Godless

About

Godless is a single player tactical turn-based strategy game with a fantasy theme. It was developed by Danil Kalyupa and was released on June 3, 2024. It received very positive reviews from players.

Become the last god of a fantasy world to avenge your kind and eliminate mortals in turn-based matches with auto battler elements.

Skip User Reviews

91%

Audience ScoreBased on 76 reviews

optimization2 positive mentions

grinding2 negative mentions

Unique blend of roguelike progression and auto-battler mechanics with deep strategic gameplay and variety in builds and upgrades.
Strong replayability supported by procedural generation, diverse difficulty settings, meta-progression, and meaningful synergy between abilities, terrain, and units.
Developer is responsive and continuously improving the game with updates, polishing gameplay balance and adding new content.

AI pathfinding and unit behavior can be frustrating, leading to inefficient or unintuitive moves that affect player control and run outcomes.
The game’s graphics and UI are functional but somewhat basic or cluttered, lacking polish and making it occasionally harder to distinguish units or navigate.
Some randomness elements and progression design (e.g., currency use for both upgrading stats and unlocking new shrines) can feel punishing or limit player agency.

gameplay
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
60%
20%
The gameplay offers a tightly designed core loop with strategic depth, evolving biomes, and meaningful mechanics that blend roguelike and auto-battler elements. While the game is polished and distinctive, it can be challenging due to a steep learning curve, occasional unintuitive unit behavior, and intrusive reward prompts. Overall, it provides a fresh, compelling experience for strategy and roguelike fans despite some annoyance factors.
- “Impressive execution for a one-man endeavor, both in terms of gameplay balance and technical polish.”
- “Biomes evolve as you progress, introducing new mechanics and modifiers that require fresh strategies.”
- “The main gameplay loop is really tight.”
- “At first I was very apprehensive; it felt kinda like a mobile game with constant pop-ups telling you what to do next and way too much going on to make up for seemingly easy/simple gameplay.”
- “The lack of direct unit control may be a turnoff for players used to more granular tactical gameplay, especially when your summoned creatures behave in ways that feel inefficient or unintuitive.”
- “The learning curve can be steep for those new to the genre or unfamiliar with roguelike mechanics, and the game doesn’t always explain its systems as clearly as it could.”
replayability
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The game offers strong replayability, largely driven by procedural generation and varied strategies at increasing difficulty levels, comparable to titles like Monster Train. However, some players find that limited unit variety within builds and the use of a single in-game currency for both permanent upgrades and unlocking new shrines can hinder the replay experience. Overall, replayability is a key strength, though progress and unlock mechanics could be better balanced to enhance long-term engagement.
- “There is a decent amount of content, but most of the replayability stems from trying different strategies at ever-increasing difficulties.”
- “Replayability is a central pillar of Godless, and it’s well-supported by the game’s procedural generation.”
- “Godless has an insane amount of replayability.”
- “Once you start a build, most new units feel underwhelming (especially considering their energy cost), so you will most likely just start with a build in mind and skip over 75% of the units' rewards. Additionally, the in-game currency used for both permanent progression and unlocking new shrines is a poor design choice. Since replayability largely depends on your starting shrine, having to choose between upgrading stats or unlocking new shrines with the same currency diminishes the replay value. A better approach would be unlocking shrines through challenges and achievements rather than currency alone.”
- “Replayability is limited because most new units are underwhelming, leading players to stick to predetermined builds and ignore many unit rewards. The shared currency for permanent upgrades and shrine unlocks forces a trade-off that negatively impacts the game's replay experience.”
- “The decision to require the same in-game currency to unlock both permanent upgrades and new shrines undermines replayability, as players must choose between enhancing stats or unlocking new starting experiences. This design reduces the incentive to explore different strategies and shrines, thereby lowering overall replay value.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The graphics are simple and minimalist, utilizing a clean hex grid that emphasizes tactical gameplay over visual flair. While not as polished as larger-budget titles, the stylized aesthetic suits the game's abstract, strategic nature. Some users felt that improved graphics and UI could enhance the game's appeal.
- “The battlefield is displayed on a clean hex grid, with stylized but simple graphics that keep your focus on positioning and tactics.”
- “While it lacks the visual flash of larger-budget titles, its minimalist aesthetic fits the abstract, godly perspective well.”
- “Somehow the graphics quite a bit remind me of Heroes of Might and Magic V and Hades; however, it has absolutely different gameplay!”
- “Graphics serviceable, nothing more.”
- “Yet, with better graphics, UI, and a fair bit of luck it could probably have gained considerably more traction.”
- “Somehow the graphics quite bit remind me of Heroes of Might and Magic V and Hades; however, it has absolutely different gameplay!”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game generally performs well, though there are occasional delays during menu transitions and when rerolling shops or terrain. Overall, further optimization is needed to enhance smoothness alongside content and balance improvements.
- “Performance is good, just some delay in menu transitions and when rerolling shops/terrain.”
- “Good game, but it still needs more optimization, content, and balance.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users find the grinding in the game to be repetitive and potentially leading to boredom, as accumulating progression currency may make the game too easy over time. There are also concerns about the game feeling unoriginal and uninspiring despite prolonged early access.
- “I like where this is going, but after grinding mindless hours and getting a lot of the meta progression currency, won't the game become easy and boring?”
- “Omg, two bloody years in Early Access to make this unoriginal, uninspiring, grindy roguelike product?”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The atmosphere is enhanced by subtle audio design featuring ambient tones and understated sound effects that effectively support the game's theme without being intrusive.
- “The audio design, while not particularly striking, adds to the atmosphere with a mix of ambient tones and understated sound effects that support the theme without overwhelming it.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story aspect received minimal attention, with users providing little to no commentary or detail about the narrative.