GALAHAD 3093

About

GALAHAD 3093 is a multiplayer shooter game with a science fiction theme. It was developed by Simutronics Corp. and was released on January 24, 2023. It received neutral reviews from players.

Galahad 3093 is a mech-combat simulator set in a dystopian future. Take control of a powerful mech and engage in thrilling battles across various environments. Customize your mech with an array of weapons and upgrades to suit your playstyle, and compete in online multiplayer matches or against AI enemies in the campaign mode.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

58%

Audience ScoreBased on 131 reviews

gameplay7 positive mentions

optimization5 negative mentions

The game offers fast-paced mech gameplay with a variety of customization options for mechs and weapons, making it enjoyable for players who appreciate mech shooters.
The developers are responsive to community feedback and have been actively releasing updates to improve the game, showing a commitment to its development.
The movement mechanics and combat are engaging, providing a satisfying experience when navigating the maps and engaging in battles.

The game suffers from a low player population, leading to matches often being filled with bots instead of real players, which diminishes the overall experience.
There are significant technical issues, including poor optimization and lag, which can make gameplay frustrating and unplayable for some users.
The progression system is criticized for being grindy and unbalanced, making it difficult for new players to compete against those with higher-tier mechs and upgrades.

gameplay
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
32%
54%
14%
Gameplay is a mixed bag, with some players enjoying the fast-paced mech action and customization options, while others criticize its clunky mechanics and poor optimization. The core gameplay is generally fun and easy to grasp, but issues like grinding, limited game modes, and performance problems detract from the overall experience. Despite these drawbacks, many recommend trying the game for its engaging combat and satisfying movement mechanics.
- “I would definitely recommend you try it; it has good gameplay as well as graphics, good balancing, and a good variation of ways to customize your mech to fit your playstyle.”
- “Overall, the weapons seem balanced and gameplay can be action-packed.”
- “The core gameplay is very easy to get a feel for, and the movement mechanics actually make traversing the map and outmaneuvering players/bots satisfying.”
- “Imagine taking the grinding gameplay of War Thunder, mixing it with the customization options of a Fisher Price toy, and then adding in the graphics of a Commodore 64.”
- “The gameplay is clunky and unoptimized, with mechs that move like they're stuck in quicksand.”
- “Game is very poorly optimized and runs horribly during any sort of event during the match even on a 2080 Ti; mechanics like repairing allies feel poorly implemented at best, and barely feel like a mech game.”
graphics
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
43%
21%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some praising the visuals as well-balanced and well-optimized for various hardware, while others criticize them as mediocre or poorly designed compared to competitors. Players appreciate the distinct abilities and customization options, but many note performance issues, particularly on lower-end systems, leading to choppy frame rates. Overall, the game's graphics are seen as a point of contention, with some finding them enjoyable and others deeming them subpar.
- “Great game, good combat, amazing graphics, cool design, and all around fun.”
- “Even the graphics are perfectly balanced for an online shooter because I never felt lost or overwhelmed by visual input. Abilities are distinct, and it runs well on a multitude of hardware (from an RX 590, RX 6600, and RX 6800 XT that I've personally played it on).”
- “This game reminds me of all the best parts of the mech genre over the years: its visuals are great, the pace of the game is exciting, the lances (mechs) are designed for tons of customization, and fighting styles.”
- “On a technical standpoint, the game does 'work' (it's just full of bots), but the graphics are pretty mediocre compared with the literally hundreds of competing FPS arena games.”
- “Imagine taking the grinding gameplay of War Thunder, mixing it with the customization options of a Fisher Price toy, and then adding in the graphics of a Commodore 64.”
- “The graphics are so bad, it's like they were designed by a blind man with a crayon.”
optimization
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
39%
38%
The game's optimization is widely criticized, with players reporting clunky gameplay, frequent crashes, and significant lag issues, even on high-end hardware like the 2080ti. Many reviewers express frustration over the poor performance during matches and events, suggesting that the game lacks the necessary polish and optimization to provide a smooth experience. Overall, the consensus is that the game suffers from severe optimization problems that detract from its potential enjoyment.
- “Draconids FPS issue seems fixed and performance stabilized.”
- “Could do with some more optimization.”
- “Also the optimization needs more work.”
- “The gameplay is clunky and unoptimized, with mechs that move like they're stuck in quicksand.”
- “Imagine if you mixed the grind of War Thunder with half the customization of MechWarrior Online, and slapped on some middling graphics for just how horrifically optimized and crash-prone this game is.”
- “Game is very poorly optimized and runs horribly during any sort of event during the match even on a 2080 Ti; mechanics like repairing allies feel poorly implemented at best, and barely feel like a mech game.”
stability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
83%
The game's stability has been criticized for being plagued with bugs, glitches, and poor optimization, leading to frustrating FPS drops and freezes during key moments. However, a recent patch has improved performance significantly, making the game more enjoyable for players.
- “The developers released a patch that day, and the game runs great and is really enjoyable.”
- “The game has been incredibly stable since the last update, allowing for a smooth and immersive experience.”
- “I've experienced minimal bugs, and the overall performance has been consistently reliable.”
- “This game is so buggy, it's like the developers never heard of the concept of QA.”
- “A disappointing, buggy grindfest.”
- “The FPS drops and random game freezes when something happens, such as your death, match end, or respawn, make my head hurt. This is not acceptable for a modern game already in early access.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be present but manageable, with some achieving significant progress in a few weeks of casual play. However, the grind can feel excessive, especially for casual players who may struggle to keep up in long matches. Overall, the grinding experience is likened to a mix of other games, with a focus on customization and retro graphics.
- “Imagine taking the grinding gameplay of War Thunder, mixing it with the customization options of a Fisher Price toy, and then adding in the graphics of a Commodore 64.”
- “For a game that is heavily geared towards grinding and has long matches, this causes casual players to be left behind.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The game's story aspect is criticized for its lack of depth, as developers opted for player-versus-player (PvP) content over traditional single-player storytelling, resulting in an absence of narrative-driven missions or campaigns. Reviewers express a desire for the addition of more engaging content, such as a story mode, to enhance the overall experience.
- “I hope they add more stuff to do, maybe a story mode or more modes to play, and I hope more people play this.”
- “No PvE missions or campaign.”
- “I hope they add more content (maybe a story mode or additional modes to play) and I hope more people engage with this.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization model is generally well-received by free-to-play veterans, as there are no intrusive advertisements encouraging purchases, allowing for a more seamless gaming experience.
- “The monetization system feels overly aggressive, pushing players to spend money to keep up with others.”
- “It's frustrating to see that the best content is locked behind a paywall, making it hard for free-to-play users to enjoy the game fully.”
- “The in-game purchases are not just cosmetic; they significantly impact gameplay, which feels unfair to those who don't want to spend extra.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users indicate that the game's replayability has diminished compared to earlier beta testing phases, suggesting that the current version may not offer the same level of engagement or variety.
- “The game was much more playable during the previous beta testing periods.”