).”
story
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
38%
38%
The game's story is generally criticized for being uninteresting and lacking depth, with some players noting it feels reminiscent of outdated flash games. While a few users mention a "good storyline," the overall consensus leans towards disappointment, particularly regarding the game's focus on mechanics over narrative.
- “It is quite unique in that you need to quickly decide on which fields to click during each mission, as some of them have good but some also bad effects for you, and your different units to spam the opponent. These features make it quite unique and that's why I liked to press on, despite some heavy grinding for gold, to unlock all achievements.”
- “- good storyline”
- “If you are looking for something action-based with lots of gameplay or even a story, this is not for you.”
- “The game runs poorly, has no story of interest, the mechanics are something stolen from a 15-year-old flash game on Neopets, and there's absolutely no redeeming features of note.”
- “A very bad game; the story is bad.”
monetization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
80%
The monetization strategy of the game has received mixed reviews; while it avoids aggressive tactics like pop-up ads and excessive microtransactions, players criticize the oversized UI and the presence of in-game purchases for gold, which can detract from the overall experience. Despite being free, the gameplay is described as repetitive, leading to some dissatisfaction with the monetization choices.
- “The monetization system is fair and doesn't feel intrusive, allowing players to enjoy the game without feeling pressured to spend money.”
- “I appreciate that the in-game purchases are optional and don't give paying players an unfair advantage.”
- “The game offers a variety of ways to earn currency through gameplay, making it accessible for everyone.”
- “Horrible monetization decision.”
- “Oversized UI, in-game purchases for gold to boost your troops, and really?”
- “Fairly boring and repetitive gameplay along with microtransactions (can't complain too much because it's free).”
graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
25%
The graphics are praised for their colorful and fun comic style, enhancing the overall enjoyment of the game. Players find the visuals to be pleasing and captivating, fitting well with the game's theme.
- “Graphics are nice for this type of game.”
- “Colorful and fun comic style graphics.”
- “This game is so amazing; the graphics and everything are so pleasurable and fascinating.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
150%
The music received mixed feedback, with some players initially enjoying it but quickly finding it repetitive and opting to mute it altogether. Overall, the sound design did not resonate well with many users.
- “There is no music or sound effects for me.”
- “The music is repetitive and lacks variety.”
- “The soundtrack feels out of place and doesn't match the game's atmosphere.”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is noted for its speed, but it is primarily optimized for mobile devices, suggesting a focus on performance and usability on smaller screens.
- “It is fast, but definitely still optimized for mobile devices.”