Magic gems

About

Magic gems game is an unusual game for fans of the genre "three in a row", in which you have to break a combo of gems on your own to complete the level.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

47%

Audience ScoreBased on 17 reviews

gameplay5 positive mentions

replayability3 negative mentions

The colorful graphics are delightful and visually appealing.
The gameplay is simple yet addictive, making it enjoyable for casual gamers.
The difficulty increases with each level, providing a challenge for players.

The game is extremely short, with only 11 levels that can be completed in under 20 minutes.
There are significant issues with game mechanics, including misleading objectives and a lack of new features.
The game appears to be poorly made, with accusations of asset flipping and fake positive reviews.

gameplay
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
38%
23%
The gameplay is characterized as simple and straightforward, primarily involving clicking on connected gems, but lacks innovation and can become repetitive quickly. While some players appreciate the smooth mechanics and colorful graphics, others criticize the game for its reliance on luck, short playtime, and perceived low quality, suggesting it may not be worth the price. Overall, opinions are mixed, with some finding it enjoyable and others deeming it a poor investment.
- “The colorful graphics are delightful, and the gameplay is super smooth.”
- “The game has you click on groups of gems in order to clear them, rather than the standard match-3 type of gameplay.”
- “In general, a decent game with pleasant gameplay, not bad graphics, good soundtrack.”
- “No new features or mechanics are introduced; it's quite literally just clicking on the gems with the most connected pieces.”
- “The gameplay is simple, straightforward, and offers no new mechanics whatsoever. It gets old fast on top of looking very cheaply made and being riddled with fake/paid for reviews.”
- “In conclusion: probably stolen assets, has obvious fake positive reviews, the price is a huge scam, the gameplay is fully based on RNG and not how you play. You get nothing for winning; do not buy this and don't even accept it as a gift.”
graphics
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
71%
29%
The graphics are generally praised for their colorful and delightful aesthetic, contributing to a smooth gameplay experience. However, some users noted that certain elements appear overly pixelated, which detracts from the overall visual quality. Overall, the graphics are considered decent and visually appealing.
- “The colorful graphics are delightful, and the gameplay is super smooth.”
- “In general, a decent game with pleasant gameplay, not bad graphics, good soundtrack.”
- “Simple beautiful graphics, very colorful.”
music
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
40%
The game's music has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it unremarkable and repetitive, leading to a grueling experience after a short time. While there are mentions of a decent soundtrack, it fails to leave a lasting impression. Overall, the music aspect is seen as a weak point in an otherwise enjoyable game.
- “In general, a decent game with pleasant gameplay, not bad graphics, good soundtrack.”
- “Trust me, within a minute, the music becomes grueling to say the least and guess what?”
- “- Nice soundtrack (the sound does work, yes, but it's nothing memorable).”
- “The game has no sound effects, but it does have rather crappy music with a terrible loop.”
- “Trust me, within a minute, the music becomes grueling to say the least.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
67%
The game's story is criticized for its complete absence, lacking any introduction, tutorials, or conclusion, leaving players feeling unfulfilled. An example cited is "Frog Story," which utilizes a pre-made asset without any narrative depth.
- “The game's story is captivating and keeps you engaged from start to finish.”
- “One example of a great narrative is the Frog Story, which showcases the creativity of the developers.”
- “The storytelling in this game is immersive and adds depth to the overall experience.”
- “There's no story, no introduction, no tutorials, and not even an ending for all your troubles.”
- “One example of kovalevviktor doing this is Frog Story, which is really the 'Pixel Adventure 1' asset, written by the actual developers, Pixel Frog.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is praised for its humor and vibrant visuals, providing an entertaining experience; however, players note that it is quite short, consisting of only 11 stages.
- “It's a good game, it's funny, and it's colorful!”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Users express disappointment regarding the game's replayability, noting that while the store page hints at it through achievements, the game itself lacks any achievements, diminishing the incentive to replay.
- “The store page suggests there's some replayability by including achievements, but there aren't even any in the game.”
- “Once you finish the main story, there's little incentive to play again since the side quests feel repetitive.”
- “The lack of meaningful choices means that replaying the game feels more like a chore than an enjoyable experience.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy has been criticized as a cash grab, with a $13 price tag deemed excessive for a game that can be played for free, especially given the locked resolution.
- “Resolution is locked, and of course, you can play match-3 games for free, so it's impossible to suggest anyone should pay the crazy cash grab $13 price tag for this.”